致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。 2019-09-30：尊敬的先生， 菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官不违反日本法律“甚至1毫米”。 三名菲律宾人是“园林公司”的受害者，这些公司非法雇用了他们。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-09-30：尊敬的先生，
菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官不违反日本法律“甚至1毫米”。
三名菲律宾人是“园林公司”的受害者，这些公司非法雇用了他们。
如果《移民法》第73-2条规定的“园林绿化公司”，“合规性”，则不违反《移民法》第70条的规定。
罪犯是警察和检察官。


第一部分表面上
从事“非法的非法工作”的菲律宾人是移民法第70条
他是“非法非法劳工罪行”的罪犯。
“非法劳动”不能仅由外国人来完成。
《移民法》对根据《移民法》第73-2条非法雇用外国人的雇主进行处罚。
但是，它不惩罚《移民管制法》第73-2条所述的非法雇主的“支持者”。


出人意料的是，《移民法》第22-4-4条
“提交虚假文件并获得居留身份”的支持者被伪装成《移民法》第70条的支持者。

这里有问题。
在“起诉书”中，“支持”《移民控制法》第22-4-4条的“行为”被设置为“犯罪原因”。
此外，由于它“支持”《移民控制法》第70条，因此被视为“犯罪”。
这不是“起诉书”。
这是犯罪事实的“替代”。


支持的行为是“提供”《移民法》第22-4-4条所述的“虚假文件”的行为。
虚假文件是“内容虚假的劳动合同文件”。

关于“支持”移民法第22-4-4条的“行为”，
在2010年7月1日之前没有“行政处置”。
以下“行政处分”与2010年7月1日修订的《移民法》中的“主要犯罪”相同。

1）取消居留身份。
2）“强制退货”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条“支持其他犯罪的罪过”不适用。
处置是上述“行政处置”。

因此，菲律宾使馆官员和外交官都是“虚假指控”。
他们没有违反日本法律“甚至1毫米”。

所有三个菲律宾人
司法部长甚至没有因违反《移民法》第22-4-4条而获得“取消居留身份”的通知。

这三名菲律宾人负责移民法，法律规定的平等，
为了不违反国际法，应“无罪”。
非法雇用三名菲律宾人的雇主不受《移民法》的惩罚。
如果真是这样，非法地“不合资格工作”的三名菲律宾人也“无罪”。
没有任何借口，即雇主在2010年7月的《移民法修正案》中不了解《移民法第73-2条》。

如果雇主遵守《移民法》第73-2条，
三个菲律宾人从未违反《移民法》第70条。
三个菲律宾人是“受害者”。
日本政府应该向他们道歉。

压制菲律宾人以非法手段进行决策的自由，
逮捕和拘禁不仅是疏忽，而且是恶意的蓄意犯罪行为。
因此，第194条对被告的行为作出了刑事规定。
它对应于“特别公职人员的滥用职权”。

菲律宾政府是否仍未抗议日本政府？
菲律宾政府有责任保护菲律宾人民。
如果菲律宾政府不理解，您应该问我问题。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文文字“公诉书的翻译”

耳鼻喉
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，恐怖主义就自然而然地解决了。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《刑法》第60条和第62条与《移民管制法》第70条相对
“申请”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广



请询问最高领导人金正恩（*）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump 2019-09-30: Dear Sir, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”. Three Filipinos are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired them illegally. If “Landscaping Companies” “Compliance” Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act, they did not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Act. Criminals are police officers and prosecutors.

To President Trump


2019-09-30: Dear Sir,
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.
Three Filipinos are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired them illegally.
If “Landscaping Companies” “Compliance” Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
they did not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Criminals are police officers and prosecutors.

Part 1. On the surface, Filipinos
who have done "unlawful illegal work" are regarded as criminals
under the Immigration Act Article 70 "Illegal Labor Offenses".
“Illegal labor” cannot be done by foreigners alone.
The Immigration Act punishes employers
who illegally hired foreigners under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
However, it does not punish "supporters"
who are illegal employers as described in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Surprisingly,
the supporter of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” is disguised as a supporter
of the Immigration Act Article 70.

There is a problem here.
In “bill of indictment”, the “act” that “supported” Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is set as “reason for crime”.
Moreover, it is considered "crime" because it "supported" Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is not "bill of indictment".
This is a “replacement” of criminal facts.


The act supported was the act of "providing" the "false document" described
in the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.
False documents are “documents of employment contracts whose contents are false”.

About "act" that "supported" Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law,
There is no “administrative disposition” before July 1, 2010.
The following “Administrative Disposition” is the same as “principal offense”
in the revision of the Immigration Law on July 1, 2010.

1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) “Forced return”.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code,
“Sin to Support Other Crimes” are not applicable.
The disposal is the “administrative disposal” mentioned above.

Therefore, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are “false accusation”.
They do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.

None of the three Filipinos have even received a “cancellation
of status of residence” from the Minister of Justice
for violating the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

The three Filipinos are “not guilty” in order to comply with the immigration law,
equality under the law, and international law.
Employers who hired three Filipinos illegally are not punished by the Immigration Act.
If that is the case, the three Filipinos who illegally "work out
of qualification" are also "not guilty".
There is no excuse that the employer did not know "Immigration Act Article 73-2"
in the July 2010 Immigration Act Amendment.

If the employers were observing Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
three Filipinos would not have violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Three Filipinos are "victims".
The Japanese government should apologize to them.

Arresting and imprisoning is not just negligence,
but a malicious and deliberate criminal act that squeezes the freedom
of decision-making by illegal means only for Filipinos.
Therefore, the act of defendant accused falls under Article 194 “abuse of authority
by special public officer”.

Is the Philippine government still not protesting the Japanese government?
It is the duty of the Philippine government to protect the Philippine people.
If the Philippine government doesn't understand, you should ask me questions.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English text “Indictment letter of indictm

ent "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 o
f the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-09-30: Monsieur, Les représentants de l’ambassade et les diplomates philippins ne violent pas la loi japonaise «même 1 mm». Trois Philippins sont victimes d '«entreprises d'aménagement paysager» qui les ont embauchés illégalement. Si les «entreprises d'aménagement paysager» «respectaient» l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration, elles ne violaient pas l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration. Les criminels sont des officiers de police et des procureurs. Partie 1 En surface Les Philippins qui accomplissaient un "travail illégal illégal" étaient du droit de l'immigration, article 70 Il est un criminel pour "crimes de travail illégaux illégaux". Le «travail illégal» ne peut être effectué que par des étrangers. La loi sur l'immigration punit les employeurs qui ont illégalement embauché des étrangers en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration. Toutefois, il ne punit pas les "supporters" qui sont des employeurs illégaux au sens de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration. Étonnamment, article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration Le partisan de «Soumettre de faux documents et obtenir le statut de résidence» est déguisé en partisan de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration. Il y a un problème ici. Dans l'acte d'accusation, l'acte qui a appuyé l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration est défini comme un "motif d'infraction". En outre, il est considéré comme un "crime" parce qu'il "soutient" l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration. Ce n'est pas un "acte d'accusation". C'est un "remplacement" des faits criminels. L'acte soutenu était l'acte consistant à "fournir" le "faux document" décrit dans l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration. Les faux documents sont des «documents de contrats de travail dont le contenu est faux». Sur "l'acte" qui "soutenait" l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration, Il n'y a pas de «décision administrative» avant le 1 er juillet 2010. La «disposition administrative» suivante est identique à «infraction principale» dans la révision de la loi sur l'immigration du 1 er juillet 2010. 1) Annulation du statut de résidence. 2) «retour forcé». Par conséquent, les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal, «Péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes», ne sont pas applicables. La cession est la «cession administrative» mentionnée ci-dessus. Par conséquent, les fonctionnaires de l'ambassade et les diplomates philippins sont des "fausses accusations". Ils ne violent pas la loi japonaise «même 1 mm». Les trois Philippins Le ministre de la Justice n'a même pas reçu “d'annulation de statut de résidence” pour violation de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration. Les trois Philippins sont responsables du droit de l'immigration, de l'égalité devant la loi, Il devrait être "non coupable" afin de ne pas violer le droit international. Les employeurs qui ont embauché trois Philippins illégalement ne sont pas punis par la loi sur l'immigration. Si tel est le cas, les trois Philippins qui «travaillent illégalement» sont également «non coupables». Il n’ya aucune excuse pour dire que l’employeur ne connaissait pas «l’article 73-2 de la loi sur l’immigration» dans l’amendement de juillet 2010 à la loi sur l’immigration. Si l’employeur respecte l’article 73-2 de la loi sur l’immigration, Trois Philippins n'ont jamais violé l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration. Trois Philippins sont des "victimes". Le gouvernement japonais devrait s'excuser auprès d'eux. Restreindre la liberté de décision par des moyens illégaux uniquement pour les Philippins, Arrestation et séquestration ne constituent pas simplement de la négligence, mais un acte criminel malveillant et délibéré. Par conséquent, l'acte de l'accusé est sanctionné pénalement par l'article 194. Cela correspond à un "abus de pouvoir d'un fonctionnaire spécial". Le gouvernement philippin ne proteste-t-il toujours pas contre le gouvernement japonais? Le gouvernement philippin a le devoir de protéger le peuple philippin. Si le gouvernement philippin ne comprend pas, vous devriez me poser des questions. Cela continuera demain. Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant. Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation" Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable". Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais». S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles. ● Traduction du texte anglais "Lettre d'accusation" ent " "Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku" La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même. http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf ● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation" "Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)" La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais. http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf ● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais) 1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re= 2) droit pénal Code pénal http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re= 3) Constitution du Japon La constitution du japon http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174 Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses. Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais. Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée. Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée. Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou. 1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents. Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux». En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2. Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal). Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs». Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire". Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration. "Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent. 2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration" Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes". C'est hors de logique dans la loi. Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4 L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli. Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela. La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice. Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable. Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration. La logique du droit est complètement folle. Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre". Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription». Les matériaux sont ci-dessous. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/ Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde. Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano Postscript: Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil. Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur. Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et la compensation de l'honneur américain. S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI". Il est publié dans le blog suivant. https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/ http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/ http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/ http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/ Yasuhiro Nagano S'il vous plaît aidez-moi. S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions. enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-09-30: Monsieur,
Les représentants de l’ambassade et les diplomates philippins ne violent pas la loi japonaise «même 1 mm».
Trois Philippins sont victimes d '«entreprises d'aménagement paysager» qui les ont embauchés illégalement.
Si les «entreprises d'aménagement paysager» «respectaient» l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration, elles ne violaient pas l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Les criminels sont des officiers de police et des procureurs.


Partie 1 En surface
Les Philippins qui accomplissaient un "travail illégal illégal" étaient du droit de l'immigration, article 70
Il est un criminel pour "crimes de travail illégaux illégaux".
Le «travail illégal» ne peut être effectué que par des étrangers.
La loi sur l'immigration punit les employeurs qui ont illégalement embauché des étrangers en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Toutefois, il ne punit pas les "supporters" qui sont des employeurs illégaux au sens de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.


Étonnamment, article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration
Le partisan de «Soumettre de faux documents et obtenir le statut de résidence» est déguisé en partisan de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Il y a un problème ici.
Dans l'acte d'accusation, l'acte qui a appuyé l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration est défini comme un "motif d'infraction".
En outre, il est considéré comme un "crime" parce qu'il "soutient" l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Ce n'est pas un "acte d'accusation".
C'est un "remplacement" des faits criminels.


L'acte soutenu était l'acte consistant à "fournir" le "faux document" décrit dans l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration.
Les faux documents sont des «documents de contrats de travail dont le contenu est faux».

Sur "l'acte" qui "soutenait" l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration,
Il n'y a pas de «décision administrative» avant le 1 er juillet 2010.
La «disposition administrative» suivante est identique à «infraction principale» dans la révision de la loi sur l'immigration du 1 er juillet 2010.

1) Annulation du statut de résidence.
2) «retour forcé».
Par conséquent, les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal, «Péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes», ne sont pas applicables.
La cession est la «cession administrative» mentionnée ci-dessus.

Par conséquent, les fonctionnaires de l'ambassade et les diplomates philippins sont des "fausses accusations".
Ils ne violent pas la loi japonaise «même 1 mm».

Les trois Philippins
Le ministre de la Justice n'a même pas reçu “d'annulation de statut de résidence” pour violation de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration.

Les trois Philippins sont responsables du droit de l'immigration, de l'égalité devant la loi,
Il devrait être "non coupable" afin de ne pas violer le droit international.
Les employeurs qui ont embauché trois Philippins illégalement ne sont pas punis par la loi sur l'immigration.
Si tel est le cas, les trois Philippins qui «travaillent illégalement» sont également «non coupables».
Il n’ya aucune excuse pour dire que l’employeur ne connaissait pas «l’article 73-2 de la loi sur l’immigration» dans l’amendement de juillet 2010 à la loi sur l’immigration.

Si l’employeur respecte l’article 73-2 de la loi sur l’immigration,
Trois Philippins n'ont jamais violé l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Trois Philippins sont des "victimes".
Le gouvernement japonais devrait s'excuser auprès d'eux.

Restreindre la liberté de décision par des moyens illégaux uniquement pour les Philippins,
Arrestation et séquestration ne constituent pas simplement de la négligence, mais un acte criminel malveillant et délibéré.
Par conséquent, l'acte de l'accusé est sanctionné pénalement par l'article 194.
Cela correspond à un "abus de pouvoir d'un fonctionnaire spécial".

Le gouvernement philippin ne proteste-t-il toujours pas contre le gouvernement japonais?
Le gouvernement philippin a le devoir de protéger le peuple philippin.
Si le gouvernement philippin ne comprend pas, vous devriez me poser des questions.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction du texte anglais "Lettre d'accusation"

ent "
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et la compensation de l'honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-09-30: Sehr geehrter Herr, Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft verstoßen nicht gegen das japanische Gesetz "sogar 1 mm". Drei Filipinos sind Opfer von „Landschaftsbauunternehmen“, die sie illegal eingestellt haben. Wenn „Landschaftsbauunternehmen“ Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes „einhalten“, verstießen sie nicht gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes. Kriminelle sind Polizisten und Staatsanwälte.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-09-30: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft verstoßen nicht gegen das japanische Gesetz "sogar 1 mm".
Drei Filipinos sind Opfer von „Landschaftsbauunternehmen“, die sie illegal eingestellt haben.
Wenn „Landschaftsbauunternehmen“ Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes „einhalten“, verstießen sie nicht gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Kriminelle sind Polizisten und Staatsanwälte.


Teil 1. An der Oberfläche
Filipinos, die "rechtswidrige illegale Arbeit" verrichteten, galten als Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 70
Er ist ein Verbrecher für "rechtswidrige illegale Arbeitsverbrechen".
"Illegale Arbeit" kann nicht nur von Ausländern verrichtet werden.
Das Einwanderungsgesetz bestraft Arbeitgeber, die illegal Ausländer gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes eingestellt haben.
Es werden jedoch keine "Unterstützer" bestraft, die illegale Arbeitgeber im Sinne von Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes sind.


Überraschenderweise Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Der Befürworter von "Einreichung falscher Dokumente und Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus" wird als Befürworter des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 70 getarnt.

Hier liegt ein Problem vor.
In der "Anklageschrift" wird das "Gesetz", das Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "unterstützt", als "Grund für die Straftat" festgelegt.
Darüber hinaus wird es als "Straftat" eingestuft, weil es Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "unterstützt".
Dies ist keine "Anklageschrift".
Dies ist ein "Ersatz" für kriminelle Tatsachen.


Der unterstützte Akt war der Akt der "Bereitstellung" des "falschen Dokuments", das in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes beschrieben ist.
Falsche Dokumente sind „Dokumente von Arbeitsverträgen, deren Inhalt falsch ist“.

Über "Handlung", die Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "unterstützt",
Vor dem 1. Juli 2010 liegt keine „behördliche Verfügung“ vor.
Die folgende „behördliche Anordnung“ entspricht der „Hauptstraftat“ bei der Überarbeitung des Einwanderungsgesetzes am 1. Juli 2010.

1) Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus.
2) "Zwangsrückgabe".
Daher finden die Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs „Sünde zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten“ keine Anwendung.
Die Entsorgung ist die oben genannte „administrative Entsorgung“.

Daher sind philippinische Botschaftsbeamte und Diplomaten "falsche Anschuldigungen".
Sie verstoßen nicht gegen das japanische Gesetz "sogar 1 mm".

Alle drei Filipinos
Der Justizminister hat nicht einmal eine „Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus“ wegen Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4 erhalten.

Die drei Filipinos sind verantwortlich für das Einwanderungsrecht, die Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz,
Es sollte "nicht schuldig" sein, um nicht gegen internationales Recht zu verstoßen.
Arbeitgeber, die drei Filipinos illegal eingestellt haben, werden vom Einwanderungsgesetz nicht bestraft.
Wenn das der Fall ist, sind die drei Filipinos, die illegal "aus der Qualifikation herausarbeiten", auch "nicht schuldig".
Es gibt keine Entschuldigung dafür, dass der Arbeitgeber den "Immigration Act Article 73-2" in der Novelle des Einwanderungsgesetzes vom Juli 2010 nicht kannte.

Wenn der Arbeitgeber Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes beachtet,
Drei Filipinos haben nie gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstoßen.
Drei Filipinos sind "Opfer".
Die japanische Regierung sollte sich bei ihnen entschuldigen.

Die Entscheidungsfreiheit nur für Filipinos mit illegalen Mitteln einschränken,
Verhaftung und Haft sind nicht nur Fahrlässigkeit, sondern eine vorsätzliche und böswillige Straftat.
Die Tat des Angeklagten ist daher krimineller Artikel 194
Es entspricht einem "Amtsmissbrauch durch einen Sonderbeamten".

Protestiert die philippinische Regierung immer noch nicht gegen die japanische Regierung?
Es ist die Pflicht der philippinischen Regierung, das philippinische Volk zu schützen.
Wenn die philippinische Regierung das nicht versteht, sollten Sie mir Fragen stellen.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Textes “Indictment letter of indictm

ent "
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-30: Dear Sir, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”. Three Filipinos are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired them illegally. If “Landscaping Companies” “Compliance” Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act, they did not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Act. Criminals are police officers and prosecutors.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-09-30: Dear Sir,
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.
Three Filipinos are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired them illegally.
If “Landscaping Companies” “Compliance” Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
they did not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Criminals are police officers and prosecutors.

Part 1. On the surface, Filipinos
who have done "unlawful illegal work" are regarded as criminals
under the Immigration Act Article 70 "Illegal Labor Offenses".
“Illegal labor” cannot be done by foreigners alone.
The Immigration Act punishes employers
who illegally hired foreigners under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
However, it does not punish "supporters"
who are illegal employers as described in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Surprisingly,
the supporter of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” is disguised as a supporter
of the Immigration Act Article 70.

There is a problem here.
In “bill of indictment”, the “act” that “supported” Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is set as “reason for crime”.
Moreover, it is considered "crime" because it "supported" Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is not "bill of indictment".
This is a “replacement” of criminal facts.


The act supported was the act of "providing" the "false document" described
in the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.
False documents are “documents of employment contracts whose contents are false”.

About "act" that "supported" Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law,
There is no “administrative disposition” before July 1, 2010.
The following “Administrative Disposition” is the same as “principal offense”
in the revision of the Immigration Law on July 1, 2010.

1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) “Forced return”.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code,
“Sin to Support Other Crimes” are not applicable.
The disposal is the “administrative disposal” mentioned above.

Therefore, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are “false accusation”.
They do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.

None of the three Filipinos have even received a “cancellation
of status of residence” from the Minister of Justice
for violating the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

The three Filipinos are “not guilty” in order to comply with the immigration law,
equality under the law, and international law.
Employers who hired three Filipinos illegally are not punished by the Immigration Act.
If that is the case, the three Filipinos who illegally "work out
of qualification" are also "not guilty".
There is no excuse that the employer did not know "Immigration Act Article 73-2"
in the July 2010 Immigration Act Amendment.

If the employers were observing Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
three Filipinos would not have violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Three Filipinos are "victims".
The Japanese government should apologize to them.

Arresting and imprisoning is not just negligence,
but a malicious and deliberate criminal act that squeezes the freedom
of decision-making by illegal means only for Filipinos.
Therefore, the act of defendant accused falls under Article 194 “abuse of authority
by special public officer”.

Is the Philippine government still not protesting the Japanese government?
It is the duty of the Philippine government to protect the Philippine people.
If the Philippine government doesn't understand, you should ask me questions.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English text “Indictment letter of indictm

ent "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 o
f the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-09-30: Dear Sir, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-09-30: Dear Sir,
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.
Three Filipinos are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired them illegally.
If “Landscaping Companies” “Compliance” Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
they did not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Criminals are police officers and prosecutors.

Part 1. On the surface, Filipinos
who have done "unlawful illegal work" are regarded as criminals
under the Immigration Act Article 70 "Illegal Labor Offenses".
“Illegal labor” cannot be done by foreigners alone.
The Immigration Act punishes employers
who illegally hired foreigners under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
However, it does not punish "supporters"
who are illegal employers as described in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Surprisingly,
the supporter of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” is disguised as a supporter
of the Immigration Act Article 70.

There is a problem here.
In “bill of indictment”, the “act” that “supported” Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is set as “reason for crime”.
Moreover, it is considered "crime" because it "supported" Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is not "bill of indictment".
This is a “replacement” of criminal facts.


The act supported was the act of "providing" the "false document" described
in the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.
False documents are “documents of employment contracts whose contents are false”.

About "act" that "supported" Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law,
There is no “administrative disposition” before July 1, 2010.
The following “Administrative Disposition” is the same as “principal offense”
in the revision of the Immigration Law on July 1, 2010.

1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) “Forced return”.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code,
“Sin to Support Other Crimes” are not applicable.
The disposal is the “administrative disposal” mentioned above.

Therefore, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are “false accusation”.
They do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.

None of the three Filipinos have even received a “cancellation
of status of residence” from the Minister of Justice
for violating the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

The three Filipinos are “not guilty” in order to comply with the immigration law,
equality under the law, and international law.
Employers who hired three Filipinos illegally are not punished by the Immigration Act.
If that is the case, the three Filipinos who illegally "work out
of qualification" are also "not guilty".
There is no excuse that the employer did not know "Immigration Act Article 73-2"
in the July 2010 Immigration Act Amendment.

If the employers were observing Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
three Filipinos would not have violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Three Filipinos are "victims".
The Japanese government should apologize to them.

Arresting and imprisoning is not just negligence,
but a malicious and deliberate criminal act that squeezes the freedom
of decision-making by illegal means only for Filipinos.
Therefore, the act of defendant accused falls under Article 194 “abuse of authority
by special public officer”.

Is the Philippine government still not protesting the Japanese government?
It is the duty of the Philippine government to protect the Philippine people.
If the Philippine government doesn't understand, you should ask me questions.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English text “Indictment letter of indictm

ent "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 o
f the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion September 29, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “The prosperity of the United States must be the prosperity of allies.” Dear Sir, The prosperity of the United States is not only “things” of the United States. It is also the “thing” of “Allies sharing freedom and democracy”. The United States should “win” the “communist market economy” in cooperation with allies. For that purpose, "GDP" should be increased by accepting "immigrants / refugees".

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

September 29, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “The prosperity of the United States must be the prosperity of allies.”

Dear Sir,

The prosperity of the United States is not only “things” of the United States. It is also the “thing” of “Allies sharing freedom and democracy”. The United States should “win” the “communist market economy” in cooperation with allies. For that purpose, "GDP" should be increased by accepting "immigrants / refugees".

Part 1. It is a continuation of the previous day.

2019.01.28 Articles posted on Asahi Shimbun Globe +

(Miriam Jordan) © 2018 The New York Times.

“Madeline Zabodney,” an “economicist” at the University of North Florida and an “immigration economics expert,” said.

“The US economy is absorbing the labor force of these illegal migrants.

Given the low unemployment rate today, employers will need more. "

Illegal immigrants are full of workplaces such as agriculture, construction, and childcare.

It is difficult for employers to fill these jobs with regular American workers.

■ What happens if all illegal immigrants are driven out?

Steve Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies in support of immigration restrictions, believes that reducing immigration will raise workers' wages and increase the willingness to find jobs for chronic U.S. unemployed people. Yes.

However, some economists say that wage increases are not an important issue.

Because there are not so many “American workers” who are willing to do “physical labor.”

One of them, Chris Tilly, a labor economist at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Ruskin School of Public Policy, “future” and “position” play a “big role” in the labor market.

“Everyone is not happy to do dirty work,” he said.

As a worker, you would prefer to work in an Amazon distribution center even at a low wage, rather than a “work to make a roof”.

According to a survey conducted by the US Construction Industry Association at the end of 2017, 70% of construction companies have a particular shortage of roofers, brickworkers, and electricians.

On the other hand, according to a report in October 2018, there was a record vacancy in the accommodation and food service sector.

In Japan, it is called “3K” “work”.

Kitui (tight).

Kitanai (dirty).

Kiken (dangerous).

So Japan accepts simple workers (immigrants).

Therefore, “incidents of violation of immigration law” occur frequently.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. We propose to build “special zones” in Europe and other countries.

Please read along with suggestions to the US (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see

Prosperity of each country is realized by the world being free, democratic, and “ruled under the law”.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion Sunday edition, September 29, 2019: Dear Sir, The British Supreme Court concludes that it is illegal to close the assembly. Will the Supreme Court “turn off the referendum to leave the EU”? President Macron says he should respect the will of the referendum. I agree. In this situation, the UK will never make a “congressional conclusion”. The Supreme Court killed Britain! Queen Elizabeth will mourn.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion


Sunday edition, September 29, 2019: Dear Sir,
The British Supreme Court concludes that it is illegal to close the assembly.
Will the Supreme Court “turn off the referendum to leave the EU”?
President Macron says he should respect the will of the referendum.
I agree. In this situation, the UK will never make a “congressional conclusion”.
The Supreme Court killed Britain! Queen Elizabeth will mourn.


Part 1. Prime Minister Johnson “falls into predicament”.
It's already having no choice.
Most of the ruling, conservative,
and opposition parties say that they want to avoid leaving without agreement.
This is great.
However, it is “stagnant” because “cannot leave” in agreement with the EU.
They don't understand that the cause is in the UK.
Many opposition politicians say that the referendum on whether to leave the EU should be repeated.
However, this means that Britain “discards” “democracy”.
Congress ignores the “people ’s will” that the people have decided.
If the parliament ignores the will of the people, the referendum is repeated.
The British parliament should return to democratic rules.

There is “Sennitite” in “Shogi” in Japan.
Let me introduce.
In “Syogi”, the placement of the pieces, the type and number of the “held pieces”
of both players, and “Move” appear “Sennitite”
when “exactly the same” appears “four times in one game”.
When it becomes “Sennitite”, “That game” is changed to “I did not”.
In case of “Syogi”, “Rematch = Sasinaosi” will be played.
The British Parliament says "Let's do Sennitite".

Some lawmakers argued that if it turns out that Prime Minister Johnson had led the Queen
in the wrong direction, he should resign.
But instead, what kind of method do you say?
In Japan, according to the constitution, the “Emperor” has the right to dissolve the Diet.
Prime Minister Abe advises the “Emperor” to dissolve.

Looking at the British Parliament,
“the Constitution of Japan made by the Allied Forces” is “useful”.

British parliamentarians should “preparedness”.
The parliament chose a “voting for people”.
The public chose “Leaving the EU”.

The solution to this situation should be left to "Prime Minister Johnson".
“Option” is “eu withdrawal without agreement”.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. The Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office is “crushing” the crimes
of prosecutors even in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
There are a lot of foreigners (uncountable).
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!
Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.

They have been arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act and have been subjected to "criminal dispositions" such as "a prison term sentence" and "fine sentence".
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.
I wrote about this yesterday.

The prosecution has arrested a third party for charges
of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I and" Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.
The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
So, as a crime against foreigner's Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”,
“Sinners supporting other crimes” of “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” apply.

The “Sin of Support” against Article 70 “Illegal Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act is stipulated in “Sin Promoting Unlawful Employment”
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents",
it is not "illegal labor" if you work within the scope of "status of residence".
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in "Applicable Law"
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".
If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.

There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano


The “war time laborers problem” during the war can only be resolved
by the Japan-Korea Convention.
Korea should say unsolved problems.
There are Koreans who have entered Japan for “international students” and “work”.
The Koreans who have been punished for violating the Immigration Law should be rescued.
"Innumerable Koreans" have been sacrificed.
The Korean government should ask the Japanese government
for their “recovery of honor” and “compensation”.

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Proposal from Japanese September 28, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “The prosperity of the United States must be the prosperity of allies.” Dear Sir, US President Trump is promoting the construction of a “Mexican border wall”. Mexico dispatches soldiers to the border. Is Trump going to crush the United States? “Illegal immigrants” are American “saviors”. The presidential election should be an elective election that accepts “illegal immigrants”.

Proposal from Japanese

September 28, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “The prosperity of the United States must be the prosperity of allies.”

Dear Sir,

US President Trump is promoting the construction of a “Mexican border wall”. Mexico dispatches soldiers to the border. Is Trump going to crush the United States? “Illegal immigrants” are American “saviors”. The presidential election should be an elective election that accepts “illegal immigrants”.

Part 1. America needs low-wage immigrants. The poor from Latin America should be accepted as “provisional immigrants” in the “special zone”. Those who work there and are recognized as safe should “open” to “all within the United States” as “labor immigrants”.

US President Trump visited a 9-meter-high iron and concrete wall on September 18 at Otay Mesa in San Diego.

He explained that the wall had reached "deep underground" and it was difficult to dig a tunnel and try to enter the country, and "heat absorbers" were used at the top, making it impossible to climb.

Noting that Mexico is sending a large number of soldiers to the border for “restraining illegal immigrants,” he said the country ’s response to the immigration issue was “great”.

However, if Mexico ceases cooperation, it warns that import duties will be imposed on its products.

He pointed out that the introduction of a 5% tariff would easily cover the cost of border walls.

The New York Times features why “illegal immigrants” are required.

2019.01.28 Articles posted on Asahi Shimbun Globe +

(Miriam Jordan) © 2018 The New York Times.

Over the past few years in the United States, government officials have been discussing breaking off the inflow of illegal workers.

But the US economy has grown to rely on illegal workers.

Many researchers who have tackled the problem of illegal workers say that quitting illegal immigration can lead to unemployment of American workers, bankruptcy, and a shrinking economy.

Border security measures have been particularly strong recently.

On the other hand, the economy is strong and the unemployment rate is falling.

Employers, especially those who need low-wage workers, say that the only option is to hire a worker without a work permit.

Currently, nearly 11 million immigrants are illegally staying in the United States.

About 8 million of them are working.

This was lower than the “12.2 million people in 2007”, which was the peak for illegal visitors.

However, according to Pew Research Institute (US think tank), illegal workers account for about 5% of all workers in the United States.

Thorough border management and economic prosperity. How do you balance both?

President Donald Trump is being hunted down.

In the 2020 presidential election, Americans should “choose” “acceptance of temporary immigrants”.

Will continue tomorrow

Part 2. In the United States, I “suggest” to build a “special zone” along the border with Mexico.

See April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition.

Japan's immigration policy is worse than the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

America's prosperity is realized by the world being free, democratic, and "ruled under the law".

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

There are many American victims.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

*

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.j

Opinion from Japanese Saturday version, September 28, 2019: Dear Sir, The Climate Action Summit was held in New York. President Trump should “request” the same “reduction” from China, the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter. It should “require” China to “stop” supporting “coal-fired power” overseas with “One Belt One Road” development investment.

Opinion from Japanese


Saturday version, September 28, 2019: Dear Sir,
The Climate Action Summit was held in New York.
President Trump should “request” the same “reduction” from China,
the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter.
It should “require” China to “stop” supporting “coal-fired power” overseas
with “One Belt One Road” development investment.
If China accepts the request,
the US should “retract” the “breakaway” of the Paris Agreement.
The international community should say! “No longer China is a developing country.”
But President Trump was courageous.


Part 1. “The United Nations Climate Action Summit,
where leaders from various countries participate,
was held in New York on the 23rd to stop global warming.
Around 60 countries, including European countries, China,
and India, were on the stage
and announced plans to increase greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.
Mr. Guterres said, “Our generation could not fulfill its responsibility to protect the planet.
“Climate emergencies are losing the competition, but we can win.”
"It's a summit to act, not to talk, not to negotiate," he said.

Mr. Guterres said greenhouse gas emissions increased even after the adoption
of the international framework “Paris Agreement” for combating global warming.
Concerned that the goal set forth in the agreement to keep it at a low level cannot be achieved.
To strengthen the measures,
Zero greenhouse gas emissions until 2050,
“By 30 years”, the same reduction of 45%.
Cancellation of “new installation” of coal-fired power generation after “20 years”,
Prohibition of fossil fuel subsidies.
He was asking each country to introduce a carbon tax that would tax emissions.

China, the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter,
promises to accelerate global warming countermeasures,
but there are criticisms that it supports overseas coal-fired power
through development investment in the Belt and Road.

Meanwhile, the United States, the world's second largest emitting country,
has declared a withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.
President Trump did not have a chance to enter the stage,
but he showed up temporarily at the "congress hall".

“BBC”. “Betrayed us”, a girl who appealed to the crisis of climate change.
An angry speech at the United Nations.
Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg (16) spoke
on the 23rd at the United Nations Climate Action Summit
in New York and accused the leaders of the country not taking action on climate change issues.

Global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions Country ranking <2018>
Ranking) Country unit: million tons
1) China 9,419.62
2) United States 5,017.89
3) India 2,481.05
4) Russia 1,550.77
5) Japan 1,150.06
6) Germany 716.73
7) Korea 696.01
8) Iran 656.36
9) Saudi Arabia 571.02
10) Canada 555.26

China has great responsibility. China is the second largest GDP country
in the world. Not a developing country.
President Trump's anger is "best".
France should demand strict cuts from China.
Otherwise, the “Paris Agreement” is meaningless. It's a waste of money!

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. Many Koreans have been arrested for violating international law and immigration laws.
(I can't count).
Korean, Chinese, Philippine, `` Everyone '' from all over the world!
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!

Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
Received "criminal disposition" such as "fine penalty".
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.

A third party has been arrested on charges of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor"
of foreigners.
The victim is me and “Kin Gungaku who is Chinese”.
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.

The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
Therefore, as a crime against foreigner immigration law Article 70 "illegal labor"
"Crime that supported other crimes" in "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code" applies.

Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor” is “sin of support”
It is stipulated in “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.

The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.

Even if you get a status of residence with "false documents",
If you work within the scope of your status of residence, it is not “illegal labor”.
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in "Applicable Law"
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".

If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate,
so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yashiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/POTD-July-10-1200x800.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/