To President Trump!
July 15, 2026: Today’s Proposal
The major Special Zones in the world are the "Mexico Border" operated by the U.S., "Algeria" jointly operated by EU countries, and the "Philippines" jointly operated by the U.K. and the U.S. These "Special Zones" are linked by a common philosophy and function as "lifelines (hubs)" to overcome the social stagnation common to developed nations. This article clarifies the full picture of this geopolitical and economic vision, focusing on the joint operation in Algeria.
1. [The Philosophy of Special Zones] A Lifeline to Break Through Developed Nations' Stagnation
Special Zones are "lifelines (hubs)" to simultaneously resolve the migration, labor, and economic issues facing developed nations. Based on a common philosophy, they facilitate global coordination. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
2. [U.S. Independent Strategy] Sole Operation of the Mexico Border
Leveraging its vast territory, the U.S. will construct a Special Zone independently at its Mexico border. This serves as a direct geopolitical hub built on the nation's core strengths. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
3. [EU Joint Strategy] Joint Operation in Algeria
Lacking vast territory, EU nations conduct "joint operations" through treaties with partner countries. Algeria symbolizes a Special Zone operated by the EU in collabora-tion with Africa. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
4. [U.K. Global Strategy] Joint Operation in the Philippines
The U.K. will operate a joint zone in the Philippines, involving the U.S. as well. This completes a multipolar hub structure that also addresses inflows from the Middle East. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
5. [Redefining Partnerships] A Grand Vision of Geopolitics and Economy
The U.S. with Latin America, the EU with Africa, and the U.K. with the Middle East—each redefines its relationship with its partner country. This is a grand vision that creates a new geopolitical order. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
6. [Provisional Immigrant Status] Provisional Acceptance of Immigrants and Refugees
The most distinctive feature of these zones is the acceptance of immigrants and refu-gees as "provisional immigrants." This protects the social order of host nations while meeting labor demand. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
7. [Visa Issuance Scheme] Legal Clarification via Treaties
While the "USA" issues visas for the Mexico Border, in Algeria and the Philippines, the nation of the company operating the factory bears the responsibility for issuance based on treaties. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
8. [Hub for Manufacturing] Redefinition as a Lifeline
The U.S. redefines the Mexico Border, the EU redefines Algeria, and the U.K. rede-fines Mindanao as their respective "manufacturing lifelines (hubs)," solidifying the foundations of their economies. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
9. [Algeria's Self-Reliance] Aiming to be Africa's No. 1 Industrial Nation
Elevating Algeria from a mere EU subcontractor to a role model for independent in-dustrialization. It aims to become an entity that leads the industrial independence of African nations. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
10. [Philippines' Self-Reliance] Aiming to be Southeast Asia's No. 1 Industrial Nation
Developing the Philippines into a role model for independent industrialization, moving beyond simple subcontracting. It aims to be a hub for industrialization throughout Southeast Asia. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
11. [Nearshoring] Breaking Free from China-Dependency Risk
The model of assembling U.K./U.S. products in these Special Zones is the ultimate form of "nearshoring" (local procurement), solving the risk of China dependency (dis-ruption of supply chains). (Yasuhiro Nagano)
12. [Technology and Infrastructure] Development of Partner Nations
Through these zones, advanced technology is transferred, infrastructure is developed, and jobs are created. Algeria and others can break free from dependency on natural gas and other resources, advancing their economic structures. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
13. [Protecting Domestic Jobs] Securing Manufacturing Zones
Against fears of threats to domestic employment in the U.S., France, the U.K., etc., Special Zones secure "each nation's independent manufacturing zone," thereby pro-tecting domestic industries. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
14. [Social Integration and Coexistence] Conflict Avoidance and Language Education
By accepting immigrants and refugees, these zones prevent domestic conflict, while providing "provisional immigrants" the opportunity to work while learning the lan-guage and culture of the "visa-issuing nation." (Yasuhiro Nagano)
15. [Roadmap for Tomorrow] A Sustainable International Framework
While I focused on Algeria today, these zones hold the key to changing the structure of the world economy. Tomorrow, I will discuss further details of this vision. (Yasuhi-ro Nagano)
Part 1: References
Pope Francis appeals to U.S. citizens to protect immigrants, letter on the 250th anni-versary of the nation's founding
https://jp.reuters.com/world/us/V7QFMMC6KVKJXIMVYV3XGGRQWE-2026-07-05/
I will write more tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)
Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]
Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.
Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.
Read the full text here: To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
[Chapter 1] Case Overview
Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.
Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.
2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.
May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).
June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.
The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.
[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation
This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.
Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.
The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:
A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.
The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.
Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.
Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.
This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.
[My Argument]
Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.
Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.
This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.
Continued in the Saturday Edition.
Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones
I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.
This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Global Special Zone Project NO2
https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
Nagano Opinion NO1
https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment