To President Trump! June 9, 2026 In modern "security theory," very few experts believe that security can be achieved simply by increasing "military spending." Therefore, I propose the creation of "#G3MA" and "#GPA." The three major military powers form their own "military alliances," which leads to war. I believe that if the "three major military powers" formed a "military alliance" (#G3MA), they would have no opposing enemies...

 To President Trump!




June 9, 2026

The fifth year of the "#UkraineWar." "#Russia," facing financial pressure, is consider-ing massive spending cuts to free up funds for "#military spending." Russia should reduce "#military spending" by creating "#G3MA."


In February of this year, the Russian Finance Minister asked the cabinet to freeze planned spending in other areas to cover the increase in "#war costs." This also ap-plies to the United States.


In modern "#security theory," very few experts believe that security can be achieved simply by increasing "#military spending." That's why I propose the creation of "#G3MA" and "#GPA."


Many countries argue that maintaining a minimum level of defense ("#military spending") to prepare for war is essential, while simultaneously pursuing "#peace diplomacy" to prevent war.


However, "#military spending" continues to increase. The world needs to create a system that prevents war. That organizational structure is the "#Military Alliance (#G3MA)" by the US, Russia, and China.


The three major military powers will go to war because they each form a "#Military Alliance." I believe that if the "#Three Major Military Powers" form a "#Military Alli-ance (#G3MA)," there will be no enemy to oppose them.


Emerging nations such as India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Iran have pursued "#Nuclear Development" based on the belief that possessing nuclear weapons will allow them to defend against American attacks.


Trump used "#Military Force" in "#Venezuela and #Iran." Seeing the "#US-Iran War," many emerging nations seriously desire "#Nuclear Development."


Nostalgic, this is America in its strong era. In 1956, Eisenhower forced the withdraw-al of the "#British and French forces" that invaded the "#Suez Canal" zone.


Wonderful, this is Russia (the Soviet Union) in its strong era. In the 1962 Cuban Mis-sile Crisis, which stemmed from the Soviet Union's construction of missile bases, Khrushchev made concessions to Kennedy.


Trump should surpass Eisenhower and Kennedy by creating a military alliance (G3MA).


The G3MA aims to transform the world's nations into exclusively defensive states, re-ducing each country's military spending to 1/10, or even 1/100, of its current level. This would drive citizens worldwide mad.


The US, Russia, and China increase their military spending every year, but they've reached their limit. Any further increases would only invite a coup d'état. Creating the G3MA is such a powerful policy that it would make Trump, Putin, and Xi Jinping heads of state for life.


Macron should support the creation of the G3MA, and he should create a Global Peace Force (GPA). If successful, Macron will also become "President for Life."


A world without war would mean the collapse of the "#Military-Industrial Economy," so the arms industry, politicians, and the military will vehemently oppose it. There-fore, I propose the creation of a "#War Show."


A "#War Show" would replace wars of killing. Killing (especially #Murder) would be prohibited in a "War Show." Since murder would be penalized, many of the soldiers would be "#AI Soldiers."


#Territorial Disputes, etc., could be approved by the "#G3MA" and held as a "#War Show," with territorial gains at stake. The arms industry, politicians, and the military would likely agree. Go Trump! Go Putin!


Part 1 References

"#Ukraine War" Year 5... "#Russia" Considers Large-Scale Spending Cuts Due to Fi-nancial Pressure

https://x.gd/0u7TQ


I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)



Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".


"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!


First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.


❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/



"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.


In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.


However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.


As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".


As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.


Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.


In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".


In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.


The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".


<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.


"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)


The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".


If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).


Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.


The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:


1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."


2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).


3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."


4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."


5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."


6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."


This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."


This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.


The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."


My argument:


"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.


"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.


Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.


The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."


However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.


The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.


Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.


Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.


Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.


Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.


Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/


For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.


Thank you.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/


If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


No comments:

Post a Comment