10/29/2019

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-10-29: Dear Sir, “Right to investigate facts” is a violation of human rights. If Japanese or Westerners are used, it becomes a human rights issue.If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.

To President Trump


2019-10-29: Dear Sir,
“Right to investigate facts” is a violation of human rights. If Japanese or Westerners are used, it becomes a human rights issue. A foreign woman marries a Japanese. Immigration officials suspect a fake marriage. Immigration officers will investigate the fact of fake marriages. Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.


Part 1. “The young rookie prosecutor” told me:
Chinese are “coming to Japan to make money”.
He “murmurs”. Chinese should be excluded.
He says to me “you” are “cooperative” to the Chinese.
This is the cause of the incident.
He is leading the police as a prosecutor.
So police officers are like this.
"You should admit crime as a" general theory "".
The police seemed to think that it was impossible to apply Articles 60 and 62
of the Criminal Code for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
with "Immigration Act Article 22-4-4" as the "reason for crime".
Because there is no such case in the past.

"Right to investigate facts" is closely related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
So police officers and prosecutors were well-informed crimes.
Furthermore, July 2010, when “indicted”, was the time when the Immigration Act was amended.
“Foreigners” who “supported” Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
became “same treatment as violators”.
In other words, “supported foreigners” were also the period
when “cancellation of status of residence” and “departure” were implemented.

The “semen” of the “bed sheets” of the couple's bed written
in the foreword is a fact heard from several close Chinese people.
“Fake marriage” was true (confirmed in Shanghai).
Such “disguised marriage” is not an “unusual story”.
“Husband” is a homosexual.
Therefore, the “family register” is vacant.
It seems that there are many “public servants” in the occupation of husbands.
Of course, a “broker” is involved.
The definition of “fake marriage” is difficult.

The media should be interested in this issue.
The issue of “gay” is news, but “spoofed marriage” is treated as a crime.
The media should pursue this issue deeply.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp






help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-29: Monsieur, Le «droit d'enquêter sur les faits» est une violation des droits de l'homme. Si des Japonais ou des Occidentaux sont utilisés, cela devient une question de droits de l'homme. Une femme étrangère épouse un Japonais. L

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-29: Monsieur,
Le «droit d'enquêter sur les faits» est une violation des droits de l'homme. Si des Japonais ou des Occidentaux sont utilisés, cela devient une question de droits de l'homme. Une femme étrangère épouse un Japonais. Les agents d'immigration soupçonnent un faux mariage. Les agents d'immigration vont enquêter sur le fait de faux mariages. Les agents d'immigration visitent les maisons des femmes. Les agents d'immigration confirment le «drap» du lit du couple. Si «sperme» est attaché, il est accepté comme statut de mariage. S'il n'est pas attaché, il est jugé comme un faux mariage.


Partie 1 «Le jeune procureur recrue» m'a dit:
Les Chinois "viennent au Japon pour gagner de l'argent".
Il "murmure". Le chinois devrait être exclu.
Il me dit «tu» es «coopératif» aux Chinois.
C'est la cause de l'incident.
Il dirige la police en tant que procureur.
Les policiers sont comme ça.
"Vous devriez admettre le crime comme une" théorie générale "".
La police a défini "l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration" comme "motif du crime"
Il semble qu'il était impossible d'appliquer les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal pour violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Parce qu'il n'y en a pas eu dans le passé.

Le "droit d'enquêter sur les faits" est étroitement lié à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Les policiers et les procureurs étaient donc des crimes bien informés.
De plus, juillet 2010, quand «inculpé», était le moment où la loi sur l'immigration a été modifiée.
Les «étrangers» qui ont «soutenu» l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration sont devenus «le même traitement que les contrevenants».
En d'autres termes, les «étrangers accompagnés» constituent également la période au cours de laquelle «l'annulation du statut de résident» et le «départ» sont appliqués.

Le «sperme» des «draps» du lit du couple écrit dans la préface est un fait entendu par plusieurs chinois proches.
Le «faux mariage» était vrai (confirmé à Shanghai).
Un tel «mariage déguisé» n'est pas une «histoire inhabituelle».
"Mari" est un homosexuel.
Par conséquent, le «registre de la famille» est vacant.
Il semble qu'il y ait beaucoup de «fonctionnaires» dans l'occupation des maris.
Bien sûr, un «courtier» est impliqué.
La définition de «faux mariage» est difficile.

Les médias devraient s'intéresser à cette question.
La question des «homosexuels» est d'actualité, mais le «mariage frauduleux» est traité comme un crime.
Les médias devraient approfondir cette question.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Il est «fou» d’appliquer le «crime pour soutenir d’autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal et à l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Cependant, "écraser" par le pouvoir de l’État signifie "arrêter" de "délai de prescription".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat Je ne m'attends pas à des mensonges.


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


help me Opinion Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 29.10.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr, Das Recht, Tatsachen zu untersuchen, ist eine Verletzung der Menschenrechte. Wenn Japaner oder Westler verwendet werden, wird dies zu einer

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


29.10.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Das Recht, Tatsachen zu untersuchen, ist eine Verletzung der Menschenrechte. Wenn Japaner oder Westler verwendet werden, wird dies zu einer Menschenrechtsfrage. Eine ausländische Frau heiratet eine Japanerin. Einwanderungsbeamte vermuten eine Scheinehe. Einwanderungsbeamte werden die Tatsache von falschen Ehen untersuchen. Einwanderungsbeamte besuchen Frauenhäuser. Einwanderungsbeamte bestätigen die "Bettdecke" des Paares. Wenn „Samen“ angehängt ist, wird dies als Heiratsstatus anerkannt. Wenn es nicht beigefügt ist, wird es als Scheinehe gewertet.


Teil 1. "Der junge Anfänger Staatsanwalt" sagte mir:
Chinesen kommen nach Japan, um Geld zu verdienen.
Er "murmelt". Chinesisch sollte ausgeschlossen werden.
Er sagt zu mir "Sie" sind "kooperativ" zu den Chinesen.
Dies ist die Ursache des Vorfalls.
Er leitet die Polizei als Staatsanwalt.
Also sind Polizisten so.
"Sie sollten Verbrechen als" allgemeine Theorie "einräumen."
Die Polizei setzte "Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4" als "Grund für die Straftat"
Es scheint unmöglich zu sein, die Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs wegen Verstoßes gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes anzuwenden.
Weil es in der Vergangenheit keinen solchen Fall gibt.

"Recht, Tatsachen zu untersuchen" steht in engem Zusammenhang mit Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Polizisten und Staatsanwälte waren also gut informierte Verbrechen.
Im Juli 2010, als „angeklagt“ wurde, wurde das Einwanderungsgesetz geändert.
"Ausländer", die Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "unterstützten", wurden zur "gleichen Behandlung wie Zuwiderhandler".
Mit anderen Worten, "unterstützte Ausländer" befanden sich auch in der Zeit, als "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Ausreise" eingeführt wurden.

Das "Sperma" der "Bettlaken" des Paarbetts im Vorwort ist eine Tatsache, die von mehreren nahen Chinesen gehört wird.
"Scheinheirat" war wahr (in Shanghai bestätigt).
Eine solche "verschleierte Ehe" ist keine "ungewöhnliche Geschichte".
"Ehemann" ist ein Homosexueller.
Daher ist das „Familienregister“ nicht besetzt.
Es scheint, dass es im Beruf der Ehemänner viele „Beamte“ gibt.
Natürlich ist ein "Makler" beteiligt.
Die Definition von "Scheinehe" ist schwierig.

Die Medien sollten an dieser Ausgabe interessiert sein.
Das Thema "Homosexuell" ist eine Neuigkeit, aber "gefälschte Ehe" wird als Verbrechen behandelt.
Die Medien sollten dieses Thema intensiv verfolgen.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "anzuwenden".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes ist für Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes nicht ursächlich.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich erwarte keine Lügen.


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Die Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Sue" zu "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-29: Dear Sir,Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-29: Dear Sir,
“Right to investigate facts” is a violation of human rights. If Japanese or Westerners are used, it becomes a human rights issue. A foreign woman marries a Japanese. Immigration officials suspect a fake marriage. Immigration officers will investigate the fact of fake marriages. Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.


Part 1. “The young rookie prosecutor” told me:
Chinese are “coming to Japan to make money”.
He “murmurs”. Chinese should be excluded.
He says to me “you” are “cooperative” to the Chinese.
This is the cause of the incident.
He is leading the police as a prosecutor.
So police officers are like this.
"You should admit crime as a" general theory "".
The police seemed to think that it was impossible to apply Articles 60 and 62
of the Criminal Code for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
with "Immigration Act Article 22-4-4" as the "reason for crime".
Because there is no such case in the past.

"Right to investigate facts" is closely related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
So police officers and prosecutors were well-informed crimes.
Furthermore, July 2010, when “indicted”, was the time when the Immigration Act was amended.
“Foreigners” who “supported” Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
became “same treatment as violators”.
In other words, “supported foreigners” were also the period
when “cancellation of status of residence” and “departure” were implemented.

The “semen” of the “bed sheets” of the couple's bed written
in the foreword is a fact heard from several close Chinese people.
“Fake marriage” was true (confirmed in Shanghai).
Such “disguised marriage” is not an “unusual story”.
“Husband” is a homosexual.
Therefore, the “family register” is vacant.
It seems that there are many “public servants” in the occupation of husbands.
Of course, a “broker” is involved.
The definition of “fake marriage” is difficult.

The media should be interested in this issue.
The issue of “gay” is news, but “spoofed marriage” is treated as a crime.
The media should pursue this issue deeply.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.



PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media  2019-10-29: Dear Sir, “Right to investigate facts” is a violation of human rights. If Japanese or Westerners are used, it becomes a human rights issue. A foreign woman marries a Japanese. Immigration officials suspect a fake marriage. Immigration officers will investigate the fact of fake marriages. Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.

To everyone in the world's media 


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-29: Dear Sir,
“Right to investigate facts” is a violation of human rights. If Japanese or Westerners are used, it becomes a human rights issue. A foreign woman marries a Japanese. Immigration officials suspect a fake marriage. Immigration officers will investigate the fact of fake marriages. Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.


Part 1. “The young rookie prosecutor” told me:
Chinese are “coming to Japan to make money”.
He “murmurs”. Chinese should be excluded.
He says to me “you” are “cooperative” to the Chinese.
This is the cause of the incident.
He is leading the police as a prosecutor.
So police officers are like this.
"You should admit crime as a" general theory "".
The police seemed to think that it was impossible to apply Articles 60 and 62
of the Criminal Code for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
with "Immigration Act Article 22-4-4" as the "reason for crime".
Because there is no such case in the past.

"Right to investigate facts" is closely related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
So police officers and prosecutors were well-informed crimes.
Furthermore, July 2010, when “indicted”, was the time when the Immigration Act was amended.
“Foreigners” who “supported” Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
became “same treatment as violators”.
In other words, “supported foreigners” were also the period
when “cancellation of status of residence” and “departure” were implemented.

The “semen” of the “bed sheets” of the couple's bed written
in the foreword is a fact heard from several close Chinese people.
“Fake marriage” was true (confirmed in Shanghai).
Such “disguised marriage” is not an “unusual story”.
“Husband” is a homosexual.
Therefore, the “family register” is vacant.
It seems that there are many “public servants” in the occupation of husbands.
Of course, a “broker” is involved.
The definition of “fake marriage” is difficult.

The media should be interested in this issue.
The issue of “gay” is news, but “spoofed marriage” is treated as a crime.
The media should pursue this issue deeply.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



10/28/2019

help me Opinion 朝鲜国际青年旅行社 尊敬的先生们,请将本 电子邮件“转发”给首席领导“金正恩先生”。 该电子邮件每天发送到世界各地的媒体,大使馆和白宫。 致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。 2019-10-28:亲爱的先生,

朝鲜国际青年旅行社


尊敬的先生们,请将本 电子邮件“转发”给首席领导“金正恩先生”。
该电子邮件每天发送到世界各地的媒体,大使馆和白宫。


致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-10-28:亲爱的先生,
2010年违反《移民控制法》的事件发生在“民主党时代”。当时,司法大臣是千叶敬子。她根据司法部长的决定改革了“移民管理系统”。一项重大改革是对“调查事实权”的限制。这导致年轻的检察官犯罪并抵制司法部长。


第一部分司法部长可以由“移民检查员或移民官员”进行“事实调查”。
司法部长可以根据调查结果“撤销”居留身份。
有关详细信息,请参阅《移民控制法》第569-2条中的“事实调查”。


警察有权进行调查,但为了进行调查,这是一个可以猜测犯罪的“案件”。
当然,“犯罪猜测”是法律上的“非法行为”。
“公民”有报告说,外国人正在对警察进行“非法劳动”。
但是,警察不能进入他们工作的“地方”并进行“调查”。
因此,“警察”与“移民官员”一起前往“报告地点”。
“移民官员”可以“审查事实”,而无需向法院提出“要求进行房屋调查”的请求。
调查的结果是,如果外国人从事非法工作,则将其移交给警察。

但是,“前司法大臣千叶惠子”拒绝了所有警察的陪伴。
这是为了保护外国人的人权。
如果您是日本人,没有法院的“令状”,您将无法进行“调查”。
进行“调查”意味着“犯罪可能性”很大。
如果不是犯罪,那将是一个“大人权问题”。
因此,我需要法院“房屋调查”的“许可证”。

为什么外国人不需要“许可证”来进行“房屋搜索”?
在日本,外国人不接受这些“基本人权”。
因此,“前司法大臣千叶惠子”拒绝“陪伴警察”。

对此“生气”的是“年轻的新检察官”。
他“抵抗”了“民主党执政党”。
这就是“发生此事件的原因”。
在“ 2010年事件”之前,还没有这样的事情。
“公民不知道“移民法””,因此“司法犯罪”是可能的。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下,仅通过查看此“起诉书”,您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说,自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书(日语)”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 (日语和英语翻译)
1)《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2)刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3)日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持,以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”,那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面,《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到(促进非法就业的罪恶)的惩罚。

但是,日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人,而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”,那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样,就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我,金国阁,菲律宾外交官,菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
将《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”适用于《移民管制法》第70条是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人按照第22-4-4条(通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份)的规定行事。
但是,对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此,《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是,国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。
材料如下。

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广

PS:白宫回答我,我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。



请询问最高领导人金正恩(*)


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的,所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是,英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天,联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府!
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情,并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃,下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”,“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。批准


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问,请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-10-28: Dear Sir, The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This caused young prosecutors to commit crimes and resist the Minister of Justice.

To President Trump


2019-10-28: Dear Sir,
The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This caused young prosecutors to commit crimes and resist the Minister of Justice.


Part 1. The Minister of Justice can have an “immigration inspector
or immigration officer” conduct an “investigation of facts”.
The Minister of Justice can “revoke” the status of residence based on the results
of the investigation.
For details, see “Investigation of facts” in Article 569-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

The police have the right to investigate, but in order to investigate,
it is a "case" where a crime can be guessed.
Of course, "criminal guess" is a legally "illegal act".
There is a report from the “citizens” that foreigners are doing “illegal labor” to the police.
However, the police cannot go into the "place" where they work and do an "investigation".
So the “police officer” goes to the “reported location” with the “immigration officer”.
“Immigration officers” can “examine facts” without making a “request”
for a “house investigation” to the court.
As a result of the investigation, foreigners are handed over to the police if it is illegal work.

However, "Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba" refused all police accompany.
This is to protect the human rights of foreigners.
If you are Japanese, you will not be able to conduct an “investigation” without a “writ”
from the court.
To do "investigation" means that "possibility of crime" is great.
If it is not a crime, it is a “big human rights issue”.
So I need a “permit” for “house investigation” from the court.

Why don't foreigners need a “license” for “house search”?
In Japan, foreigners do not accept these “basic human rights”.
So “Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba” refused to “accompany the police”.

What was “angry” to this was the “young new prosecutor”.
He "resisted" the "Democratic Party Administration".
This is the “reason why this incident” occurred.
Before the “2010 incident,” there was no such thing.
“Citizens do not know“ immigration law ””, so “judicial crime” was possible.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.



My information

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-28: Monsieur, La violation de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration de 2010 a eu lieu à «l'âge du parti démocrate». À l’époque, le ministre de la Justice était Keiko Chiba. Elle a réformé le «système administratif d'immigration» à la discrétion du ministre de la Justice. Une réforme majeure est la restriction du «droit d’enquêter sur les faits». Cela a amené de jeunes procureurs à commettre des crimes et à résister au ministre de la Justice. 

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-28: Monsieur,
La violation de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration de 2010 a eu lieu à «l'âge du parti démocrate». À l’époque, le ministre de la Justice était Keiko Chiba. Elle a réformé le «système administratif d'immigration» à la discrétion du ministre de la Justice. Une réforme majeure est la restriction du «droit d’enquêter sur les faits». Cela a amené de jeunes procureurs à commettre des crimes et à résister au ministre de la Justice.


Partie 1 Le ministre de la Justice peut demander à un "inspecteur de l'immigration ou à un agent d'immigration" de "mener une enquête sur les faits".
Le ministre de la Justice peut «révoquer» le statut de résident en fonction des résultats de l'enquête.
Pour plus de détails, voir «Enquête sur les faits» à l’article 569-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.


La police a le droit d'enquêter, mais pour enquêter, il s'agit d'un "cas" où un crime peut être deviné.
Bien entendu, la «conjecture criminelle» est un «acte illégal» légalement.
Les «citoyens» ont signalé que des étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» auprès de la police.
Cependant, la police ne peut pas se rendre dans le "lieu" où elle travaille et mener une "enquête".
Ainsi, le «policier» se rend à «l'emplacement signalé» avec «l'agent d'immigration».
Les «agents d’immigration» peuvent «examiner les faits» sans «demander» une «enquête au domicile» au tribunal.
À la suite de l'enquête, les étrangers sont remis à la police s'il s'agit d'un travail illégal.

Cependant, "l'ex-ministre de la Justice Keiko Chiba" a refusé tout accompagnement de police.
C'est pour protéger les droits humains des étrangers.
Si vous êtes japonais, vous ne pourrez pas mener une "enquête" sans un "bref" du tribunal.
Faire une "enquête" signifie que "la possibilité d'un crime" est grande.
Si ce n'est pas un crime, c'est un «gros problème de droits de l'homme».
J'ai donc besoin d'un "permis" pour "l'enquête de la maison" du tribunal.

Pourquoi les étrangers n'ont-ils pas besoin d'une «licence» pour la «recherche de maison»?
Au Japon, les étrangers n'acceptent pas ces «droits fondamentaux de l'homme».
Ainsi, l’ancien ministre de la Justice Keiko Chiba a refusé d’accompagner la police.

Ce qui était «fâché», c’était le «jeune nouveau procureur».
Il a "résisté" à "l'administration du parti démocrate".
C'est la "raison pour laquelle cet incident" s'est produit.
Avant «l'incident de 2010», cela n'existait pas.
«Les citoyens ne connaissent pas le« droit de l'immigration »», le «crime judiciaire» était donc possible.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Il est «fou» d’appliquer le «crime pour soutenir d’autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal et à l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Un étranger a agi conformément à l'article 22-4-4 (acquisition du statut de résident par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Cependant, "écraser" par le pouvoir de l’État signifie "arrêter" de "délai de prescription".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat Je ne m'attends pas à des mensonges.


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


help me Opinion Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-28: Sehr geehrter Herr, Der Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz von 2010 ereignete sich im „Zeitalter der Demokratischen Partei“. Zu dieser Zeit war der Justizminister Keiko Chiba. Sie reformierte das „Immigrationsverwaltungssystem“ nach Ermessen des Justizministers. Eine wichtige Reform ist die Einschränkung des "Rechtes, Tatsachen zu untersuchen". Dies veranlasste junge Staatsanwälte, Verbrechen zu begehen und sich dem Justizminister zu widersetzen.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten

2019-10-28: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Der Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz von 2010 ereignete sich im „Zeitalter der Demokratischen Partei“. Zu dieser Zeit war der Justizminister Keiko Chiba. Sie reformierte das „Immigrationsverwaltungssystem“ nach Ermessen des Justizministers. Eine wichtige Reform ist die Einschränkung des "Rechtes, Tatsachen zu untersuchen". Dies veranlasste junge Staatsanwälte, Verbrechen zu begehen und sich dem Justizminister zu widersetzen.


Teil 1. Der Justizminister kann einen "Einwanderungsinspektor oder Einwanderungsbeamten" beauftragen, eine "Untersuchung der Tatsachen" durchzuführen.
Der Justizminister kann den Aufenthaltsstatus auf der Grundlage der Untersuchungsergebnisse „widerrufen“.
Für Einzelheiten siehe "Untersuchung von Tatsachen" in Artikel 569-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.


Die Polizei hat das Recht, Nachforschungen anzustellen, aber um Nachforschungen anzustellen, handelt es sich um einen "Fall", bei dem ein Verbrechen vermutet werden kann.
Natürlich ist "kriminelle Vermutung" eine rechtlich "illegale Handlung".
Es gibt einen Bericht der "Bürger", wonach Ausländer "illegale Arbeit" bei der Polizei verrichten.
Die Polizei kann jedoch nicht an den "Ort", an dem sie arbeitet, gehen und "Ermittlungen" durchführen.
Also geht der "Polizist" mit dem "Einwanderungsbeamten" zum "gemeldeten Ort".
"Einwanderungsbeamte" können "Tatsachen untersuchen", ohne "eine Anfrage" für eine "Hausuntersuchung" beim Gericht einzureichen.
Infolge der Ermittlungen werden Ausländer der Polizei übergeben, wenn es sich um illegale Arbeit handelt.

"Ehemaliger Justizminister Keiko Chiba" lehnte jedoch jede polizeiliche Begleitung ab.
Dies soll die Menschenrechte von Ausländern schützen.
Wenn Sie Japaner sind, können Sie keine "Untersuchung" durchführen, ohne eine "gerichtliche Verfügung".
"Ermittlungen" zu betreiben bedeutet, dass "die Möglichkeit eines Verbrechens" groß ist.
Wenn es kein Verbrechen ist, handelt es sich um ein „großes Menschenrechtsproblem“.
Also brauche ich eine "Erlaubnis" für "Hausuntersuchungen" vom Gericht.

Warum brauchen Ausländer keine "Lizenz" für die "Haussuche"?
In Japan akzeptieren Ausländer diese „grundlegenden Menschenrechte“ nicht.
Deshalb weigerte sich der ehemalige Justizminister Keiko Chiba, die Polizei zu begleiten.

Was "wütend" war, war der "junge neue Staatsanwalt".
Er "widerstand" der "Demokratischen Parteiverwaltung".
Dies ist der „Grund für diesen Vorfall“.
Vor dem „2010er Vorfall“ gab es so etwas nicht.
"Bürger kennen das" Einwanderungsrecht "nicht, daher war" Justizkriminalität "möglich.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten andere „illegale Arbeit“ als „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es "willkürlich" verbietet, nur Ausländer "zu bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "anzuwenden".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ein Ausländer handelte gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.
Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich erwarte keine Lügen.


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Die Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Sue" zu "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-28: Dear Sir, The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This cause

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-28: Dear Sir,
The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This caused young prosecutors to commit crimes and resist the Minister of Justice.


Part 1. The Minister of Justice can have an “immigration inspector
or immigration officer” conduct an “investigation of facts”.
The Minister of Justice can “revoke” the status of residence based on the results
of the investigation.
For details, see “Investigation of facts” in Article 569-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

The police have the right to investigate, but in order to investigate,
it is a "case" where a crime can be guessed.
Of course, "criminal guess" is a legally "illegal act".
There is a report from the “citizens” that foreigners are doing “illegal labor” to the police.
However, the police cannot go into the "place" where they work and do an "investigation".
So the “police officer” goes to the “reported location” with the “immigration officer”.
“Immigration officers” can “examine facts” without making a “request”
for a “house investigation” to the court.
As a result of the investigation, foreigners are handed over to the police if it is illegal work.

However, "Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba" refused all police accompany.
This is to protect the human rights of foreigners.
If you are Japanese, you will not be able to conduct an “investigation” without a “writ”
from the court.
To do "investigation" means that "possibility of crime" is great.
If it is not a crime, it is a “big human rights issue”.
So I need a “permit” for “house investigation” from the court.

Why don't foreigners need a “license” for “house search”?
In Japan, foreigners do not accept these “basic human rights”.
So “Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba” refused to “accompany the police”.

What was “angry” to this was the “young new prosecutor”.
He "resisted" the "Democratic Party Administration".
This is the “reason why this incident” occurred.
Before the “2010 incident,” there was no such thing.
“Citizens do not know“ immigration law ””, so “judicial crime” was possible.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-10-28: Dear Sir, The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This caused young prosecutors to commit crimes and resist the Minister of Justice.

To everyone in the world's media 


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-28: Dear Sir,
The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This caused young prosecutors to commit crimes and resist the Minister of Justice.


Part 1. The Minister of Justice can have an “immigration inspector
or immigration officer” conduct an “investigation of facts”.
The Minister of Justice can “revoke” the status of residence based on the results
of the investigation.
For details, see “Investigation of facts” in Article 569-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

The police have the right to investigate, but in order to investigate,
it is a "case" where a crime can be guessed.
Of course, "criminal guess" is a legally "illegal act".
There is a report from the “citizens” that foreigners are doing “illegal labor” to the police.
However, the police cannot go into the "place" where they work and do an "investigation".
So the “police officer” goes to the “reported location” with the “immigration officer”.
“Immigration officers” can “examine facts” without making a “request”
for a “house investigation” to the court.
As a result of the investigation, foreigners are handed over to the police if it is illegal work.

However, "Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba" refused all police accompany.
This is to protect the human rights of foreigners.
If you are Japanese, you will not be able to conduct an “investigation” without a “writ”
from the court.
To do "investigation" means that "possibility of crime" is great.
If it is not a crime, it is a “big human rights issue”.
So I need a “permit” for “house investigation” from the court.

Why don't foreigners need a “license” for “house search”?
In Japan, foreigners do not accept these “basic human rights”.
So “Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba” refused to “accompany the police”.

What was “angry” to this was the “young new prosecutor”.
He "resisted" the "Democratic Party Administration".
This is the “reason why this incident” occurred.
Before the “2010 incident,” there was no such thing.
“Citizens do not know“ immigration law ””, so “judicial crime” was possible.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

10/27/2019

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion October 27, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Dear Sirs, Is Mike Pompeo Secretary of State Real? If it is a fake, Twitter of President Trump may be a fake. The US is “What ’s going on?” There is no contact from the White House.


Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

October 27, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition:
Dear Sirs, Is Mike Pompeo Secretary of State Real? If it is a fake, Twitter of President Trump may be a fake. The US is “What ’s going on?” There is no contact from the White House.

Part 1. He says:
It is a World Bank project in collaboration with the United States.
 This project aims to provide loans / subsidies to individuals, companies, and all other functional sub-states to boost business.
.....................................
It also aims to reduce the global poverty and unemployment rates.
.....................................
I immediately conveyed my thoughts.
(See another email).

President Trump is “being in trouble” by building a “border wall with Mexico”.
Now, the Trump administration cannot afford to reduce the global poverty and unemployment rates.
I haven't opened the details email from the United Nations.
However, the project content I guess can reduce poverty and unemployment in Latin America.

Reducing the world's poverty and unemployment rates is “great”.
However, it is also true that such stories are often “scams”.
You can have multiple “accounts” on Twitter.
President Trump also has multiple accounts.
Anyone can do “spoofing” by diverting their names and photos.

In Europe, “EU” “collapsed” due to the inflow of “immigrants and refugees”.
However, “acceptance” of “EU” “immigrants, refugees” has reduced the “poverty rate and unemployment rate” in poor countries.
However, it led to “unemployment of its own people” and “destruction of living environment due to cultural differences”.

For Europe to become a global economic leader, it is to be top in GDP.
The top strategy for GDP is to increase the population.
To do so, create a “special zone” and accept “immigrants and refugees” as “provisional migrants”.
This will reduce global poverty and unemployment.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. We propose to build “special zones” in Europe and other countries.
Please read along with suggestions to the US (Saturday).
April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see

Prosperity of each country is realized by the world being free, democratic, and “ruled under the law”.
I seriously seek the rule of law.
Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.
Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.
Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano





2025-03-31:على الرئيس ترامب تشجيع الحكومة البريطانية على إنشاء "منطقة فلبينية خاصة". لكي تبقى المملكة المتحدة، نحتاج إلى "منطقة خارجية خاصة" بدلاً من مستعمرة خارجية.

 2025-03-31: طبعة يومية،  إسرائيل تقتل 400 شخص في غارات جوية واسعة النطاق على غزة. وكما هو متوقع، فإن التوصل إلى اتفاق لوقف إطلاق النار ...