Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten 2018-01-08: Bitte helfen Sie Ausländern, die in Japan wegen "illegaler Arbeit" bestraft wurden. Ausländer sind unschuldig, da sie gegen internationales Recht verstoßen. Bitte hilf mir.

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer!


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten


2018-01-08: Bitte helfen Sie Ausländern, die in Japan wegen "illegaler Arbeit" bestraft wurden.
Ausländer sind unschuldig, da sie gegen internationales Recht verstoßen. Bitte hilf mir.


Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Eine Person, die einen Ausländer mit "illegaler Arbeit" beschäftigt hat
Ausländer sind unschuldig, wenn sie nicht gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Verbrechen, die illegale Beschäftigung fördern" verfügen.
In diesem Fall ist es die Logik des Gesetzes, nicht über illegal beschäftigte Ausländer zu verfügen. Ich bin unschuldig
Es gibt natürlich niemanden, der "illegale Arbeit" "geholfen" hat.

Bei dem Vorfall im Jahr 2010 erhoben Polizeibeamte und Staatsanwälte "mehr" bösartige Straftaten.
Wir haben keine Arbeitgeber entsorgt, die zuvor "illegale Arbeit" gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden, die illegale Arbeit fördern" durchgeführt haben.
Nur Ausländer, die "illegale Arbeit" verrichteten, wurden jedoch wegen "illegaler Arbeitskriminalität" gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes mit einer Geldstrafe belegt.
Und sie wurden "zwangsweise" nach Übersee zurückgeführt.

In diesem Fall schuf er im Auftrag von "Arbeitgeber" des Artikels 73-2 "Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert" einen "gefälschten Unterstützer".
"Gefälschter Anhänger" unterstützte Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Auf diese Weise wurden Ausländern, die "illegale Arbeit" verrichteten, "Strafe für Arbeit" anstelle von "Geldstrafen" verhängt.
Und "Zwangsweise ins Ausland zurückgeschickt".

Eine dritte Partei ist "Ich und" KinGungaku ", die den Chinesen" die Dokumente des Arbeitsvertrags "zur Verfügung stellte.
Dies ist das Verbrechen, auf das der Staatsanwalt in der "Anklageschrift" hinweist.
Der Ankläger sagt, das "Arbeitsvertragsdokument" sei "falsch".
Dies ist jedoch die Bestimmung in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente und Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus".
Tatsachen sind, wie geschrieben, keine Straftaten.
Daher ist "KinGungaku" bei mir unschuldig, auch wenn es so ist, wie der Ankläger sagt.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.
Ich werde weitermachen, bis du verstanden hast.

Ich "appelliere" an die beiden Dinge.
Bitte unterstützen Sie dieses Jahr, damit wir dieses Jahr lösen können.

1. Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsgenehmigung" durch. Aber ein Ausländer ist unschuldig.

Nur Ausländer wurden durch Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden illegaler Arbeit" bestraft.
Auf der anderen Seite verwendet das Immigration Control Act Arbeitgeber, die "Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehungen" illegaler Arbeit im Rahmen des Immigration Act 73-2 sind
(Ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung förderte).

Die japanische Justiz "entsorgt" jedoch nur Ausländer, verfügt jedoch nicht über Arbeitgeber.
Dies verstößt offensichtlich gegen den "Grundsatz der Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal beschäftigt hat, unschuldig ist, ist ein Ausländer, der illegal gearbeitet hat, unschuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, "der andere strafrechtliche Verbrechen unterstützt hat" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat im philippinischen Land, ein Mitarbeiter der philippinischen Botschaft" ist unschuldig.

2 Der "Grund für ein Verbrechen", auf das die Staatsanwaltschaft Anwendung findet "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" lautet wie folgt.
Ausländer führten die in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat durch (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente).
Dagegen gibt es keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Disposition ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" durch "Justizminister" und "obligatorischer Rückzug ins Ausland".
Daher kann "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" nicht angewandt werden.

Die japanische Regierung "zermalmt" Beschwerden.
"Zerquetschen" durch Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Das Material ist unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Bitte "retten" Sie viele "Opfer" mit "Mut und Gerechtigkeit".
Ich fordere die japanische Regierung auf, "die Ehre zurückzugewinnen" und "das Opfer zu entschädigen".

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen ***************

Es ist offen für das Programm unten.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


 (Yasuhiro Nagano)


Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan. Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan.
Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

Dear sirs. A foreigner is innocent if he / she does not dispose of a person
who employed a foreigner of "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
In that case, it is the logic of law to not dispose of foreigners who have been illegally employed.
I am innocent.
Naturally, there is no one who "helped" any "illegal work".

In the incident that occurred in 2010,
police officials and prosecutors filed "more" malicious crimes.
We have not disposed of employers who previously made "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners who carried out "illegal work" have been "fined"
for "illegal labor crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
And they were "forcibly repatriated" overseas.

In this case, he created "fake supporter" on behalf of "Employer" of Article 73-2 "Sin
that promoted illegal employment".
"Fake supporter" is one who supported Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.

By doing this, foreigners who did "illegal labor" were made "punishment
for labor" instead of "fines punishment".
And "Forcibly repatriated outside the country" did.

A third party is "me and" KinGungaku ", which provided" the documents
of employment contract "to Chinese.
This is the crime reasons the prosecutor points out in the "indictment".
The prosecutor says that the "employment contract document" is "false".
However, this is the provision of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revoke the status
of residence by submitting false documents and obtaining status of residence".
As written, even facts are not criminal acts.
Therefore, even if it is as the prosecutor says, "KinGungaku" with me is innocent.

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
Please support this year so that we can solve this year.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone at the media 2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan. Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To everyone at the media


2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan.
Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

Dear sirs. A foreigner is innocent if he / she does not dispose of a person
who employed a foreigner of "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
In that case, it is the logic of law to not dispose of foreigners who have been illegally employed.
I am innocent.
Naturally, there is no one who "helped" any "illegal work".

In the incident that occurred in 2010,
police officials and prosecutors filed "more" malicious crimes.
We have not disposed of employers who previously made "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners who carried out "illegal work" have been "fined"
for "illegal labor crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
And they were "forcibly repatriated" overseas.

In this case, he created "fake supporter" on behalf of "Employer" of Article 73-2 "Sin
that promoted illegal employment".
"Fake supporter" is one who supported Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.

By doing this, foreigners who did "illegal labor" were made "punishment
for labor" instead of "fines punishment".
And "Forcibly repatriated outside the country" did.

A third party is "me and" KinGungaku ", which provided" the documents
of employment contract "to Chinese.
This is the crime reasons the prosecutor points out in the "indictment".
The prosecutor says that the "employment contract document" is "false".
However, this is the provision of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revoke the status
of residence by submitting false documents and obtaining status of residence".
As written, even facts are not criminal acts.
Therefore, even if it is as the prosecutor says, "KinGungaku" with me is innocent.

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
Please support this year so that we can solve this year.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world are being sacrificed.
Please report the facts as a journalist.
"Government under the law" can not be bought by money.

My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To President Trump 2019-01-07: Please help us, it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan. The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


2019-01-07: Please help us,
it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.


Dear Sir, We are saying that "no crime is detected, and there is no crime".
Japan disposes of illegal labor under the following system of laws.
1. We will dispose of "foreigners who have engaged in illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "offenses of illegal employment".
2. "Employer" who has made "illegal labor" to foreigners is dismissed
as "Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act" Promotion of Illegal Employment ".

Japan's law will punish both of them equally because they are based
on the "equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.
The Diet then enacts the Immigration Control Law,
which does not violate the "International Law" (the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights), which prohibits consciously disposing of foreigners.

The actual situation is that the "employer" who made illegal work
for foreigners is not dismissed as "crime promoting illegal employment"
in Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreign nationals who have committed "illegal labor" are disposed of
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor", and are forced to "repatriate" overseas.
This is contrary to international law,
which prohibits discrimination of foreigners "consciously".
It also violates the "Equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
(crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
 (Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

À Emmanuel · Président français Macron 2019-01-07: S'il vous plaît aidez-nous. C'est un crime commis par des policiers, des procureurs et des juges japonais. Le gouvernement japonais "cache" ce crime. S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.

<Courrier public> #MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme!


À Emmanuel · Président français Macron


2019-01-07: S'il vous plaît aidez-nous.
C'est un crime commis par des policiers, des procureurs et des juges japonais.
Le gouvernement japonais "cache" ce crime. S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.


Chers Messieurs. Nous disons "aucun crime n'est deviné, et nous ne commettons pas de crimes".
Le Japon dispose du "travail illégal" dans le système législatif suivant.
1 "Les étrangers ayant effectué un" travail illégal "seront éliminés en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration" Péchés du travail illégal ".
2 "Employeur" ayant fait en sorte qu'un "travail illégal" soit confié à un étranger en vertu de la "Loi sur l'immigration n ° 73, article 2", "infraction visant à promouvoir l'emploi illégal".

La loi japonaise criminalise les deux parties sur un pied d'égalité.
La raison en est due à "l'égalité devant la loi" de la Constitution du Japon.
Et la Diète a interdit l'élimination consciente des étrangers "du droit international"
Je légifère sur le droit de l'immigration afin de ne pas violer le Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques.

Cependant, en réalité, les "employeurs" qui laissent des étrangers travailler illégalement
En vertu de l’article 2 de la loi sur l’immigration 73, il n’est pas qualifié de "crime qui a favorisé l’emploi illégal".
Toutefois, seuls les étrangers qui ont effectué du "travail illégal" sont éliminés en vertu de "l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration" du travail illégal ".
Et nous sommes "rapatriés de force" en dehors du pays.

Ceci est contraire au droit international qui interdit aux étrangers de discriminer "consciemment".
Cela viole également "l'égalité devant la loi" de la Constitution du Japon.

Je continuerai demain.
Je vais continuer jusqu'à ce que vous compreniez.


Je "fais appel" des deux choses.
S'il vous plaît soutenir cette année afin que nous puissions résoudre cette année.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais un étranger est innocent.

L'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péchés du travail illégal" était puni par les étrangers.
D'autre part, la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration utilise des employeurs qui sont des "relations de cause à effet" de travail illégal au sens de la Loi sur l'immigration 73-2
(Un crime qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, le pouvoir judiciaire japonais ne "jette" que des étrangers, mais il ne dispose pas des employeurs.
Cela viole évidemment le "principe d'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international interdisant l’élimination consciente des étrangers.

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement un étranger est innocent, un étranger qui a travaillé illégalement est innocent.
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe personne «qui ait soutenu d’autres crimes de droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate dans le pays philippin, membre du personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La "cause du crime" à laquelle l'accusation applique "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" est la suivante.
Les étrangers ont commis l'acte prévu à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration (acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" contre cela.
La décision est "annulation du statut de résidence" du "ministre de la Justice" et "retrait obligatoire vers des pays étrangers".
Par conséquent, "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" ne peut pas être appliqué.

Le gouvernement japonais "écrase" les plaintes.
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir de l'Etat, c'est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Le matériel est en dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
S'il vous plaît "sauver" beaucoup de "victimes" avec "courage et justice".
Je demande au gouvernement japonais de "récupérer son honneur" et de "dédommager la victime" de la victime.

Cordialement, Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est ouvert au programme ci-dessous.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten 2019-01-07: Bitte helfen Sie uns. Es ist ein Verbrechen von japanischen Polizeibeamten, Staatsanwälten und Richtern. Die japanische Regierung "versteckt" dieses Verbrechen. Bitte hilf mir.

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer!


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten


2019-01-07: Bitte helfen Sie uns.
Es ist ein Verbrechen von japanischen Polizeibeamten, Staatsanwälten und Richtern.
Die japanische Regierung "versteckt" dieses Verbrechen. Bitte hilf mir.


Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Wir sagen "kein Verbrechen wird vermutet und wir begehen keine Verbrechen".
Japan verfügt über "illegale Arbeit" im Rahmen des folgenden Rechtssystems.
1. "Ausländer, die" illegale Arbeit "ausgeführt haben, werden gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" Sünden der illegalen Beschäftigung "entsorgt.
2 "Arbeitgeber", der aufgrund eines "Einwanderungsgesetzes 73, Artikel 2" illegale Beschäftigungsförderungskriminalität "die Ausweisung" illegaler Arbeit "an einen Ausländer bewirkt hat

Das japanische Gesetz kriminalisiert beide Parteien gleichermaßen.
Der Grund dafür liegt in der "Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz" der Verfassung von Japan.
Und der Landtag verbot die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern "Völkerrecht"
Ich gesetzest das Einwanderungsgesetz, um den Internationalen Pakt über bürgerliche und politische Rechte nicht zu verletzen.

In der Realität jedoch "Arbeitgeber", die Ausländer illegal arbeiten lassen
Sie wird gemäß Artikel 2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes 73 nicht als "ein Verbrechen, das die illegale Beschäftigung begünstigt", erlassen.
Nur Ausländer, die "illegale Arbeit" ausgeführt haben, werden jedoch gemäß Artikel 70 "Zuwanderungsgesetz", "illegale Arbeitskriminalität", entsorgt.
Und wir werden außerhalb des Landes "zwangsweise repatriiert".

Dies steht im Widerspruch zum internationalen Recht, das Ausländern verbietet, "bewusst" zu diskriminieren.
Es verstößt auch gegen "Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz" der Verfassung von Japan.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.
Ich werde weitermachen, bis du verstanden hast.


Ich "appelliere" an die beiden Dinge.
Bitte unterstützen Sie dieses Jahr, damit wir dieses Jahr lösen können.

1. Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsgenehmigung" durch. Aber ein Ausländer ist unschuldig.

Nur Ausländer wurden durch Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden illegaler Arbeit" bestraft.
Auf der anderen Seite verwendet das Immigration Control Act Arbeitgeber, die "Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehungen" illegaler Arbeit im Rahmen des Immigration Act 73-2 sind
(Ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung förderte).

Die japanische Justiz "entsorgt" jedoch nur Ausländer, verfügt jedoch nicht über Arbeitgeber.
Dies verstößt offensichtlich gegen den "Grundsatz der Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal beschäftigt hat, unschuldig ist, ist ein Ausländer, der illegal gearbeitet hat, unschuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, "der andere strafrechtliche Verbrechen unterstützt hat" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat im philippinischen Land, ein Mitarbeiter der philippinischen Botschaft" ist unschuldig.

2 Der "Grund für ein Verbrechen", auf das die Staatsanwaltschaft Anwendung findet "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" lautet wie folgt.
Ausländer führten die in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat durch (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente).
Dagegen gibt es keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Disposition ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" durch "Justizminister" und "obligatorischer Rückzug ins Ausland".
Daher kann "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" nicht angewandt werden.

Die japanische Regierung "zermalmt" Beschwerden.
"Zerquetschen" durch Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Das Material ist unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Bitte "retten" Sie viele "Opfer" mit "Mut und Gerechtigkeit".
Ich fordere die japanische Regierung auf, "die Ehre zurückzugewinnen" und "das Opfer zu entschädigen".

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen ***************

Es ist offen für das Programm unten.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


(Yasuhiro Nagano)


Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-07: Please help us, it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan. The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-01-07: Please help us,
it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.


Dear Sir, We are saying that "no crime is detected, and there is no crime".
Japan disposes of illegal labor under the following system of laws.
1. We will dispose of "foreigners who have engaged in illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "offenses of illegal employment".
2. "Employer" who has made "illegal labor" to foreigners is dismissed
as "Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act" Promotion of Illegal Employment ".

Japan's law will punish both of them equally because they are based
on the "equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.
The Diet then enacts the Immigration Control Law,
which does not violate the "International Law" (the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights), which prohibits consciously disposing of foreigners.

The actual situation is that the "employer" who made illegal work
for foreigners is not dismissed as "crime promoting illegal employment"
in Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreign nationals who have committed "illegal labor" are disposed of
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor", and are forced to "repatriate" overseas.
This is contrary to international law,
which prohibits discrimination of foreigners "consciously".
It also violates the "Equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
(crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
 (Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone at the media 2019-01-07: Please help us, it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan. The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To everyone at the media


2019-01-07: Please help us,
it is a crime by police officers, prosecutors and judges in Japan.
The Japanese government is "hiding" this crime.


Dear Sir, We are saying that "no crime is detected, and there is no crime".
Japan disposes of illegal labor under the following system of laws.
1. We will dispose of "foreigners who have engaged in illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "offenses of illegal employment".
2. "Employer" who has made "illegal labor" to foreigners is dismissed
as "Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act" Promotion of Illegal Employment ".

Japan's law will punish both of them equally because they are based
on the "equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.
The Diet then enacts the Immigration Control Law,
which does not violate the "International Law" (the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights), which prohibits consciously disposing of foreigners.

The actual situation is that the "employer" who made illegal work
for foreigners is not dismissed as "crime promoting illegal employment"
in Article 2 of Article 73 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreign nationals who have committed "illegal labor" are disposed of
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor", and are forced to "repatriate" overseas.
This is contrary to international law,
which prohibits discrimination of foreigners "consciously".
It also violates the "Equality under the law" of the Japanese Constitution.

It will continue tomorrow.
I will continue until I understand it.

I "complain" about two things.
We ask for your support to resolve this year.

1. An alien has engaged in "illegal labor" other than "eligibility for residence,"
but the alien is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal" of illegal labor
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposes" only foreign nationals,
but does not dispose of employers.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
And violates international law that prohibits consciously disposing of only foreign nationals.

If an employer illegally hiring an alien is innocent, the alien who worked illegally is innocent.
In this case, no one "supports the other crimes of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Phillipin country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The reason for the crime to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Penal Code
(crime supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
And an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
 (Acquisition of Status of Residence by Submission of False Documents) by a foreigner.
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
The disposition is "withdrawal of residence status" by the Minister of Justice
and "forcible deportation to foreign countries".
Therefore, Article 62 of the Penal Code (crimes to support other crimes) is not applicable.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaints.
"Crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations."

The materials are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Victims are the world's worst.
In "courage and justice," please "rescue" the victim.
I demand the Japanese government to "restore honor"
and "compensate the victims" of the victims.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world are being sacrificed.
Please report the facts as a journalist.
"Government under the law" can not be bought by money.

My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President Trump 2019-01-06】

January 5, 2019

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/POTD-November-29-2018-1.jpg

● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a 　#MeToo victim 　too.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Dear Sirs International people. Year End & New Year January 06, 2019: If the ICC deals only with human rights issues of a specific country, the international community should withdraw from "ICC". And we should make a new "ICC" with "the world police officer America" ​​as the main axis.

Dear Sirs International people.


Year End & New Year January 06, 2019:
If the ICC deals only with human rights issues of a specific country,
the international community should withdraw from "ICC".
And we should make a new "ICC" with "the world police officer America" ​​as the main axis.


Dear Sir, Please "listen" to the summary of the ICC complaint.
In the judicial system of Japan, there is a "retrial request system",
but due to "Error of applicable law" can not be claimed.
However, when "crime such as police officers involved in the incident" is confirmed,
"Request for a retrial" can be done.

Crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges is obvious.
They illegally "arrested / detained" me.
It is "a crime that a special civil servant abused his authority."
Because they prosecuted me for "false reasons" with "purpose to impose penalties",
it is "a crime of false accusations."

So I submitted "Complaint" and "Accusation letter"
to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office and the Metropolitan Police Department,
However, they refuse to submit no matter how many times they submit.
The reason is "Crime is not clear".
The fact that they do not accept for these reasons themselves is a crime.

Since Japan has given prosecutors "monopoly right of indictment",
we can not make a trial as a "criminal case" unless the prosecution accepts "Complaint"
or "Accusation letter".

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I am "claiming" two things in this crime.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal labor other than status of residence". This is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished with Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the Immigration Control Act, the Immigration Control Act provides for employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work to the immigration control under Article 73-2
(A crime that promoted illegal employment).
However, Japan's judiciary "disposses" only foreigners and does not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If "an employer who illegally employed" is innocent,
"a foreigner who worked illegally" is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. "Prosecution letter" "as a reason for crime,
It points out the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no such penalty.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "crime to support other crimes of criminal law" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "support" a lot of victims with your courage and justice.
I am asking the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for victims" of the victims.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President Trump 2019-01-05】

January 4, 2019

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/POTD-November-29-2018-1.jpg

● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a 　#MeToo victim 　too.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Dear Sirs International people. End of Year & New Year's Day January 05, 2019: If the ICC ignores the "Rome Statute or ICC Regulation", the international community should withdraw from the ICC at all.

Dear Sirs International people.



End of Year & New Year's Day January 05, 2019:
If the ICC ignores the "Rome Statute or ICC Regulation",
the international community should withdraw from the ICC at all.


Dear Sir, Please "listen" to the summary of the ICC complaint. In case
In April 2011, I will be "Judgment" of "1 year and a half of labor punishment"
and "fine 1 million yen".
I appealed to the Tokyo High Court but was rejected in October 2011.
I appealed to the "Supreme Court" but was rejected
in February 2012 for the reason that "appeal" due to mistakes
in the applicable law is not subject to deliberation under the Criminal Procedure Act ".
And I was "imprisoned" in March 2012.
And I was released from prison in March 2013 with complete termination of sentence.

As an accomplice, KinGungaku acknowledged the crime,
It was not sentenced to imprisonment but suspended execution,
and was forcibly repatriated to China at the end of October 2010.
By the time of August 2010,
the Chinese four people were fined for a year and a half due to labor charges,
It was forcibly repatriated to China with sentence of "execution suspension".
In case

Article 14 of the Constitution (Equality under the Law) paragraph 1,
"All citizens are equal under the law, politically,
economically or socially by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance In relation,
it will not be discriminated. "

Article 31 of the Constitution, "No person shall be deprived of its life
or freedom unless undertaken by the law, and no other punishment can be imposed.

The "International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan
Article 2 (1) (3),
Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13, Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17,
Article 26,

Judicial officials are clearly in breach of the above and we are innocent.
This is "False charges"

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I've "claimed" two things in this case.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished with Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, Japan's judiciary "disposses" only foreigners and does not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If "an employer who illegally employed" is innocent,
"a foreigner who worked illegally" is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. "Prosecution letter" "as a reason for crime,
It points out the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no criminal penalty against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "crime to support other crimes of criminal law" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "support" a lot of victims with your courage and justice.
I am asking the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for victims" of the victims.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President Trump 2019-01-04】

January 3, 2019

Instead of setting politics aside and putting the safety of our country first, Democrats in Congress have continued to obstruct. In doing so, they have refused to come together with Republicans to pass commonsense legislation that provides adequate funding to secure America's borders and prevent a partial government shut down. As I have said throughout this process, I remain committed to finding an agreemnet that reopens our Government and ensures that our Nation's borders are safe and secure. I urge Congress to rejoin me in Washington to immediatly pass appropriations legislation that properly addresses the critical issues affecting our Nation's security and prosperity. Thank you for your email. Sincerely,Donald Trump

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/POTD-November-29-2018-1.jpg

● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a 　#MeToo victim 　too.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/