To President Trump!
2026-10-13 [Proposal for Today] The structural crisis of international justice and the contradiction of violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention exposed by Tomoko Akane’s nomination report for the Nobel Peace Prize: A thorough critique in 15 sec-tions strongly denouncing the reality that Japan’s arbitrary judicial culture has been exported to international justice, and urging the establishment of true "rule of law" to the world. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
1【Legitimate Concerns Regarding the Report on Akane’s Nobel Peace Prize Candida-cy】The feeling I experienced—that "if Akane is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, the value of the Nobel Prize will be shaken"—is a "legitimate concern" held by anyone who understands the structure of international law, even if Japan's Prime Minister cannot grasp it. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
2【ICC Arrest Warrant Issuance and Trends in Peace Prize Evaluations】Why was Akane reported as a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate"? This is because the ICC issuing an arrest warrant for President Putin was highly praised by a segment of the interna-tional community. The Nobel Peace Prize tends to evaluate the investigation of war crimes, the protection of civilians, and the strengthening of international criminal jus-tice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
3【Grave International Legal Contradictions of Expanding Jurisdiction】However, as I have pointed out, a grave international legal contradiction exists—namely, the ICC's expansion of jurisdiction to investigate non-member states—and it is only natural that criticism arises that ignoring this and nominating her "shakes the value of the Nobel Prize." (Yasuhiro Nagano)
4【Arbitrary Selection Criteria and the Fall of the Nobel Prize's Value】The Nobel Peace Prize tends to evaluate the investigation of war crimes, the protection of civil-ians, and the strengthening of international criminal justice. Once again, this appears to be an arbitrary selection. This holds no value. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
5【Legitimacy of Intuition Coinciding with Experts' Discussions】The reason why be-ing nominated for the Nobel Prize is said to "shake its value." My intuition completely coincides with the arguments of international law experts. We must uphold codified law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
6【Violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and Non-Applicability of Exception Interpretations】Reason 1: The ICC is violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. A treaty imposes no obligations on third states. The U.S. is not a member, Israel is not a member, and Russia is not a member. The ICC's exceptional interpretation does not hold! (Yasuhiro Nagano)
7【Questions Regarding Target Countries and Individuals for Arrest Warrants】Despite this, the ICC has investigated and issued arrest warrants for American sol-diers, the Israeli Prime Minister, and the Russian President. This is a violation of the foundational principle of international law (pacta tertiis). Why has an arrest warrant not been issued for Zelenskyy? It is a mystery. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
8【Importing Japanese Prosecutorial Culture into the ICC】Reason 2: Akane may have brought Japanese prosecutorial culture (arbitrary interpretation) into the ICC. The structure that occurred in my case—expanding administrative dispositions into criminal punishments, arbitrary detention, and punishing claims of false accusation—is characteristic of Japan's prosecutorial culture. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
9【Export of Japanese-Style Arbitrariness in International Justice】Akane originates from the Japanese prosecutor corps and has been deeply involved in the ICC's inves-tigation policies. Consequently, criticism exists that "Japanese-style arbitrariness"—where the ICC expands its jurisdiction to investigate nationals of non-member states—has been exported to international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
10【U.S. Government Sanctions Imposed on Akane】Reason 3: The United States sanctioned Akane. The Trump administration imposed sanctions, asset freezes, and entry bans on ICC officials including Akane. This was done via U.S. domestic law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
11【Exercise of Authority Over Non-Member States and Vienna Convention Principles】The reason is clear: "The ICC is exercising authority over non-member states. This is a violation of international law. In other words, the U.S. treats Article 34 of the Vien-na Convention as an absolute principle. The ICC is breaking it." (Yasuhiro Nagano)
12【Political Evaluation in the Nobel Prize and Reflection of European Values】Reason 4: The Nobel Prize includes "political evaluation." The Nobel Peace Prize is strongly influenced by European political values, international public opinion, and the dynam-ics of international politics. Because the ICC is supported by Europe (especially France and the Netherlands), a structural dynamic exists wherein European political values are reflected in the selection of Nobel Peace Prize candidates. (Yasuhiro Naga-no)
13【Spread of Concerns Shared Among International Relations Scholars】The feeling I experienced—that "this will destroy the value of the Nobel Prize"—is shared among international relations scholars as well. We cannot allow a Nobel Peace Prize to be awarded to violators of international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
14【Inseparability of Overcoming International Human Rights Violations and Miscar-riage of Justice Relief】My case involves grave violations of international human rights law: arbitrary detention, infringement on the principle of legality, inhuman treatment, and a lack of remedy. Correcting the ICC's violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and forcing adherence to the "rule of law" will lead to correcting my miscarriage of justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
15【Realization of Justice Through Continued Petitions to International Bodies】I will continue to submit petitions to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to force Japan to be governed under the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
Part 1 Related URL
ICC issues arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova over war crimes related to Ukraine invasion
https://www.bbc.com/japanese/64985430
I will write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano(Japanese)
1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)
Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]
Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.
Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.
Read the full text here: To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
[Chapter 1] Case Overview
Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.
Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.
2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.
May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).
June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.
The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.
[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation
This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.
Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.
The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:
A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.
The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.
Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.
Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.
This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.
[My Argument]
Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.
Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.
This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.
Continued in the Saturday Edition.
Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones
I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.
This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Global Special Zone Project NO2
https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
Nagano Opinion NO1
https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment