To President Trump!
June 12, 2026
Li Ying says Trump's visit to China "began with friendship and ended with awkward-ness." The US and China should create "offset tariffs that balance exports and im-ports" to revitalize trade and strengthen trust.
Instead of calling for a "G2," Trump should form a "military alliance (#G3MA)" with the US, Russia, and China to become security allies. Xi Jinping would likely agree.
However, Trump completely distrusts China. The "G2" talk was a lie. Under these cir-cumstances, a "military alliance (#G3MA)" cannot be formed.
The host country, China, hosted a top-class banquet at the Great Hall of the People for the Trump delegation, preparing exquisite gifts and commemorative medals sym-bolizing Chinese culture. But what a surprise!
Just before boarding their return flight, the group "#discarded" the entry/exit passes, delegation badges, and temporary cell phones they had received from the Chinese side, as well as the phones they had used only during their visit. What unpleasant behavior!
The US National Security Bureau harbors deep-seated distrust regarding spy devices hidden in Chinese "gifts." China, too, is likely concerned about whether the #Boeing aircraft it imports contain spy devices.
China has announced an agreement to purchase 200 US-made #Boeing aircraft for the first time in nine years, and to import at least $17 billion worth of US agricultural products annually until 2028. However...
On his return journey, Trump said the #Boeing purchase could reach up to 750 air-craft, but the actual contract was significantly smaller than the market expectation of 500. That's fine!
While I appreciate Trump's business negotiations, I believe he should propose a strategy for increasing US-China trade through a balanced export-import model. However, I think the skills of the Trump administration's staff are far too weak.
Trump should communicate a clear ideology to the world. Within that framework, he should implement policies that impose high tariffs, the "Trump tariffs," as a sound argument.
Trump should state, "I want to expand free world trade," and that sustainable expan-sion requires the creation of "offset tariffs that balance exports and imports."
The US would impose the "Trump tariffs" only on the net import value (the difference between import value and export value) for each importing company. By creating "offset tariffs that balance exports and imports," tariffs would effectively become zero.
Mr. Trump should say that "companies exporting to the US" can reduce tariffs to vir-tually zero by importing "American products" from the US in parallel with exporting to the US.
For more details on "#BalancedCountervailingTariffs," please see my previous posts. "#BalancedCountervailingTariffs" will save America. "#BalancedCountervailingTariffs" will expand "world trade."
Mr. Trump should create "#BalancedCountervailingTariffs" to change the image of "#TrumpTariffs" and explain that the US is creating "#BalancedCountervailingTariffs" to expand world trade. Go America, Go Trump!
Part 1 References
What does Trump's visit to China, which ended in "friendship followed by awkward-ness," suggest about future US-China relations?
https://x.gd/DxUIp
I will write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment