To President Trump
At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor"
and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-05-27:Dear Sirs, Prime Minister Abe no longer says "Government under the law".
He can not say that. Japan does not do "rule under the law".
He has no "qualification" to say about human rights in China and North Korea.
Part 1. This week will be explained in the "judgment document".
"Chinese" did "illegal work outside the qualification"
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
On the other hand, the third party is punished by "Criminal Law Article 60"
and "Article 62" Sin for supporting (other) other crimes "".
The reason for the crime is the reason why the third party provided "support"
for the Immigration Control Act 22-4 (4) "Cancellation of residence status".
The logic of law is crazy.
It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Again, the "judgment document" will be written in Japanese in order to be accurately stated.
Everybody, please translate correctly.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
被告人を懲役1年6月及び罰金100万円に処する。
未決勾留日数中170日をその懲役刑に算入する。
その罰金を完納することができないときは,金5000円を1日に換算した期間、
被告人を労役場に留置する。
訴訟費用中,通訳人「高橋世蘭」及び証人「森徳正純」に支給した分は被告人の負担とする。
(罪となるべき事実)
被告人は,分離前相被告人ジンジュンシュエ(金軍学,以下「ジン」という。)と共謀の上,
先週の「起訴状」と同じです・・・・・・・・・・・
第1 中華人民共和国の国籍を有する外国人であるヂャンシューホイ(張述輝,以
Decision
Main sentence
Same as last week's 'bill of indictment'
End of sentence,
被告人には前科前歴はないことなど被告人のために酌むべき事情を考慮しても,
被告人に対しては:実刑をもつて臨むほかない。よって,主文のとおり判決する。
(求刑)懲役1年6月,罰金100万円
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Japan's trial "decides" as required by the prosecutors.
This is a fact.
Moreover, it is the contents that faked "the law to apply".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Email
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor"
and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-05-27:Dear Sirs, Prime Minister Abe no longer says "Government under the law".
He can not say that. Japan does not do "rule under the law".
He has no "qualification" to say about human rights in China and North Korea.
Part 1. This week will be explained in the "judgment document".
"Chinese" did "illegal work outside the qualification"
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
On the other hand, the third party is punished by "Criminal Law Article 60"
and "Article 62" Sin for supporting (other) other crimes "".
The reason for the crime is the reason why the third party provided "support"
for the Immigration Control Act 22-4 (4) "Cancellation of residence status".
The logic of law is crazy.
It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Again, the "judgment document" will be written in Japanese in order to be accurately stated.
Everybody, please translate correctly.
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
被告人を懲役1年6月及び罰金100万円に処する。
未決勾留日数中170日をその懲役刑に算入する。
その罰金を完納することができないときは,金5000円を1日に換算した期間、
被告人を労役場に留置する。
訴訟費用中,通訳人「高橋世蘭」及び証人「森徳正純」に支給した分は被告人の負担とする。
(罪となるべき事実)
被告人は,分離前相被告人ジンジュンシュエ(金軍学,以下「ジン」という。)と共謀の上,
先週の「起訴状」と同じです・・・・・・・・・・・
第1 中華人民共和国の国籍を有する外国人であるヂャンシューホイ(張述輝,以
Decision
Main sentence
Same as last week's 'bill of indictment'
End of sentence,
被告人には前科前歴はないことなど被告人のために酌むべき事情を考慮しても,
被告人に対しては:実刑をもつて臨むほかない。よって,主文のとおり判決する。
(求刑)懲役1年6月,罰金100万円
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・
Japan's trial "decides" as required by the prosecutors.
This is a fact.
Moreover, it is the contents that faked "the law to apply".
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
