To President Trump! May 6, 2026 Trump, yet another "#assassinationattempt". This is "#Americanstyle". "Kill the #gun" if you don't like them! The suspect calls himself "#DearFederalAssassin". At the very least, a civilized country would use their bare hands! "#Allen" claimed his targets were only "#administration officials" excluding FBI Director Patel, but also stated he would shoot others if necessary to reach his targets.

To President Trump!

May 6, 2026

Trump faces another assassination attempt. This is the American way. Kill anyone you don't like with a gun! The suspect calls himself "Dear Federal Assassin." At least punch them with your bare hands—that's what a civilized country would do!

"Suspect Allen" stated he would only target "official administration officials" excluding FBI Director Patel, but would shoot others if necessary to reach his targets.

Why exclude "FBI Director Patel"? Director Patel is a fervent Trump supporter, has long criticized the "FBI as corrupt," and took office on a platform of dismantling and rebuilding the organization.

He pointed out that the venue's "security" was lax. He wrote that "security hadn't an-ticipated someone checking into the hotel the day before," making it easy to bring weapons into the hotel. Crazy.

The New York Post claimed that even if an "Iranian agent" had brought in a machine gun, it would have gone unnoticed. Trump should say, "Guns are scarier than nucle-ar weapons."

The New York Post, citing officials, reported that the suspect had made politically rad-ical statements and told his sister he would do "something" to solve the problem. Was he a "Kamikaze"?

I believe "Allen" was a "Trump supporter." I think he was disappointed with the Trump administration's policies and wanted to "punish" Trump's cabinet members.

I believe in the existence of Trump's "deep state." Could Allen use this incident as an opportunity to "change America"?

The July 2022 shooting and assassination of former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe had a profound impact on Japanese politics, society, and security.

After the incident, the perpetrator's motive was attributed to the "Unification Church (now...)" It was revealed that the assassination attempt was motivated by a "person-al grudge" against the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, and the close relationship between politicians and the organization became a major "social problem."

A new law regulating the organization's "unfair recruitment" and "double donations" and providing relief to victims was enacted with unusual speed. Currently, a request for a "dissolution order" is being made to the court.

Furthermore, the "National Police Agency" acknowledged that there were "serious problems" with its response on the ground, and security measures have been funda-mentally restructured. In the United States, after a series of assassination attempts, what has changed? Is that what he meant?

Trump should first strengthen gun control after repeated assassination attempts against him. If he can do this, I think international politics will change.

In America, while over 70% of people call for stronger gun control (such as back-ground checks), 60% believe that gun ownership is important for self-defense. Amer-ica should change its Constitution.

Trump is not so much afraid of Iran's nuclear weapons, but rather afraid of America's gun ownership. We should be honest. America should transform from a "#barbaric country" to a "#safe country."

In the "incident" involving "#former Prime Minister," "#defendant Yamagami" re-ceived a "#life sentence" in district court, but he made a "great contribution" to "solving #Japan's social problems." "#Suspect Allen" should also make a contribution.

#Suspect Allen was arrested alive. The trial should reveal the reasons for the assas-sination, and the Trump administration's cabinet should revise its "#government." Go America, Go Trump!

Part 1 References

Suspect in shooting near President Trump's dinner party issued a statement 10 minutes before the attack, calling himself "Dear Federal Assassin"

https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp/articles/-/2626423?display=1

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano