To President Trump! April 28, 2026 Regarding the "#IranWar," President Trump's statements remain inconsistent. One moment he says "Iran will agree to everything," and the next, two days later, he says "we'll blow up the whole country." Negotiation schedules have also been changed numerous times. President Trump should pursue "#AmericaFirst" under the G3MA. President Trump should form a "#MilitaryAlliance (#G3MA)" with Russia and China, and rebuild the American economy while making the world a "#NationFocusedOnlyOnSelfDefense."

To President Trump!

April 28, 2026

Regarding the "#IranWar," President Trump's statements remain inconsistent. He said "Iran will agree to everything," and then two days later, he said "we'll blow up the whole country." Negotiation schedules have also been changed numerous times. President Trump should pursue "#AmericaFirst" under the G3MA.

President Trump should form a "#MilitaryAlliance (#G3MA)" with Russia and China, and rebuild the American economy while making the world a "nation focused solely on self-defense."

The "#MilitaryAlliance (#G3MA)" could significantly reduce "#MilitarySpending," but it likely won't be ready in time for the "#MidtermElections." Because the American people are dis-appointed with the Trump administration's "#EconomicPolicies," a "#BalancedCountervail-ingTariff" should be created to "mitigate" the pain caused by the "#TrumpTariffs."

I appreciate the Trump Tariffs as a policy to eliminate America's "#TradeDeficit." However, there is a lack of policies to mitigate the "aftermath" of the high tariff policy. A "balanced countervailing duty" should be established.

A "balanced countervailing duty" is a policy to mitigate the high tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. It's a system that imposes high tariffs, similar to the Trump tariffs, on the net import value (import value minus export value) per importer.

A "balanced countervailing duty" encourages importers to promote the export of US prod-ucts alongside their imports. This allows consumers to purchase imported goods "duty-free" through the export efforts of importers.

For example, Walmart imports clothing and daily necessities from China. At the same time, Walmart "sells" (exports) US products to Chinese exporters.

Walmart's tariffs are levied based on the "net import value" ("(import value) - (export val-ue)") over a certain period. This is more effective the higher the tariff rate.

If Walmart focuses on exports, the tariffs will effectively become zero. Consumers are more likely to purchase goods from retailers with "zero" tariffs, which will bring about changes in the American retail industry.

Chinese exporters will strengthen their export competitiveness against the US by importing American products and profit from selling American products within China.

The "balanced countervailing duty" system will not only eliminate the US "trade deficit" but also expand global trade. This effect is greater the higher the tariff rate.

The Trump administration should urgently implement the "balanced countervailing duty" policy in conjunction with the unpopular "Trump tariffs" to eliminate the US "trade deficit."

The Trump administration has learned that tariffs alone cannot eliminate the "trade deficit." By using "balanced countervailing duties" and "Trump tariffs" together, the US can become an export-oriented nation.

"Export promotion" through "balanced countervailing duties" means an increase in the production of US products. This will lead to "job creation," but given the current high manufacturing costs in the US, this is unrealistic.

The US should reduce manufacturing costs and enhance export competitiveness by em-ploying undocumented immigrants. To achieve this, establishing a "#Special Zone" is an urgent task. Go, Trump!

Part 1 References

Trump's statements continue to waver: "Iran agrees to everything," then two days later, "We'll blow up the whole country"... Negotiation schedule also changes repeatedly

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20260422-GYT1T00165/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano