To President Trump! September 16, 2025 On June 20, 2022, Ukraine outlawed all opposition parties and confiscated their assets. Why aren't European countries criticizing President Zelenskyy's denial of freedom of speech? See Chapter 1 for "Referenced Articles." Is Europe being "used" by President Zelenskyy? All 11 opposition parties in Ukraine have been banned. Gentlemen, there are no opposition parties in Ukraine.
To President Trump!
September 16, 2025
On June 20, 2022, Ukraine outlawed all opposition parties and confiscated their assets. Why aren't European countries criticizing President Zelenskyy's denial of freedom of speech? See Chapter 1 for "Referenced Articles."
Is Europe being "used" by President Zelenskyy? All 11 opposition parties in Ukraine have been banned. Gentlemen, there are no opposition parties in Ukraine.
There are no opposition parties in Ukraine. This is the "ideal state" that Europe-an countries strive for. That's why they support President Zelenskyy. Opposi-tion parties and citizens in European countries should protest against their re-spective governments.
"Pro-Russian" parties are not allowed to exist or operate. This is why freedoms are lost and criticism that the country is tantamount to totalitarianism cannot be refuted.
While Western media criticize Russia's restrictions on freedom of speech, they remain silent about Ukraine's suppression of freedom. Why? Trump should blame the media.
Yuda, a puppet of President Zelenskyy and the source of funding for the Azev Regiment, and oligarch Kolomoiskyy are rivals over vested interests.
Despite the height of the pandemic crisis, Medvedček flew to Moscow to secure President Putin's promise of free vaccines. This was blocked by the Biden ad-ministration.
In August 2021, Medvedček's secretary, Bossy, traveled to the United States and contacted the CIA. The US later concluded that a coup against Zelenskyy was being orchestrated.
Sensing a crisis, Bossy withdrew funds from a Dallas bank and fled to Serbia (TIME magazine, February 2, 2022). The Biden administration was behind this conspiracy.
In May 2021, Medvedček was indicted on charges of "treason" for plotting a coup. He was subsequently placed under house arrest, fitted with a GPS tag, his home monitored, and his television station shut down.
On May 14, 2022, President Zelenskyy signed a bill simplifying the procedures for banning political parties deemed "anti-Ukrainian."
Thus, while freedom of speech remains in the Baltic states, it is only marginal-ized in Armenia and Georgia. There is no freedom of speech at all in Belarus and Ukraine.
Le Pen of the French National Rally should protest the "Ukrainization" of Europe and make it an issue in the presidential election. She should also stand in soli-darity with other European opposition leaders.
President Trump should reveal the "truth" about President Zelenskyy, President Biden, and Europe. He should acknowledge Russia's EMP attack on Ukraine and "force an end" to the Ukrainian war.
Part 1: References
★Why aren't Western countries criticizing President Zelenskyy for thwarting his citizens' freedom of speech?
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/dankaidamyutaka/e/a8b67a0e13890ace4f587518a96c0123
I'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Comments
Post a Comment