<Public mail> #metoo Human rights victim!
Dear Sirs International people.
End of Year & New Year January 04, 2019:
Judges should make a judgment based on "Constitution and Law".
By "logic that" Okeya "makes money if the wind blows,
I forcibly make it a criminal. It is a judge's individual crime.
Dear Sir, Please "listen" to the summary of the ICC complaint.
Summary of 2010 "Violation of Immigration",
"Incident aiding a violation of Immigration Act".
I (Nagano), who was the president of Lefco,
issued "Tentative decision of recruitment" to four Chinese people by January 2009,
but in Lehman shock in the fall of 2008,
the schedule of orders is " Drastically reduced "in March 2009,
we canceled" Tentative decision of recruitment ".
Four Chinese who failed "getting a job" at Lefco Inc.
worked at a "restaurant" after graduating from college.
So they were arrested from May 2010 to June in the Immigration Act 70 (4) illegal work
by activities other than the status of residence.
However, those who hire Chinese people will not be arrested under Article 2
of the Immigration Act 73 (a crime of promoting illegal employment). It is "innocent".
Kin Gungaku, who was in charge of me and recruitment,
has not done the act prescribed in Article 2 of Immigration Act 73.
The judge says.
I have no intention of employing Chinese people. However,
I handed out "the contract documents of false content of employment" prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act to the Chinese.
Therefore, the Chinese easily obtained "qualification of stay" of "technology"
or "humanities international".
As "qualification for residence" was obtained, the Chinese were able to live in Japan.
Because the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to do "illegal work".
Therefore, it is clear that "we" delivered "contract documents of false contents
of employment" to Chinese and "causal relation" that the Chinese made "illegal work".
Such "argument" is the "argument" of "Quibble".
In Japan, "If the wind blows" Okeya "is called" yield a profit "
Of course, it violates "logic of law"
It is not a crime to submit Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(to obtain false documents and obtain qualification for residence).
This action only cancels the "status of residence" given by the Minister of Justice.
I would like to say to "a foolish judge".
Even if they acquire the status of residence as "Contract documents of false employment",
if they work within the scope of residence status,
they will not become "illegal work".
Everyone in the international community should teach this "logic of law" to Japanese prosecutors
and judges.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I've "claimed" two things in this case.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished with Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, Japan's judiciary "disposses" only foreigners and does not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If "an employer who illegally employed" is innocent,
"a foreigner who worked illegally" is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. "Prosecution letter" "as a reason for crime,
It points out the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no criminal penalty against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence"
by "Minister of Justice" and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "crime to support other crimes of criminal law" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "support" a lot of victims with your courage and justice.
I am asking the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for victims" of the victims.
Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
