To President Trump
August 31, 2026 [Today's Proposal] Sanctions Against ICC President Akane and the Structural Homogeneity of the Japanese Judiciary: Breaking Authoritarianism via G3MA and GPA
1. [Sanctions on ICC President Akane & Japanese Judiciary] The Trump administra-tion sanctioned ICC President Akane for "abuse of power." Japan's judiciary and the ICC share the exact same structure. This is a power clash of "U.S. vs. Japan-Europe," and Americans should confront the ICC. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
2. [Major Powers Outside the ICC] The "U.S., Russia, and China" are not ICC mem-bers, and the ICC has no jurisdiction over them. The U.S. must fight for freedom, democracy, and human rights. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
3. [Why Major Powers Reject the ICC] Non-member powers (U.S., Russia, China, In-dia) reject the ICC due to strong vigilance against sovereignty violations and military intervention. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
4. [Arbitrary State Power and My Criminal Suppression] In 2010, I was arbitrarily punished in an immigration violation case alongside a Chinese national. My case is a textbook human rights violation mirroring this international crisis. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
5. [Complex Human Rights Violations] From international human rights law, my case involved arbitrary/punitive detention, violation of legality, and denial of a fair trial. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
6. [Ignored by the ICC & Fighting Authoritarianism] The ICC ignored my pleas for help. Because its structure matches the Akane case, we must firmly reject authoritar-ianism. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
7. [Rigid Institutional Culture in Japan] Japanese administrative and judicial bodies stubbornly push their own interpretations, treating dissent as defiance to protect their legitimacy. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
8. [The ICC's Dangerous Ideology] The ICC excessively claims to be the "guardian of international humanitarian law" to investigate non-members—an extremely danger-ous ideology. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
9. [Shared Ills of Japan's Judiciary and the ICC] Both suffer from expanded authority, arbitrary operations, punishment of dissenters, and rigid self-justification. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
10. [The True Challenge for Americans] Americans must not view this merely as a Trump-ICC dispute; it shares the exact structure of Japan's judiciary. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)
11. [A Paradigm Shift for Alliances] This is a test of freedom and human rights. I propose creating the "G3MA" (U.S.-China-Russia alliance) to shift from an "alliance for fighting" to an "alliance for creating peace." (Yasuhiro Nagano)
12. [Proxy War via the ICC] Non-member powers (U.S., China, Russia) have collided with the ICC, while Japan and Europe wage a proxy war against the U.S. through the ICC. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
13. [End of Unjust International Order] The ICC fails to judge powerful nations while condemning them. This contradictory structure must end immediately. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)
14. [Governance Under Law] This transcends personal likes or dislikes regarding leaders. "Governance under law" is clashing head-on, regardless of administrations. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
15. [A Law-Abiding Joint Hegemony] Democrats should unite against Japan and Eu-rope. Let law-abiding nations (U.S., Russia, China) form a joint hegemonic state to fight fake rule-of-law states. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
Part 1 Related URL
[FNN Prime Online](
https://www.fnn.jp/articles/-/1097103
I will write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)
Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]
Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.
Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.
Read the full text here: To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
[Chapter 1] Case Overview
Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.
Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.
2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.
May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).
June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.
The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.
[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation
This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.
Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.
The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:
A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.
The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.
Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.
Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.
This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.
[My Argument]
Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.
Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.
This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.
Continued in the Saturday Edition.
Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones
I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.
This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Global Special Zone Project NO2
https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
Nagano Opinion NO1
https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment