【公開メール】#MeToo人権被害者！
テリサ・メイ英首相に
2019-02-05：昨年12月、
韓国の "海軍駆逐艦はP-1パトロール機を照射
数回日本の海上自衛隊の火器管制レーダーで。
それは戦争の危機に瀕しています。
西洋社会は「沈黙」です。それはクレイジーです！
拝啓。検察官は「外国人を雇用させた雇用主を処分しない」
「違法行為を促進した犯罪」として「入国管理法第73条の2の規定に基づく。
その場合、
「違法労働」をした外国人を処分しないのが「法の論理」です
入国管理法第70条に基づく。（外国人は有罪ではありません）。
もしそうなら、もちろん、違法労働の促進者はいない。
これは法律の下でのガバナンスであり、基本的人権を尊重することです。
これを行うことは国際法の遵守です。
以前は、違法に外国人を雇用していた雇用主は処分されていませんでした。
移民法第73条の2「違法雇用を助長する罪」に基づく。
そして「違法な仕事」をした外国人だけが「国から追放された」
移民法第70条の「違法労働の投獄」による
そして「罰金」。これは国際法違反です。
検察官等は「事件」においてより悪質な「犯罪行為」を行った
平成22年に発生した「入国法違反の推進のお知らせ」
検察官などが不正に第三者の「プロモーター」を代理で「創設」します
「違法雇用促進の罪」について
The prosecutors dispose of third parties to make them appear as if they were disposed of equally,
and made foreigners who carried out illegal work "a crime of labor"
and "expelled them outside the country".
In case
"I and KinGungaku" who provided "a document of contract of employment" to Chinese by a third party.
"I and Kin Gungaku" is not a crime that promoted illegal employment "
of Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
but a" disposition of obtaining a status of residence
by submitting false documents "in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act The reason
for crime was that he supported him.
This disposition is to cancel the status of residence of a foreign national.
It is "Administrative Punishment" by the Minister of Justice.
And "crime of support" of Article 60, Article 62 of the Penal Code can not be applied.
Prosecutors, however, ignored the "logic of law".
Prosecutors and others abused the "crime of support"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against the Immigration Act 70
(crime of unlawful labor) which is not related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
It is a crazy judiciary that is completely out of "logic of law".
Even this, can you not understand, or are you having no justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue with next week.
I will continue until you understand.
God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
テリサ・メイ英首相に
2019-02-05：昨年12月、
韓国の "海軍駆逐艦はP-1パトロール機を照射
数回日本の海上自衛隊の火器管制レーダーで。
それは戦争の危機に瀕しています。
西洋社会は「沈黙」です。それはクレイジーです！
拝啓。検察官は「外国人を雇用させた雇用主を処分しない」
「違法行為を促進した犯罪」として「入国管理法第73条の2の規定に基づく。
その場合、
「違法労働」をした外国人を処分しないのが「法の論理」です
入国管理法第70条に基づく。（外国人は有罪ではありません）。
もしそうなら、もちろん、違法労働の促進者はいない。
これは法律の下でのガバナンスであり、基本的人権を尊重することです。
これを行うことは国際法の遵守です。
以前は、違法に外国人を雇用していた雇用主は処分されていませんでした。
移民法第73条の2「違法雇用を助長する罪」に基づく。
そして「違法な仕事」をした外国人だけが「国から追放された」
移民法第70条の「違法労働の投獄」による
そして「罰金」。これは国際法違反です。
検察官等は「事件」においてより悪質な「犯罪行為」を行った
平成22年に発生した「入国法違反の推進のお知らせ」
検察官などが不正に第三者の「プロモーター」を代理で「創設」します
「違法雇用促進の罪」について
The prosecutors dispose of third parties to make them appear as if they were disposed of equally,
and made foreigners who carried out illegal work "a crime of labor"
and "expelled them outside the country".
In case
"I and KinGungaku" who provided "a document of contract of employment" to Chinese by a third party.
"I and Kin Gungaku" is not a crime that promoted illegal employment "
of Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
but a" disposition of obtaining a status of residence
by submitting false documents "in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act The reason
for crime was that he supported him.
This disposition is to cancel the status of residence of a foreign national.
It is "Administrative Punishment" by the Minister of Justice.
And "crime of support" of Article 60, Article 62 of the Penal Code can not be applied.
Prosecutors, however, ignored the "logic of law".
Prosecutors and others abused the "crime of support"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against the Immigration Act 70
(crime of unlawful labor) which is not related to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
It is a crazy judiciary that is completely out of "logic of law".
Even this, can you not understand, or are you having no justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom,
democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue with next week.
I will continue until you understand.
God will always support 'justice'.
I certainly believe that justice is "wins".
I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners,
but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And we are in violation of international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
"Crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensation for the victim" of the victim.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
