To President Trump! May 13, 2026 Mr. Trump should also advocate for the creation of "balanced countervailing duties" in other countries. Exporters should expand "international trade" by importing "products from other countries" alongside their own exports. If "balanced countervailing duties" are introduced in the United States, exporters from other countries will compete to export their own products to the US "duty-free" by importing "products from other countries."

 To President Trump!

May 13, 2026

Continuing from yesterday: If the US does not announce the creation of "balanced countervailing duties," the Chinese government should advise the US for the sake of China and for the expansion of global trade.

The US should establish the "balanced countervailing duties" proposed by Nagano, Japan. They should say that this would eliminate the US trade deficit.

However, the Trump administration should announce the creation of "balanced coun-tervailing duties" before China. Since the "balanced countervailing duties" policy is an export policy, the US media will be confused.

As I have stated many times, I believe that "Trump 2.0" is necessary to eliminate the US trade deficit. Other countries are simply protesting that it is "unfair and one-sided."

The Trump administration should argue that the US trade deficit is unsustainable and that balance between exports and imports is essential for the sustainable develop-ment of global trade.

President Trump should announce the creation of "balanced countervailing duties" and revise US tariff policy. The US should impose high tariffs on individual importers based on their net import value over a certain period.

President Trump should also advocate for the creation of "balanced countervailing du-ties" in other countries. Exporters should expand "international trade" by importing "products from other countries" in parallel with their own exports.

If "balanced countervailing duties" are implemented in the US, exporters from other countries will compete to export their own products to the US "duty-free" by import-ing "US products."

"Balanced countervailing duties" are more effective in cases of high tariffs, like in "Trump 2.0," because exporters will strive to export to the US "duty-free."

With the introduction of "balanced countervailing duties," companies like "Walmart" can export US products to China in exchange for importing Chinese products, aiming for "duty-free" imports.

If companies like #Walmart succeed in importing goods duty-free, other importers will likely follow suit. This chain reaction should alleviate the inflation caused by #Trump2.0.

Americans should be pleased that tariff revenues from #Trump2.0 are decreasing. This means a reduction in the US trade deficit and job creation.

A decrease in the US trade deficit means increased exports of US products and job creation. However, this alone does not result in a trade surplus.

President Trump's approval rating for his #CostOfLiving for Americans has fallen from 25% in the previous poll to 22%. The #IranWar, which began at the end of February, has caused a sharp rise in #gasoline prices and is a major factor in the decline in his approval rating.

#Inflation is a heavy burden on American households, and there are growing con-cerns within the #Republican party that they will lose their majority in Congress in the November midterm elections. I am certain of this.

The outcome of the "#IranWar" remains uncertain, but the inflation caused by "#Tariffs" under "#Trump2.0" can be curbed by "#BalancedCountervailingTariffs."

Republican lawmakers should seriously consider the creation of "#BalancedCounter-vailingTariffs." More tomorrow. Go America, Go Trump!

Part 1 References

Trump's approval rating at 34%, lowest of his term; dissatisfaction with rising cost of living = survey

https://jp.reuters.com/world/us/DHMWLVKHRJKMRIOLOLVM4TCBPM-2026-04-28/

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp