To President Trump 2019-04-25:Dear Sirs, It is "Yukichi Hukuzawa" (1835-1901) who is the person of the portrait of a 10,000 yen bill which is the highest "banknote" in Japan. He is writing "An encouragement of Learning". At the beginning of the book, it is said that the famous word "It is said that heaven does not create one man above or below another man". It is what I think about France's super-educated society.

To President Trump


2019-04-25:Dear Sirs, It is "Yukichi Hukuzawa" (1835-1901) who is the person of the portrait of a 10,000 yen bill
which is the highest "banknote" in Japan.
He is writing "An encouragement of Learning".
At the beginning of the book,
it is said that the famous word "It is said that heaven does not create one man above
or below another man".
It is what I think about France's super-educated society.

Because it is difficult, I write various ways of speaking.
"An encouragement of Learning" = Japanese "recommendation of study" =
Recommendation of the academic.

"It is said that heaven does not create one man above
or below another man" = Japanese "The heaven does not build a man on a man,
not build a man below a man" = Heaven is not made the people on top of people,
not made the people under the people.

"It is said that heaven does not create one man above
or below another man" means that human beings are all equal
and should not be discriminated against by rank, honor, family, occupation, etc.

"Yukichi Hukuzawa" prescribes the importance of study in "An enrollment of Learning",
but this study does not end to so-called desk study.
Living in society, "keep accounts [books]"
and "Stare at the" situation "of the era" are also "learning, study".

This passage, famous for claiming "equality," is followed by the word "to be told."
In other words, it is not a word that "Yukichi Hukuzawa" created.
It is originally considered as a "quoted sentence"
from the "American Declaration of Independence."
Furthermore, the sentence is not complete by this alone.
In "the sentence after the sentence",
they insist that "the world of people is not" equal "in fact.
This is also described on the website of Keio University,
a university founded by Yukichi Hukuzawa.
"Yukichi Hukuzawa" wanted to say that "the difference between people" is not
from "nature in one's bones" but from "doing to study or not to study".

What do you think, guys?

This story will continue tomorrow


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",

then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support
other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro


Continue to NO2

NO2


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone



For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************