To President Trump! May 15, 2026 By building a "refinery" in a "special zone" and employing "illegal immigrants" (temporary immigrants) as "refinery workers," America can secure a stable supply of rare metals. The Trump administration should build a "special zone (industrial zone)" along the Mexican border where "illegal immigrants" are flowing in and employ them at lower wages than in China. If this happens, the world's factory will relocate to the Mexican border, and America will "re-emerge" as the "world's factory." Go America, go Trump!

 To President Trump!

May 15, 2026

Continuing from yesterday. "#UndocumentedImmigrants" study "English and Ameri-can culture" in "#Special Zones," and if they meet certain qualifications, they are is-sued regular "#WorkVisitors." Many people say that "#UndocumentedImmigrants" are "taking jobs from Americans," so I'm writing about this today.

Many "#MAGA" supporters on "#Trustsocia" and "#Getter" agree that providing edu-cation to "#UndocumentedImmigrants" in "#Special Zones" and employing them as "#LowWageWorkers" is in the national interest of America.

"#UndocumentedImmigrants (#TemporaryImmigrants)" are restricted from residing within "#Special Zones" after entering the country. "#MAGA" supporters also appre-ciate this point.

Factories where "#UndocumentedImmigrants (#TemporaryImmigrants)" work in "#Special Zones" offer lower wages than China, making it easier to secure "#Low-WageWorkers," which is why companies are competing to build factories there.

Many of these companies have expanded into China and are relocating their factories to the United States. Apple's iPhone manufacturing plants are one example.

This also includes factories producing clothing and general merchandise for American brands. For American brands, manufacturing in the U.S. enhances brand credibility. This symbolizes the resurgence of "Made in America."

Furthermore, it includes many companies that currently export and sell products in the U.S. Manufacturing in the U.S. reduces tariffs and transportation costs. Even if tariffs were eliminated, factories would likely relocate to the U.S.

These companies manufacture in the U.S. and export to Europe, Asia, and other countries worldwide. Established supply chains and low wages are major attractions for manufacturing.

Companies supplying raw materials and components from existing U.S. factory zones are experiencing increased production and labor shortages due to priority given to shipments to "special zones" under the "Special Zone Supply Chain Act." In other words, employment for workers in existing factory zones will increase.

When American companies expanded into China, American material and parts facto-ries were unable to export to China and were forced to close. "#Special Zones" are protected by law within the United States.

"#Undocumented Immigrants" willingly take on "#Harsh Jobs" that Americans avoid. I propose building shipyards in "#Special Zones" and "training" them as "#Shipbuild-ing Workers."

#Undocumented Immigrants who acquire shipbuilding skills in "#Special Zones" can obtain "#Work Visas" and work in shipyards across the United States. By securing shipbuilding workers, the US "shipbuilding industry will 'revive'."

The "#Rare Metal Refining" business is dangerous. Because it is dangerous, the US withdrew from the refining business. As a result, the US is "threatened" by China's "#Rare Metal Export Restrictions."

By constructing a "refinery" in a "special zone" and employing "illegal immigrants" (temporary immigrants) as "refinery workers," the US can secure a stable supply of rare metals.

The Trump administration should construct a "special zone (industrial zone)" along the Mexican border where "illegal immigrants" are flowing in, and employ them at lower wages than China. If this happens, the world's factory will shift to the Mexican border, and the US will "re-emerge" as the "world's factory." Go America, go Trump!

Part 1 References

Trump Republicans: Struggling in both houses of Congress? High inflation and Iran operation weigh heavily - Six months until the US midterm elections

https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2026050200278&g=int

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano