Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-05-17:Chers Messieurs, Pour que les États-Unis puissent revenir à l'Accord de Paris, il convient de répondre à la question du président Trump! Où va l'argent que le "don" va? ". Afin de prévenir les dommages sur la santé, chaque pays impose des “droits carbone” aux produits importés.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-05-17:Chers Messieurs, Pour que les États-Unis puissent revenir à l'Accord de Paris, il convient de répondre à la question du président Trump!
Où va l'argent que le "don" va? ".
Afin de prévenir les dommages sur la santé, chaque pays impose des “droits carbone” aux produits importés.
Je pense que la priorité devrait être donnée à la promotion de l’abolition de la «production d’énergie au charbon».


Partie 1 Le président Trump a déclaré le 1er juin 2017.
«Le sommet de la Division climat des Nations Unies contribue au fonds 100 milliards de dollars par an
J'ai dit "beaucoup d'argent" plusieurs fois.
"100 milliards de dollars sont l'économie américaine, l'industrie, les travailleurs,
Cela a un impact négatif majeur sur les intérêts de la population et des contribuables.
En outre, sur la base des "résultats de l'enquête" de "American Home Economics Research Association",
L’Accord de Paris coûtera US $ 3 000 milliards en produit intérieur brut (PIB) d’ici 2040.
Et cela montre "une vue" de "perte" d'emploi de 6,5 millions de personnes.

Également en 2015, le directeur exécutif du Fonds vert pour le climat
Plusieurs fois après 2020, le fonds estimé augmentera pour nécessiter 450 milliards de dollars par an.
Cependant, personne ne sait même où va l'argent.
Et le président Donald Trump
Personne ne peut répondre à la question "Où est l'argent que les États-Unis ont commencé à aller?"
Trump a critiqué le fonds pour son "utilisation abusive" en raison de ses "mesures de réchauffement".
L'argent effectivement versé au fonds de lutte contre le réchauffement climatique est financé
Dans les pays en développement tels que les petites îles des Caraïbes, les océans Pacifique et Indien et l’Afrique
Il est utilisé comme fonds de prise de contrôle ou de lutte contre la corruption à des fins politiques telles que les dictateurs et les dirigeants. (Ci-dessus, sur Wikipedia).


La "destination des contributions" du Fonds pour le réchauffement de la planète est suspecte. C'est fou.

Je dis.
La contribution de 450 milliards de dollars devrait être supportée par le pourcentage d'émissions de CO2 de chaque pays.
Dans la proportion de 2015, la Chine est de 28,4%. États-Unis 15,4%, Inde 6,4%, Russie 4,8%,
Le Japon est 3,5%.
La part des contributions s'élève à 127,8 milliards de dollars en Chine, à 69,3 milliards de dollars aux États-Unis et à 28,8 milliards de dollars en Inde.
La Russie est 21,6 milliards de dollars. Le Japon représente 15,8 milliards de dollars.

Le coût de la défense du Japon pour l'exercice 2019 s'élève à 5 257,4 milliards de yens (environ 47,8 milliards de dollars).
Le fardeau japonais de 15,8 milliards de dollars ne peut être économisé qu'en réduisant les coûts de la défense.
Le Fonds pour le réchauffement climatique n'est pas réaliste.

Les centrales au charbon émettent non seulement du CO2, mais également des particules, du SO2, des NOx et du mercure,
Cela nuit à la santé de nombreuses personnes dans le monde.
L'abolition totale de la production d'électricité au charbon, l'Allemagne fournissant près de 40% de son électricité en 2038
Le Royaume-Uni prévoit également d'éliminer complètement le charbon avant 2025.
L’arrière-plan du mouvement de dégroupage de l’énergie thermique dans le monde est un facteur autre que la décarbonisation.

Je veux prévenir les dommages de santé
Chaque pays impose un "droit carbone" sur les produits importés
Je pense que la priorité devrait être donnée aux pays qui abolissent la "production d'électricité au charbon" de leur plein gré.
Les règles de taxation du carbone devraient être discutées rapidement dans les G7 et G20.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme.
Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si l'employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent",
Les étrangers qui travaillent illégalement sont également coupables.
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister 2019-05-17:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Damit die Vereinigten Staaten zum Pariser Abkommen zurückkehren können, sollte die Frage von Präsident Trump beantwortet werden! Wohin geht das Geld der "Spende"? ". Um Gesundheitsschäden zu vermeiden, erhebt jedes Land „CO2-Abgaben“ auf importierte Produkte.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister


2019-05-17:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Damit die Vereinigten Staaten zum Pariser Abkommen zurückkehren können, sollte die Frage von Präsident Trump beantwortet werden!
Wohin geht das Geld der "Spende"? ".
Um Gesundheitsschäden zu vermeiden, erhebt jedes Land „CO2-Abgaben“ auf importierte Produkte.
Ich denke, dass der Förderung der Abschaffung der „Kohlekraftgewinnung“ Priorität eingeräumt werden sollte.


Teil 1 Präsident Trump sagte am 1. Juni 2017.
„Die Spitze der UN-Klimadivision hat jährlich 100 Milliarden US-Dollar zum Fonds beigetragen
Ich sagte oft "viel Geld".
"100 Milliarden Dollar sind die US-Wirtschaft, die Industrie, die Arbeiter,
Dies hat erhebliche negative Auswirkungen auf die Interessen der Bürger und der Steuerzahler.
Basierend auf den "Umfrageergebnissen" der "American Home Economics Research Association",
Das "Pariser Abkommen" wird bis 2040 3 Billionen US-Dollar des Bruttoinlandsprodukts (BIP) kosten.
Und es zeigt "eine Perspektive", um die Beschäftigung von 6,5 Millionen Menschen zu "verlieren".

Ebenfalls 2015 wurde der Exekutivdirektor des Green Climate Fund
Nach 2020 wird der geschätzte Fonds häufig auf 450 Mrd. USD jährlich ansteigen.
Niemand weiß jedoch, wo das Geld hingeht.
Und, Präsident Donald Trump
Es gibt niemanden, der die Frage beantworten kann: "Wo ist das Geld, mit dem die USA angefangen haben?"
Trump hat den Fonds wegen seiner "Erwärmungsmaßnahmen" als "Missbrauch" kritisiert.
Das Geld, das tatsächlich zur Erderwärmung beigetragen hat, wird unterstützt
In Entwicklungsländern wie den kleinen Inseln im karibischen, pazifischen und indischen Ozean sowie in Afrika
Es wird als Übernahme- oder Bestechungsfonds für politische Zwecke wie Diktatoren und Herrscher eingesetzt. (Oben von Wikipedia).


Das "Beitragsziel" des Global Warming Fund ist verdächtig. Es ist verrückt.

Sage ich
Der Beitrag von 450 Milliarden US-Dollar sollte vom prozentualen Anteil der CO2-Emissionen jedes Landes getragen werden.
In 2015 beträgt China 28,4%. Die Vereinigten Staaten 15,4%, Indien 6,4%, Russland 4,8%,
Japan beträgt 3,5%.
Der Anteil der Beiträge beträgt in China 127,8 Mrd. USD, in den USA 69,3 Mrd. USD und in Indien 28,8 Mrd. USD.
Russland hat 21,6 Milliarden Dollar. Japan hat 15,8 Milliarden Dollar.

Japans Verteidigungskosten belaufen sich im Geschäftsjahr 2019 auf 5.257,4 Milliarden Yen (ungefähr 47,8 Milliarden USD).
Die japanische Last von 15,8 Milliarden US-Dollar kann nur durch die Senkung der Verteidigungskosten eingespart werden.
Der Global Warming Fund ist nicht realistisch.

Kohlekraftwerke emittieren nicht nur CO2, sondern auch Partikel, SO2, NOx und Quecksilber.
Es schadet der Gesundheit vieler Menschen auf der ganzen Welt.
Die vollständige Abschaffung der Kohlekraftwerke, bei denen Deutschland bis 2038 fast 40% des deutschen Stroms liefert,
Das Vereinigte Königreich plant, Kohlekraftstoffe bis 2025 vollständig zu beseitigen.
Der Hintergrund der weltumspannenden Bewegung der Entkohlungskraft ist ein anderer Faktor als die Entkohlung.

Ich möchte Gesundheitsschäden vermeiden
Jedes Land erhebt eine "CO2-Abgabe" auf importierte Produkte
Ich denke, dass den Ländern Priorität eingeräumt werden sollte, die die "Kohlekraftgewinnung" freiwillig abschaffen.
Die CO2-Besteuerungsregeln sollten in den G7 und G20 unverzüglich erörtert werden.

Teil 2 Ich verklage zwei Dinge.
Dies ist ein "internationaler" Menschenrechtsmissbrauch der japanischen Regierung.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden können.
Wenn die Welt die "Herrschaft unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch den Terrorismus zu regeln.
Aber es ist verrückt.

1 Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsqualifikation" aus. Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden für das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz (Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen") bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz hingegen gilt für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben (Artikel 73-2).
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das rechtswidrige Arbeit fördert).

Allerdings hat die japanische Justiz nur Ausländer "bestraft", "Arbeitgeber" jedoch nicht "bestraft".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Gleichheitsregel nach dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das "willkürlich" nur Ausländer "bestraft".

Wenn der Arbeitgeber, der illegal einen Ausländer engagiert, "unschuldig" ist
Ausländer, die illegal gearbeitet haben, sind ebenfalls schuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es keinen, der "gegen andere Verbrechen im Strafrecht" gestützt wurde, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen, und ein philippinischer Botschaftsvertreter" sind nicht schuldig.

2 Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden", um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen.
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer unterliegen der Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebenen Maßnahme.
Dafür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Verfügungen lauten: "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewandt werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigration Control Act 22-4-4, auf die die "Anklageschrift" verweist, haben keinen kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigration Control Act 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zermalmt "Staatsanwaltschaft".
"Zerquetschen" durch die Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die deutsche Regierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Danke als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall des Verstoßes gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte die "Berufung" an den "Internationalen Strafgerichtshof".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Name Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-05-17:President Trump said on June 1, 2017. "The top of the UN's climate sector has repeatedly called the $ 100 billion funded every year a" very small amount of money ". "The $ 100 billion hurts the U.S. economy, industry, workers, the people and the taxpayer's interests," he added.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-05-17:Dear Sirs, In order for the United States to return to the Paris Agreement,
President Trump's question should be answered!
Where does the money that "donation" goes to? ".
In order to prevent health damage, each country imposes “carbon duties” on imported products.
I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of “coal power generation”.


Part 1. President Trump said on June 1, 2017.
"The top of the UN's climate sector has repeatedly called
the $ 100 billion funded every year a" very small amount of money ".
"The $ 100 billion hurts the U.S. economy, industry, workers,
the people and the taxpayer's interests," he added.
In addition, based on the "survey results" of "American Home Economics Research Association",
The “Paris Agreement” will cost US $ 3 trillion in gross domestic product (GDP) by 2040.
And it shows "a view" to "loss" employment of 6.5 million people.

Also in 2015, the Executive Director of the Green Climate Fund
Many times after 2020, the estimated fund will increase to require $ 450 billion annually.
However, no one knows even where the money goes.
And, President Donald Trump
There is no one who can answer the question, "Where is the money that the US started to go?"
Trump has criticized the fund for being "misuse" because of its "warming measures."
The money actually contributed to the global warming fund is supported
In developing countries such as the small islands of the Caribbean,
Pacific and Indian Oceans and Africa
It is used as a takeover or bribery fund for political purposes such as dictators and rulers.
(Above, from Wikipedia).


The "contribution destination" of the Global Warming Fund is suspicious. It's crazy.

I say.
The contribution of $ 450 billion should be borne
by the percentage of CO2 emissions of each country.
In the proportion of 2015, China is 28.4%. The United States 15.4%, India 6.4%, Russia 4.8%,
Japan is 3.5%.
The share of contributions is $ 127.8 billion in China, $ 69.3 billion in the US,
and $ 28.8 billion in India.
Russia is $ 21.6 billion. Japan is $ 15.8 billion.

Japan's defense cost in fiscal 2019 is ¥ 5,257.4 billion (approximately $ 47.8 billion).
The Japanese burden of $ 15.8 billion can only be saved by cutting off defense costs.
The Global Warming Fund is not realistic.

Coal-fired power plants emit not only CO2, but also particulate matter, SO2, NOx and mercury,
It hurts the health of many people around the world.
The total abolition of coal-fired power generation,
in which Germany supplies nearly 40% of Germany's electricity by 2038,
The United Kingdom is also planning to completely eliminate coal fuel by 2025.
The background of the movement of de-coaling power
that spreads all over the world is a factor other than de-carbonisation.

I want to prevent health damage
Each country imposes a "carbon duty" on imported products
I think that priority should be given to countries abolishing "coal power generation" voluntarily.
The carbon taxation rules should be discussed promptly in the G7 and G20.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
The Immigration Control Act, on the other hand,
applies to employers who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor under Article 73-2.
I am punished for (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If the employer who illegally hires a foreigner is "innocent,"
Foreigners who are illegally worked are also guilty.
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. The prosecutor's office said, “Support for Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Act”
For Article 70 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
It is "crazy" to "apply" "sin to support other crimes".
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners are immigration control Article 22-4-4
Conducted the action prescribed in
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-05-17:Dear Sirs, In order for the United States to return to the Paris Agreement, President Trump's question should be answered! Where does the money that "donation" goes to? ". In order to prevent health damage, each country imposes “carbon duties” on imported products. I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of “coal power generation”.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-05-17:Dear Sirs, In order for the United States to return to the Paris Agreement,
President Trump's question should be answered!
Where does the money that "donation" goes to? ".
In order to prevent health damage, each country imposes “carbon duties” on imported products.
I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of “coal power generation”.


Part 1. President Trump said on June 1, 2017.
"The top of the UN's climate sector has repeatedly called
the $ 100 billion funded every year a" very small amount of money ".
"The $ 100 billion hurts the U.S. economy, industry, workers,
the people and the taxpayer's interests," he added.
In addition, based on the "survey results" of "American Home Economics Research Association",
The “Paris Agreement” will cost US $ 3 trillion in gross domestic product (GDP) by 2040.
And it shows "a view" to "loss" employment of 6.5 million people.

Also in 2015, the Executive Director of the Green Climate Fund
Many times after 2020, the estimated fund will increase to require $ 450 billion annually.
However, no one knows even where the money goes.
And, President Donald Trump
There is no one who can answer the question, "Where is the money that the US started to go?"
Trump has criticized the fund for being "misuse" because of its "warming measures."
The money actually contributed to the global warming fund is supported
In developing countries such as the small islands of the Caribbean,
Pacific and Indian Oceans and Africa
It is used as a takeover or bribery fund for political purposes such as dictators and rulers.
(Above, from Wikipedia).


The "contribution destination" of the Global Warming Fund is suspicious. It's crazy.

I say.
The contribution of $ 450 billion should be borne
by the percentage of CO2 emissions of each country.
In the proportion of 2015, China is 28.4%. The United States 15.4%, India 6.4%, Russia 4.8%,
Japan is 3.5%.
The share of contributions is $ 127.8 billion in China, $ 69.3 billion in the US,
and $ 28.8 billion in India.
Russia is $ 21.6 billion. Japan is $ 15.8 billion.

Japan's defense cost in fiscal 2019 is ¥ 5,257.4 billion (approximately $ 47.8 billion).
The Japanese burden of $ 15.8 billion can only be saved by cutting off defense costs.
The Global Warming Fund is not realistic.

Coal-fired power plants emit not only CO2, but also particulate matter, SO2, NOx and mercury,
It hurts the health of many people around the world.
The total abolition of coal-fired power generation,
in which Germany supplies nearly 40% of Germany's electricity by 2038,
The United Kingdom is also planning to completely eliminate coal fuel by 2025.
The background of the movement of de-coaling power
that spreads all over the world is a factor other than de-carbonisation.

I want to prevent health damage
Each country imposes a "carbon duty" on imported products
I think that priority should be given to countries abolishing "coal power generation" voluntarily.
The carbon taxation rules should be discussed promptly in the G7 and G20.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
The Immigration Control Act, on the other hand,
applies to employers who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor under Article 73-2.
I am punished for (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If the employer who illegally hires a foreigner is "innocent,"
Foreigners who are illegally worked are also guilty.
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. The prosecutor's office said, “Support for Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Act”
For Article 70 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
It is "crazy" to "apply" "sin to support other crimes".
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners are immigration control Article 22-4-4
Conducted the action prescribed in
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-05-16:The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government. The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners. There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic". Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-05-16:Dear Sirs, I think the Democratic Party's "Green New Deal Bill" is wonderful.
But it is not realistic. I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition
of "coal power generation" with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.

Part 1. February 7, 2019. Democrat Alexander Ocasio Cortes
and Senator Ed Marquee have announced a "Green New Deal Bill" that plans to reverse climate change
within 10 years and eliminate all US carbon emissions.
Already, strong opposition has been raised not only from the Republican Party,
but also from industry and the Democratic Party as a reckless plan that can not be achieved.
Outline of the Green New Deal bill.
Aim to shift carbon emissions from fossil fuels to 100% renewable energy within 10 years.
Launch 14 infrastructures and large industrial projects to realize the project.
And "eliminate" emissions of "greenhouse gases" from all sectors of the economy.

Problems are also pointed out.
(1) There are no concrete measures to abolish fossil fuels and no cost calculation
for conversion to renewable energy.
(2) A portion of the cost will be borne by the carbon tax and the people.
Specifically, the marginal tax rate of income tax for people
with income of over $ 10 million is raised to 70%.
The main investment funds will be borrowed from the newly established New Green Bank's central bank,
but direct lending by such central banks is unprecedented.
(4) The conversion to renewable energy will create 10 million new jobs,
but does not consider the loss of employment related to the fossil fuel economy.
5 The schedule for "modification" of the energy industry is not indicated.

 The US energy consumption ratio for 2017 is 37% oil, 29% natural gas, and 14% coal.
Fossil fuel accounts for 80% of the total.
Even in Germany, it aims to abolish the current 40% coal ratio by 2038,
and by 2030 the abolition of 80% fossil fuel thermal power is a non-viable plan.

Even "the bill proponent" Cortez himself admits that it is impossible to achieve with investments
from 585 "millionaires" (a wealthy person with over $ 1 billion in wealth) and businesses across the US .
Achieving an energy ratio of 80% within 10 years is only a dream.
I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of "coal power generation"
with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.
Revenues from “carbon duty” on imported goods should be used to subsidize “renewable energy”
in importing countries.
Everyone, please consider.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-05-16:Dear Sirs, I think the Democratic Party's "Green New Deal Bill" is wonderful.

To President Trump


At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration
in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-05-16:Dear Sirs, I think the Democratic Party's "Green New Deal Bill" is wonderful.
But it is not realistic. I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition
of "coal power generation" with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.

Part 1. February 7, 2019. Democrat Alexander Ocasio Cortes
and Senator Ed Marquee have announced a "Green New Deal Bill" that plans to reverse climate change
within 10 years and eliminate all US carbon emissions.
Already, strong opposition has been raised not only from the Republican Party,
but also from industry and the Democratic Party as a reckless plan that can not be achieved.
Outline of the Green New Deal bill.
Aim to shift carbon emissions from fossil fuels to 100% renewable energy within 10 years.
Launch 14 infrastructures and large industrial projects to realize the project.
And "eliminate" emissions of "greenhouse gases" from all sectors of the economy.

Problems are also pointed out.
(1) There are no concrete measures to abolish fossil fuels and no cost calculation
for conversion to renewable energy.
(2) A portion of the cost will be borne by the carbon tax and the people.
Specifically, the marginal tax rate of income tax for people
with income of over $ 10 million is raised to 70%.
The main investment funds will be borrowed from the newly established New Green Bank's central bank,
but direct lending by such central banks is unprecedented.
(4) The conversion to renewable energy will create 10 million new jobs,
but does not consider the loss of employment related to the fossil fuel economy.
5 The schedule for "modification" of the energy industry is not indicated.

 The US energy consumption ratio for 2017 is 37% oil, 29% natural gas, and 14% coal.
Fossil fuel accounts for 80% of the total.
Even in Germany, it aims to abolish the current 40% coal ratio by 2038,
and by 2030 the abolition of 80% fossil fuel thermal power is a non-viable plan.

Even "the bill proponent" Cortez himself admits that it is impossible to achieve with investments
from 585 "millionaires" (a wealthy person with over $ 1 billion in wealth) and businesses across the US .
Achieving an energy ratio of 80% within 10 years is only a dream.
I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of "coal power generation"
with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.
Revenues from “carbon duty” on imported goods should be used to subsidize “renewable energy”
in importing countries.
Everyone, please consider.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-05-16:Chers Messieurs, Je pense que le "Green New Deal Bill" du Parti démocrate est merveilleux. Mais ce n'est pas réaliste. Je pense que la priorité devrait être donnée à la promotion de l'abolition de la "production d'électricité au charbon" dommageable pour la santé en introduisant le "droit au carbone" proposé la veille.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-05-16:Chers Messieurs, Je pense que le "Green New Deal Bill" du Parti démocrate est merveilleux. Mais ce n'est pas réaliste.
Je pense que la priorité devrait être donnée à la promotion de l'abolition de la "production d'électricité au charbon" dommageable pour la santé en introduisant le "droit au carbone" proposé la veille.

Partie 1 7 février 2019. Le démocrate Alexander Ocasio Cortes et le sénateur Ed Marquee
Au bout de 10 ans, nous avons annoncé le "Green New Deal Bill", un plan visant à inverser les effets du changement climatique et à éliminer toutes les émissions de carbone des États-Unis.
Déjà, non seulement le parti républicain, mais aussi l’industrie et le parti démocrate ont soulevé une vive opposition en tant que plan imprudent et irréalisable.
Esquisse du projet de loi Green New Deal.
Vise à transformer les émissions de carbone provenant des combustibles fossiles en une énergie 100% renouvelable d'ici 10 ans.
Lancer 14 infrastructures et grands projets industriels pour réaliser le projet.
Et "éliminer" les émissions de "gaz à effet de serre" de tous les secteurs de l'économie.

Les problèmes sont également signalés.
(1) Il n’existe aucune mesure concrète pour abolir les combustibles fossiles et aucun calcul des coûts de conversion en énergie renouvelable.
(2) Une partie du coût sera supportée par la taxe sur le carbone et par la population.
Plus précisément, le taux marginal d'imposition sur le revenu des personnes ayant un revenu supérieur à 10 millions de dollars est porté à 70%.
3 Les principaux fonds d'investissement seront empruntés à la banque centrale de la nouvelle banque verte, nouvellement créée.
Ce type de prêt direct par les banques centrales est sans précédent.
4La conversion aux énergies renouvelables créera 10 millions de nouveaux emplois, mais
Il ne tient pas compte de la perte d’emploi liée à l’économie de combustibles fossiles.
5 Le calendrier de "modification" du secteur de l'énergie n'est pas indiqué.

 Le ratio de consommation d'énergie des États-Unis pour 2017 est de 37% de pétrole, 29% de gaz naturel et 14% de charbon.
Les combustibles fossiles représentent 80% du total.
Même en Allemagne, "l'objectif est d'abolir le ratio charbon actuel de 40% d'ici 2038",
L'abolition de 80% de la puissance thermique des combustibles fossiles d'ici 2030 est un plan non viable.

Même "le partisan de la facture", Cortez lui-même compte 585 "millionnaires" aux États-Unis.
Nous reconnaissons qu’il s’agit d’un plan qui ne peut être réalisé même avec (un investissement de plus d’un milliard de dollars) et des investissements d’entreprises.
Atteindre un ratio énergétique de 80% en 10 ans n’est qu’un rêve.
Je pense que la priorité devrait être donnée à la promotion de l'abolition de la "production d'électricité au charbon" dommageable pour la santé en introduisant le "droit au carbone" proposé la veille.
Les revenus provenant des «droits d'émission de carbone» sur les produits importés devraient être utilisés pour subventionner les «énergies renouvelables» dans les pays importateurs.
Tout le monde, s'il vous plaît envisager.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Il est "fou" d '"appliquer" les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal "Des péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes" contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers ont agi conformément à l'article 22-4-4 (acquisition du statut de résident par le dépôt de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister 2019-05-16:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich finde die "Green New Deal Bill" der Demokratischen Partei wunderbar. Das ist aber nicht realistisch. Meines Erachtens sollte der Förderung der Abschaffung der "Kohlekraftgewinnung" mit Gesundheitsschäden Priorität eingeräumt werden, indem die am Vortag vorgeschlagene "Kohlenstoffpflicht" eingeführt wird.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister


2019-05-16:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich finde die "Green New Deal Bill" der Demokratischen Partei wunderbar. Das ist aber nicht realistisch.
Meines Erachtens sollte der Förderung der Abschaffung der "Kohlekraftgewinnung" mit Gesundheitsschäden Priorität eingeräumt werden, indem die am Vortag vorgeschlagene "Kohlenstoffpflicht" eingeführt wird.

Teil 1 7. Februar 2019. Demokraten Alexander Ocasio Cortes und Senator Ed Marquee
Innerhalb von 10 Jahren haben wir den "Green New Deal Bill" angekündigt, einen Plan zur Umkehr des Klimawandels und zur Beseitigung aller US-Kohlendioxidemissionen.
Starke Opposition wurde nicht nur von der Republikanischen Partei, sondern auch von der Industrie und der Demokratischen Partei als unbesonnener Plan erhoben, der nicht erreicht werden kann.
Überblick über die Green New Deal-Rechnung.
Ziel ist es, die CO2-Emissionen aus fossilen Brennstoffen innerhalb von 10 Jahren in 100% erneuerbare Energie umzuwandeln.
Starten Sie 14 Infrastrukturen und industrielle Großprojekte, um das Projekt zu realisieren.
"Emissionen" von "Treibhausgasen" aus allen Wirtschaftssektoren "beseitigen".

Probleme werden auch aufgezeigt.
(1) Es gibt keine konkreten Maßnahmen zur Abschaffung fossiler Brennstoffe und keine Kostenberechnung für die Umwandlung in erneuerbare Energien.
(2) Ein Teil der Kosten wird von der CO2-Steuer und den Bürgern getragen.
Insbesondere wird der Grenzsteuersatz der Einkommensteuer für Personen mit einem Einkommen von über 10 Millionen US-Dollar auf 70% angehoben.
3 Die Hauptinvestitionsmittel werden von der neu gegründeten Zentralbank der New Green Bank aufgenommen.
Eine solche direkte Kreditvergabe durch Zentralbanken ist beispiellos.
4 Durch die Umstellung auf erneuerbare Energien werden 10 Millionen neue Arbeitsplätze geschaffen
Der Verlust der Beschäftigung im Zusammenhang mit dem Verbrauch fossiler Brennstoffe wird nicht berücksichtigt.
5 Der Zeitplan für die "Modifizierung" der Energiewirtschaft ist nicht angegeben.

 Die US-Energieverbrauchsquote für 2017 beträgt 37% Öl, 29% Erdgas und 14% Kohle.
Fossiler Brennstoff macht 80% der Gesamtmenge aus.
Selbst in Deutschland "ist es das Ziel, die derzeitige Kohlequote von 40% bis 2038 abzuschaffen"
Die Abschaffung von 80% der thermischen Energie aus fossilen Brennstoffen bis 2030 ist ein nicht realisierbarer Plan.

Sogar "der Befürworter der Rechnung" Cortez selbst hat 585 "Millionäre" in den Vereinigten Staaten
Wir geben zu, dass dies ein Plan ist, der selbst mit (Investitionen mit einem Vermögen von über einer Milliarde US-Dollar) und Investitionen von Unternehmen nicht verwirklicht werden kann.
Es ist nur ein Traum, innerhalb von 10 Jahren eine Energiequote von 80% zu erreichen.
Meines Erachtens sollte der Förderung der Abschaffung der "Kohlekraftgewinnung" mit Gesundheitsschäden Priorität eingeräumt werden, indem die am Vortag vorgeschlagene "Kohlenstoffpflicht" eingeführt wird.
Einnahmen aus der CO2-Abgabe auf importierte Waren sollten verwendet werden, um „erneuerbare Energie“ in Importländern zu subventionieren.
Jeder, bitte berücksichtigen.

Teil 2 Ich verklage zwei Dinge.
Dies ist ein "internationaler" Menschenrechtsmissbrauch der japanischen Regierung.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden können.
Wenn die Welt die "Herrschaft unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch den Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1 Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsqualifikation" aus. Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden für das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz (Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen") bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz hingegen gilt für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben (Artikel 73-2).
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das rechtswidrige Arbeit fördert).

Allerdings hat die japanische Justiz nur Ausländer "bestraft", "Arbeitgeber" jedoch nicht "bestraft".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Gleichheitsregel nach dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das "willkürlich" nur Ausländer "bestraft".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal Ausländer beschäftigt hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind auch illegal arbeitende Ausländer "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es keinen, der "gegen andere Verbrechen im Strafrecht" gestützt wurde, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen, und ein philippinischer Botschaftsvertreter" sind nicht schuldig.

2 Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", die Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs "Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes anzuwenden.
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer haben sich gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente) verhalten.
Dafür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Verfügungen lauten: "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewandt werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigration Control Act 22-4-4, auf die die "Anklageschrift" verweist, haben keinen kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigration Control Act 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zermalmt "Staatsanwaltschaft".
"Zerquetschen" durch die Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die deutsche Regierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Danke als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall des Verstoßes gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte die "Berufung" an den "Internationalen Strafgerichtshof".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Name Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-05-16:February 7, 2019. Democrat Alexander Ocasio Cortes and Senator Ed Marquee have announced a "Green New Deal Bill" that plans to reverse climate change within 10 years and eliminate all US carbon emissions. Already, strong opposition has been raised not only from the Republican Party, but also from industry and the Democratic Party as a reckless plan that can not be achieved.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-05-16:Dear Sirs, I think the Democratic Party's "Green New Deal Bill" is wonderful.
But it is not realistic. I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition
of "coal power generation" with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.

Part 1. February 7, 2019. Democrat Alexander Ocasio Cortes
and Senator Ed Marquee have announced a "Green New Deal Bill" that plans to reverse climate change
within 10 years and eliminate all US carbon emissions.
Already, strong opposition has been raised not only from the Republican Party,
but also from industry and the Democratic Party as a reckless plan that can not be achieved.
Outline of the Green New Deal bill.
Aim to shift carbon emissions from fossil fuels to 100% renewable energy within 10 years.
Launch 14 infrastructures and large industrial projects to realize the project.
And "eliminate" emissions of "greenhouse gases" from all sectors of the economy.

Problems are also pointed out.
(1) There are no concrete measures to abolish fossil fuels and no cost calculation
for conversion to renewable energy.
(2) A portion of the cost will be borne by the carbon tax and the people.
Specifically, the marginal tax rate of income tax for people
with income of over $ 10 million is raised to 70%.
The main investment funds will be borrowed from the newly established New Green Bank's central bank,
but direct lending by such central banks is unprecedented.
(4) The conversion to renewable energy will create 10 million new jobs,
but does not consider the loss of employment related to the fossil fuel economy.
5 The schedule for "modification" of the energy industry is not indicated.

 The US energy consumption ratio for 2017 is 37% oil, 29% natural gas, and 14% coal.
Fossil fuel accounts for 80% of the total.
Even in Germany, it aims to abolish the current 40% coal ratio by 2038,
and by 2030 the abolition of 80% fossil fuel thermal power is a non-viable plan.

Even "the bill proponent" Cortez himself admits that it is impossible to achieve with investments
from 585 "millionaires" (a wealthy person with over $ 1 billion in wealth) and businesses across the US .
Achieving an energy ratio of 80% within 10 years is only a dream.
I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of "coal power generation"
with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.
Revenues from “carbon duty” on imported goods should be used to subsidize “renewable energy”
in importing countries.
Everyone, please consider.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-05-16:Dear Sirs, I think the Democratic Party's "Green New Deal Bill" is wonderful. But it is not realistic. I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of "coal power generation" with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-05-16:Dear Sirs, I think the Democratic Party's "Green New Deal Bill" is wonderful.
But it is not realistic. I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition
of "coal power generation" with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.

Part 1. February 7, 2019. Democrat Alexander Ocasio Cortes
and Senator Ed Marquee have announced a "Green New Deal Bill" that plans to reverse climate change
within 10 years and eliminate all US carbon emissions.
Already, strong opposition has been raised not only from the Republican Party,
but also from industry and the Democratic Party as a reckless plan that can not be achieved.
Outline of the Green New Deal bill.
Aim to shift carbon emissions from fossil fuels to 100% renewable energy within 10 years.
Launch 14 infrastructures and large industrial projects to realize the project.
And "eliminate" emissions of "greenhouse gases" from all sectors of the economy.

Problems are also pointed out.
(1) There are no concrete measures to abolish fossil fuels and no cost calculation
for conversion to renewable energy.
(2) A portion of the cost will be borne by the carbon tax and the people.
Specifically, the marginal tax rate of income tax for people
with income of over $ 10 million is raised to 70%.
The main investment funds will be borrowed from the newly established New Green Bank's central bank,
but direct lending by such central banks is unprecedented.
(4) The conversion to renewable energy will create 10 million new jobs,
but does not consider the loss of employment related to the fossil fuel economy.
5 The schedule for "modification" of the energy industry is not indicated.

 The US energy consumption ratio for 2017 is 37% oil, 29% natural gas, and 14% coal.
Fossil fuel accounts for 80% of the total.
Even in Germany, it aims to abolish the current 40% coal ratio by 2038,
and by 2030 the abolition of 80% fossil fuel thermal power is a non-viable plan.

Even "the bill proponent" Cortez himself admits that it is impossible to achieve with investments
from 585 "millionaires" (a wealthy person with over $ 1 billion in wealth) and businesses across the US .
Achieving an energy ratio of 80% within 10 years is only a dream.
I think that priority should be given to promoting the abolition of "coal power generation"
with health damage by introducing the "carbon duty" proposed the day before.
Revenues from “carbon duty” on imported goods should be used to subsidize “renewable energy”
in importing countries.
Everyone, please consider.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-05-15:Dear Sirs, There is a new framework called “Paris Agreement” against global warming. America will withdraw. The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution." But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-05-15:Dear Sirs, There is a new framework called “Paris Agreement”
against global warming. America will withdraw.
Even if each country contributes $ 450 billion annually,
"Where will the money go?" A more effective way is
for countries to introduce "carbon duty" into "imported products".
I think that exporting countries will try to reduce “coal power generation”.


Part 1. President Trump in front of the White House
on June 1, 2017, criticized the $ 100 billion,
saying that "a big hit to the interests of the US economy, industry, workers,
people and taxpayers."
Also in 2015, the Secretary General of the Green Climate Fund has repeatedly stated
that the estimated fund will increase to require $ 450 billion annually from 2020 onwards.
But no one knows even where the money is "where to go".
The money actually contributed to the Global Warming Fund is used
for political purposes such as dictatorships and rulers
in developing countries such as the Caribbean, the Pacific,
the small islands of the Indian Ocean, and Africa.
It has become "acquisition funds" or "funds for bribery".
(Above, Wikipedia)

Germany will completely abolish coal-fired power generation,
which supplies nearly 40% of Germany's electricity by 2038,
and the United Kingdom will completely abolish coal fuel by 2025.
It turned out that there are factors other than "decarbonization"
behind the movement of "de-coal power generation" which spreads all over the world.
A study by ETH Zurich has revealed that coal-fired power plants are
becoming hot spots for diffusing harmful substances
into the atmosphere more than carbon emissions.

Coal-fired power plants emit not only CO2,
but also particulate matter, SO2, NOx and mercury,
which harm the health of many people around the world.
China and the United States are the two largest producers of coal power.
In terms of health damage, India has the highest "sacrifice" in the world.
Central Europe, North America and China have many modern power plants,
but Eastern Europe, Russia and India have many "old power plants"
that do not have enough exhaust gas treatment.

In Europe, emission control of power plants has been effective.
Local health damage caused by particulate matter,
SO2, and NOx mainly occurs in Asia (India and China) where coal-fired power is used.

 As global coal resources are expected to last hundreds of years,
air pollution from harmful substances will also continue.
It is desirable not to mine coal with high mercury and sulfur content.
However, in the two major countries in growth (China and India),
industrialization continues and there is a high risk of worsening pollution.
The research team believes that reducing health hazards
from coal power should be a global priority.
Health damage from coal power generation will not be resolved by the Paris Agreement.
I think that it is more convincing than "decarbonization
for the prevention of suspicious global warming" if it becomes a measure
against health damage.
In order to prevent health damage caused by coal power generation,
I propose that "carbon duty" be applied to "imported products"
from countries that generate coal power.
As a result,
I believe that exporting countries will promote the abolition of “coal power generation”
with the economic disadvantage of “coal power generation”.

I think that the introduction of “carbon duty” should be discussed in G7 and G20.
If it takes time to conclude, France, Germany, etc. "precede"
and consider the introduction of "carbon duty".

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.


Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.

To President Trump


At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration
in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-05-15:Dear Sirs, There is a new framework called “Paris Agreement”
against global warming. America will withdraw.
Even if each country contributes $ 450 billion annually,
"Where will the money go?" A more effective way is
for countries to introduce "carbon duty" into "imported products".
I think that exporting countries will try to reduce “coal power generation”.


Part 1. President Trump in front of the White House
on June 1, 2017, criticized the $ 100 billion,
saying that "a big hit to the interests of the US economy, industry, workers,
people and taxpayers."
Also in 2015, the Secretary General of the Green Climate Fund has repeatedly stated
that the estimated fund will increase to require $ 450 billion annually from 2020 onwards.
But no one knows even where the money is "where to go".
The money actually contributed to the Global Warming Fund is used
for political purposes such as dictatorships and rulers
in developing countries such as the Caribbean, the Pacific,
the small islands of the Indian Ocean, and Africa.
It has become "acquisition funds" or "funds for bribery".
(Above, Wikipedia)

Germany will completely abolish coal-fired power generation,
which supplies nearly 40% of Germany's electricity by 2038,
and the United Kingdom will completely abolish coal fuel by 2025.
It turned out that there are factors other than "decarbonization"
behind the movement of "de-coal power generation" which spreads all over the world.
A study by ETH Zurich has revealed that coal-fired power plants are
becoming hot spots for diffusing harmful substances
into the atmosphere more than carbon emissions.

Coal-fired power plants emit not only CO2,
but also particulate matter, SO2, NOx and mercury,
which harm the health of many people around the world.
China and the United States are the two largest producers of coal power.
In terms of health damage, India has the highest "sacrifice" in the world.
Central Europe, North America and China have many modern power plants,
but Eastern Europe, Russia and India have many "old power plants"
that do not have enough exhaust gas treatment.

In Europe, emission control of power plants has been effective.
Local health damage caused by particulate matter,
SO2, and NOx mainly occurs in Asia (India and China) where coal-fired power is used.

 As global coal resources are expected to last hundreds of years,
air pollution from harmful substances will also continue.
It is desirable not to mine coal with high mercury and sulfur content.
However, in the two major countries in growth (China and India),
industrialization continues and there is a high risk of worsening pollution.
The research team believes that reducing health hazards
from coal power should be a global priority.
Health damage from coal power generation will not be resolved by the Paris Agreement.
I think that it is more convincing than "decarbonization
for the prevention of suspicious global warming" if it becomes a measure
against health damage.
In order to prevent health damage caused by coal power generation,
I propose that "carbon duty" be applied to "imported products"
from countries that generate coal power.
As a result,
I believe that exporting countries will promote the abolition of “coal power generation”
with the economic disadvantage of “coal power generation”.

I think that the introduction of “carbon duty” should be discussed in G7 and G20.
If it takes time to conclude, France, Germany, etc. "precede"
and consider the introduction of "carbon duty".

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.


Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-05-15:Chers Messieurs, Il existe un nouveau cadre appelé «Accord de Paris» contre le réchauffement climatique. L'Amérique se retirera. Même si chaque pays verse 450 milliards de dollars par an, "Où ira l'argent?" Un moyen plus efficace consiste pour les pays à introduire un "droit carbone" dans les "produits importés" Je pense que les pays exportateurs essaieront de réduire la «production d'électricité au charbon».

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-05-15:Chers Messieurs, Il existe un nouveau cadre appelé «Accord de Paris» contre le réchauffement climatique.
L'Amérique se retirera. Même si chaque pays verse 450 milliards de dollars par an, "Où ira l'argent?"
Un moyen plus efficace consiste pour les pays à introduire un "droit carbone" dans les "produits importés"
Je pense que les pays exportateurs essaieront de réduire la «production d'électricité au charbon».


Partie 1 Le président Trump est devant la Maison Blanche le 1er juin 2017,
100 milliards de dollars, c’est «l’économie, l’industrie, les travailleurs,
Cela a un impact négatif majeur sur les intérêts de la population et des contribuables.
Également en 2015, le directeur exécutif du Fonds vert pour le climat
Plusieurs fois après 2020, le fonds estimé augmentera pour nécessiter 450 milliards de dollars par an.
Mais personne ne sait même où se trouve l'argent "où aller".
L’argent effectivement versé au Fonds pour le réchauffement de la planète est un petit pays insulaire des Caraïbes, de l’océan Pacifique et de l’océan Indien.
Il est utilisé à des fins politiques telles que les dictatures et les dirigeants de pays en développement tels que l’Afrique.
Il s’est transformé en "fonds d’acquisition" ou "fonds pour la corruption". (Ci-dessus, Wikipedia)

L'abolition totale de la production d'électricité au charbon, l'Allemagne fournissant près de 40% de son électricité en 2038
Le Royaume-Uni prévoit également d'éliminer complètement le charbon avant 2025.
Il s'est avéré que d'autres facteurs que la "décarbonisation" se cachent derrière le mouvement de "production d'énergie dégroupant" qui se propage dans le monde entier.
À la recherche de l’ETH Zurich, les centrales à charbon dépassent les émissions de carbone,
Le fait qu'il s'agisse d'un point chaud qui diffuse des substances nocives dans l'atmosphère est clarifié.

Les centrales au charbon émettent non seulement du CO2, mais également des particules, du SO2, des NOx et du mercure,
Cela nuit à la santé de nombreuses personnes dans le monde.
La Chine et les États-Unis sont les deux plus grands producteurs d'énergie au charbon.
En termes de dommages pour la santé, l’Inde a le "sacrifice" le plus élevé au monde.
L’Europe centrale, l’Amérique du Nord et la Chine possèdent de nombreuses centrales modernes,
L’Europe de l’Est, la Russie et l’Inde possèdent de nombreuses "vieilles centrales" qui ne disposent pas d’un traitement suffisant pour les gaz d’échappement.

En Europe, le contrôle des émissions des centrales électriques a été efficace.
Dommages causés localement à la santé par les particules, le SO2 et les NOx
Il se produit principalement en Asie (Inde et Chine), où l’énergie au charbon est utilisée.

 Les ressources mondiales en charbon devraient durer des centaines d’années.
 Si cela continue, la pollution de l'air par les substances nocives continuera.
Il est souhaitable de ne pas extraire du charbon à haute teneur en mercure et en soufre.
Toutefois, dans les deux principaux pays en croissance (Chine et Inde), l’industrialisation se poursuit et le risque d’aggravation de la pollution est élevé.
L’équipe de recherche est convaincue que la réduction des risques pour la santé liés à la production de charbon devrait être une priorité mondiale.
Les dommages pour la santé résultant de la production d'électricité à partir du charbon ne seront pas résolus par l'Accord de Paris.
Si cela devient une mesure des dommages pour la santé,
Je pense que c'est plus convaincant que "la décarbonisation pour prévenir un réchauffement planétaire suspect".
Afin de prévenir les dommages pour la santé causés par la production d’énergie au charbon,
Nous proposons d’appliquer un "droit carbone" aux "produits importés" de pays producteurs de charbon.
En conséquence, je pense que les pays exportateurs vont promouvoir l'abolition de la «production d'électricité au charbon» avec le désavantage économique de la «production d'électricité au charbon».

Je pense que l'introduction du «devoir carbone» devrait être discutée dans les G7 et G20.
S'il faut du temps pour conclure, la France,
L'Allemagne et les autres pays devraient "diriger" et envisager l'introduction d'un "droit du carbone".


Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp