To President Trump! December 11, 2025 Musk claims that approximately 80% of Tesla's future value will come from its in-house developed humanoid robot, "Optimus." Is he joking? Humanoid robots make extensive use of rare metals, essential for high-performance motors and batteries. Does President Xi Jinping approve?

 To President Trump!

December 11, 2025

Musk claims that approximately 80% of Tesla's future value will come from its in-house developed humanoid robot, "Optimus." Is he joking?

Humanoid robots make extensive use of rare metals, essential for high-performance motors and batteries. Does President Xi Jinping approve?

Rare earths (a type of rare metal) such as neodymium and praseodymium, used in powerful permanent magnets, are core materials for Tesla.

China holds an overwhelming share of the global market for the production (mining and refining) of rare earths, including neodymium and praseodymium. Imports from China are unstable.

China accounts for approximately 70% of the world's mining volume (as of 2024). In the refining sector, China accounts for over 90% of the global market share and controls the entire supply chain. It appears that President Xi Jinping holds the key to Tesla's future.

While some rare metal and rare earth raw materials are exported from the United States to China, the United States imports refined products. Addressing this issue is urgent.

Mining rare metals and rare earths can result in chemicals and waste flowing in-to water sources, potentially contaminating soil and groundwater.

Ore may contain radioactive materials such as uranium and thorium, and the mining and refining processes generate large amounts of radioactive waste, posing potential health risks.

As a result, the United States has withdrawn from the refining business. Refin-ing is a job Americans hate. The United States needs to build safe factories and ensure the safety of refinery workers.

Rare metals are essential to Musk's vision of AI robots, AI taxis, and electric ve-hicles. Without a "special zone," his vision would be nothing more than a pipe dream.

I believe refining should take place in a "special zone" on the Mexican border. Temporary immigrants (illegible immigrants) should be employed as refinery workers.

Musk should build a smelting plant in a "Special Zone," employ "temporary im-migrants" (illegal immigrants), and become self-sufficient in rare metals and ra-re earths.

Rare metals and rare earths are widely used in cutting-edge weapons essential to U.S. national security. Musk should cooperate with U.S. national security.

As Musk says, the entire White House staff is "incompetent." The smelting op-eration in the "Special Zone" is the "key" to Musk's business success.

Mr. Musk! Please explain my proposed "Special Zone" to President Trump. By establishing a "Special Zone" on the Mexican border, we can secure factory land.

And by accepting illegal immigrants as "temporary immigrants," we can secure lower-wage workers than China or the U.S. This is not only beneficial for Tesla, but it's a true "MAGA fulfillment"!

Part 1: References

Elon Musk "surrenders" to Google on self-driving cars? Tesla shifts focus to ro-botics?

https://jidounten-lab.com/u_56886

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano