To President Trump! June 2, 2026 Generation Z, disillusioned with the Biden administration's economic management, initially viewed Trump's grand promise to "build the greatest economy in world history" favorably. However, Gen Z's approval rating has halved from 50% a year ago to 25%, while their disapproval rating has surged from 42% to 67%. Expectations for Trump have turned to disappointment.

 To President Trump!




June 2, 2026

Mr. Yabe explains the reasons why Trump's approval rating halved in one year due to the "departure of Trump supporters," and why Generation Z, which spearheaded Trump's resurgence, abandoned the image of a "great America."


In the United States, Generation Z refers to the generation born between the mid-1990s and the early 2010s. They are "digital natives" who grew up with the internet and smartphones.


Generation Z in American society: They are in their mid-teens to early thirties, make up over 20% of the American population, and are becoming the center of the con-sumer and labor markets. Their annual purchasing power exceeds $150 billion (ap-proximately 22 trillion yen), and they have a significant influence on the consumption behavior of their parents' generation.


Generation Z was disillusioned with the Biden administration's economic manage-ment, so they favorably received Trump's grand promise to "build the greatest econ-omy in world history."


However, approval ratings among Gen Z have halved from 50% a year ago to 25%, while disapproval ratings have surged from 42% to 67%. Expectations for Trump have turned to disappointment.


More than a year after his inauguration, Trump's campaign promises have remained largely unfulfilled, and he is fully focused on responding to the war with Iran.


As a result, inflation continues, housing prices are rising, college tuition is soaring, employment is stagnant, and the uninsured population is increasing, creating a com-plex and difficult economic situation.


I propose imposing tariffs on the net imports (imports minus exports) of importing companies to prevent the surge in import prices caused by tariffs.


I support Trump tariffs as an excellent system for reducing America's trade deficit. However, President Trump lacks ideology.


Regarding the #trade deficit, in order to "continue expanding global trade," "sustain-able balanced trade" like the #SDGs is necessary. Mr. Trump should emphasize the need for the goal of "balancing exports and imports."


#Kissinger supplied #dollars to other countries through US import policies to prevent the decline of the US #dollar. This policy made the #dollar the world's #reserve cur-rency.


Of course, it was foreseeable that "distributing #dollars" would result in a #trade def-icit. I believe what was missing was a policy to reclaim #dollars through the export of US products.


The US government should adopt a policy of "exporting #US products" not only to import #products from other countries, but also to balance the #balance of payments in #dollar settlements.


If "balance countervailing duties" are set at the importing company level, exporters in exporting countries can export their products to the US with "zero tariffs" if they im-port the same amount of products from the US.


This should be called a "#Sustainable Global Trade Expansion Policy." Trump should explain his "#Vision" for promoting US exports and expanding global trade to "#Gen-erationZ." Go, President Trump!


Part 1 References

"Trump's Disengagement" Halves Approval Ratings in One Year: Why Generation Z, the Driving Force Behind His Resurrection, Has Gone Away with "Great America"

https://president.jp/articles/-/113233


I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)



Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".


"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!


First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.


❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/



"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.


In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.


However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.


As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".


As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.


Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.


In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".


In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.


The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".


<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.


"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)


The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".


If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).


Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.


The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:


1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."


2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).


3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."


4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."


5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."


6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."


This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."


This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.


The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."


My argument:


"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.


"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.


Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.


The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."


However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.


The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.


Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.


Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.


Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.


Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.


Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/


For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.


Thank you.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/


If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


Comments