To President Trump! September 24, 2025 The Conservative Party's hardline stance, calling for the deportation of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, is widely sympathetic among Conservative supporters who are calling for fundamental reform of immigration policy. My proposal is the best way to "deal with illegal immigration and rebuild Britain." Illegal immigrants entering the UK should be housed in "special zones" (factory zones) established overseas and employed as "low-wage workers" by British companies.

 To President Trump!

September 24, 2025

The right-wing Reform Party is gaining support amid growing voter dissatisfac-tion with existing political parties. "I propose that Britain accept illegal immi-grants into overseas 'zones' and employ them in overseas factories."

The Reform Party's approval ratings are higher than those of the two major parties, the ruling Labour Party and the Conservative Party. Britain is at a turn-ing point. Britain should improve productivity by building factories overseas and establishing a division of labor with the home country.

The Reform Party's hardline stance, calling for the deportation of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, is widely sympathetic among Conservative supporters who want fundamental reform of immigration policy. My proposal is the best way to "deal with illegal immigrants and regenerate Britain."

They don't speak English. They have a different religion. They don't understand the British way of life. Needless to say, these illegal immigrants should not co-exist with British citizens.

Illegal immigrants entering the UK should be housed in "special zones" (factory zones) established overseas and employed as "low-wage workers" by British companies.

Illegal immigrants should be accepted into "special zones" as "temporary British immigrants" and employed as "low-wage workers" compared to countries like China and Mexico.

The UK should establish "special zones" in countries like Australia and the Phil-ippines as "overseas factory sites" where low-wage workers can reside.

To improve labor productivity, British companies should employ "illegal immi-grants" in "overseas special zone factories" and build production systems that can compete on price with Chinese companies.

High-value-added "materials and parts" would be manufactured in the UK and transported (exported) to factories built in "overseas special zones," where they would be assembled and processed into products.

Factories in "special zones" would be equipped with the latest equipment, and "production engineers" would be "recruited" from China and other countries. The majority of the workforce would be low-wage "temporary immigrants (ille-gal immigrants)."

As a result, the products produced in the zones will be cheaper and of higher quality than those made in China. The more products sold in the zones, the more vital the British economy will be.

Temporary (illegal) immigrants in the zones receive low wages, but are provid-ed with free food, clothing, shelter, healthcare, and education. Companies only have to pay them their wages.

Despite their low wages, temporary immigrants enjoy better lives than low-paid British workers. The remittances they send home enrich the lives of people back home.

Illegal immigrants already in the UK will voluntarily move to the zones. This will exclude illegal immigrants from the UK.

Temporary immigrants will receive English language and compulsory education while working. If they meet certain conditions, they will be granted a British work visa.

This is similar to the zone on the US-Mexico border. The Reform Party should accept my proposal, work with Trump, and restore Britain's status as "Great Britain."

Part 1: References

Support for UK right-wing parties soars...The Reform Party takes a tough stance against illegal immigration

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250907-OYT1T50007/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp