To President Trump! September 29, 2025 An anti-immigration demonstration attended by 110,000 people in London. The best solution for the UK is to create "special zones" overseas and employ illegal immigrants at low wages in "overseas factories." This incident began when an Ethiopian man sexually harassed a young girl at an "asylum seeker hotel" in the UK. What a shameless act!

 To President Trump!

September 29, 2025

110,000 people participated in an anti-immigration demonstration in London. The best solution for the UK would be to create "special zones" overseas and employ illegal immigrants at low wages in "overseas factories."

This incident began when an Ethiopian man sexually harassed a young girl at an "asylum seeker hotel" in the UK. What a shameless act!

In July of this year, an Ethiopian man staying at a hotel in Essex, southeast England, sexually harassed a young girl by trying to kiss her and groping her. This is unacceptable!

On the 13th, right-wing activists called for a large-scale demonstration in Lon-don against the acceptance of refugees and immigrants. From now on, these should be held weekly.

Demonstrators carried British and English flags, and some even wore President Trump's "MAGA" (Make America Great Again) hats. Amazing!

Demonstrators shouted slogans critical of Starmer and held up placards reading "Send them back." I believe it would be in Britain's interest to employ them at low wages in "British factories overseas."

Businessman Elon Musk also stated at an online rally hosted by Robinson that "uncontrolled mass immigration will ruin Britain." This is a valid point.

I have no intention of discriminating against illegal immigrants. The problem is accepting illegal immigrants who don't know English or British customs into the UK. It is unreasonable to accept them.

However, developed countries like the UK need illegal immigrants to compete with "products made by Chinese companies that employ low-wage workers." The UK should "employ" them overseas.

Germany became an economic superpower by accepting large numbers of "ille-gal immigrants" and importing cheap Russian natural gas. Other EU countries followed suit. However...

President Trump built a wall on the Mexican border to prevent illegal immigra-tion, but the manufacturing industry is on the verge of collapse due to a short-age of low-wage workers.

The United States should establish a "special zone" on the Mexican border to isolate illegal immigrants and employ them at low wages. France should estab-lish a "special zone" in Algeria.

I don't think the UK's Conservative and Labour parties can deal with the immi-gration problem. They don't understand my proposal for a "special zone." In Musk's words, they're "like a bag of bricks."

Reform UK should accept my proposal. This would "revive" British manufactur-ing and solve the immigration problem. Illegal immigrants should be "em-ployed" in overseas factories.

Hiring "illegal immigrants" as low-wage workers in overseas factories would strengthen the competitiveness of British manufacturing. Trump should "iso-late" illegal immigrants in a "special zone" on the Mexican border and employ them at low wages.

Part 1: References

110,000 people attend anti-immigration demonstration in London, 5,000 at-tend anti-racism demonstration

https://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2025/09/569898_1.php

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano