To President Trump!
October 2, 2026 [Proposal of the Day] To prevent the crisis of military AI running out of control, the leaders of the United States, China, and Russia should hold an emer-gency summit and establish G3MA (Three Great Military Alliance). (Yasuhiro Nagano)
1. [US-China-Russia Summit] The three leaders—Donald Trump of the United States, Vladimir Putin of Russia, and Xi Jinping of China—should hold an emergency summit to avert the crisis of military AI. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
2. [Draft Joint Declaration of G3MA] I present the "G3MA (Three Great Military Alli-ance) Joint Declaration Draft" to safeguard global peace and stability. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)
3. [Severe Risks of AI Weapons] AI weapons pose a profound danger of making au-tonomous decisions and triggering wars independently of human intent due to misi-dentifications or hacking. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
4. [Curbing Runaway AI through Trilateral Coordination] Unlike nuclear weapons, military AI technologies operate and react continuously. A joint management frame-work through trilateral coordination is indispensable to curb their runaway risks. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)
5. [Purpose of Establishing G3MA] The purpose of establishing G3MA is to prevent the runaway of military AI by formulating safety standards for autonomous weapons and establishing emergency communication lines. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
6. [Stabilization of Military Equilibrium] We will stabilize the global military equilibri-um by maintaining military balance through trilateral coordination, supporting other nations in shifting to exclusive defense, and curbing arms races. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
7. [Complementing the Regulatory Vacuum in International Law] To address the vacuum in international law where AI weapons remain unregulated, powerful nations must establish a self-binding framework to complement the United Nations. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
8. [Core Principle of G3MA: Human-in-the-Loop] As a fundamental principle of G3MA, we will agree to prohibit AI from making the decision to initiate war, ensuring that the final decision always rests with humans. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
9. [Enhancing Transparency and Safety] We aim to enhance transparency and safety by sharing AI weapon safety standards, communication protocols, and fail-safe mechanisms among the three nations. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
10. [Prevention of Accidental Wars] To prevent accidental conflicts caused by misi-dentifications or erroneous communications, a permanent emergency hotline will be established among the three countries to prevent accidental war. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
11. [Joint Design of International Management Models] The three nations bear the responsibility to jointly design an international management model for military AI technologies and present it to the world. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
12. [Recognition of Security in the AI Era] The three nations must recognize that se-curity in the age of AI cannot be maintained through traditional military alliances and international law alone. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
13. [A New Framework for World Order] G3MA is a new framework designed to stabi-lize the world order through cooperation rather than confrontation. (Yasuhiro Naga-no)
14. [Initiation of Formal Negotiations] To safeguard peace in the age of AI, the three nations must express their willingness to initiate formal negotiations toward the es-tablishment of G3MA. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
15. [Sense of Crisis Over Military AI and Joint Management of Runaway Risks] Amid growing concerns over the military use of AI—such as the fierce standoff between the U.S. Department of Defense and Anthropic—runaway risks should be jointly managed by the three nations. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
Part 1 Related URL
Anthropic's Sense of Crisis Over Military AI: Fierce Standoff with the U.S. Department of Defense
[https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASV4J24MZV4JUHBI00BM.html?msockid=04a596c8fcaf655a30718111fda06420](https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASV4J24MZV4JUHBI00BM.html?msockid=04a596c8fcaf655a30718111fda06420&utm_source=gemini)
I will write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)
Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]
Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.
Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.
Read the full text here: To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
[Chapter 1] Case Overview
Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.
Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.
2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.
May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).
June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.
The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.
[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation
This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.
Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.
The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:
A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.
The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.
Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.
Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.
This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.
[My Argument]
Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.
Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.
This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.
Continued in the Saturday Edition.
Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones
I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.
This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Global Special Zone Project NO2
https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
Nagano Opinion NO1
https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment