To President Trump – October 16, 2026 [A Crisis on the Eve of a Second "Pearl Harbor" by the Japanese Government] Prime Minister Takaichi’s "double-tongued" diplomacy—characterized by her clamoring that Japan remains subject to the "enemy state" clauses—is intensifying. Americans have become like canaries that have forgotten the rallying cry, "Remember Pearl Harbor." Unless the U.S. regains its patriotism, Japan will continue its attacks, weaponizing the International Criminal Court (ICC) to target the United States. (Yasuhiro Nagano) [The Clash Between International Politics and Law Regarding ICC Arrest Warrants] The issue surrounding ICC arrest warrants represents a collision between the privileges and immunities enshrined in Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and the jurisdictional scope of the Rome Statute. As nations selectively invoke these provisions to suit their own political agendas, we are witnessing the collapse of the "rule of law"—a point I have long highlighted—and the emergence of arbitrary legal application at the level of international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump!

2026-10-16 [Proposal for Today] The origin of President Trump is right here! In March 2020, the ICC's decision to reverse its stance and investigate suspicions of war crimes by U.S. soldiers in the Afghanistan war enraged the U.S. This judicial runaway ignoring jurisdiction outside non-member states is completely consistent with the structure of arbitrary legal interpretation continuing from my immigration law wrong-ful conviction case. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【The Crisis on the Eve of the Japanese Government's "Second Pearl Harbor"】Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's double-tongued diplomacy is intensifying as she shouts that Japan is currently under the enemy state clauses. Many Americans are like canaries who have forgotten "Remember the Pearl Harbor," and unless they re-gain patriotism, Japan's attacks utilizing the ICC will continue. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2【Systematic Organization of the Flow of International Legal Structures】Before re-ceiving the next attack, let us systematically organize the ICC arrest warrants, U.S. administration responses, Tomoko Akane's role, Vienna Convention Article 34, and Macron's position as a single international legal structure. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3【Collision Between International Politics and Law Surrounding ICC Warrants】The ICC arrest warrant issue is a collision between the privilege and immunity under Vi-enna Convention Article 34 and Rome Statute jurisdiction. As countries use this to suit political convenience, the collapse of the rule of law and arbitrary application that I point out are occurring at the international judicial level. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【ICC Warrant Flow and Issuance for Putin】1. The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Putin in March 2023, but Russia is a non-member, making its practical effectiveness almost zero. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5【U.S. Military Incident and Severe U.S. Sanctions】2. When the ICC attempted to investigate U.S. war crime suspicions in the Afghanistan war, non-member U.S. completely denied jurisdiction, and the Trump administration imposed sanctions such as entry bans and asset freezes on the ICC prosecutor. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【Israeli Prime Minister Warrant and Political Attitude Shifts】3. When the ICC is-sued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu during the Gaza war, the U.S. fully supported Israel and intensified sanctions. This political dominance where attitudes shift 180 degrees by administration is pointed out. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7【Political Influence of U.S. Administration Changes on the Judiciary】The structure where the Trump administration sanctions the ICC, the Biden administration shows cooperation, and Trump sanctions again is political rule where the judiciary is subject to political influence. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8【Tomoko Akane's Role and Export of Japanese Prosecutor Culture】4. Akane origi-nates from the Japanese prosecutor corps and is structurally involved in each case. The reason the U.S. sanctioned Akane is jurisdiction abuse, and the arbitrary illegal interpretation by prosecutors in my case is being reproduced in international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Vienna Convention Article 34 and Immunities of International Organizations】5. Vienna Convention Article 34 stipulates privileges and immunities for international organization officials, but the U.S. sanctioned Akane for exercising authority over non-member states. Unless Article 34 is strictly recognized, the weight of interna-tional treaties collapses. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【Macron's Position and Ambiguity Without Touching the Core】6. While Macron protects ICC independence and respects warrants, he avoids touching the core issue of exercising jurisdiction over non-member states. This stems from France's calcula-tion not to confront the U.S. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【My Internationally Correct Claims and Common Structures】7. My immigration case, the Ghosn case, and the Akane case share common structures: jurisdiction ex-pansion, independent legal interpretation, political intervention, punishment of dis-senters, and disregard for international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【The Importance of My Wrongful Conviction Case as the Ultimate Origin】8. My immigration law wrongful conviction case is the earliest concrete example and abso-lute origin of this entire chain. Unless my case is resolved, the ICC case will not end. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13【Limits of Japanese Legal Consciousness and Responsibility of the International Community】Japan is a country where people fail to understand international law or the constitution, making my case a major global problem beyond a personal matter. Early resolution by the international community is indispensable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14【Execution of Structural Reforms to Restore International Trust】Leaving the structural contradictions of Japan's judicial system unaddressed will shatter trust in international legal order. We demand drastic reforms to relieve global victims and re-alize the true rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15【Solidarity to Establish the True Rule of Law】To prevent arbitrary legal interpre-tation and detention by state power, we strongly urge the international community to unite, correct the abnormalities of Japan's judicial culture, and establish the true rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

[Afgan war crimes investigation: ICC reverses decision, U.S. reacts]

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/51764050

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano