To President Trump! May 4, 2026 The acceptance of illegal immigrants is a hot topic as a response to the refugee crisis and a solution to the domestic labor shortage. I argue that by accepting them into special zones and employing them as low-wage workers, the United States can solve the illegal immigration problem and restore the international competitiveness of American products. I believe that the US trade deficit stems from the lack of international competitiveness of American products. The cause of this is clearly the wage gap between the US and China.

 

To President Trump!

May 4, 2026

The acceptance of illegal immigrants has become a subject of debate as a response to the refugee crisis and as a solution to the domestic labor shortage. I argue that by accepting them into special zones and employing them as low-wage workers, the United States can solve the illegal immigration problem and restore the international competitiveness of American products.

I believe that the US trade deficit stems from the lack of international competitive-ness of American products. The cause is clearly the wage gap between the US and China.

While introducing state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment to improve productivity is an effective way to narrow the wage gap and increase price competitiveness against Chinese products, it is actually China that is introducing the latest manufacturing equipment. This is ironic.

The price difference between American and Chinese products is clearly due to the wage gap. Data from the early 2020s shows that the average wage in the US is sev-eral times higher (approximately 4-6 times) than in China. It's no surprise that "#American products" are at a disadvantage against "#Chinese products."

Considering the "#wage gap" between the US and China is several times larger (ap-proximately 4-6 times), it's understandable that American business leaders hesitate to invest in the US. I believe this gap can be rectified by employing "#illegal immi-grants" at low wages.

However, accepting "#illegal immigrants" without providing them with education in-evitably creates problems. Therefore, I propose a method of accepting them into "#special zones" and providing them with education while they work.

"#illegal immigrants" would be isolated in "#special zones" as "#temporary immi-grants," with their residence restricted. This would negate the claim that "#illegal immigrants" are dangerous.

"#Temporary immigrants (#illegal immigrants)" would be employed as "#low-wage workers" at lower wages than Chinese workers. This would allow factories within the "#special zones" to compete with "#Chinese products" on price.

"Temporary immigrants (illegal immigrants)" work as "low-wage workers" for lower wages than Chinese workers, but their "food, clothing, housing, healthcare, and edu-cation are free." I believe they are wealthier than workers within the United States.

"Temporary immigrants (illegal immigrants)" who meet certain conditions are grant-ed "regular work status" and can leave the "special zone" to work nationwide. This will alleviate the labor shortage in the United States.

The "special zone" in the United States is located "inside the wall" that Trump built on the "Mexico border." Trump's "wall on the Mexican border" is precisely what will have this effect. If a double wall is built, a "special zone" will be created in between.

The "special zone law (supply chain provisions)" will supply materials and parts from existing industrial zone factories to the "special zone." The more products are pro-duced and sold in the "special zone," the more shipments from existing industrial zone factories will increase, leading to higher incomes for American workers.

Trump should propose creating a special zone on the Mexican border to reverse the #immigration policy. The American people would dream of building a #newAmerica. Go America, Go Trump!

Part 1 References

[Reading the Earth] Perspectives on Immigration Policy: Interests and Prejudices, In-tensifying Debates… Takenori Inoki, Professor Emeritus, Osaka University

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/serial/earth/20260426-GYT8T00002/

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano