<Public mail>
And if we do restoration of honor in 'procedure of law',
it can be said that 'governance under the law'. However,
the prosecutor ignores criminal charges against the criminal offense of the prosecutor.
There are a lot of victims around you, too.
Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. Because 'foreigners' lived in Japan,
the reason for believing that a crime was made is malignant discrimination
against "foreigners" and "human rights violation".
And it is abuse of "crime aiding crime".
With this, everyone is made a criminal,
losing life or wealth. It is totally crazy.
As a "reason for assistance" for "illegal employment",
the judge provided "Chinese people" with "Contract of false employment"
(requested by the section manager).
"Minister of Justice" issued "status of residence" to "Chinese" at "discretion".
Therefore, "Chinese" was able to acquire "status of residence" easily.
So "Chinese" got "immigration visa" at "discretion" from "foreign minister".
So "Chinese" lived in Japan. "Chinese" was able to live in Japan,
so I was able to do illegal work.
For reasons of "causal relationship" like this,
the judges applied the criminal law 'sin of assistance'.
However, as mentioned above,
even if it is "a contract of false employment,"
there is no "legal basis" to acquire "the qualification for residence"
or "permission to enter the country" Hmm. And there is no "causal relation".
Also, because "foreigners" could live in Japan,
the reason for believing that a crime was made is malignant discrimination
against "foreigners" and "human rights violation".
And it is abuse of "crime aiding crime".
With this, everyone is made a criminal,
losing life or wealth. It is totally crazy.
Employers who have worked foreigners illegally have not been punished.
Only foreigners who have worked illegally are punished.
This is a violation of international law prohibiting arbitrary discrimination
against foreigners.
In this case, both must be "equal under the law". Foreigners are "innocent."
There are many victims around you.
Everyone, now, let's help!
Under the Immigration Act's "Purpose of Legislation",
punishment of "assistance" or "promotion" against illegal work must
apply Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Crime that promotes illegal labor".
We can not punish aiding acts of Article 22-4 of the Immigration Act
(withdrawal of status of residence).
It is "error" of "applicable law". Of course, it is "innocence".
Everyone in the international community,
please worry about the situation in Japan.
Everyone in the world,
please make Japan Japan "governed under the law of the law".
The Japanese government has an obligation to apologize
and restore our honor and to compensate damages as soon as possible.
However, the Japanese government still ignores this case today.
There is a limit to life. Please help me.
President Donald Trump 's reply encourages me.
President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people
and their willingness to stay informed and get involved.
President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Best regards Yasuhiro Nagano
Request to media ******************************************
This humanitarian crime is a more severe crime than a Japanese abduction crime by North Korea.
Please introduce the unbelievable "humanitarian crime of application law violation" of the officials of the Japanese government with your media!
Your justice action will lead to the elimination of terror crime from the earth!
International Criminal Court:
Japan officially became a Party of 105 countries on October 1, 2007.
The Rome Statute and its cooperation law came into force on October 1, 2007 under domestic law.
Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court
This case falls under the following case. This incident occurred in 2010.
Article 7 Crimes against humanity
(E) significant deprivation of detention and other physical freedoms
in violation of the basic rules of international law
Preamble · Article 1 (Court)
The International Criminal Court complements the criminal jurisdiction of the state.
Article 27 (irrelevance of public qualification)
The International Criminal Court Regulations, regardless of their public qualifications,
It applies equally to all.
Even heads of State, lawmakers, public officials are not exempt
from criminal liability based on the regulations.
My information *************************************************
I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.
It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
*****************************************************************
