help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-29: Dear Sir,Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.
To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-10-29: Dear Sir,
“Right to investigate facts” is a violation of human rights. If Japanese or Westerners are used, it becomes a human rights issue. A foreign woman marries a Japanese. Immigration officials suspect a fake marriage. Immigration officers will investigate the fact of fake marriages. Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.
Part 1. “The young rookie prosecutor” told me:
Chinese are “coming to Japan to make money”.
He “murmurs”. Chinese should be excluded.
He says to me “you” are “cooperative” to the Chinese.
This is the cause of the incident.
He is leading the police as a prosecutor.
So police officers are like this.
"You should admit crime as a" general theory "".
The police seemed to think that it was impossible to apply Articles 60 and 62
of the Criminal Code for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
with "Immigration Act Article 22-4-4" as the "reason for crime".
Because there is no such case in the past.
"Right to investigate facts" is closely related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
So police officers and prosecutors were well-informed crimes.
Furthermore, July 2010, when “indicted”, was the time when the Immigration Act was amended.
“Foreigners” who “supported” Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
became “same treatment as violators”.
In other words, “supported foreigners” were also the period
when “cancellation of status of residence” and “departure” were implemented.
The “semen” of the “bed sheets” of the couple's bed written
in the foreword is a fact heard from several close Chinese people.
“Fake marriage” was true (confirmed in Shanghai).
Such “disguised marriage” is not an “unusual story”.
“Husband” is a homosexual.
Therefore, the “family register” is vacant.
It seems that there are many “public servants” in the occupation of husbands.
Of course, a “broker” is involved.
The definition of “fake marriage” is difficult.
The media should be interested in this issue.
The issue of “gay” is news, but “spoofed marriage” is treated as a crime.
The media should pursue this issue deeply.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
2019-10-29: Dear Sir,
“Right to investigate facts” is a violation of human rights. If Japanese or Westerners are used, it becomes a human rights issue. A foreign woman marries a Japanese. Immigration officials suspect a fake marriage. Immigration officers will investigate the fact of fake marriages. Immigration officers visit women's homes. Immigration officers confirm the “sheet” of the couple's bed. If “semen” is attached, it is accepted as a marriage status. If it is not attached, it is judged as a fake marriage.
Part 1. “The young rookie prosecutor” told me:
Chinese are “coming to Japan to make money”.
He “murmurs”. Chinese should be excluded.
He says to me “you” are “cooperative” to the Chinese.
This is the cause of the incident.
He is leading the police as a prosecutor.
So police officers are like this.
"You should admit crime as a" general theory "".
The police seemed to think that it was impossible to apply Articles 60 and 62
of the Criminal Code for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
with "Immigration Act Article 22-4-4" as the "reason for crime".
Because there is no such case in the past.
"Right to investigate facts" is closely related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
So police officers and prosecutors were well-informed crimes.
Furthermore, July 2010, when “indicted”, was the time when the Immigration Act was amended.
“Foreigners” who “supported” Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
became “same treatment as violators”.
In other words, “supported foreigners” were also the period
when “cancellation of status of residence” and “departure” were implemented.
The “semen” of the “bed sheets” of the couple's bed written
in the foreword is a fact heard from several close Chinese people.
“Fake marriage” was true (confirmed in Shanghai).
Such “disguised marriage” is not an “unusual story”.
“Husband” is a homosexual.
Therefore, the “family register” is vacant.
It seems that there are many “public servants” in the occupation of husbands.
Of course, a “broker” is involved.
The definition of “fake marriage” is difficult.
The media should be interested in this issue.
The issue of “gay” is news, but “spoofed marriage” is treated as a crime.
The media should pursue this issue deeply.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
Comments
Post a Comment