To President Trump! June 12, 2025 Many people agree with my proposal. The Trump administration should quickly introduce a "balanced countervailing duty" to impose taxes on "units such as exporters to the United States" in order to balance "US exports and imports". I propose to create a "balanced countervailing duty" and incorporate it into the "Trump tariff". We need a "policy" that will make tariffs "zero" if companies make an effort. The purpose of the "Trump tariff" is to eliminate the "American trade deficit". I propose to impose the "Trump tariff" on the difference between "exports and imports" at the "corporate/organization" level.

 To President Trump!

Weekday Edition, June 12, 2025

On May 23, US President Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on all EU imports to the US, rekindling trade friction. This leaves no room for "pro-US companies" to make an effort.

I propose creating a "balanced countervailing tariff" and incorporating it into the "Trump tariff." We need a "policy" that will make tariffs "zero" if companies make an effort.

In "trade," I believe that exports and imports should be "balanced." Therefore, companies in exporting countries should also import from exporting countries.

The purpose of the "Trump tariff" is to eliminate the "American trade deficit." I propose imposing the "Trump tariff" on the difference between "exports and imports" at the "company/organization" level.

If "Company A" exports $100 million of "French products" from "France" to "US" and imports $100 million from the US, the "Trump tariff" will be "zero."

If the amount of exports to the United States minus the amount of imports from the United States is $1,000, the Trump tariffs will be levied on $1,000.

Trump should establish a balanced countervailing duty system as soon as pos-sible. Companies and organizations that only export to the United States and do not import should be subject to high Trump tariffs.

Some people argue that the Trump tariffs will shrink world trade, but I argue that combining the Trump tariffs with balanced countervailing duties can ex-pand world trade.

This is human psychology. If the difference between exports and imports is zero, there will be no tariffs, but if there are many exports, people will try to increase imports to make the tariffs zero.

Many people agree with my proposal. The Trump administration should quickly introduce a "balanced countervailing duty" that taxes "units such as exporters to the United States" in order to balance "US exports and imports."

President Trump has warned Apple that iPhones not manufactured in the Unit-ed States will be subject to "at least" 25% import duties. Where is the "factory zone" where "low-wage workers" live to build a factory in the United States?

I don't think there is such a place in the United States. Mr. Trump should "build" a "factory zone" in the United States where "low-wage workers" live.

So I "continue to propose" that a "special zone" be established on the "Mexican border" and that the illegal immigrants "flocking" to the Mexican border be ac-cepted as "temporary immigrants" and employed as "low-wage workers."

The wages of "low-wage workers" in the "special zone" are lower than those of Mexican and Chinese workers. However, "food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education" for "low-wage workers" are free.

If a "special zone" is established on the Mexican border, companies will "run around" to build factories in the "special zone." White House officials should un-derstand this and convey it to President Trump.

Part 1 References

President Trump threatens EU with 50% tariffs, rekindling tensions

https://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/877636

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp