To President Trump – October 14, 2026 The United States must squarely confront the issue of international judicial bodies overstepping their jurisdiction and strongly urge a halt to the ICC’s political runaway actions! Presenting the issues of the ICC’s encroachment on sovereignty and Japan’s system of arbitrary detention to the U.S., and arguing for the necessity of international judicial reform. [Structural Commonalities and State Overreach Across Four Major Cases] My case from June 2010 (in which a violation of Article 22-4, Paragraph 4 of the Immigration Control Act was treated as a criminal matter) shares structural commonalities with the "Wishma Case," the "Ghosn Case," and the "ICC Judge Akane Case." The world must ensure that Japan becomes a nation truly governed by the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump!

2026-10-14 [Proposal for Today] A denunciation document exposing the structural homogeneity of "jurisdictional deviation of authority," "arbitrary detention," and "po-liticization of justice" common to the Wishma case, the Ghosn case, and the ICC Akane case, starting from the 2010 Immigration Control Act wrongful conviction case, and demanding fundamental reforms of the Japanese government and international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

1【Structural Commonalities and State Jurisdictional Deviations Spanning Four Major Cases】My case from June 2010 shares structural commonalities with the "Wishma case," the "Ghosn case," and the "ICC Akane case." The world should make Japan a nation governed under the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

2【The Necessity of Systematically Organizing Common Threads Across Three Major Cases】In these three cases, authorities have deviated from their original jurisdiction. Centered on my case, we must systematically organize the commonalities; otherwise, neither the ICC case nor my case can be resolved. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

3【The Reality of Arbitrary Detention Deviating from Original Jurisdiction】Originally, the charge in my case was an administrative disposition. An administrative disposi-tion does not constitute aiding and abetting under the Penal Code. Despite this, the prosecution indicted me. This is a clear deviation of jurisdiction (Arbitrary Detention). (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

4【Arbitrary Detention via Immigration Discretion in the Wishma Case】The Wishma case involved a domestic violence victim placed in detention rather than protection, who died while denied medical care. This constitutes unpermissible arbitrary deten-tion based on immigration discretion. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

5【The Ghosn Case and Japan's Host Justice Structure in Criminal Procedure】The Ghosn case expanded the elements of aggravated breach of trust, resulting in pro-longed detention and repeated re-arrests. Japan's hostage justice is literally arbitrary detention itself. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

6【Assertions of Sovereignty Deviation in the ICC Akane Case】In the ICC Akane case, the U.S. is not an ICC member. Investigating non-member nationals is a devia-tion of sovereignty, and the U.S. asserts that the ICC has improperly expanded its original jurisdiction. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

7【Convenient Expansion of Legal Interpretation by Authorities】Authorities conven-iently expand legal interpretation. My case expanded an employment contract issue—an administrative matter—into a criminal penalty. This is a grave infringement on the principle of legality. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

8【Arbitrary Reduction of Humanitarian Obligations in the Wishma Case】The Wish-ma case ignored domestic violence victim protection provisions and dismissed medical care obligations based on internal regulations. This is an arbitrary reduction of hu-manitarian obligations. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

9【Arbitrary Application of Detention Requirements in the Ghosn Case】The Ghosn case arbitrarily expanded detention requirements and abused re-arrests. This is noth-ing other than a severely distorted operation of criminal procedure. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

10【Criticisms of Expanding International Law Interpretation in the ICC Akane Case】In the ICC Akane case, the ICC interprets that investigation of non-member nationals is possible. Many experts strictly point out this is an expansive interpretation of inter-national law. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

11【Punitive Detention and Show-Trial Justice Against Those Defying Authority】I was refused parole because I claimed my innocence, and was imprisoned until the full term despite being a first-time offender. This is punitive detention, and show-trial justice is Japan's specialty. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

12【Retaliatory Responses in the Wishma and Ghosn Cases】The Wishma case treat-ed complaining detainees as troublesome and denied medical care, while the Ghosn case tightened the screws with extreme bail conditions. These are all punitive re-sponses against those defying authority. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

13【The Structure of Political Punishment in the ICC Akane Case】The ICC Akane case—where investigations continued despite U.S. pressure leading to sanctions—clearly demonstrates the structure of political punishment. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japa-nese))

14【Political Weakness and Limitations of International and Judicial Organs】In both my case and the Wishma case, the UN and international bodies do not intervene in Japan's immigration issues. National political power strongly suppresses the functions of international human rights bodies. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

15【Denunciation of Japan's Governance Structure and Demand for Victim Relief】While shouting about the rule of law, the reality of the Japanese government is rule by decree of power. The international community should denounce the Japanese government to relieve victims worldwide. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

Part 1 Related URL

Death of Wishma Sandamali

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Wishma_Sandamali

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp