Help me!Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-12-06: Sehr geehrter Herr, Ich habe mit Chinesen und Myanmarern gesprochen, die gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz verstoßen haben. Sie sind "illegale Einwanderer,

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-12-06: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Ich habe mit Chinesen und Myanmarern gesprochen, die gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz verstoßen haben. Sie sind "illegale Einwanderer, deren Aufenthaltsdauer überschritten wurde". Aber ich habe viele Opfer des Einwanderungsrechts gesehen. Japans Migrationsmaßnahmen bestrafen "reguläre Einwanderer" illegal mit dem Ziel, "das Land gewaltsam zu verlassen". Dieses Problem kann nur gelöst werden, wenn in jedem Land ein Gesetzentwurf zur „Regierungsführung nach japanischen Menschenrechten und Gesetzen“ erlassen wurde.


Teil 1. Es gibt zu viele Opfer dieses Vorfalls.
Ich wurde verhaftet und erneut verhaftet.
Also wurde ich verhaftet und über 40 Tage in ein „Internierungslager“ gesperrt.
Vom "Polizeigewahrsam" können Sie früh morgens in den "Escort Bus" einsteigen.
"Ziel" ist "Bezirksstaatsanwaltschaft Tokio" oder "Bezirksgericht Tokio".
Bis zum Ziel fährt der "Escort Bus" um die Polizeistation in Tokio, um zu jeder Polizeistation zu gelangen
"Hebe" den "Verdächtigen" auf, der "eingeschlossen" ist.
Die Polizeistation "holt" Ausländer aus verschiedenen Ländern zum "Escort Bus" ab.
Wenn Sie mehr als 10 Polizeistationen besuchen, ist der „Escort-Bus“ voller „Verdächtiger“.
Am Morgen erreichen wir gegen 9:00 Uhr das „Tokyo District Prosecution“ und das „Tokyo District Court“.
Am Bezirksgericht Tokio verbringe ich meinen Tag auf einem Stuhl, der in einem großen Wartebereich mit Handschellen gefesselt ist.
Das Interview mit dem Richter dauert ca. 10 Minuten.
Der Rest wird in einem großen Wartebereich verbracht.
Mehr als 100 "Verdächtige" warten auf Sie.
In der Staatsanwaltschaft des Bezirks Tokio wartet eine Gruppe von etwa 10 Personen im „Eisengitterraum“.
Ich denke, es gibt ungefähr 20 "Eisengitterräume".
Der Verdächtige ist "mit Handschellen gefesselt" und verbringt einen Tag.

Und abends steigen Sie in den „Escort Bus“.
Im Gegensatz zum Morgen fährt der „Escort Bus“ um die Polizeistation herum und lässt den „Verdächtigen“ fallen.
Die Rückkehr zur Polizeistation erfolgt von 17:00 bis 18:00 Uhr.

Das Polizeigewahrsam hat mehrere Personen in einem Raum.
Im Raum werden sich "Verdächtige" durch "Nummer" anrufen.
Der Verdächtige kann frei sprechen.
Tagsüber gibt es eine Pause von ca. 10 Minuten.
Ich habe viele Ausländer und Japaner gesehen.
Viele Japaner sind "Verdächtige" der "Drogenkriminalität".
Viele Ausländer sind "Verdächtige" eines "Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungsrecht".
Ich habe einen Amerikaner gesehen, aber nicht gesprochen.
Die Amerikaner schienen auch "das Einwanderungsgesetz zu verletzen".

Weiter zur nächsten Woche.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
"Anwendbar" für "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" ist "Fehler im anwendbaren Recht".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Bewerber wie Verwaltungsbeamte und Schulpersonal sind strafbar
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz wurde auf der 192. außerordentlichen Landtagssitzung verabschiedet.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
Allerdings "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht
"Stop" in "Altern, Statistik der Einschränkungen".
Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.

Bitte senden Sie eine E-Mail, wenn die URL des Dokumentwebs wie unten gezeigt ist. (Geben Sie eine private URL zurück.)
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano



Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-12-06: Dear Sir, This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-12-06: Dear Sir,
I spoke with Chinese and Myanmar people who violated the Immigration Control Act. They are “illegal immigrants whose period of residence has been exceeded”. But I have seen many victims of immigration law. Japan's migrant measures punish “regular immigrants” illegally for the purpose of “forcibly leaving the country”. This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.


Part 1. There are too many victims of this incident.
I was arrested and re-arrested.
So I was arrested and confined to a “detention center” for over 40 days.
From the "Police Detention Center", you will be placed on the "Escort bus" early in the morning.
"Destination" is "Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office" or "Tokyo District Court".
Until it arrives at the destination, the “Escort bus” goes around the police stations
in Tokyo in order to “pick up” the “suspect” who is “contained” in each police station.
The police station “picks up” foreigners from various countries to “Escort bus”.
If you visit more than 10 police stations, the “Escort bus” will be full of “suspects”.
In the morning, we will arrive at the “Tokyo District Prosecution”
and “Tokyo District Court” at around 9am.
At the Tokyo District Court, I spend my day sitting in a chair handcuffed in a large waiting area.
The interview with the judge is about 10 minutes.
The rest is spent in a large waiting area.
More than 100 "suspects" are waiting.
At the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office,
a group of about 10 people will wait in the “iron lattice room”.
I think there are about 20 “iron lattice rooms”.
The suspect is "handcuffed" and spends a day.

And in the evening, get on the “Escort bus”.
Contrary to the morning, the “Escort bus” goes around the police station and drops the “suspect”.
The time to return to the police station is from 17:00 to 18:00.

The police “detention center” has several people in one room.
In the room, "suspects" will call each other by "number".
The suspect can talk freely.
During the day, there is a break for about 10 minutes.
So I've seen a lot of foreigners and Japanese people.
Many Japanese are "suspects" of "drug crime".
Many foreigners are “suspects” of “violation of immigration law”.
I saw an American but did not talk.
The Americans also seemed to be “violating the Immigration Act”.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site"
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal
of those who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” is not causal to Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To everyone in the world's media 2019-12-06: Dear Sir, I spoke with Chinese and Myanmar people who violated the Immigration Control

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-12-06: Dear Sir,
I spoke with Chinese and Myanmar people who violated the Immigration Control Act. They are “illegal immigrants whose period of residence has been exceeded”. But I have seen many victims of immigration law. Japan's migrant measures punish “regular immigrants” illegally for the purpose of “forcibly leaving the country”. This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.


Part 1. There are too many victims of this incident.
I was arrested and re-arrested.
So I was arrested and confined to a “detention center” for over 40 days.
From the "Police Detention Center", you will be placed on the "Escort bus" early in the morning.
"Destination" is "Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office" or "Tokyo District Court".
Until it arrives at the destination, the “Escort bus” goes around the police stations
in Tokyo in order to “pick up” the “suspect” who is “contained” in each police station.
The police station “picks up” foreigners from various countries to “Escort bus”.
If you visit more than 10 police stations, the “Escort bus” will be full of “suspects”.
In the morning, we will arrive at the “Tokyo District Prosecution”
and “Tokyo District Court” at around 9am.
At the Tokyo District Court, I spend my day sitting in a chair handcuffed in a large waiting area.
The interview with the judge is about 10 minutes.
The rest is spent in a large waiting area.
More than 100 "suspects" are waiting.
At the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office,
a group of about 10 people will wait in the “iron lattice room”.
I think there are about 20 “iron lattice rooms”.
The suspect is "handcuffed" and spends a day.

And in the evening, get on the “Escort bus”.
Contrary to the morning, the “Escort bus” goes around the police station and drops the “suspect”.
The time to return to the police station is from 17:00 to 18:00.

The police “detention center” has several people in one room.
In the room, "suspects" will call each other by "number".
The suspect can talk freely.
During the day, there is a break for about 10 minutes.
So I've seen a lot of foreigners and Japanese people.
Many Japanese are "suspects" of "drug crime".
Many foreigners are “suspects” of “violation of immigration law”.
I saw an American but did not talk.
The Americans also seemed to be “violating the Immigration Act”.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site"
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal
of those who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” is not causal to Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan
and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials
and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled
by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government
for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim
for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty",
the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left
on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하 2019-12-05 : 인사말, 나는 "같은 내용"을 SNS에도 게시물을 계속하고 있습니다. 일본인은 '정의'를 잃었습니다.

조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하


2019-12-05 : 인사말,
나는 "같은 내용"을 SNS에도 게시물을 계속하고 있습니다. 일본인은 '정의'를 잃었습니다. 외국인의 격려는 "기쁘다"입니다. 이 문제는 각국이 「일본의 인권 · 법률에 따라 통치 '를 요구하는 법안을 입법하지 않으면 해결되지 않습니다.


제 1 부. "저와 Kingungaku"의 "기소, bill of indictment"우리의 "무죄"를 설명합니다.

나는 "기소, bill of indictment"에 기재된 순서대로 설명을합니다.
검찰은 입관 법 70 조 ""체류 자격 외 노동 '위반자 4 명에 대해 "처럼"에 기재를하고 있습니다.
'1 인분'은 다음과 같은 구성입니다.

1) 검찰은 중국인이 입국 관리법 70 조 「재류 자격 외 노동 '을 한 사실을 언급하고 있습니다.
2) 검찰은 "허위 서류 = 내용이 허위 고용 계약 서류"를 "내"가 작성한 사실을 말합니다.
3) 검찰은 위의 서류를 中國 사람이다 Kingungaku가 중국에 "제공"한 사실을 언급하고 있습니다.
4) 검찰은 중국인이 "허위 서류"를 첨부하여 도쿄 입국 관리국에 제출 한 사실을 언급하고 있습니다.

기재되어 있지 않지만, 중국은 「재류 자격」을 취득했습니다.
그래서 위의 첫 번째 입관 법 70 조 「재류 자격 외 노동 '을 한 사실이 생깁니다.

재판관은 "판결문 '에서'인과 관계 '를 설명합니다.
1) 중국인은 "허위 서류」의 제공을 받았다.
2) 중국인은 그래서 「재류 자격」을 얻었다.
3) 중국인은 그래서 일본에 체류 할 수 있었다.
4) 중국은 일본에 거주 할 수 있기 때문에 입관 법 70 조 위반의 노동자 수 있었다.
5) 따라서 '허위의 서류 "를"제공 "한 것과"입관 법 70 조 위반'은 '인과 관계'는 '보통'이다.

이 논법은 "결론"을 무리하게 "유도"하는 "논법"입니다.
외국인이 일본에 거주하는 "범죄하는"며 "단정"하고 있습니다. "이 사상」은 인권 침해입니다.

중요한 것은 '인과 관계'의 잘못입니다.
나는 그 전에 말합니다.
입관 법 22-4-4 조의 위반은 법무부 장관의 행정 처분이므로 형법을 적용 할 수 없습니다.

"인과 관계"의 오류로 돌아갑니다.
"허위 서류"에 「재류 자격」을 얻었다 고합니다.
그들이 「재류 자격」의 범위에서 작동하는 경우, 입관 법 70 조 위반 "체류 자격 외 노동 '이되지 않습니다.
그러나 입관 법이 규정하도록 입관 법 70 조 위반
「자격 외 노동 '의 인과 관계는 입관 법 73-2 조 "불법 노동을 조장하는 죄"에 있습니다.
재판관은 "입관 법 '의 취지를 전혀 이해하지 않는다.

내일 계속됩니다.

아래의 "사이트"에서 "bill of indictment"를 참조하십시오.
이 사건이 "bill of indictment"을 본 것만으로, 당신은 "적용 법률의 오류"를 이해할 수 있습니다.

"영문 번역」과 「일본어 원문 'PDF 파일을 참조하십시오.
개인 정보의 취급에 충분히주의를하십시오.
● 영문 번역 "기소 letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
영문 번역은 참고입니다. 정확하게는 각자해야합니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● 일본어 원문 '기소 letter of indictment "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
영문 번역은 잘못된 것입니다. 영문 번역은 위의 "PDF"를 참조하십시오.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● 관련 법률을 참조하십시오. (일본어 및 영문 번역)
1) 出入国管理及び難民認定法
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) 형법
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) 일본 국 헌법
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


제 2 부. 나는 두 가지를 "호소"있습니다.
"2019 년 11 월 4 일 개정"
나는뿐만 아니라 중국이나 필리핀 사람뿐만 아니라
세계의 많은 희생자를 위해 싸우고 있습니다.
사건에서 10 년 가까이됩니다. 내 생명에는 한계가 있습니다.
세계가 "법에 따라 통치 '를 무시한다면 테러로 해결하는 것은 당연합니다.

1. 외국인이 「재류 자격」이외의 「불법 노동 '을 실시했다. 그러나 외국인은 무죄입니다.
외국인 만 입관 법 70 조 "불법 노동의 죄 '로 처벌되었습니다.
이에 대해 입관 법은 불법 노동의 '인과 관계'인 고용주를 입관 법 73-2 조
(불법 취업을 조장 한 죄)로 처벌하고 있습니다.
그러나 일본의 사법은 외국인 만 "처벌"했지만 "고용주"을 "처벌"하지 않습니다.
이것은 분명히 일본 국 헌법 14 조 '법 아래 평등의 원칙'에 위배됩니다.
그리고 '의식'에 외국인 만 "처벌"하는 것을 금지 한 국제법을 위반하고 있습니다.
불법으로 외국인을 고용 한 고용주가 "무죄"이면 불법으로 일하게 된 외국인도 '무죄'입니다. .

2. 검찰은 "입관 법 22-4-4 조 지원"을 이유로
입관 법 70 조에 대하여 형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄"를 "적용"했지만
"적용 법률의 오류"입니다.
"입관 법 22-4-4 조"는 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 사람의 처분입니다.
::::
기존 입관 법은 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자에 대하여
처벌의 대상이 없습니다 (구법 70 조, 74 조의 6).
허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자이를 방조한 회사, 변호사,
행정 서사 및 교직원 등의 신청 대행 사람을 처벌 대상으로 한 개정 입관 법 제 192 회 임시 국회에서 성립했습니다.
"2017 년 1 월 1 일부터 시행"되어 있습니다.
::::
"나, KinGungaku, 필리핀 국가의 외교관, 필리핀 대사관 직원"100 % "무죄"입니다.

"참고": 외국인이 입국 관리법 22-4-4 조
(허위 서류를 제출하는 것에 의한 status of residence의 취득)에 규정하는 행위를했다.
그러나 이에 대한 "형사 처벌"은 없습니다.
처분은 법무부 장관의 'status of residence 취소'와 '국외 강제 퇴거 "입니다.
따라서 「형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄 '가 적용되지 않습니다.
"기소"가 지적하는 입관 법 22-4-4 조의 '범죄의 이유'는 입관 법 70 조 및 인과 관계가 없다.

검찰은 "고소장, bill of indictment"을 "握りつぶす, crush something in one 's hand"하고 있습니다.
그러나 국가 권력에 의한 "crush something in one 's hand '는'시효, statute of limitations"의 "정지"입니다.

자료는 아래에 있습니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

피해자는 세계에 많이 있습니다.
감사합니다. Yasuhiro Nagano

추신 : White House는이 문제에서 내가 만족하는 해결책을 진지하게 검토하고 나는 대답했습니다.
나는 결과를 기다리고 있습니다. "거짓말이 없다"것을 기대하고 있습니다.

자료의 Web URL을 아래 표시하면 메일을 주시기 바랍니다. (비공개 URL을 회신합니다).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

나가노 恭博



최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한의 말은 모두 믿을 수 없다.
그래서 '납북자'를 기인한다고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 아래에서 걷고 있습니다.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


세계를 움직이려면 중 하나가 필요합니다
"핵 미사일"또는 "거액의 돈"입니다.
"핵 미사일"에 집착하는 '김정은 각하'의 생각은 옳은 것 같습니다.
중국 말입니다.
"Without the trust of the people, there can be no government"
북한의 국민을 "중요한"합니다.


내 정보 

우편 번호 2610-0003
주소 Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
이름 YasuhiroNagano 나가노 恭博
휴대 전화
이메일


도와주세요.
불명 한 점은 문의 해주십시오.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! 2019-12-05：亲爱的先生， 我继续在SNS上发布“相同内容”。日本人失去了“正义”。外国人的鼓励是“快乐的”。除非每个国家立法通过一项法案寻求“根据日本人权和法律进行治理”，否则这个问题将无法解决。

2019-12-05：亲爱的先生，
我继续在SNS上发布“相同内容”。日本人失去了“正义”。外国人的鼓励是“快乐的”。除非每个国家立法通过一项法案寻求“根据日本人权和法律进行治理”，否则这个问题将无法解决。


第一部分我们将在“我和Kingungaku”的“起诉书”中解释我们的“纯真”。

我将按照“起诉书，起诉书”中描述的顺序进行解释。
检方以同样的方式陈述了《移民法》第70条“居住身份以外的劳工”的四名违规者。
“一个人”具有以下配置。

1）控方指出，中国人根据《移民控制法》第70条“在居住地以外的地方从事劳工”。
2）检方指出，“我”准备了“虚假文件＝虚假雇用的合同文件”。
3）控方指出，上述文件是由中国人金刚阁“提供”给中国人的。
4）控方指出，中国人向东京移民局提交了“假证件”。

尽管未列出，但中国人已获得“居民身份”。
这导致了第一个移民法第70条“居住身份以外的劳工”的制定。

法官在“判决”中解释“因果关系”。
1）向中国人提供了“虚假文件”。
2）中国人能够获得“居住身份”。
3）中国人能够留在日本。
4）由于中国人能够在日本生活，因此他们能够违反《移民法》第70条进行工作。
5）因此，“提供”“虚假文件”与“违反《移民管制法》第70条”之间的“因果关系”是“清楚的”。

这种推理是一种“理由”，是通过武力“引领”“结论”的。
当外国人居住在日本时，他/她认为他/她将犯罪。 “这种思想”是对人权的侵犯。

重要的是“因果关系”错误。
我在那之前说。
违反《移民管制法》第22-4-4条是司法部长的行政处罚，因此不能适用刑法。

返回“因果关系”错误。
假设您获得了带有“假证件”的“居民身份”。
如果他们在“居住身份”范围内工作，则不会违反《移民控制法》第70条的规定，在“居住身份以外的地方工作”。
但是，根据《移民法》的规定，违反了《移民法》第70条
“不合格劳工”的因果关系在于《移民法》第72-2条“改善非法劳工”。
法官根本不理解“移民法”的含义。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，仅通过查看此“起诉书”，您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人，
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。
但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《移民法》第70条对刑法“罪犯支持其他犯罪”的第60条和第62条“适用”
这是“错误的法律适用”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上，《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束（第70条，第74-6条）。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人，工作场所，律师，
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》，适用于行政代理人和学校职员等行政代理。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100％“无辜的”。

“参考”：外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是，被国家权力“压垮”是“衰老，局限性统计”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。
最好的问候。长野康广

PS：白宫回答我，我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。

如果文档Web的URL如下所示，请发送电子邮件。 （返回一个私有URL）。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

长野康广


*以下是发送给中国驻东京大使馆的电子邮件的内容


我不仅每天向日本，而且也向国际社会发送。
日本需要外国工人。
但是，除非解决了这个问题，否则外国工人不会来。
此外，公司不能安心雇用外国人。
请认真考虑这个问题。

中国政府应保护因违反《 2010年移民法》而受到非法惩罚的中国人。
我正在与日本政府斗争，以帮助“贫穷的中国人”。
人们不仅仅是华为的首席财务官！
习近平主席应该采取“人权穷人”的照顾。
你应该抗议日本政府。
您应该要求恢复荣誉和``赔偿''！
否则，在中国人民革命是必要的。

对华为首席财务官的非法逮捕抗议了加拿大政府。
然后，采取了对策。
然而，对于2010年的受害人“ Kin gungaku”，
100％非法逮捕，但未对日本政府提出抗议

“ Kin Gungaku” =金成研究。
他最初是延边的职业足球运动员。
他的父亲是延边共产党领导人。
中国政府是否放弃了强大的爱国主义共产主义者的家庭？

因违反《移民管制法》第70条而受到惩罚的四人为“汗”。
“非法劳动”不能仅由中国人来完成。
雇主非法雇用他们。
雇主不受《移民法》第73-2条的处罚。
他有意识地只惩罚了中国人。这违反了国际法。


当一名中国人被捕时，
我老婆给我打电话。
她说：“请帮助我的丈夫”。
我告诉我妻子
“您应立即与中国大使馆联系并说明情况。” “我很快就会被释放。”
然后妻子说。
“中国政府不会提供帮助。”
我以为，“大使馆成员”正在“坠入”日本政府的“蜜罐”。


如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


如有任何疑问，请与我们联系！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!To President Trump 2019-12-05: Dear Sir, We will explain our “innocence” in “Bill of indictment” of “I and Kingungaku”. I will explain in the order described in “Indictment, bill of indictment”. The prosecution states in the same way about the four violators

2019-12-05: Dear Sir,
I continue to post “same content” on SNS. The Japanese lost “justice”. The encouragement of foreigners is “happy”. This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.


Part 1. We will explain our “innocence” in “Bill of indictment” of “I and Kingungaku”.

I will explain in the order described in “Indictment, bill of indictment”.
The prosecution states in the same way about the four violators
of the Immigration Act Article 70 "Labor outside the status of residence".
“One person” consists of the following.

1) The prosecution states the fact that the Chinese did Article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” under the Immigration Control Act.
2) The prosecution states that "I" created "false documents = contract documents
for false employment."
3) The prosecution states that the above documents were “provided” to Chinese
by Kingungaku, a Chinese.
4) The prosecution stated the fact that the Chinese submitted to the Tokyo Immigration Bureau
with “false documents” attached.

Although not listed, the Chinese have obtained a “resident status”.
This leads to the fact that the first immigration law article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” was done.

The judge explains the “causality” in the “judgment”.
1) The Chinese were provided with “false documents”.
2) The Chinese were able to obtain “residence status”.
3) The Chinese were able to stay in Japan.
4) Since the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to work
in violation of the Immigration Act Article 70.
5) Therefore, “causal relationship” is “clear”
between “providing” “false documents” and “violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act”.

This reasoning is a “reason” that forcibly “leads” the “conclusion”.
When a foreigner lives in Japan,
he / she concludes that he / she will commit a crime “This thought” is a violation of human rights.

The important thing is the “causality” error.
I say before that.
Violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative punishment
by the Minister of Justice, so criminal law cannot be applied.

Return to the “causality” error.
Suppose you have obtained a "resident status" with a "false document".
If they work within the scope of “Residence Status”,
they will not be “labor outside the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
However, as stipulated by the Immigration Control Law,
the cause and effect of violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “Unqualified Labor” lies
in Article 72-2 “Crime to Promote Illegal Labor”.
The judge does not understand the meaning of the “immigration law” at all.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site"
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers

who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” is not causal to Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-12-05: Monsieur, Je continue à poster «même contenu» sur SNS. Les Japonais ont perdu la

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-12-05: Monsieur,
Je continue à poster «même contenu» sur SNS. Les Japonais ont perdu la «justice». L'encouragement des étrangers est «heureux». Cette question ne sera résolue que si chaque pays légifère un projet de loi visant à «la gouvernance dans le respect des lois et des droits de l'homme japonais».


Partie 1 Nous expliquerons notre "innocence" dans "Acte d'accusation" de "Moi et Kingungaku".

Je vais expliquer dans l'ordre décrit dans «Acte d'accusation, acte d'accusation».
L’accusation affirme de la même manière que les quatre contrevenants à l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Travail en dehors du statut de résident».
«Une personne» comprend les éléments suivants.

1) L’accusation affirme que les Chinois ont appliqué l’article 70 «Travail hors statut de résident» en vertu de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
2) L’accusation déclare que «j» a préparé «de faux documents = des documents contractuels de faux emploi».
3) L’accusation déclare que les documents susmentionnés ont été «fournis» au chinois par Kingungaku, un Chinois.
4) L’accusation a déclaré que les Chinois avaient soumis au Bureau de l’immigration de Tokyo des «faux documents» en pièce jointe.

Bien que non répertoriés, les Chinois ont obtenu un "statut de résident".
Cela a abouti au fait que le premier article de la loi sur l’immigration, article 70, «Travail en dehors du statut de résident» a été créé.

Le juge explique la «causalité» dans le «jugement».
1) Les Chinois ont reçu de «faux documents».
2) Les Chinois ont pu obtenir un «statut de résident».
3) Les Chinois ont pu rester au Japon.
4) Depuis que les Chinois ont pu vivre au Japon, ils ont pu travailler en violation de l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
5) Ainsi, le «lien de causalité» est «clair» entre «fournir» «de faux documents» et «enfreindre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration».

Ce raisonnement est une «raison» qui «force» la «conclusion».
Lorsqu'un étranger vit au Japon, il conclut qu'il / elle commettra un crime. "Cette pensée" est une violation des droits de l'homme.

L'important est l'erreur de «causalité».
Je dis avant cela.
La violation de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration est une sanction administrative infligée par le ministre de la Justice. Le droit pénal ne peut donc pas être appliqué.

Retour à l'erreur de "causalité".
Supposons que vous ayez obtenu un "statut de résident" avec un "faux document".
S'ils travaillent dans le cadre du «statut de résidence», ils ne seront pas considérés comme «du travail en dehors du statut de résidence», en violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Cependant, conformément à la loi sur l'immigration, les violations de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
La relation de cause à effet du «travail non qualifié» se trouve à l'article 72-2 «Améliorer le travail illégal» de la loi sur l'immigration.
Le juge ne comprend pas du tout la signification de la «loi sur l'immigration».

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
«Appliqué» aux articles 60 et 62 du code pénal «Les pécheurs soutenant d'autres crimes» contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "une mauvaise loi à appliquer".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence par une demande de falsification, le lieu de travail, un avocat,
La loi révisée sur le contrôle de l'immigration, qui s'applique aux agents administratifs tels que les administrateurs et le personnel des écoles, a été mise en place à la 192ème diète.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans sa main" avec le pouvoir de l'État est un "arrêt" de "vieillissement, statistiques de limitations".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.

Veuillez envoyer un e-mail si l'URL du document Web est comme indiqué ci-dessous. (Retourne une URL privée).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano



Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-12-05: Sehr geehrter Herr, Ich poste weiterhin "denselben Inhalt" auf SNS. Die Japaner verloren "Gerechtigkeit". Die Ermutigung der Ausländer ist "glücklich". Dieses Problem kann

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-12-05: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Ich poste weiterhin "denselben Inhalt" auf SNS. Die Japaner verloren "Gerechtigkeit". Die Ermutigung der Ausländer ist "glücklich". Dieses Problem kann nur gelöst werden, wenn in jedem Land ein Gesetzentwurf zur „Regierungsführung nach japanischen Menschenrechten und Gesetzen“ erlassen wurde.


Teil 1. Wir werden unsere "Unschuld" in der "Anklageschrift" von "Ich und Kingungaku" erklären.

Ich werde es in der Reihenfolge erläutern, die unter "Anklage, Anklageschrift" beschrieben ist.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft stellt in gleicher Weise über die vier Verstöße gegen das Zuwanderungsgesetz Art. 70 „Arbeit außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus“ fest.
"Eine Person" hat die folgende Konfiguration.

1) Die Staatsanwaltschaft weist darauf hin, dass die Chinesen nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 „Arbeit außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus“ verrichtet haben.
2) Die Staatsanwaltschaft stellt fest, dass "Ich" "falsche Dokumente = Vertragsdokumente falscher Beschäftigung" erstellt hat.
3) Die Staatsanwaltschaft gibt an, dass die oben genannten Dokumente den Chinesen von Kingungaku, einem Chinesen, „zur Verfügung gestellt“ wurden.
4) Die Staatsanwaltschaft gab an, dass die Chinesen dem Tokyo Immigration Bureau "falsche Dokumente" beigefügt hätten.

Obwohl nicht gelistet, haben die Chinesen einen "Aufenthaltsstatus" erhalten.
Dies führt dazu, dass der erste einwanderungsrechtliche Artikel 70 „Arbeit außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus“ erledigt wurde.

Der Richter erklärt die "Kausalität" im "Urteil".
1) Den Chinesen wurden „falsche Dokumente“ zur Verfügung gestellt.
2) Die Chinesen konnten den Aufenthaltsstatus erlangen.
3) Die Chinesen konnten in Japan bleiben.
4) Da die Chinesen in Japan leben konnten, konnten sie unter Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes arbeiten.
5) Daher ist der „Kausalzusammenhang“ „klar“ zwischen der Bereitstellung „falscher Dokumente“ und dem „Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes“.

Diese Argumentation ist ein "Grund", der gewaltsam die "Schlussfolgerung" "führt".
Wenn ein Ausländer in Japan lebt, kommt er / sie zu dem Schluss, dass er / sie ein Verbrechen begehen wird. "Dieser Gedanke" ist eine Verletzung der Menschenrechte.

Wichtig ist der Kausalitätsfehler.
Sage ich vorher.
Ein Verstoß gegen Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes wird vom Justizminister verwaltungsrechtlich geahndet, sodass das Strafrecht nicht angewendet werden kann.

Kehren Sie zum Fehler "Kausalität" zurück.
Angenommen, Sie haben einen "Aufenthaltsstatus" mit einem "falschen Dokument" erhalten.
Wenn sie im Rahmen des „Aufenthaltsstatus“ arbeiten, handelt es sich nicht um „Arbeitnehmer außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus“, was gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstößt.
Verstöße gegen Artikel 70 des Zuwanderungsgesetzes sind jedoch durch das Zuwanderungsgesetz geregelt
Der Kausalzusammenhang von „unqualifizierter Arbeit“ liegt in Artikel 72-2 „Verbesserung der illegalen Arbeit“ des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Der Richter versteht die Bedeutung des „Einwanderungsgesetzes“ überhaupt nicht.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
"Angewandte" Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches "Sünder zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 70
Es ist "falsches Gesetz anzuwenden".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz, das für Verwaltungsbeamte wie Verwaltungsbeamte und Schulpersonal gilt, wurde auf dem 192. Landtag verabschiedet.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
"Etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht ist jedoch "Stopp" des "Alterns, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.

Bitte senden Sie eine E-Mail, wenn die URL des Dokumentwebs wie unten gezeigt ist. (Geben Sie eine private URL zurück.)
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano



Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-12-05: Dear Sir,This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-12-05: Dear Sir,
I continue to post “same content” on SNS. The Japanese lost “justice”. The encouragement of foreigners is “happy”. This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.


Part 1. We will explain our “innocence” in “Bill of indictment” of “I and Kingungaku”.

I will explain in the order described in “Indictment, bill of indictment”.
The prosecution states in the same way about the four violators
of the Immigration Act Article 70 "Labor outside the status of residence".
“One person” consists of the following.

1) The prosecution states the fact that the Chinese did Article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” under the Immigration Control Act.
2) The prosecution states that "I" created "false documents = contract documents
for false employment."
3) The prosecution states that the above documents were “provided” to Chinese
by Kingungaku, a Chinese.
4) The prosecution stated the fact that the Chinese submitted to the Tokyo Immigration Bureau
with “false documents” attached.

Although not listed, the Chinese have obtained a “resident status”.
This leads to the fact that the first immigration law article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” was done.

The judge explains the “causality” in the “judgment”.
1) The Chinese were provided with “false documents”.
2) The Chinese were able to obtain “residence status”.
3) The Chinese were able to stay in Japan.
4) Since the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to work
in violation of the Immigration Act Article 70.
5) Therefore, “causal relationship” is “clear”
between “providing” “false documents” and “violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act”.

This reasoning is a “reason” that forcibly “leads” the “conclusion”.
When a foreigner lives in Japan,
he / she concludes that he / she will commit a crime “This thought” is a violation of human rights.

The important thing is the “causality” error.
I say before that.
Violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative punishment
by the Minister of Justice, so criminal law cannot be applied.

Return to the “causality” error.
Suppose you have obtained a "resident status" with a "false document".
If they work within the scope of “Residence Status”,
they will not be “labor outside the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
However, as stipulated by the Immigration Control Law,
the cause and effect of violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “Unqualified Labor” lies
in Article 72-2 “Crime to Promote Illegal Labor”.
The judge does not understand the meaning of the “immigration law” at all.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site"
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers

who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” is not causal to Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To everyone in the world's media 2019-12-05: Dear Sir, I continue to post “same content” on SNS. The Japanese lost “justice”. The encouragement of foreigners is “happy”. This issue will not

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-12-05: Dear Sir,
I continue to post “same content” on SNS. The Japanese lost “justice”. The encouragement of foreigners is “happy”. This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.


Part 1. We will explain our “innocence” in “Bill of indictment” of “I and Kingungaku”.

I will explain in the order described in “Indictment, bill of indictment”.
The prosecution states in the same way about the four violators
of the Immigration Act Article 70 "Labor outside the status of residence".
“One person” consists of the following.

1) The prosecution states the fact that the Chinese did Article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” under the Immigration Control Act.
2) The prosecution states that "I" created "false documents = contract documents
for false employment."
3) The prosecution states that the above documents were “provided” to Chinese
by Kingungaku, a Chinese.
4) The prosecution stated the fact that the Chinese submitted to the Tokyo Immigration Bureau
with “false documents” attached.

Although not listed, the Chinese have obtained a “resident status”.
This leads to the fact that the first immigration law article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” was done.

The judge explains the “causality” in the “judgment”.
1) The Chinese were provided with “false documents”.
2) The Chinese were able to obtain “residence status”.
3) The Chinese were able to stay in Japan.
4) Since the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to work
in violation of the Immigration Act Article 70.
5) Therefore, “causal relationship” is “clear”
between “providing” “false documents” and “violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act”.

This reasoning is a “reason” that forcibly “leads” the “conclusion”.
When a foreigner lives in Japan,
he / she concludes that he / she will commit a crime “This thought” is a violation of human rights.

The important thing is the “causality” error.
I say before that.
Violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative punishment
by the Minister of Justice, so criminal law cannot be applied.

Return to the “causality” error.
Suppose you have obtained a "resident status" with a "false document".
If they work within the scope of “Residence Status”,
they will not be “labor outside the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
However, as stipulated by the Immigration Control Law,
the cause and effect of violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “Unqualified Labor” lies
in Article 72-2 “Crime to Promote Illegal Labor”.
The judge does not understand the meaning of the “immigration law” at all.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site"
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers

who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” is not causal to Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan
and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials
and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled
by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government
for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim
for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty",
the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left
on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하 2019-12-04 : 인사말, 나는 매일 여러분에게 보내는 내용의 편지 총리 관저와 주요 정당이나 국회의원에 전송하고

조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하


2019-12-04 : 인사말,
나는 매일 여러분에게 보내는 내용의 편지 총리 관저와 주요 정당이나 국회의원에 전송하고 있습니다. 여전히 무시를하고 있습니다. 나는이 사실을 확인하기 위해 전송합니다. 이 문제는 각국이 「일본의 인권 · 법률에 따라 통치 '를 요구하는 법안을 입법하지 않으면 해결되지 않습니다.


제 1 부. 2017 년 1 월 법의 입법 전에 "허위 서류"를 "제공"한 사람은 "무죄"입니다.
따라서 2010 년의 「나와 Kingungaku "2014 년 파"ィ릿삔 대사관 직원과 외교관 "는 무죄입니다.

나는이 사건에 관여 한 관계자를 다음의 죄명으로 "고소 complaint ','기소 prosecution"을하고 있습니다.
형법 제 172 조.
"허위 고소 등 죄, Crimes of False Complaints"
형법 제 194 조.
"특별 공무원 직권 남용죄, Crimes of abuse of authority by special public officer"

형사 소송법에 따라 "해당 법률의 오류 '의 이유에 의한"재심의 청구 "는 할 수 없습니다.
그러나 사건에서 특별 공무원의 범죄가 분명하다 경우는 가능합니다.
필리핀 대사관의 직원에 대해서는 "시효, prescription, time bar,"이 아니다.
그들은 '시효'(7 년)을 주장하는 것이다.
"공소 시효, prescription of the right to prosecute an accused"는
"일정한 기간 동안 공소, prosecution"가 "제기"되지 않은 경우 "공소,
prosecution의 권리 '가'소멸 '하는 것입니다.
일본에서는 "공소 시효가 완성"까지의 기간은 대상이되는 범죄 "법정형"가 "기준"으로되어있다
(형사 소송법 250 조).
'공소 시효'가 인정되는 근거로는 사실 상태의 존중과 범죄로 인한 사회적 영향의 감소,
사건에서 장기간이 경과 한 것에 의한 "증거의 소산"과 그 결과 "원죄"를 "유도"가능성이있다.

나는 마지막 "고소 complaint"및 "고발, prosecution"도쿄 지검 "検事正"에 송부하고 있습니다.
도쿄 지검에서 서류는 반환받지 않습니다.
그러나 "고소 complaint"및 "고발, prosecution"을 받아야 검찰이
"직권을 남용"하고 "허용"을하지 않기 때문에 '시효'는 정지합니다.

내일 계속됩니다.


아래의 "사이트"에서 "bill of indictment"를 참조하십시오.
이 사건이 "bill of indictment"을 본 것만으로, 당신은 "적용 법률의 오류"를 이해할 수 있습니다.

"영문 번역」과 「일본어 원문 'PDF 파일을 참조하십시오.
개인 정보의 취급에 충분히주의를하십시오.
● 영문 번역 "기소 letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
영문 번역은 참고입니다. 정확하게는 각자해야합니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● 일본어 원문 '기소 letter of indictment "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
영문 번역은 잘못된 것입니다. 영문 번역은 위의 "PDF"를 참조하십시오.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● 관련 법률을 참조하십시오. (일본어 및 영문 번역)
1) 出入国管理及び難民認定法
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) 형법
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) 일본 국 헌법
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


제 2 부. 나는 두 가지를 "호소"있습니다.
"2019 년 11 월 4 일 개정"
나는뿐만 아니라 중국이나 필리핀 사람뿐만 아니라
세계의 많은 희생자를 위해 싸우고 있습니다.
사건에서 10 년 가까이됩니다. 내 생명에는 한계가 있습니다.
세계가 "법에 따라 통치 '를 무시한다면 테러로 해결하는 것은 당연합니다.

1. 외국인이 「재류 자격」이외의 「불법 노동 '을 실시했다. 그러나 외국인은 무죄입니다.
외국인 만 입관 법 70 조 "불법 노동의 죄 '로 처벌되었습니다.
이에 대해 입관 법은 불법 노동의 '인과 관계'인 고용주를 입관 법 73-2 조
(불법 취업을 조장 한 죄)로 처벌하고 있습니다.
그러나 일본의 사법은 외국인 만 "처벌"했지만 "고용주"을 "처벌"하지 않습니다.
이것은 분명히 일본 국 헌법 14 조 '법 아래 평등의 원칙'에 위배됩니다.
그리고 '의식'에 외국인 만 "처벌"하는 것을 금지 한 국제법을 위반하고 있습니다.
불법으로 외국인을 고용 한 고용주가 "무죄"이면 불법으로 일하게 된 외국인도 '무죄'입니다. .

2. 검찰은 "입관 법 22-4-4 조 지원"을 이유로
입관 법 70 조에 대하여 형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄"를 "적용"했지만
"적용 법률의 오류"입니다.
"입관 법 22-4-4 조"는 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 사람의 처분입니다.
::::
기존 입관 법은 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자에 대하여
처벌의 대상이 없습니다 (구법 70 조, 74 조의 6).
허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자이를 방조한 회사, 변호사,
행정 서사 및 교직원 등의 신청 대행 사람을 처벌 대상으로 한
개정 입관 법 제 192 회 임시 국회에서 성립했습니다.
"2017 년 1 월 1 일부터 시행"되어 있습니다.
::::
"나, KinGungaku, 필리핀 국가의 외교관, 필리핀 대사관 직원"100 % "무죄"입니다.

"참고": 외국인이 입국 관리법 22-4-4 조
(허위 서류를 제출하는 것에 의한 status of residence의 취득)에 규정하는 행위를했다.
그러나 이에 대한 "형사 처벌"은 없습니다.
처분은 법무부 장관의 'status of residence 취소'와 '국외 강제 퇴거 "입니다.
따라서 「형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄 '가 적용되지 않습니다.
"기소"가 지적하는 입관 법 22-4-4 조의 '범죄의 이유'는 입관 법 70 조 및 인과 관계가 없다.

검찰은 "고소장, bill of indictment"을 "握りつぶす, crush something in one 's hand"하고 있습니다.
그러나 국가 권력에 의한 "crush something in one 's hand '는'시효, statute of limitations"의 "정지"입니다.

자료는 아래에 있습니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

피해자는 세계에 많이 있습니다.
감사합니다. Yasuhiro Nagano

추신 : White House는이 문제에서 내가 만족하는 해결책을 진지하게 검토하고 나는 대답했습니다.
나는 결과를 기다리고 있습니다. "거짓말이 없다"것을 기대하고 있습니다.

자료의 Web URL을 아래 표시하면 메일을 주시기 바랍니다. (비공개 URL을 회신합니다).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

나가노 恭博


최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한의 말은 모두 믿을 수 없다.
그래서 '납북자'를 기인한다고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 아래에서 걷고 있습니다.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


세계를 움직이려면 중 하나가 필요합니다
"핵 미사일"또는 "거액의 돈"입니다.
"핵 미사일"에 집착하는 '김정은 각하'의 생각은 옳은 것 같습니다.
중국 말입니다.
"Without the trust of the people, there can be no government"
북한의 국민을 "중요한"합니다.


내 정보 

우편 번호 2610-0003
주소 Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
이름 YasuhiroNagano 나가노 恭博
휴대 전화
이메일


도와주세요.
불명 한 점은 문의 해주십시오.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! 我每天都会向总理官邸，主要政党和议员发送电子邮件。我像往常一样忽略它。我要确认这个事实。除非每个国家立法通过一项法案寻求“根据日本人权和法律进行治理”，否则这个问题将无法解决。

2019-12-04：亲爱的先生，
我每天都会向总理官邸，主要政党和议员发送电子邮件。我像往常一样忽略它。我要确认这个事实。除非每个国家立法通过一项法案寻求“根据日本人权和法律进行治理”，否则这个问题将无法解决。


第一部分在2017年1月的立法之前“提供”“虚假文件”的人是“无辜的”。
因此，2010年的“我和Kingungaku”和2014年的菲律宾“菲律宾大使馆和外交官”都没有被无罪释放。

我因“起诉，投诉”和“控告，起诉”而涉嫌以下罪行。
《刑法》第172条。
“虚假投诉罪案”
《刑法》第194条。
“特别公职人员滥用职权的罪行”。

根据《刑事诉讼法》，不能以“适用法律错误”为由提出“重审请求”。
但是，在这种情况下，特别公务员的犯罪很明显。
菲律宾大使馆的工作人员不是“年龄，处方，时间限制”。
他们将坚持“衰老”（7年）。
起诉被告的权利的规定是什么
如果在一段时间内未提出“起诉，起诉”，
起诉权是“灭绝”。
在日本，目标犯罪的“刑事处罚”被视为直到“起诉日期完成”为止的时间的“标准”。
（《刑事诉讼法》第250条）。
公认“起诉倾向”的理由是尊重事实并减少犯罪的社会影响，
自事件发生以来很长一段时间可能导致“触发”“证据消失”，并因此导致“赎罪”。

我已将最后的“指控，投诉”和“指控，起诉”发送给东京检察官的“检察官办公室”。
东京地方检察官未退还任何文件。
但是，检察官应该接受“指控，起诉”和“指控，起诉”
“衰老”已停止，因为不接受“滥用职权”和“接受”。

明天将继续。


请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，仅通过查看此“起诉书”，您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人，
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。
但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《移民法》第70条对刑法“罪犯支持其他犯罪”的第60条和第62条“适用”
这是“错误的法律适用”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上，《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束（第70条，第74-6条）。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人，工作场所，律师，
行政书记员和学校职员等申请者必须遵守刑法
修订后的《移民控制法》是在第192届国会特别会议上颁布的。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100％“无辜的”。

“参考”：外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是，被国家权力“压垮”是“衰老，局限性统计”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。
最好的问候。长野康广

PS：白宫回答我，我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。

如果文档Web的URL如下所示，请发送电子邮件。 （返回一个私有URL）。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

长野康广


*以下是发送给中国驻东京大使馆的电子邮件的内容


我不仅每天向日本，而且也向国际社会发送。
日本需要外国工人。
但是，除非解决了这个问题，否则外国工人不会来。
此外，公司不能安心雇用外国人。
请认真考虑这个问题。

中国政府应保护因违反《 2010年移民法》而受到非法惩罚的中国人。
我正在与日本政府斗争，以帮助“贫穷的中国人”。
人们不仅仅是华为的首席财务官！
习近平主席应该采取“人权穷人”的照顾。
你应该抗议日本政府。
您应该要求恢复荣誉和``赔偿''！
否则，在中国人民革命是必要的。

对华为首席财务官的非法逮捕抗议了加拿大政府。
然后，采取了对策。
然而，对于2010年的受害人“ Kin gungaku”，
100％非法逮捕，但未对日本政府提出抗议

“ Kin Gungaku” =金成研究。
他最初是延边的职业足球运动员。
他的父亲是延边共产党领导人。
中国政府是否放弃了强大的爱国主义共产主义者的家庭？

因违反《移民管制法》第70条而受到惩罚的四人为“汗”。
“非法劳动”不能仅由中国人来完成。
雇主非法雇用他们。
雇主不受《移民法》第73-2条的处罚。
他有意识地只惩罚了中国人。这违反了国际法。


当一名中国人被捕时，
我老婆给我打电话。
她说：“请帮助我的丈夫”。
我告诉我妻子
“您应立即与中国大使馆联系并说明情况。” “我很快就会被释放。”
然后妻子说。
“中国政府不会提供帮助。”
我以为，“大使馆成员”正在“坠入”日本政府的“蜜罐”。


如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


如有任何疑问，请与我们联系！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To President Trump 2019-12-04: Dear Sir,

To President Trump


2019-12-04: Dear Sir,
I send e-mails to the Prime Minister's official residence, major political parties and parliamentarians every day. I ignore it as usual. I am sending to confirm this fact. This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.


Part 1. Those who “provide” “false documents”
before the legislation of January 2017 are “innocent”.
Therefore, “I and Kingungaku” in 2010 and Philippines “Philippine Embassy
and Diplomats” in 2014 are not acquitted.

I have been involved in this case with the following offenses for "sue, complaint"
and "accuse, prosecution".
Article 172 of the Penal Code.
"Crimes of False Complaints"
Article 194 of the Penal Code.
“Crimes of abuse of authority by special public officer”.

According to the Criminal Procedure Law, “request for retrial” cannot be made
for the reason of “error of applicable law”.
However, it is possible if the crime of a special civil servant is obvious in the case.
The staff of the Embassy of the Philippines is not “aging, prescription, time bar”.
They will insist on “aging” (7 years).
"Prescription of the right to prosecute an accused" means "prosecution,
prosecution for a certain period of time"
The right of prosecution is to “extinguish”.
In Japan, “statutory penalties” for covered crimes are the “standard”
for the period up to “completion of legal prosecution”
(Article 250 of the Criminal Procedure Code).
The grounds for "propensity for prosecution" are as follows: "respect of the facts",
reduction of social impact due to crime,
"dissipation of evidence" after a long period of time from the case,
and "induction" as a result There is a possibility to do.

I have sent the last “charge, complaint”
and “charge, prosecution” to the Tokyo Prosecutor's “Prosecutor's Office”.
No documents have been returned from the Tokyo District Prosecution.
However, since the prosecutor who should receive the “complaint, complaint”
and “accuse, prosecution” does not “accept” due to “abuse of authority”,
“aging” has stopped.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site"
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” is not causal to Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp