To President Trump! December 12, 2025 I am Japanese. Prime Minister Takaichi's statement that "If China attacks Taiwan, Japan can respond with the Self-Defense Forces" is a fabrication by a "militarist." Prime Minister Takaichi countered, "If it involves the use of warships or the use of force, it could easily become an existential threat." However, Japan does not recognize Taiwan as a nation.

 To President Trump!

December 12, 2025

I am Japanese. Prime Minister Takaichi's statement that "If China attacks Taiwan, Japan can respond with the Self-Defense Forces" is a fabrication by a "milita-rist."

Prime Minister Takaichi countered, "If it involves the use of warships or the use of force, it could easily become a situation of existential threat." However, Ja-pan does not recognize Taiwan as a nation.

Taiwan is not a formal ally of Japan. Japan and Taiwan have not had formal dip-lomatic relations since the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communiqué.

"Existence-Threatening Situation" is a legal term used in the security-related legislation enacted in 2015 to refer to a situation in which Japan's existence is threatened by an armed attack against an ally. In such a situation, the Self-Defense Forces would be deployed to deal with the threat.

Japan does not recognize Taiwan as a nation. Therefore, it cannot be consid-ered a "nation." Therefore, Takaichi's statement is a lie perpetrated by Japanese militarists.

I am a "conservative" who defends the Japanese Constitution, which was draft-ed by the U.S. military after World War II. Article 9 declares that Japan seeks international peace and forever renounces war and the use of force.

The Constitution stipulates that "Japan forever renounces war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling interna-tional disputes," and stipulates that Japan will not possess armaments or rec-ognize the right of belligerency. This is "Japanese conservatism."

UN Resolution 2758 (1971) granted the People's Republic of China the status of "sole representative of China" and expelled the Republic of China (Taiwan) from the United Nations.

This resolution has served as the basis for the Chinese government's claims that "there is only one China in the world" and that "Taiwan is part of Chinese terri-tory." It has also asserted that the People's Republic of China is the sole legiti-mate government representing China and promoted the "One China" principle internationally.

Japanese "conservatives" believe that defending the post-World War II "Consti-tution of Japan" and UN Resolution 2758 is just. Takaichi is a "prewar milita-rist."

Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping should expel militarists like the Takaichi admin-istration from the international community. The American people must not for-get the slogan "Remember Pearl Harbor."

Because the attack on Pearl Harbor occurred before Japan declared war, the United States considered it a "surprise attack." The American people should be wary of the rise of Japanese militarists.

To prevent the resurgence of militarism, the Chinese government should form a "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA)" with the United States and Russia to block Japan's rise.

Today, no country possesses overwhelming economic, military, and political power and can exert significant influence on the international community. This is why militarists are running rampant in every country.

President Trump should form a "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA)" with the United States, Russia, and China, and as "joint hegemons," aim to reduce glob-al military spending and improve the lives of its people.

Part 1: References

How the Japan PM's Taiwan remarks provoked the fury of China

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crklvx2n7rzo

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp