To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . The “hostage justice” in Japan's prosecutors is human rights abuses. I was not granted "Bail" even after the trial decision. I was imprisoned for over a year. Those who claim innocence do not "release".

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-04-30:Dear Sirs, when Mrs. Carroll wrote a letter to French President Macron,
he replied, "I will do everything I can for the former President of Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France should insist on international treaties.
The judicial independence and sovereignty of each country should be protected
under the ratified treaty.


Part 1. It is yesterday's continuation.
I was punished for supporting a Chinese who violated Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
There is no punishment under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
It only cancels the granted status of residence.
The "International Human Rights Code B" prohibits arrest, confinement
and punishment in violation of basic laws.
If this is only me or Chinese, it will not be an international issue.
Because this "error of applicable law" and punishing foreigners "arbitrarily" are routinely done,
it causes many foreign victims.
So I appeal to "everyone."

The Chinese government does not pursue the Japanese government
because the Chinese government violates human rights.
The Philippine government can not protest the Japanese government
because it does not have human resources who understand international law and human rights.
The US government does not protest against customers who buy weapons (Japan).
France, the world's human rights police officer, should protest Japan.

The “hostage justice” in Japan's prosecutors is human rights abuses.
I was not granted "Bail" even after the trial decision.
I was imprisoned for over a year.
Those who claim innocence do not "release".
The prosecutor's office does not "release" until his body weakens, lies and admits sin.
Those who claim innocence do not give "probation of execution" to prison sentences.
(In principle, a prison sentence of up to three years
on first offense is "probation of execution").
Even in prisons, they do not give "parole" if they do not admit crimes.
(Principle: If the punishment ends two thirds, it is a "parole").

The future of Carlos Ghoon's suspect is the same fate as me.

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Covenant B has also been ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified by the "International Covenant
on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone



Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent", then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent." If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act. "I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

To President Trump


2019-04-30:Dear Sirs, when Mrs. Carroll wrote a letter to French President Macron,
he replied, "I will do everything I can for the former President of Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France should insist on international treaties.
The judicial independence and sovereignty of each country should be protected
under the ratified treaty.


Part 1. It is yesterday's continuation.
I was punished for supporting a Chinese who violated Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
There is no punishment under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
It only cancels the granted status of residence.
The "International Human Rights Code B" prohibits arrest, confinement
and punishment in violation of basic laws.
If this is only me or Chinese, it will not be an international issue.
Because this "error of applicable law" and punishing foreigners "arbitrarily" are routinely done,
it causes many foreign victims.
So I appeal to "everyone."

The Chinese government does not pursue the Japanese government
because the Chinese government violates human rights.
The Philippine government can not protest the Japanese government
because it does not have human resources who understand international law and human rights.
The US government does not protest against customers who buy weapons (Japan).
France, the world's human rights police officer, should protest Japan.

The “hostage justice” in Japan's prosecutors is human rights abuses.
I was not granted "Bail" even after the trial decision.
I was imprisoned for over a year.
Those who claim innocence do not "release".
The prosecutor's office does not "release" until his body weakens, lies and admits sin.
Those who claim innocence do not give "probation of execution" to prison sentences.
(In principle, a prison sentence of up to three years
on first offense is "probation of execution").
Even in prisons, they do not give "parole" if they do not admit crimes.
(Principle: If the punishment ends two thirds, it is a "parole").

The future of Carlos Ghoon's suspect is the same fate as me.

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Covenant B has also been ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified by the "International Covenant
on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro



My information ***************************************************

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone



For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français Chers Messieurs, Lorsque Mme Carroll a écrit une lettre au président Macron "Nous ferons tout ce que nous pouvons pour Gone", a déclaré la réponse, mais il n'y a pas eu de "contact de suivi". La France devrait insister sur les traités internationaux. L’indépendance judiciaire et la souveraineté de chaque pays sont Il devrait être protégé par le traité ratifié.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-04-30:Chers Messieurs, Lorsque Mme Carroll a écrit une lettre au président Macron
"Nous ferons tout ce que nous pouvons pour Gone", a déclaré la réponse, mais il n'y a pas eu de "contact de suivi".
La France devrait insister sur les traités internationaux. L’indépendance judiciaire et la souveraineté de chaque pays sont
Il devrait être protégé par le traité ratifié.


Partie 1 C'est une continuation d'hier.
J'ai été puni pour avoir soutenu un Chinois qui avait enfreint l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration.
L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration ne prévoit aucune sanction. Il n'annule que le statut de résidence accordé.
Le "Code international des droits de l'homme B" interdit l'arrestation, la détention et la punition en violation des lois fondamentales.
Si ce n'est que moi ou le chinois, ce ne sera pas un problème international.
Parce que cette "erreur de droit applicable" et la punition "arbitraire" d'étrangers sont systématiquement commises,
Il fait beaucoup de victimes étrangères.
Je lance donc un appel à "tout le monde".


Le gouvernement chinois ne poursuit pas le gouvernement japonais parce que le gouvernement chinois viole les droits de l'homme.
Le gouvernement philippin ne peut pas protester contre le gouvernement japonais, car il ne dispose pas de ressources humaines qui comprennent le droit international et les droits de l'homme.
Le gouvernement américain ne proteste pas contre les clients qui achètent des armes (Japon).
La France, la police mondiale des droits de l'homme, devrait protester contre le Japon.

La «justice prise en otage» par les procureurs japonais est une violation des droits de l'homme.
Je n'ai pas obtenu de "caution" même après la décision du procès.
J'ai été emprisonné pendant plus d'un an.
Ceux qui prétendent l'innocence ne "libèrent" pas.
Le bureau du procureur ne "libère" pas tant que son corps ne s'affaiblit pas, ne ment pas et ne reconnaît pas le péché.
Ceux qui prétendent être innocents n'accordent pas de "probation d'exécution" aux peines de prison.
(En principe, une peine de prison pouvant aller jusqu'à trois ans à la première infraction est une "sursis à exécution").
Même dans les prisons, ils ne donnent pas de "libération conditionnelle" s'ils n'admettent pas de crimes.
(Principe: Si la peine prend fin aux deux tiers, il s’agit d’une "libération conditionnelle").

L'avenir du suspect de Carlos Ghoon est le même sort que moi.

Le gouvernement français devrait formuler une demande fondée sur le "Code international des droits de l'homme B".
Le pacte international relatif aux droits de l'homme B a également été ratifié par le Japon.
La France ne doit pas tolérer que les pays ratifiés par le "Pacte international relatif aux droits de l'homme B" ne se conforment pas au traité.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Nagano Yoshihiro

PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister "Wir werden alles tun, was wir für Gone tun können", sagte die Antwort, aber es gab keinen "Anschlusskontakt". Frankreich sollte auf internationalen Verträgen bestehen. Die rechtliche Unabhängigkeit und Souveränität jedes Landes ist Es sollte durch den ratifizierten Vertrag geschützt werden.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister


2019-04-30:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, als Frau Carroll einen Brief an Präsident Macron schrieb
"Wir werden alles tun, was wir für Gone tun können", sagte die Antwort, aber es gab keinen "Anschlusskontakt".
Frankreich sollte auf internationalen Verträgen bestehen. Die rechtliche Unabhängigkeit und Souveränität jedes Landes ist
Es sollte durch den ratifizierten Vertrag geschützt werden.


Teil 1 Es ist eine Fortsetzung von gestern.
Ich wurde für die Unterstützung eines Chinesen bestraft, der gegen Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstieß.
Es gibt keine Bestrafung nach Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes. Es hebt nur den gewährten Aufenthaltsstatus auf.
Das "Internationale Menschenrechtsgesetzbuch B" verbietet Verhaftung, Unterbringung und Bestrafung unter Verletzung grundlegender Gesetze.
Wenn es sich nur um mich oder um Chinesen handelt, wird es keine internationale Angelegenheit sein.
Da dieser "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" und die "willkürliche" Bestrafung von Ausländern routinemäßig durchgeführt werden,
Es bringt viele ausländische Opfer hervor.
Also appelliere ich an "alle".


Die chinesische Regierung verfolgt die japanische Regierung nicht, weil die chinesische Regierung die Menschenrechte verletzt.
Die philippinische Regierung kann nicht gegen die japanische Regierung protestieren, weil sie keine Humanressourcen hat, die das Völkerrecht und die Menschenrechte verstehen.
Die US-Regierung protestiert nicht gegen Kunden, die Waffen kaufen (Japan).
Frankreich, der Menschenrechtspolizist der Welt, sollte gegen Japan protestieren.

Die "Geiseljustiz" in Japans Staatsanwaltschaft ist die Verletzung der Menschenrechte.
Ich erhielt auch nach der Gerichtsentscheidung keine "Kaution".
Ich war über ein Jahr im Gefängnis.
Diejenigen, die Unschuld behaupten, "entlassen" sie nicht.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft "befreit" sich nicht, bis sein Körper schwächer wird, lügt und Sünde zugibt.
Diejenigen, die Unschuld behaupten, geben den Haftstrafen keine "Bewährungsstrafe".
(Eine Freiheitsstrafe von bis zu drei Jahren wegen erster Straftat ist grundsätzlich "Bewährungsstrafe").
Selbst in Gefängnissen geben sie keine "Bewährung", wenn sie keine Verbrechen zulassen.
(Prinzip: Wenn die Bestrafung zu zwei Dritteln endet, ist dies eine "Bewährung").

Die Zukunft des Verdächtigen von Carlos Ghoon ist dasselbe Schicksal wie ich.

Die französische Regierung sollte einen Antrag auf Grundlage des "International Human Rights Code B" stellen.
Der Internationale Menschenrechtsabkommen B wurde ebenfalls von Japan ratifiziert.
Frankreich darf nicht dulden, dass Länder, die durch den "Internationalen Pakt über Menschenrechte B" ratifiziert wurden, den Vertrag nicht einhalten.

Teil 2 Ich verklage zwei Dinge.
Dies ist ein "internationaler" Menschenrechtsmissbrauch der japanischen Regierung.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden können.
Wenn die Welt die "Herrschaft unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch den Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1 Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsqualifikation" aus. Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden für das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz (Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen") bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz hingegen gilt für Arbeitgeber, die "ursächliche Beziehungen" rechtswidriger Arbeit nach Artikel 73-2 darstellen.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das rechtswidrige Arbeit fördert).

Allerdings hat die japanische Justiz nur Ausländer "bestraft", "Arbeitgeber" jedoch nicht "bestraft".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Gleichheitsregel nach dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das "willkürlich" nur Ausländer "bestraft".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal Ausländer beschäftigt hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind auch illegal arbeitende Ausländer "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es keinen, der "gegen andere Verbrechen im Strafrecht" gestützt wurde, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen, und ein philippinischer Botschaftsvertreter" sind nicht schuldig.

2 Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden", um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen.
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer unterliegen der Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebenen Maßnahme.
Dafür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Verfügungen lauten: "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewandt werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigration Control Act 22-4-4, auf die die "Anklageschrift" hingewiesen hat, stehen in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigration Control Act 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zermalmt "Staatsanwaltschaft".
"Zerquetschen" durch die Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Nagano Yoshihiro


PS:
Die deutsche Regierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Danke als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall des Verstoßes gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte die "Berufung" an den "ICC"


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan
Adresse   Japan
Name Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail 

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister Dear Sirs, when Mrs. Carroll wrote a letter to French President Macron, he replied, "I will do everything I can for the former President of Gone," but there is no "follow-up contact." France should insist on international treaties. The judicial independence and sovereignty of each country should be protected under the ratified treaty.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-04-30:Dear Sirs, when Mrs. Carroll wrote a letter to French President Macron,
he replied, "I will do everything I can for the former President of Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France should insist on international treaties.
The judicial independence and sovereignty of each country should be protected
under the ratified treaty.


Part 1.x
If this is only me or Chinese, it will not be an international issue.
Because this "error of applicable law" and punishing foreigners "arbitrarily" are routinely done,
it causes many foreign victims.
So I appeal to "everyone."

The Chinese government does not pursue the Japanese government
because the Chinese government violates human rights.
The Philippine government can not protest the Japanese government
because it does not have human resources who understand international law and human rights.
The US government does not protest against customers who buy weapons (Japan).
France, the world's human rights police officer, should protest Japan.

The “hostage justice” in Japan's prosecutors is human rights abuses.
I was not granted "Bail" even after the trial decision.
I was imprisoned for over a year.
Those who claim innocence do not "release".
The prosecutor's office does not "release" until his body weakens, lies and admits sin.
Those who claim innocence do not give "probation of execution" to prison sentences.
(In principle, a prison sentence of up to three years
on first offense is "probation of execution").
Even in prisons, they do not give "parole" if they do not admit crimes.
(Principle: If the punishment ends two thirds, it is a "parole").

The future of Carlos Ghoon's suspect is the same fate as me.

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Covenant B has also been ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified by the "International Covenant
on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-04-30:Dear Sirs, when Mrs. Carroll wrote a letter to French President Macron, he replied, "I will do everything I can for the former President of Gone," but there is no "follow-up contact." France should insist on international treaties. The judicial independence and sovereignty of each country should be protected under the ratified treaty.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-04-30:Dear Sirs, when Mrs. Carroll wrote a letter to French President Macron,
he replied, "I will do everything I can for the former President of Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France should insist on international treaties.
The judicial independence and sovereignty of each country should be protected
under the ratified treaty.


Part 1. It is yesterday's continuation.
I was punished for supporting a Chinese who violated Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
There is no punishment under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
It only cancels the granted status of residence.
The "International Human Rights Code B" prohibits arrest, confinement
and punishment in violation of basic laws.
If this is only me or Chinese, it will not be an international issue.
Because this "error of applicable law" and punishing foreigners "arbitrarily" are routinely done,
it causes many foreign victims.
So I appeal to "everyone."

The Chinese government does not pursue the Japanese government
because the Chinese government violates human rights.
The Philippine government can not protest the Japanese government
because it does not have human resources who understand international law and human rights.
The US government does not protest against customers who buy weapons (Japan).
France, the world's human rights police officer, should protest Japan.

The “hostage justice” in Japan's prosecutors is human rights abuses.
I was not granted "Bail" even after the trial decision.
I was imprisoned for over a year.
Those who claim innocence do not "release".
The prosecutor's office does not "release" until his body weakens, lies and admits sin.
Those who claim innocence do not give "probation of execution" to prison sentences.
(In principle, a prison sentence of up to three years
on first offense is "probation of execution").
Even in prisons, they do not give "parole" if they do not admit crimes.
(Principle: If the punishment ends two thirds, it is a "parole").

The future of Carlos Ghoon's suspect is the same fate as me.

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Covenant B has also been ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified by the "International Covenant
on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro



Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone



Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn. The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government. The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners. There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic". Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn.
When he wrote a letter to French President McLon,
he said, "I will do everything I can for the former President Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 1. It is said that there is no "contact"
when trying to contact Mr. McLon's "close adviser" thereafter.
She claims that she has "not received support from France," and she appeals to McLon for help.

About Gone's former chairman.
The French Foreign Minister Rudorian met on the 5th with the Foreign Minister Taro Kono,
who attended the Foreign Ministerial Meeting of seven major countries (G7) held
in France on the 5th.
He told "Taro Kono, Foreign Minister" that "it is important that France respects the principle
of presumed innocence and that the Consulate General can properly protect its own people."
He also said, "France fully respects the independence and sovereignty of Japan's judiciary."
It clarified at the press conference after the G7 foreign ministers meeting on the 6th.

France can not protect its own people if it says,
"It completely respects Japan's judicial independence and sovereignty."
About the "presumed principle of innocence".
In a narrow sense,
it is a principle that indicates the location of burden of proof in a criminal trial,
and unless a prosecutor does "prove" a accused person's "guilty",
the accused person is given an "innocence".
(= The accused does not bear the responsibility to prove his innocence).
(Article 336 of Criminal Procedure Code).
In a broad sense (as a rule), it means that no one is treated as a criminal (has the right)
until a conviction is finalized.
(Another term may be used such as "the principle
of" assuming innocence "such as Article 14 paragraph 2
of the International Covenant on Human Rights B).

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Convention B is ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support
other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone



Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump 2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn. Part 2. I "suing" two things. This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government. We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place. If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

To President Trump


2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn.
When he wrote a letter to French President McLon,
he said, "I will do everything I can for the former President Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 1. It is said that there is no "contact"
when trying to contact Mr. McLon's "close adviser" thereafter.
She claims that she has "not received support from France," and she appeals to McLon for help.

About Gone's former chairman.
The French Foreign Minister Rudorian met on the 5th with the Foreign Minister Taro Kono,
who attended the Foreign Ministerial Meeting of seven major countries (G7) held
in France on the 5th.
He told "Taro Kono, Foreign Minister" that "it is important that France respects the principle
of presumed innocence and that the Consulate General can properly protect its own people."
He also said, "France fully respects the independence and sovereignty of Japan's judiciary."
It clarified at the press conference after the G7 foreign ministers meeting on the 6th.

France can not protect its own people if it says,
"It completely respects Japan's judicial independence and sovereignty."
About the "presumed principle of innocence".
In a narrow sense,
it is a principle that indicates the location of burden of proof in a criminal trial,
and unless a prosecutor does "prove" a accused person's "guilty",
the accused person is given an "innocence".
(= The accused does not bear the responsibility to prove his innocence).
(Article 336 of Criminal Procedure Code).
In a broad sense (as a rule), it means that no one is treated as a criminal (has the right)
until a conviction is finalized.
(Another term may be used such as "the principle
of" assuming innocence "such as Article 14 paragraph 2
of the International Covenant on Human Rights B).

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Convention B is ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support
other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro


My information ***************************************************

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone



For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-04-29:Chers Messieurs, a déclaré Carol Gorn, épouse de Carlos Gorn. Quand j'ai écrit une lettre au président français "Nous ferons tout ce que nous pouvons pour Gone", a déclaré la réponse, mais il n'y a pas eu de "contact de suivi". La France ne doit pas tolérer que les pays ratifiés par le "Pacte international relatif aux droits de l'homme B" ne se conforment pas au traité.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-04-29:Chers Messieurs, a déclaré Carol Gorn, épouse de Carlos Gorn.
Quand j'ai écrit une lettre au président français
"Nous ferons tout ce que nous pouvons pour Gone", a déclaré la réponse, mais il n'y a pas eu de "contact de suivi".
La France ne doit pas tolérer que les pays ratifiés par le "Pacte international relatif aux droits de l'homme B" ne se conforment pas au traité.


Partie 1 On dit qu'il n'y a pas de "contact" lorsque vous essayez de contacter le "conseiller proche" de M. McLon par la suite.
Elle affirme n'avoir "pas reçu de soutien de la France" et fait appel à McLon.


À propos de l'ancien président de Gone.
Rudorian ministre français des Affaires étrangères le 5
Participation à 7 réunions de ministres des affaires étrangères dans 7 grands pays (G7) en France
C'était quand j'ai rencontré le ministre des Affaires étrangères, Taro Kono, le 5.
Il est "ministre des Affaires étrangères Taro Kono"
"La France valorise le principe d'innocence et estime qu'il est important que le consulat général soit capable de protéger correctement son peuple."
Je t'ai dit.
Il a également déclaré: "La France respecte pleinement l'indépendance et la souveraineté de la justice japonaise".
Cela a été clarifié lors de la conférence de presse qui a suivi la réunion des ministres des Affaires étrangères du G7 le 6.

La France ne peut pas protéger son peuple si elle dit: "Elle respecte complètement l'indépendance judiciaire et la souveraineté du Japon".

À propos du "principe présumé d'innocence".
Dans un sens étroit, c'est un principe qui indique le fardeau de la preuve dans les procès pénaux.
"Tant que le procureur ne" prouve "pas l'accusé
L'accusé est "puni".
(= L’accusé ne porte pas la responsabilité de prouver son innocence).
(Article 336 du code de procédure pénale).
Dans un sens large (en règle générale), jusqu’à ce que la condamnation soit finalisée,
Cela signifie que personne n'est traité comme un criminel (a le droit).
(Le "principe de l'innocence de l'assomption" tel que l'article 14, paragraphe 2 du Pacte international relatif aux droits de l'homme
D'autres termes sont parfois utilisés.

Le gouvernement français devrait formuler une demande fondée sur le "Code international des droits de l'homme B".
La Convention internationale des droits de l'homme B est ratifiée par le Japon.
La France ne doit pas tolérer que les pays ratifiés par le "Pacte international relatif aux droits de l'homme B" ne se conforment pas au traité.

Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme.
Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Nagano Yoshihiro

PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister 2019-04-29:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, sagte Carol Gorn, Frau von Carlos Gorn. Als ich einen Brief an den französischen Präsidenten schrieb "Wir werden alles tun, was wir für Gone tun können", sagte die Antwort, aber es gab keinen "Anschlusskontakt". Frankreich darf nicht dulden, dass Länder, die durch den "Internationalen Pakt über Menschenrechte B" ratifiziert wurden, den Vertrag nicht einhalten

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Premierminister


2019-04-29:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, sagte Carol Gorn, Frau von Carlos Gorn.
Als ich einen Brief an den französischen Präsidenten schrieb
"Wir werden alles tun, was wir für Gone tun können", sagte die Antwort, aber es gab keinen "Anschlusskontakt".
Frankreich darf nicht dulden, dass Länder, die durch den "Internationalen Pakt über Menschenrechte B" ratifiziert wurden, den Vertrag nicht einhalten.


Teil 1 Es wird gesagt, dass es keinen "Kontakt" gibt, wenn Sie danach versuchen, Mr. McLons "engen Berater" zu kontaktieren.
Sie behauptet, dass sie "keine Unterstützung aus Frankreich erhalten hat" und bittet McLon um Hilfe.


Über den ehemaligen Vorsitzenden von Gone.
Rudorianischer Außenminister am 5. September
Teilnahme an 7 Außenministertreffen in 7 großen Ländern (G7) in Frankreich
Am 5. traf ich mich mit Außenminister Taro Kono.
Er ist "Taro Kono Außenminister"
"Frankreich schätzt das Prinzip der Unschuld und hält es für wichtig, dass das Generalkonsulat seine eigenen Leute angemessen schützen kann."
Ich habe es dir gesagt.
Er sagte auch: "Frankreich respektiert die Unabhängigkeit und Souveränität der japanischen Justiz voll und ganz."
Auf der Pressekonferenz nach dem G7-Außenministertreffen am 6. März wurde das klargestellt.

Frankreich kann sein eigenes Volk nicht schützen, wenn es sagt: "Es respektiert Japans gerichtliche Unabhängigkeit und Souveränität völlig."

Über das "vermutete Prinzip der Unschuld".
Im engeren Sinne ist es ein Prinzip, das die Beweislast in Strafverfahren aufzeigt.
"Solange der Staatsanwalt den Angeklagten nicht" beweist "
Der Angeklagte wird "bestraft".
(= Der Angeklagte trägt nicht die Verantwortung, seine Unschuld zu beweisen).
(Artikel 336 der Strafprozessordnung).
Im weitesten Sinne (in der Regel), bis eine Verurteilung abgeschlossen ist,
Es bedeutet, dass niemand als Verbrecher behandelt wird (hat das Recht).
(Das "Prinzip der Mariä Himmelfahrt-Unschuld"), wie Artikel 14 Absatz 2 des Internationalen Menschenrechtsabkommens B,
Andere Begriffe werden manchmal verwendet.

Die französische Regierung sollte einen Antrag auf Grundlage des "International Human Rights Code B" stellen.
Die Internationale Menschenrechtskonvention B wird von Japan ratifiziert.
Frankreich darf nicht dulden, dass Länder, die durch den "Internationalen Pakt über Menschenrechte B" ratifiziert wurden, den Vertrag nicht einhalten.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2 Ich verklage zwei Dinge.
Dies ist ein "internationaler" Menschenrechtsmissbrauch der japanischen Regierung.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden können.
Wenn die Welt die "Herrschaft unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch den Terrorismus zu regeln.
Aber es ist verrückt.

1 Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsqualifikation" aus. Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden für das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz (Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen") bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz hingegen gilt für Arbeitgeber, die "ursächliche Beziehungen" rechtswidriger Arbeit nach Artikel 73-2 darstellen.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das rechtswidrige Arbeit fördert).

Allerdings hat die japanische Justiz nur Ausländer "bestraft", "Arbeitgeber" jedoch nicht "bestraft".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Gleichheitsregel nach dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das "willkürlich" nur Ausländer "bestraft".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal Ausländer beschäftigt hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind auch illegal arbeitende Ausländer "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es keinen, der "gegen andere Verbrechen im Strafrecht" gestützt wurde, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen, und ein philippinischer Botschaftsvertreter" sind nicht schuldig.

2 Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden", um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen.
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer unterliegen der Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebenen Maßnahme.
Dafür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Verfügungen lauten: "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewandt werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigration Control Act 22-4-4, auf die die "Anklageschrift" hingewiesen hat, stehen in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigration Control Act 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zermalmt "Staatsanwaltschaft".
"Zerquetschen" durch die Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Nagano Yoshihiro


PS:
Die deutsche Regierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Danke als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall des Verstoßes gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte die "Berufung" an den "ICC"


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan
Adresse   Japan
Name Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail 

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn. Part 1. It is said that there is no "contact" when trying to contact Mr. McLon's "close adviser" thereafter. She claims that she has "not received support from France," and she appeals to McLon for help.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn.
When he wrote a letter to French President McLon,
he said, "I will do everything I can for the former President Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 1. It is said that there is no "contact"
when trying to contact Mr. McLon's "close adviser" thereafter.
She claims that she has "not received support from France," and she appeals to McLon for help.

About Gone's former chairman.
The French Foreign Minister Rudorian met on the 5th with the Foreign Minister Taro Kono,
who attended the Foreign Ministerial Meeting of seven major countries (G7) held
in France on the 5th.
He told "Taro Kono, Foreign Minister" that "it is important that France respects the principle
of presumed innocence and that the Consulate General can properly protect its own people."
He also said, "France fully respects the independence and sovereignty of Japan's judiciary."
It clarified at the press conference after the G7 foreign ministers meeting on the 6th.

France can not protect its own people if it says,
"It completely respects Japan's judicial independence and sovereignty."
About the "presumed principle of innocence".
In a narrow sense,
it is a principle that indicates the location of burden of proof in a criminal trial,
and unless a prosecutor does "prove" a accused person's "guilty",
the accused person is given an "innocence".
(= The accused does not bear the responsibility to prove his innocence).
(Article 336 of Criminal Procedure Code).
In a broad sense (as a rule), it means that no one is treated as a criminal (has the right)
until a conviction is finalized.
(Another term may be used such as "the principle
of" assuming innocence "such as Article 14 paragraph 2
of the International Covenant on Human Rights B).

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Convention B is ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support
other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro

PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn. When he wrote a letter to French President McLon, he said, "I will do everything I can for the former President Gone," but there is no "follow-up contact." France must not tolerate that countries ratified by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the tre

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn.
When he wrote a letter to French President McLon,
he said, "I will do everything I can for the former President Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

Part 1. It is said that there is no "contact"
when trying to contact Mr. McLon's "close adviser" thereafter.
She claims that she has "not received support from France," and she appeals to McLon for help.

About Gone's former chairman.
The French Foreign Minister Rudorian met on the 5th with the Foreign Minister Taro Kono,
who attended the Foreign Ministerial Meeting of seven major countries (G7) held
in France on the 5th.
He told "Taro Kono, Foreign Minister" that "it is important that France respects the principle
of presumed innocence and that the Consulate General can properly protect its own people."
He also said, "France fully respects the independence and sovereignty of Japan's judiciary."
It clarified at the press conference after the G7 foreign ministers meeting on the 6th.

France can not protect its own people if it says,
"It completely respects Japan's judicial independence and sovereignty."
About the "presumed principle of innocence".
In a narrow sense,
it is a principle that indicates the location of burden of proof in a criminal trial,
and unless a prosecutor does "prove" a accused person's "guilty",
the accused person is given an "innocence".
(= The accused does not bear the responsibility to prove his innocence).
(Article 336 of Criminal Procedure Code).
In a broad sense (as a rule), it means that no one is treated as a criminal (has the right)
until a conviction is finalized.
(Another term may be used such as "the principle
of" assuming innocence "such as Article 14 paragraph 2
of the International Covenant on Human Rights B).

The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Convention B is ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support
other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Zip code

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone



Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To everyone in the world. April 28, 2019, Special Zone of Europe Sunday Edition: Dear Sirs, the labor shortage in Europe is serious with the declining birthrate and aging population. However, the increase in refugees has become a major social issue. Therefore, each country should accept the world's "poor" as a "temporary immigration" by limiting it to a "special zone."

To everyone in the world.

April 28, 2019, Special Zone of Europe Sunday Edition:

Dear Sirs, the labor shortage in Europe is serious with the declining birthrate and aging population. However, the increase in refugees has become a major social issue. Therefore, each country should accept the world's "poor" as a "temporary immigration" by limiting it to a "special zone."

Part 1. I also mentioned last week.

At the end of last year, the German Merkel administration cabinet-decided a "Specialist Immigration Bill" to expand the acceptance of foreign workers outside the (EU) region.

If you can speak German and have received vocational training, you will be able to enter Germany and search for jobs for six months, even if you do not have a place to work.

In Germany, the increase in refugees became a social issue, causing the Merkel administration to shake, but it was considered urgent to resolve the shortage of labor.

Aim for implementation from the beginning of 2020 after discussions in the Diet.

Germany's expanding acceptance of foreign workers is due to the fact that labor shortages have become serious due to the declining birthrate and aging population.

In particular, there is a lack of specialized human resources with excellent skills in local SMEs, and there are also surveys that two-thirds of companies in the next three years will need new human resources.

This is the same in Japan.

Japan will accept "foreign skilled workers" from April 2019.

(We have already accepted foreign students and "interns of foreigners' skills" as labor force.)

Since "interns of foreigners' skills" are severe working conditions, there is a problem of fleeing from "the training destination".

Japan, unlike France, employs new graduates from high school and college (4 years) to educate through work.

This is because Japanese commerce and industry valued "experience and achievement".

In Japan, management and employees in "company" have long said "to live together; to be close friends; to eat out of the sam".

Every company has a sense of being a member of a community.

As in France, there is no discrimination of status due to academic background.

Although there are "politeness" above and below depending on the age, "discrimination based on Educational background is not in principle.

I think in France it is the treatment of "bak + 3".

It is similar to the German "Meister" system.

I think the German labor system and the minds of workers are wonderful.

However, it is doubtful that German society accepts human resources who can speak German and receive vocational training.

So I propose a "special zone".

Accept foreign workers outside the EU as "temporary immigration" in "special zones".

Movement is limited to "special zones".

Even if it escapes, it is only in the "special zone".

"Temporary immigration" learns German-style work while working in the "special zone" factory.

I think they learn while working "German".

(It is better to have a "German language school" or a "vocational training school" to learn at night etc.)

The “international skills trainee” who will come to Japan will learn Japanese and skills in about two years.

If they work for three years, they become "skilled technicians".

In the "temporary immigration" work in the "special zone" for about three years, it becomes a "skilled worker" who can speak German.

So if you make "temporary immigration" a system that allows you to work freely in Germany as "immigrant workers", it will be a great force for local SMEs.

I think they can live with the German citizen as well.

Of course, "temporary immigrants" who do not fall under "appropriate" do not qualify as "migrant workers".

It will continue next week.

Part 2. We propose to build "special zones" in each country, including Europe.

Please read along with the proposal for the United States (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see.

April 28, 2019, supplementary matters.

Omit.

The prosperity of each country is realized by the freedom, democracy and "ruled under the law" of the world.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please direct the concerned parties to investigate.

Materials submitted to the ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose the name and the required items.

If you have any questions please email me.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano "Nagano Hirohiro"