To President Biden! 2021-12-31: Write the summary again. This case is "around" from May to July 2010. It was in 2008. I told a Chinese who is planning to graduate from a Japanese university in March 2009 We have "issued" a "contract (tentative document)" to be employed from April 2009 to Chinese people.

 To President Biden!

2021-12-31: Dear Sir [This year is also New Year's Eve. 

I am "appealing" to "Japan's arbitrary judicial system" to Japanese political parties, 

politicians, world politicians, government officials and the media, and many others. 

I will "explain" the reason.I am complaining every day. 

However, those who see it for the first time do not understand the "big picture". 

I will write the summary again.

This case is "around" from May to July 2010. 

It was in 2008. I "issued" a "contract (tentative document)" to be employed 

from April 2009 to Chinese who are planning to graduate from a Japanese university in March 2009.

However, in September 2008, the "Lehman shock" occurred. 

My company "cancelled" hiring just like "other companies".

From December 2008 to January 2009, 

Chinese who are planning to hire have applied 

for "renewal of status of residence" to the Immigration Bureau. At that time, 

I am submitting the "employment contract" and "company profile" issued 

by my company to the Immigration Bureau. 

Since January 2009, they have received a "notification postcard" 

from the Immigration Bureau to "issue" a "new status of residence". 

Since March 2009, 

they have submitted a university "diploma" to the Immigration Bureau and received a "visa".

The Chinese, who had been canceled from hiring, 

continued to work after graduating from a restaurant where they worked part-time as a student. 

And "they" were arrested for "labor other than status of residence" 

under "Article 70 of the Immigration Control and Refuge" from June to July 2010. 

However, the "restaurant" employers who hired "they" have not been arrested.

In June 2010, I was arrested "together" with a Chinese "subordinate (Kin gungaku)". 

The crime is "a violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control 

and Refuge, which is a crime of Chinese people (labor outside the status of residence)". 

The "Sin of support" of the "Criminal Code" was applied to it. 

Then, in April 2011, 

I was sentenced by the Tokyo District Court according to the indictment

(one and a half years in prison and a fine of 500,000 yen). 

In January 2012, the Supreme Court dismissed the "appeal" 

and the sentence was finalized. 

He was "incarcerated" in March 2012. 

I was released from prison in March 2013 with a "maturity of sentence".

When I was released from prison, 

I prepared for a "request for retrial" procedure. In my case, 

it is an error in "applicable law". 

To request a retrial, you must confirm the crime of a police officer, prosecutor, judge, etc.

Their crimes are "special civil service abuse of authority" and "false accusation". 

I have submitted "Criminal accusations" to the "Tokyo Regional Prosecutors Office" many times. 

However, no matter how many times I submit it, all I get is "Write when, who, where, and what". 

Continue to Part 1 below,

Part 1. Please see the contents of the "Criminal Accusation" as it is open to the public. 

All the requirements are written.

The Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office is always "rejected". 

So I submitted it to the Tokyo Higher Prosecutor's Office. 

The reply from the East Tokyo Higher Prosecutor's Office took more than 3 months, 

but it was "not accepted". 

The Supreme Public Prosecutor's Office responds "I understand" and is "not accepted". 

This closed the way for retrial requests. 

That is why I am appealing to international organizations, 

the international community, Japanese political parties, and politicians. 

The answer from the Japan Federation of Bar Associations is 

that the Japan Federation of Bar Associations does not have the "power" to solve this problem. 

This is the fact of Japan that is "not governed under the law".

The reason for the crime in the indictment is 

that I supported Articles 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control and Refuge. 

It is written that my company issued a "false employment document" to Chinese people. 

The "judgment" was obtained as a "status of residence" 

because the Chinese received a "false employment document". 

It was possible for them to live in Japan. Since they were able to live in Japan, 

they were able to "work out of qualification". This is the "logic of law" in Japan. Obviously wrong.

I said the "contents of the indictment" would not be in dispute. 

But I argued that the reason for the crime in the indictment was "not punishable." 

This is evidenced by the January 2017 revision of the Immigration Control Act. 

The reason for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control and Refuge is "Sin of support" 

for the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control and Refuge, 

which is a "deviation" from the "logic of the law". In Japan, the judicial system is "collapsed".

I will write tomorrow, too.

The amendment of the Immigration Control Act in January 2017 states 

that "I am not guilty" as the reason for the amendment.

Reason: Amend from "cannot be punished" to "can be punished".

It is a false charge. 

However, the Japanese government has not yet apologized. 

See below for the indictment. (Japanese)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/c9639cd8d9ab6f7d734bdbb61511a31e

See below for the indictment. (English translation)

http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Part 2 Please see the following for the "false charges" of "crimes 

of support for immigration law violations" in 2010

Japanese.

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98

English.

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

Part 3 Construction of a special zone.

"Special zone of Algeria" by "EU", "Special zone of Mexico border" 

by the United States, "Special zone of Australia" by the new TPP (IPP), 

"Special zone of Okinawa" of Japan .... 

The "special zone" "accepts" refugees and poor people as "provisional migrants." 

They "separate" from "workers in developed countries". 

Developed countries can “manufacture” “cheap” than Chinese products 

by “employing” “provisional immigrants”. 

English, Japanese, French, German

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Very truly yours.

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:

Allies should unite "economy and security"!

The greatest security is to beat Chinese products. To do so, 

"immigrants and refugees" should be accepted as "provisional immigrants" in "special zones". 

"Temporary immigrants" are restricted to living in "special zones". 

"Temporary immigrants" are "low-wage workers" that are cheaper than "Chinese workers".

However, it is "income of grace" for "they" who do not have a job. 

This allows us to bring to market cheaper products than Chinese products. 

"Mainland workers" become "high wages" by working separately from "provisional immigrants". 

The world should trade according to the rules of the market economy. 

We should help "poor, migrants, refugees" and become rich. 

You should build "Algeri's Special Zone", 

"Mexico Border Special Zone" and "Australia's Special Zone".

       https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Economic activity should be "returned to normal" even under the "new corona"! 

Will I continue to receive the corona vaccine two or three times a year? Crazy! 

"SARS virus" has disappeared by "quarantine and treatment" of infected people. 

"PCR test" takes time. We should develop an "inspection system" 

that instantly "identifies" the "infected person" like thermography. 

In certain places tested, "non-infected" can return to "normal life" without a mask! 

It should be developed jointly by each country within a year. 

The "nation of freedom and democracy" should be revived! 

See daily posts for details. Or contact us!

Yasuhiro Nagano

If you have any questions, please contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp