To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-09: Please help us, the Japanese prosecutors are in violation of the "applicable law." The victim is me and the Chinese [Kingungaku] and the diplomat of Phillipine.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-01-09: Please help us, the Japanese prosecutors are in violation of the "applicable law."
The victim is me and the Chinese [Kingungaku] and the diplomat of Phillipine.


Dear Sir, The crime for supporting the illegal labor
of Chinese people is a crime promoted illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law.

The public prosecutor illegally points out Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
and says that this is a criminal act.
Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act stipulates
that "if a foreigner submits a false document and obtains his / her status of residence,
he / she shall revoke his / her status of residence".

Since we provided the Chinese with a "document of false employment contracts,"
Chinese people were easily able to obtain their status of residence.
The Chinese people came to live in Japan.
Since the Chinese have lived in Japan, they have had "illegal labor".

In this "causal relationship", we applied the "crime to support other crimes" of the criminal law,
which is the general law, against "illegal labor".

As a matter of fact, Chinese people are not receiving "withdrawal"
from "Minister of Justice" under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
If canceled, the Chinese will be "forced to be deported".
Therefore, it is not a crime for us to provide "false contracts of employment" to Chinese people.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
 (crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone at the media 2019-01-09: Please help us, the Japanese prosecutors are in violation of the "applicable law." The victim is me and the Chinese [Kingungaku] and the diplomat of Phillipine.

To everyone at the media


2019-01-09: Please help us, the Japanese prosecutors are in violation of the "applicable law."
The victim is me and the Chinese [Kingungaku] and the diplomat of Phillipine.


Dear Sir, The crime for supporting the illegal labor
of Chinese people is a crime promoted illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law.

The public prosecutor illegally points out Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
and says that this is a criminal act.
Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act stipulates
that "if a foreigner submits a false document and obtains his / her status of residence,
he / she shall revoke his / her status of residence".

Since we provided the Chinese with a "document of false employment contracts,"
Chinese people were easily able to obtain their status of residence.
The Chinese people came to live in Japan.
Since the Chinese have lived in Japan, they have had "illegal labor".

In this "causal relationship", we applied the "crime to support other crimes" of the criminal law,
which is the general law, against "illegal labor".

As a matter of fact, Chinese people are not receiving "withdrawal"
from "Minister of Justice" under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
If canceled, the Chinese will be "forced to be deported".
Therefore, it is not a crime for us to provide "false contracts of employment" to Chinese people.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
 (crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world are being sacrificed.
Please report the facts as a journalist.
"Government under the law" can not be bought by money.

My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan. Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear sirs. Please "forward" this e-mail to Foreign Minister Lee Yong-Ho.
This mail is sending every day to the world media,
the embassies of various countries, the White House, etc.


Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea


2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan.
Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

Dear sirs. A foreigner is innocent if he / she does not dispose of a person
who employed a foreigner of "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
In that case, it is the logic of law to not dispose of foreigners who have been illegally employed.
I am innocent.
Naturally, there is no one who "helped" any "illegal work".

In the incident that occurred in 2010,
police officials and prosecutors filed "more" malicious crimes.
We have not disposed of employers who previously made "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners who carried out "illegal work" have been "fined"
for "illegal labor crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
And they were "forcibly repatriated" overseas.

In this case, he created "fake supporter" on behalf of "Employer" of Article 73-2 "Sin
that promoted illegal employment".
"Fake supporter" is one who supported Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.

By doing this, foreigners who did "illegal labor" were made "punishment
for labor" instead of "fines punishment".
And "Forcibly repatriated outside the country" did.

A third party is "me and" KinGungaku ", which provided" the documents
of employment contract "to Chinese.
This is the crime reasons the prosecutor points out in the "indictment".
The prosecutor says that the "employment contract document" is "false".
However, this is the provision of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revoke the status
of residence by submitting false documents and obtaining status of residence".
As written, even facts are not criminal acts.
Therefore, even if it is as the prosecutor says, "KinGungaku" with me is innocent.

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
Please support this year so that we can solve this year.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to His Excellency Lee Young Ho ***************************************** *

Please request from the Pyongyang government to the Japanese government.
"The Japanese government should" resolve "the incident of abduction of foreigners" incident.
There are many "victims" of "Koreans" who are "the same ethnic group".
On behalf of "people of Korea" please protest the Japanese government!

I also send the contents of the same to President Donald Trump of the White House.
President Donald Trump sometimes has encouragement reply.
For example, it is a reply like the following. The contents are different every time.

The White House, Washington
November 16, 2018
  In case

There is no greater honor than serving as President of the United States. I especially enjoy hearing from the American people, and I appreciate you emailing your thoughts and suggestions.

"Babe" Ruth, Jr., Elvis Presley, Alan Page, Senator Orrin (Raber Staubach, Justice Antonin Scalia, George Herman) Hatch, and Miriam Adelson. Each of these extraordinary individuals has made an indelible mark on American history through their outstanding achievements and endeavors.

I encourage you to watch today's ceremony honoring these outstanding Americans.

My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure that your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump


The White House, Washington
October 28, 2018
  In case

Thank you for your email. My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

As my administration continues to fight the drug and opioid crisis on all fronts, I encourage Americans to participate in National Prescription Drug Take Back Day Saturday, October 27, 2018. Take Back Day is in an opportunity for individuals to safely dispose of expired or unused prescription drugs at one of any of the thousands of drop-off sites.

Ninety percent of these accidental fatalities are due to drug overdose, and the majority of drug poisoning deaths are opioid-related -A problem that most frequently originates inside the family medicine cabinet.

During a hands of prescription drugs for disposal at more than 5,800 collection sites: sufficient pills to fill three Boeing 757 airplanes. We must continue to ensure that these drugs do not end up in the hands of our most vulnerable.

Together, we will defeat this epidemic as one people, one family, and one magnificent Nation under God.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump


From the staff of the White House, I receive a reply every day

November 19, 2018

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.

President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.

Sincerely,

The Office of Presidential Correspondence

I am waiting for a reply from the North Korean government.

My information *********************************************** ****

Yasuhiro Nagano


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump 2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan. Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan.
Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

Dear sirs. A foreigner is innocent if he / she does not dispose of a person
who employed a foreigner of "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
In that case, it is the logic of law to not dispose of foreigners who have been illegally employed.
I am innocent.
Naturally, there is no one who "helped" any "illegal work".

In the incident that occurred in 2010,
police officials and prosecutors filed "more" malicious crimes.
We have not disposed of employers who previously made "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners who carried out "illegal work" have been "fined"
for "illegal labor crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
And they were "forcibly repatriated" overseas.

In this case, he created "fake supporter" on behalf of "Employer" of Article 73-2 "Sin
that promoted illegal employment".
"Fake supporter" is one who supported Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.

By doing this, foreigners who did "illegal labor" were made "punishment
for labor" instead of "fines punishment".
And "Forcibly repatriated outside the country" did.

A third party is "me and" KinGungaku ", which provided" the documents
of employment contract "to Chinese.
This is the crime reasons the prosecutor points out in the "indictment".
The prosecutor says that the "employment contract document" is "false".
However, this is the provision of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revoke the status
of residence by submitting false documents and obtaining status of residence".
As written, even facts are not criminal acts.
Therefore, even if it is as the prosecutor says, "KinGungaku" with me is innocent.

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
Please support this year so that we can solve this year.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

À Emmanuel · Président français Macron 2018-01-08: S'il vous plaît, aidez les étrangers qui ont été punis pour "travail illégal" au Japon. Les étrangers sont innocents car ils violent le droit international. S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.

<Courrier public> #MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme!


À Emmanuel · Président français Macron


2018-01-08: S'il vous plaît, aidez les étrangers qui ont été punis pour "travail illégal" au Japon.
Les étrangers sont innocents car ils violent le droit international. S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.


Chers Messieurs. Une personne qui a employé un étranger de "travail illégal"
Les étrangers sont innocents s'ils ne disposent pas de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration "Crimes encourageant l'emploi illégal".
Dans ce cas, la logique du droit est de ne pas éliminer les étrangers employés illégalement. Je suis innocent
Naturellement, personne n'a "aidé" un "travail illégal".

Lors de l'incident survenu en 2010, des policiers et des procureurs ont déposé "davantage" de crimes malveillants.
Nous n'avons pas éliminé les employeurs qui avaient auparavant fait du "travail illégal" en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration "Des péchés qui promeuvent le travail illégal".
Toutefois, seuls les étrangers ayant effectué un "travail illégal" ont été condamnés à une "amende" pour "un travail illégal" aux termes de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Et ils ont été "rapatriés de force" à l'étranger.

Dans ce cas, il a créé le "faux partisan" au nom de "l'employeur" de l'article 73-2 "Un péché favorisant l'emploi illégal".
"Fake Supporter" est quelqu'un qui a soutenu l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Ce faisant, les étrangers qui faisaient du "travail illégal" se voyaient infliger une "peine de main-d'oeuvre" au lieu d'une "peine d'amende".
Et "rapatriés de force hors du pays" l'ont fait.

Un tiers est "moi et" KinGungaku ", qui a fourni" les documents du contrat de travail "au chinois.
Ce sont les motifs de crime que le procureur souligne dans l'acte d'accusation.
Le procureur dit que le "document de contrat de travail" est "faux".
Toutefois, il s'agit de la disposition de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration "Révoquer le statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents et en obtenant le statut de résidence".
Comme écrit, même les faits ne sont pas des actes criminels.
Par conséquent, même si c'est comme le procureur le dit, "KinGungaku" avec moi est innocent.

Je continuerai demain.
Je vais continuer jusqu'à ce que vous compreniez.

Je "fais appel" des deux choses.
S'il vous plaît soutenir cette année afin que nous puissions résoudre cette année.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais un étranger est innocent.

L'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péchés du travail illégal" était puni par les étrangers.
D'autre part, la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration utilise des employeurs qui sont des "relations de cause à effet" de travail illégal au sens de la Loi sur l'immigration 73-2
(Un crime qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, le pouvoir judiciaire japonais ne "jette" que des étrangers, mais il ne dispose pas des employeurs.
Cela viole évidemment le "principe d'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international interdisant l’élimination consciente des étrangers.

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement un étranger est innocent, un étranger qui a travaillé illégalement est innocent.
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe personne «qui ait soutenu d’autres crimes de droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate dans le pays philippin, membre du personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La "cause du crime" à laquelle l'accusation applique "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" est la suivante.
Les étrangers ont commis l'acte prévu à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration (acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" contre cela.
La décision est "annulation du statut de résidence" du "ministre de la Justice" et "retrait obligatoire vers des pays étrangers".
Par conséquent, "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" ne peut pas être appliqué.

Le gouvernement japonais "écrase" les plaintes.
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir de l'Etat, c'est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Le matériel est en dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
S'il vous plaît "sauver" beaucoup de "victimes" avec "courage et justice".
Je demande au gouvernement japonais de "récupérer son honneur" et de "dédommager la victime" de la victime.

Cordialement, Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est ouvert au programme ci-dessous.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten 2018-01-08: Bitte helfen Sie Ausländern, die in Japan wegen "illegaler Arbeit" bestraft wurden. Ausländer sind unschuldig, da sie gegen internationales Recht verstoßen. Bitte hilf mir.

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer!


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten


2018-01-08: Bitte helfen Sie Ausländern, die in Japan wegen "illegaler Arbeit" bestraft wurden.
Ausländer sind unschuldig, da sie gegen internationales Recht verstoßen. Bitte hilf mir.


Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Eine Person, die einen Ausländer mit "illegaler Arbeit" beschäftigt hat
Ausländer sind unschuldig, wenn sie nicht gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Verbrechen, die illegale Beschäftigung fördern" verfügen.
In diesem Fall ist es die Logik des Gesetzes, nicht über illegal beschäftigte Ausländer zu verfügen. Ich bin unschuldig
Es gibt natürlich niemanden, der "illegale Arbeit" "geholfen" hat.

Bei dem Vorfall im Jahr 2010 erhoben Polizeibeamte und Staatsanwälte "mehr" bösartige Straftaten.
Wir haben keine Arbeitgeber entsorgt, die zuvor "illegale Arbeit" gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden, die illegale Arbeit fördern" durchgeführt haben.
Nur Ausländer, die "illegale Arbeit" verrichteten, wurden jedoch wegen "illegaler Arbeitskriminalität" gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes mit einer Geldstrafe belegt.
Und sie wurden "zwangsweise" nach Übersee zurückgeführt.

In diesem Fall schuf er im Auftrag von "Arbeitgeber" des Artikels 73-2 "Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert" einen "gefälschten Unterstützer".
"Gefälschter Anhänger" unterstützte Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Auf diese Weise wurden Ausländern, die "illegale Arbeit" verrichteten, "Strafe für Arbeit" anstelle von "Geldstrafen" verhängt.
Und "Zwangsweise ins Ausland zurückgeschickt".

Eine dritte Partei ist "Ich und" KinGungaku ", die den Chinesen" die Dokumente des Arbeitsvertrags "zur Verfügung stellte.
Dies ist das Verbrechen, auf das der Staatsanwalt in der "Anklageschrift" hinweist.
Der Ankläger sagt, das "Arbeitsvertragsdokument" sei "falsch".
Dies ist jedoch die Bestimmung in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente und Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus".
Tatsachen sind, wie geschrieben, keine Straftaten.
Daher ist "KinGungaku" bei mir unschuldig, auch wenn es so ist, wie der Ankläger sagt.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.
Ich werde weitermachen, bis du verstanden hast.

Ich "appelliere" an die beiden Dinge.
Bitte unterstützen Sie dieses Jahr, damit wir dieses Jahr lösen können.

1. Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsgenehmigung" durch. Aber ein Ausländer ist unschuldig.

Nur Ausländer wurden durch Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden illegaler Arbeit" bestraft.
Auf der anderen Seite verwendet das Immigration Control Act Arbeitgeber, die "Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehungen" illegaler Arbeit im Rahmen des Immigration Act 73-2 sind
(Ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung förderte).

Die japanische Justiz "entsorgt" jedoch nur Ausländer, verfügt jedoch nicht über Arbeitgeber.
Dies verstößt offensichtlich gegen den "Grundsatz der Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal beschäftigt hat, unschuldig ist, ist ein Ausländer, der illegal gearbeitet hat, unschuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, "der andere strafrechtliche Verbrechen unterstützt hat" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat im philippinischen Land, ein Mitarbeiter der philippinischen Botschaft" ist unschuldig.

2 Der "Grund für ein Verbrechen", auf das die Staatsanwaltschaft Anwendung findet "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" lautet wie folgt.
Ausländer führten die in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat durch (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente).
Dagegen gibt es keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Disposition ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" durch "Justizminister" und "obligatorischer Rückzug ins Ausland".
Daher kann "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" nicht angewandt werden.

Die japanische Regierung "zermalmt" Beschwerden.
"Zerquetschen" durch Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Das Material ist unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Bitte "retten" Sie viele "Opfer" mit "Mut und Gerechtigkeit".
Ich fordere die japanische Regierung auf, "die Ehre zurückzugewinnen" und "das Opfer zu entschädigen".

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen ***************

Es ist offen für das Programm unten.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


 (Yasuhiro Nagano)


Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan. Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan.
Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

Dear sirs. A foreigner is innocent if he / she does not dispose of a person
who employed a foreigner of "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
In that case, it is the logic of law to not dispose of foreigners who have been illegally employed.
I am innocent.
Naturally, there is no one who "helped" any "illegal work".

In the incident that occurred in 2010,
police officials and prosecutors filed "more" malicious crimes.
We have not disposed of employers who previously made "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners who carried out "illegal work" have been "fined"
for "illegal labor crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
And they were "forcibly repatriated" overseas.

In this case, he created "fake supporter" on behalf of "Employer" of Article 73-2 "Sin
that promoted illegal employment".
"Fake supporter" is one who supported Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.

By doing this, foreigners who did "illegal labor" were made "punishment
for labor" instead of "fines punishment".
And "Forcibly repatriated outside the country" did.

A third party is "me and" KinGungaku ", which provided" the documents
of employment contract "to Chinese.
This is the crime reasons the prosecutor points out in the "indictment".
The prosecutor says that the "employment contract document" is "false".
However, this is the provision of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revoke the status
of residence by submitting false documents and obtaining status of residence".
As written, even facts are not criminal acts.
Therefore, even if it is as the prosecutor says, "KinGungaku" with me is innocent.

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
Please support this year so that we can solve this year.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone at the media 2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan. Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To everyone at the media


2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan.
Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

Dear sirs. A foreigner is innocent if he / she does not dispose of a person
who employed a foreigner of "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
In that case, it is the logic of law to not dispose of foreigners who have been illegally employed.
I am innocent.
Naturally, there is no one who "helped" any "illegal work".

In the incident that occurred in 2010,
police officials and prosecutors filed "more" malicious crimes.
We have not disposed of employers who previously made "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners who carried out "illegal work" have been "fined"
for "illegal labor crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
And they were "forcibly repatriated" overseas.

In this case, he created "fake supporter" on behalf of "Employer" of Article 73-2 "Sin
that promoted illegal employment".
"Fake supporter" is one who supported Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.

By doing this, foreigners who did "illegal labor" were made "punishment
for labor" instead of "fines punishment".
And "Forcibly repatriated outside the country" did.

A third party is "me and" KinGungaku ", which provided" the documents
of employment contract "to Chinese.
This is the crime reasons the prosecutor points out in the "indictment".
The prosecutor says that the "employment contract document" is "false".
However, this is the provision of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revoke the status
of residence by submitting false documents and obtaining status of residence".
As written, even facts are not criminal acts.
Therefore, even if it is as the prosecutor says, "KinGungaku" with me is innocent.

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
Please support this year so that we can solve this year.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world are being sacrificed.
Please report the facts as a journalist.
"Government under the law" can not be bought by money.

My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To President Trump 2019-01-07: Please help us, it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan. The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


2019-01-07: Please help us,
it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.


Dear Sir, We are saying that "no crime is detected, and there is no crime".
Japan disposes of illegal labor under the following system of laws.
1. We will dispose of "foreigners who have engaged in illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "offenses of illegal employment".
2. "Employer" who has made "illegal labor" to foreigners is dismissed
as "Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act" Promotion of Illegal Employment ".

Japan's law will punish both of them equally because they are based
on the "equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.
The Diet then enacts the Immigration Control Law,
which does not violate the "International Law" (the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights), which prohibits consciously disposing of foreigners.

The actual situation is that the "employer" who made illegal work
for foreigners is not dismissed as "crime promoting illegal employment"
in Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreign nationals who have committed "illegal labor" are disposed of
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor", and are forced to "repatriate" overseas.
This is contrary to international law,
which prohibits discrimination of foreigners "consciously".
It also violates the "Equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
(crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
 (Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

À Emmanuel · Président français Macron 2019-01-07: S'il vous plaît aidez-nous. C'est un crime commis par des policiers, des procureurs et des juges japonais. Le gouvernement japonais "cache" ce crime. S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.

<Courrier public> #MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme!


À Emmanuel · Président français Macron


2019-01-07: S'il vous plaît aidez-nous.
C'est un crime commis par des policiers, des procureurs et des juges japonais.
Le gouvernement japonais "cache" ce crime. S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.


Chers Messieurs. Nous disons "aucun crime n'est deviné, et nous ne commettons pas de crimes".
Le Japon dispose du "travail illégal" dans le système législatif suivant.
1 "Les étrangers ayant effectué un" travail illégal "seront éliminés en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration" Péchés du travail illégal ".
2 "Employeur" ayant fait en sorte qu'un "travail illégal" soit confié à un étranger en vertu de la "Loi sur l'immigration n ° 73, article 2", "infraction visant à promouvoir l'emploi illégal".

La loi japonaise criminalise les deux parties sur un pied d'égalité.
La raison en est due à "l'égalité devant la loi" de la Constitution du Japon.
Et la Diète a interdit l'élimination consciente des étrangers "du droit international"
Je légifère sur le droit de l'immigration afin de ne pas violer le Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques.

Cependant, en réalité, les "employeurs" qui laissent des étrangers travailler illégalement
En vertu de l’article 2 de la loi sur l’immigration 73, il n’est pas qualifié de "crime qui a favorisé l’emploi illégal".
Toutefois, seuls les étrangers qui ont effectué du "travail illégal" sont éliminés en vertu de "l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration" du travail illégal ".
Et nous sommes "rapatriés de force" en dehors du pays.

Ceci est contraire au droit international qui interdit aux étrangers de discriminer "consciemment".
Cela viole également "l'égalité devant la loi" de la Constitution du Japon.

Je continuerai demain.
Je vais continuer jusqu'à ce que vous compreniez.


Je "fais appel" des deux choses.
S'il vous plaît soutenir cette année afin que nous puissions résoudre cette année.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais un étranger est innocent.

L'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péchés du travail illégal" était puni par les étrangers.
D'autre part, la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration utilise des employeurs qui sont des "relations de cause à effet" de travail illégal au sens de la Loi sur l'immigration 73-2
(Un crime qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, le pouvoir judiciaire japonais ne "jette" que des étrangers, mais il ne dispose pas des employeurs.
Cela viole évidemment le "principe d'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international interdisant l’élimination consciente des étrangers.

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement un étranger est innocent, un étranger qui a travaillé illégalement est innocent.
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe personne «qui ait soutenu d’autres crimes de droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate dans le pays philippin, membre du personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La "cause du crime" à laquelle l'accusation applique "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" est la suivante.
Les étrangers ont commis l'acte prévu à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration (acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" contre cela.
La décision est "annulation du statut de résidence" du "ministre de la Justice" et "retrait obligatoire vers des pays étrangers".
Par conséquent, "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" ne peut pas être appliqué.

Le gouvernement japonais "écrase" les plaintes.
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir de l'Etat, c'est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Le matériel est en dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
S'il vous plaît "sauver" beaucoup de "victimes" avec "courage et justice".
Je demande au gouvernement japonais de "récupérer son honneur" et de "dédommager la victime" de la victime.

Cordialement, Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est ouvert au programme ci-dessous.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten 2019-01-07: Bitte helfen Sie uns. Es ist ein Verbrechen von japanischen Polizeibeamten, Staatsanwälten und Richtern. Die japanische Regierung "versteckt" dieses Verbrechen. Bitte hilf mir.

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer!


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten


2019-01-07: Bitte helfen Sie uns.
Es ist ein Verbrechen von japanischen Polizeibeamten, Staatsanwälten und Richtern.
Die japanische Regierung "versteckt" dieses Verbrechen. Bitte hilf mir.


Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Wir sagen "kein Verbrechen wird vermutet und wir begehen keine Verbrechen".
Japan verfügt über "illegale Arbeit" im Rahmen des folgenden Rechtssystems.
1. "Ausländer, die" illegale Arbeit "ausgeführt haben, werden gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" Sünden der illegalen Beschäftigung "entsorgt.
2 "Arbeitgeber", der aufgrund eines "Einwanderungsgesetzes 73, Artikel 2" illegale Beschäftigungsförderungskriminalität "die Ausweisung" illegaler Arbeit "an einen Ausländer bewirkt hat

Das japanische Gesetz kriminalisiert beide Parteien gleichermaßen.
Der Grund dafür liegt in der "Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz" der Verfassung von Japan.
Und der Landtag verbot die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern "Völkerrecht"
Ich gesetzest das Einwanderungsgesetz, um den Internationalen Pakt über bürgerliche und politische Rechte nicht zu verletzen.

In der Realität jedoch "Arbeitgeber", die Ausländer illegal arbeiten lassen
Sie wird gemäß Artikel 2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes 73 nicht als "ein Verbrechen, das die illegale Beschäftigung begünstigt", erlassen.
Nur Ausländer, die "illegale Arbeit" ausgeführt haben, werden jedoch gemäß Artikel 70 "Zuwanderungsgesetz", "illegale Arbeitskriminalität", entsorgt.
Und wir werden außerhalb des Landes "zwangsweise repatriiert".

Dies steht im Widerspruch zum internationalen Recht, das Ausländern verbietet, "bewusst" zu diskriminieren.
Es verstößt auch gegen "Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz" der Verfassung von Japan.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.
Ich werde weitermachen, bis du verstanden hast.


Ich "appelliere" an die beiden Dinge.
Bitte unterstützen Sie dieses Jahr, damit wir dieses Jahr lösen können.

1. Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsgenehmigung" durch. Aber ein Ausländer ist unschuldig.

Nur Ausländer wurden durch Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden illegaler Arbeit" bestraft.
Auf der anderen Seite verwendet das Immigration Control Act Arbeitgeber, die "Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehungen" illegaler Arbeit im Rahmen des Immigration Act 73-2 sind
(Ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung förderte).

Die japanische Justiz "entsorgt" jedoch nur Ausländer, verfügt jedoch nicht über Arbeitgeber.
Dies verstößt offensichtlich gegen den "Grundsatz der Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal beschäftigt hat, unschuldig ist, ist ein Ausländer, der illegal gearbeitet hat, unschuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, "der andere strafrechtliche Verbrechen unterstützt hat" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat im philippinischen Land, ein Mitarbeiter der philippinischen Botschaft" ist unschuldig.

2 Der "Grund für ein Verbrechen", auf das die Staatsanwaltschaft Anwendung findet "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" lautet wie folgt.
Ausländer führten die in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat durch (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente).
Dagegen gibt es keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Disposition ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" durch "Justizminister" und "obligatorischer Rückzug ins Ausland".
Daher kann "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" nicht angewandt werden.

Die japanische Regierung "zermalmt" Beschwerden.
"Zerquetschen" durch Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Das Material ist unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Bitte "retten" Sie viele "Opfer" mit "Mut und Gerechtigkeit".
Ich fordere die japanische Regierung auf, "die Ehre zurückzugewinnen" und "das Opfer zu entschädigen".

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen ***************

Es ist offen für das Programm unten.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


(Yasuhiro Nagano)


Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-07: Please help us, it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan. The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-01-07: Please help us,
it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.


Dear Sir, We are saying that "no crime is detected, and there is no crime".
Japan disposes of illegal labor under the following system of laws.
1. We will dispose of "foreigners who have engaged in illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "offenses of illegal employment".
2. "Employer" who has made "illegal labor" to foreigners is dismissed
as "Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act" Promotion of Illegal Employment ".

Japan's law will punish both of them equally because they are based
on the "equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.
The Diet then enacts the Immigration Control Law,
which does not violate the "International Law" (the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights), which prohibits consciously disposing of foreigners.

The actual situation is that the "employer" who made illegal work
for foreigners is not dismissed as "crime promoting illegal employment"
in Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreign nationals who have committed "illegal labor" are disposed of
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor", and are forced to "repatriate" overseas.
This is contrary to international law,
which prohibits discrimination of foreigners "consciously".
It also violates the "Equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
(crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
 (Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone at the media 2019-01-07: Please help us, it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan. The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To everyone at the media


2019-01-07: Please help us,
it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.


Dear Sir, We are saying that "no crime is detected, and there is no crime".
Japan disposes of illegal labor under the following system of laws.
1. We will dispose of "foreigners who have engaged in illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "offenses of illegal employment".
2. "Employer" who has made "illegal labor" to foreigners is dismissed
as "Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act" Promotion of Illegal Employment ".

Japan's law will punish both of them equally because they are based
on the "equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.
The Diet then enacts the Immigration Control Law,
which does not violate the "International Law" (the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights), which prohibits consciously disposing of foreigners.

The actual situation is that the "employer" who made illegal work
for foreigners is not dismissed as "crime promoting illegal employment"
in Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreign nationals who have committed "illegal labor" are disposed of
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor", and are forced to "repatriate" overseas.
This is contrary to international law,
which prohibits discrimination of foreigners "consciously".
It also violates the "Equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
(crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
 (Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world are being sacrificed.
Please report the facts as a journalist.
"Government under the law" can not be bought by money.

My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************