To President Trump! May 27, 2026 In the UK local elections, the Labour Party suffered a crushing defeat, while the Reform UK party achieved victories in various locations. The Labour Party should support the creation of the G3MA and aim for economic recovery through a special zone policy. The special zone policy is similar to the US Mexican border. The difference is that the US establishes special zones domestically, while the UK establishes special zones overseas.

 To President Trump!

May 27, 2026

In the UK local elections, the Labour Party suffered a crushing defeat, while the Re-form UK party achieved victories in various locations. The Labour Party should sup-port the creation of the G3MA and aim for economic revitalization through a special zone policy.

The special zone policy is similar to the US's Mexican border. The difference is that the US establishes special zones domestically, while the UK establishes them over-seas.

For Britons, this is easier to understand if viewed as the creation of a modern-day colony in a positive sense. Accepting illegal immigrants into the UK would lead to conflict with British citizens. The UK should accept illegal immigrants in overseas spe-cial zones.

The UK's "#Special Zone policy" involves building a "#Special Zone" (overseas facto-ry zone) in the Philippines, employing "#illegal immigrants" at "#low wages," and stimulating the economy with "British products" that are cheaper and superior to Chinese products.

The UK is a "#processing trade nation." It produces high value-added raw materials and components domestically, exports them to factories in overseas "#Special Zones," where products are assembled, and then exported to countries around the world, including China.

In the case of the US, a "#Special Zone" (#factory zone) is built on the Mexican bor-der, accepting "#illegal immigrants" from Central and South America and employing them at even lower wages than in China.

In the case of the UK, a "#Special Zone" (#factory zone) is built in the Philippines, accepting "#illegal immigrants" from the Middle East and employing them at even lower wages than in China.

The reason why companies in the UK and around the world are building factories in "#Philippine Special Zones" is because they are located near major consumer coun-tries like China and Japan, and because there are workers living there at "#lower wages" than in China.

In the UK, refugees and illegal immigrants from the Middle East are accepted into the Philippines' "Special Zone" under UK residency status. This is made possible by a "Special Zone Treaty" signed with the Philippine government.

For example, the British smartphone manufacturer "Nothing" will build an assembly plant in the Philippines' "Special Zone." The company will employ illegal immigrants for simple labor such as assembly work.

While these illegal immigrants' wages are lower than those in China, they are provid-ed with free food, clothing, housing, medical care, and education. Furthermore, the company only covers wages. These costs are covered by a "cooperative" that oper-ates the "Special Zone."

Components for Nothing smartphones are manufactured in mainland UK and export-ed to factories within the "Special Zone." In the "Special Zone," low-wage workers assemble the products, which are then exported to China, the UK, and other coun-tries.

The more products sold in the Philippines' "#Special Zone," the more jobs will be created for workers in UK "parts" factories. This will lead to a revival of British manu-facturing.

Like the US, the UK has product development capabilities. However, high manufac-turing costs put it behind Chinese products. By employing "#low-wage" workers overseas, the UK can gain price competitiveness against Chinese products.

The UK's "#Labour Party" should face the judgment of the British people regarding its "#Special Zone policy" in the Philippines by the 2029 general election. Go Britain, go #Labour Party!

Part 1 References

"#Labour Party" suffers crushing defeat in UK local elections, Starmer announces re-election; Reform UK wins in various locations

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/articles/cqxp4q73vn8o

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp