To President Trump!
September 21, 2026【Proposal for Today】This text highlights the double standards of freedom of speech and regulation in the U.S. election campaign, as well as the di-lemma facing the Republican Party, and examines the imbalances in rules applied be-tween politicians and ordinary citizens from fifteen perspectives.
1[The Contradictions Lurking in the Elections of the Land of the Free] While holding up the banner of the "land of the free," the United States harbors major contradic-tions regarding the nature of that freedom ahead of the midterm elections. What emerges from this is ultimately the conclusion of a "double-standard democracy." (Yasuhiro Nagano)
2[The Trump Dilemma = Someone Bringing Gasoline to a Burning Building and In-sisting They Are "Putting Out the Fire"] The Republican Party is saddled with Mr. Trump, whose remarks repeatedly lose votes, and is grappling with profound internal conflicts. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
3[The Fate of the Republican Party = A Tragicomedy of Protecting a Candidate with a Self-Destruct Switch] Protecting a candidate whose votes decrease every time he speaks has become the fate of the Republican Party. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
4[Speech Decreases Votes, Silence Erases Presence] Mr. Trump faces a catch-22 where speaking invites backlash, while silence draws dissatisfaction from his support-ers. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
5[American Election Commercials = Legal Horror Movies] Television commercials le-gally broadcast horrifying imagery and scandal attacks, making the campaign look like a horror movie. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
6[Instant Ban on SNS, Chorus of Approval on Television] While the same expressions are prohibited on social media, they are protected on television as official advertise-ments for the candidate's camp. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
7[Citizens' Speech Restricted Like a Communist Country, Politicians Given Infinite Free Passes] Ordinary citizens face permanent bans for posting, while politicians' re-marks are protected under the guise of public interest. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
8[A Country Where "Go Home" Chants Do Not Happen = Because Opponents Cannot Enter the Venue] "Go Home" chants like those in Japan do not occur in the U.S., making rallies safe spaces exclusively for supporters. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
9[Explosive Footage OK on TV, Explosively Viral Sharing Forbidden on SNS] Nuclear explosions and riot footage are permitted on television, but deleted on social media under the pretext of high virality. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
10[Candidate Advertisements Protected by Law, Ordinary Citizen Posts Erased by Terms of Service] TV commercials are protected by law, whereas social media posts are freely deleted under corporate terms of service. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
11[SNS Fearing Misinformation, Television Loving Horror Imagery] Social media im-poses strict regulations to prevent the spread of misinformation, but television toler-ates horror staging as a campaign tactic. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
12["This Candidate is a Criminal" is Legal on TV, Instantly Deleted on SNS] Aggres-sive expressions that run normally on television are treated as defamation and sub-ject to deletion on social media. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
13[International Discussion = Should We Standardize Criteria? But Reality Makes It Impossible] Discussions on unifying standards exist worldwide, but differences in the nature of media make implementation difficult. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
14[EU Tightens Regulations, U.S. Stalls on Freedom of Speech, Japan Confined to Debate] The current reality shows the EU tightening regulations via the DSA, the U.S. hitting a wall over freedom of speech, and Japan stopping at mere debate. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
15[Double-Standard Democracy = Freedom Exists, But the Question Is Who Has It] American democracy maintains a dual structure where different standards apply to politicians and citizens, despite championing freedom. Right here lies the greatest contradiction of the "land of the free." (Yasuhiro Nagano)
Part 1 Related URL
"What to do with Mr. Trump, whose votes drop the moment he opens his mouth..." The "Trump Dilemma" Tormenting the Republican Party
https://x.gd/IAfMr
I will write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano ((English)
1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)
Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]
Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.
Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.
Read the full text here: To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
[Chapter 1] Case Overview
Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.
Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.
2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.
May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).
June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.
The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.
[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation
This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.
Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.
The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:
A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.
The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.
Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.
Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.
This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.
[My Argument]
Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.
Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.
This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.
Continued in the Saturday Edition.
Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones
I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.
This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Global Special Zone Project NO2
https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
Nagano Opinion NO1
https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
No comments:
Post a Comment