To President Trump, April 26, 2026 The US-China summit was originally scheduled for late March to early April, but was postponed to May 14th and 15th due to the Iran war. Given the uncertainty surrounding the end of the Iran war, it is questionable whether the US-China summit will actually take place. Following the US Supreme Court's ruling that reciprocal tariffs are unconstitutional, the Trump administration imposed a uniform 10% tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act, later raising it to 15%. The Xi Jinping administration is expected to strongly oppose the introduction of new tariff measures against China.

To President Trump

April 26, 2026

The US-China summit was originally scheduled for late March to early April, but was postponed to May 14th and 15th due to the Iran war. Given the uncer-tainty surrounding the end of the Iran war, it is questionable whether the US-China summit will actually take place.

Following the US Supreme Court's ruling that reciprocal tariffs are unconstitu-tional, the Trump administration imposed a uniform 10% tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act, later raising it to 15%. The Xi Jinping administration is expected to strongly oppose the introduction of new tariff measures against China.

While I support tariff measures under Section 122 of the Trade Act, the Trump administration should create a complementary tariff system that benefits both countries and businesses.

I propose the creation of a balanced countervailing duty system. Under this system, US importers are encouraged to promote exports alongside imports, and the balanced export/import portion is exempt from tariffs, with tariffs on-ly levied on net imports.

If exports and imports are balanced, trade will increase without limit. I pro-pose a balanced countervailing duty system that eliminates tariffs on balanced export/import transactions.

The US prioritizes efficiency in trade. This is the cause of the US trade deficit. The US should eliminate its trade deficit not through tariffs, but through ex-port promotion.

US importers should export US products worth the same amount as their im-ports. Tariffs should be levied on the difference between exports and imports, i.e., each importer's trade deficit.

For example, Walmart should strive to have Chinese exporters import US products worth the same amount as its own imports.

If the "#export and import values" are equal, tariffs will be zero. If tariffs are imposed only on the US trade deficit, it is possible to reduce tariffs to zero and minimize the trade deficit through effort.

"#Balanced countervailing duties" will benefit both countries and "#global trade will continue to expand." "#Balanced countervailing duties" will bring significant benefits to companies that make the effort.

For example, "#Nissan and GM" form a sales partnership. Nissan exports Nis-san cars to the US on a dedicated ship, and on the return trip, loads GM Cadil-lacs and exports them to Japan.

Thanks to "#Balanced countervailing duties," the more "#Nissan" imports "#GM cars," the more "#Nissan" can "#export Nissan cars to the US duty-free." Both Nissan and GM will reap enormous profits.

Chinese exporters, thanks to "#Balanced countervailing duties," will be able to export Chinese products to the US duty-free as their imports of US products increase. "#American consumers will be delighted."

President Trump should explain the "#tariff increases" and the creation of "#balanced countervailing duties" to President Xi Jinping during their meeting. President Xi Jinping would be pleased. "#trade between the two countries" would be balanced, and "#trade volume would increase."

The EU and other countries around the world should also demand the creation of "#balanced countervailing duties" from the US as a condition for raising US tariffs. This would eliminate the US trade deficit and expand global trade. Go, President Trump!

Part 1 References

Iran War Casts Shadow on US-China Summit, and Impact on Ukraine Situation

https://www.recordchina.co.jp/b974649-s518-c10-d1518.html

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2: Immigration Law Violation Cases, Sunday Edition

Chapter 7: When I was released from prison after completing my sentence, I read the newspaper and found out that a similar incident had occurred at the Philippine Embassy.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

Philippine diplomats, embassy staff, and Filipino drivers have suffered the same damage as me.

I have also filed a criminal accusation against this case.

I and the Chinese in the 2010 immigration law violation case, and the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomats in 2013, were punished for the same reason.

I have submitted my complaint and the complaints of the Chinese and Filipinos to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, and the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office.

However, all of them were rejected. If the prosecutor accepts and rejects the case, I can request the Prosecutor's Review Board to prosecute, but I have no way to oppose the rejection.

I also appealed to political parties and Diet members. But they were all ignored.

A city council member accompanied me to the Democratic Party's legal advisor. However, the advisor's answer was that if the "principal offense" is found guilty, then the "crime of aiding and abetting" is established. Is he really a lawyer?

The Democratic Party's legal advisor says that all those who graduated from the Legal Training and Research Institute have the same answer. This is proof that Japan is not "governed under the law".

I asked the Japan Bar Association for support. They said that the JFBA does not have the "power" to solve the problem. Japan's "judicial system" is crazy.

I have "emailed" "political parties and Diet members", as well as "the Prime Minister's Office and the Human Rights Bureau" on "Facebook and (X)", but they are still ignoring me.

This case is an arbitrary misapplication of the law by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. (It is an illegal act).

The charges are "Abuse of the authority of a special public official" and "Crimes of False Complaints".

In my "personal opinion," the prosecutors "concealed" the "criminal complaint" and "criminal accusation" by their "authority." Therefore, the "statute of limitations" has been suspended.

"Chapter 8." This case is "legally" an "error in the application of law."

"Errors in the application of law" are not subject to "requests for retrial" under the "Criminal Procedure Law."

However, if the "crime of the inspectors and police officers involved in the case" is "proven," a request for retrial can be made.

1. The charge against the "special public officials" in this case is "abuse of the authority of special public officials."

They "arrested" us even though there was "no suspicion of a crime." And they even "detained" us. (There is a precedent for grand jury decisions.)

2. And it is "the crime of false accusation." It is a fact that they "indicted" us and even found us guilty in a "trial" in order to make us criminals.

Requests for retrial can be made by us or by the prosecutors.

I believe that the prosecution should admit guilt and make a request for a retrial.

I will not give up. It has been 15 years since the incident.

The only country that can resolve this case is the United States.

When Trump was the former president, he promised me.

He replied with a signed letter saying, "I will resolve this in a way that satisfies you."

I hope that this time he will keep his promise.

President Trump, let's work together to "revive the Rust Belt" and create a "special zone on the Mexican border."

And let's cross the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean in two hours with the "American Linear Canal Railway," a freight train dedicated to containers that will replenish the Panama Canal.

People around the world, please support us.

Part 3. Construction of a special zone. It's a new business model.

No2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

No1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Part 4. "US-Russia-China" three-nation military alliance and war show

No2: https://urc-military.seesaa.net/

No1: https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

Part 5. Ukraine War

No2: https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/

No1: https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

Part 6. Japan's infamous judicial system and human rights violations

No2: https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/

No1: https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

Part 7. Development of virus detectors for coronavirus and other viruses

https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

Part 8. North Korea's abduction and missile issues

https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

Part 9. One Coin Union & Hydrogen Vehicle Promotion

https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

Part 10. Nagano Opinion, Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant: CO2 Free & SDGs

https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano