To the world media

I appeal for this every day. 1. Create a "special zone" in the world. Instead of developed countries "resetting" their economic stagnation with war, they can make "each other" happy by accepting "refugees and illegal immigrants" as "temporary immigrants" in a "special zone" isolated from the general public, and employing them as "low-wage workers". 2. Establish a "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA). A "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA)" will be established between the three countries of "the

To everyone in the world June 01, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: Dear Sirs, the US-China trade war is said to be "very similar" to "US-Japan semiconductor friction". Japan accepted the US request. As a result, Japan is to receive "lost 20 years". China is looking at Japan.

To everyone in the world

June 01, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition:

Dear Sirs, the US-China trade war is said to be "very similar" to "US-Japan semiconductor friction". Japan accepted the US request. As a result, Japan is to receive "lost 20 years". China is looking at Japan.

The “US-Japan Semiconductor Agreement” began in 1978 when US semiconductor manufacturers put a claim on Japanese “import barriers” and “government assistance”.

Exports of semiconductors to the US were cited as security reasons, threatening the foundation of the US high-tech and defense industries.

"National-led industrial policy" "Government assistance" "Import barrier" "US high-tech, concern about the defense industry" These are the same as "US-China trade friction".

East Asia and the United States always repeat the same problem.

The Japanese computer industry at that time was just beginning in the 1960s.

At that time, “Fujitsu” received huge subsidies every year from the Ministry of International Trade and Industry Ministry of Economy.

Not only "Fujitsu", "Hitachi" and "NEC" are the same.

"Fujitsu" and "Hitachi" created a "development company" against "IBM 360" by "joint venture" at the "request" of the government.

At that time, large Japanese companies used general-purpose computers of "IBM" and "UNIVAC".

The Japanese government was putting pressure on companies to use "made-in-Japan computers".

The company I work for was a UNIVAC computer.

Every year, the Ministry of International Trade and Industry was under pressure to use the "Fujitsu" computer.

So in 1970, the company changed to a large Fujitsu computer (compatible with IBM 360).

The large computer of "Fujitsu" and "Hitachi" can compete with "IBM" equally.

In the semiconductor and computer industries in Japan, the Japanese government raised companies by "national policy".

China looks at Japan, so it is doing a copy of the business model

Many Japanese say that it is a lie, but Japan has always been a socialist nation.

It is the same "national socialism" as Germany. "Nazi" is it?

So China is easy to imitate Japan.

When Japan led the semiconductor industry, the American Jews came to Japan to buy semiconductors with a trunk. It was called "grey market".

After a few years they became "big, rich".

The current rich man in the United States has gained "big profits" from imports from China.

The situation in the United States has been and remains the same.

I think that China today is "Faway" 's "5G" or "smart phone" instead of "semiconductor".

President Donald Trump is also doing "imitation".

In April 1987, the US Reagan administration launched measures to raise the tariff to 100% for PCs, power tools, color TVs, etc. made in Japan. (Released in June of the same year).

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. To the United States, I "propose" to build a "special zone" along the border with Mexico.

April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: Please see.

The reality of Japan's immigration policy is worse than in the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

The prosperity of America is realized by freedom, democracy, and "ruled under the law" in the world.

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please direct the concerned parties to investigate.

There are also many American victims.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/POTD-May-30.jpeg.jpg

Materials submitted to the ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose the name and the required items.

If you have any questions please email me.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Dear Sirs International people. Saturday Edition, June 1, 2019:Dear Sir, On May 26, at the Japan-US Summit Meeting, President Donald Trump watched "The Grand Sumo". In the US media he is "a bad reputation" as having beat "a lot of" gracious etiquette bienseance ". The leaders of each country need "manner" to protect the culture of the other country. He will come to Japan again in June with the G20.

Dear Sirs International people.

Saturday Edition, June 1, 2019:Dear Sir, On May 26, at the Japan-US Summit Meeting,
President Donald Trump watched "The Grand Sumo".
In the US media he is "a bad reputation" as having beat "a lot of" gracious etiquette bienseance ".
The leaders of each country need "manner" to protect the culture of the other country.
He will come to Japan again in June with the G20.

Part 1. In the "Masu seat" where "Zabuton" is usually laid, "sofa" is arranged specially.
In order for Mr. Trump to rise to "Dohyo" for "award" of "US President's Cup",
"temporary" "staircase" was also prepared.
In "spectating" of "Grand Sumo", "Kokugikan" broke "the culture of sumo wrestling"
and welcomed him with an unusual "response".

With over 100 police officers alerting the inside and outside of the “Kokugikan”,
the security system has become unparalleled in the past,
but it was not always welcomed by the general audience.
Nearly 10 SPs behind them were guarding while standing.
As a result, it became difficult for the audience at the back to see the ground floor,
and "booing" began to fly, such as "I can not see it."
In addition, some groups "be Sit down !, be Sit down!",
They started be of Sit down "Chorus".
Suddenly, a security person spoke something to the group who was raising a voice,
and the chorus ceased.
The SP people also lowered their waist, so they didn't get any more trouble.
There was also a danger that handguns would be used if the "trouble" grew.
The White House staff is wrong in "recognition" for "handguns".
If a gun is used, Japan will definitely become “anti-US”.

The audience usually sit on a "cushion" called "Zabuton" on the "ground",
but they were given a "chair" to Trump and his wife Melania.
The "Japan Sumo Association" barred "to throw" "Zabuton" for safety measures.
When people go up to "Dohyo", it is a rule to go up with "barefoot".
However, "Trump President" got on "Dohyo" wearing "slippers".
And he "gives" the winner "award".
It's crazy!
Furthermore, he did not seem to be concentrating on the "game" of "Trump President"
and did not respond to some "dramatic scenes".
President Trump should have studied and watched the culture of 'sumo'.
"Dohyo" is a sacred place and "sumo" is a sacred ritual dedicated to "Japanese gods".

The security system was also very strict,
and the Japanese people were subject to many restrictions.
Many people say, "I do not want you to come to Japan again."
Leaders of each country should understand that when visiting the other country,
the security will cause much inconvenience to the lives of the people of the other country.
Therefore, the period of stay should be short.
And please do not do "manor" that would destroy the culture of the other country.
Then, President Trump should not say that "the Japan-US trade talks will be held
in August (after the election is over)."
It is East Asian culture that people do not say even if they think in their hearts.

Part 2. There are many Koreans who have been arrested
for immigration law violations in violation of international law.
(I can not count).
Koreans, Chinese, Filipinos, "everyone" all over the world!
Help the victims of the Japanese government around you!

The victims are foreigners who "worked illegally"
in activities other than "Certificate of residence" in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act and
We have received "criminal punishment" such as "a penalty sentence".
And they are foreigners who have been forced to repatriate.

We arrest a third party for "supporting" the aforementioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is me or "Kin Gungaku who is Chinese".
Other victims are officials from the Embassy of the Philippines and diplomats
from the Philippines.
I think there are more victims, but I do not know the information.

It is a third party who has handed out the “contract documents
for employment” to foreigners who have “illegal labor”.
It has nothing to do with "illegal labor."
The prosecution says in Indictment:

I gave a foreigner "Employment Contract Documents with False Content".
Foreigners were able to easily obtain the status of residence
by attaching “Employment Contract Documents with False Content”.
Foreigners came to live in Japan because they got “Certificate of residence”.
Foreigners were able to do "illegal labor" because they were in Japan.
Therefore, as a crime against Article 70 "illegal labor"
of the immigration control law of foreigners,
We apply "the crime that supported other crimes" of "Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code".

"Sins of support" for Article 70 "illegal labor" of the Immigration Control Act
It prescribes in "the crime which promotes unlawful work".

The "crime reasons" of the prosecution are stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Act "Revocation of Status of Residence by Filing False Documents".
There is no punishment for that. Only the status of residence is cancelled.
And "forced repatriation" will be.

Even if you get a status of residence in "false documents",
It is not "illegal labor" if it works within the scope of the status of residence.
The application of Article 62 and Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
and the Philippine diplomat is an error of the "applicable law".
This is the perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the governments and media of each country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "restoration of honor" and "reparations".

If governments and embassies can not protest the Japanese government,
request an investigation from the ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support "Appeal to ICC".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translated document is incorrect, please contact us by email.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Nagano Yoshihiro

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/POTD-May-30.jpeg.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-05-31:　The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government. The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners. There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic". Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .

2019-05-31:Dear Sirs, "Nature" in the UK accuses the Japanese government
that it can not be scientifically said that "remains" of "Megumi Yokota" is a "fake".
North Korea is "presumption of innocence".
Japan began to move the United Nations and President Donald Trump with the "force" of money.
China and Japan are "crazy".

Part 1. It is a "judgment letter" of "aid / case"
of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Also, the "judicial decision" is written in Japanese to accurately state.
Everyone, please translate correctly.

1 前提となる事実。
以下の事実については,証拠上明らかであり,被告人・弁護人もこれを争っていない。
(1)レフコ社と各正犯者の雇用実態
レフコ社は被告人が経営するIT会社であるが,各正犯者は,
レフコ社で一度も働いたことはなく,いずれも飲食店で働いていた。

(2)面接の不実施
被告人は各正犯者の雇用契約書等を作成する前に面接しなかった。
以下省略。

What I am in dispute is that the reason for the "prosecution" is not a crime.
The criminal reason of the indictment points out Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

The indictment states the same for the four Chinese A, B, C, and D, respectively.
1) Chinese A is working at Restaurant X and reports the "facts"
that violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The "fact" that Nagano created "false documents"
(contract documents with false content) in the "LEFCO company".
3) The fact that "Kin Gungaku", which is regarded as "Complicity",
has passed a "fake document" to Chinese A.
4) "Fact" that Chinese A "attached" false documents ",
went to Tokyo Immigration, and updated" status of residence ".

If it is "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D are violation of Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
However, there are no "facts" that Chinese A, B, C, and D received "disposition"
as a violation of the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) by the Minister of Justice.

Even if it is a "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D do not violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of "status
of residence" received from the Minister of Justice.
The “causal relationship” in which the Chinese A, B, C, D violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act is the “employer”
who hired a non-qualified foreigner prescribed
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Immigration issues are international issues.
Japan accepts foreigners in the name of "technical intern".
They escape from the training site for reasons such as illegal low wages.
"Technical intern" can work only at "the training destination".
Japan's judicial administration punishes foreigners who work illegally
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"Technical intern" is forced to work like "slave".

I also report to "OHCHR".
Ambassadors of African countries say.
"OHCHR" is for Africa. !
Japan is an economical big sponsor of "OHCHR".
"OHCHR" does not say to Japan.

Next week, I will write about foreign victims who violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.

My information *********************************************** ****

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

Email

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-05-31

To President Trump

At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.

2019-05-31:Dear Sirs, "Nature" in the UK accuses the Japanese government
that it can not be scientifically said that "remains" of "Megumi Yokota" is a "fake".
North Korea is "presumption of innocence".
Japan began to move the United Nations and President Donald Trump with the "force" of money.
China and Japan are "crazy".

Part 1. It is a "judgment letter" of "aid / case"
of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Also, the "judicial decision" is written in Japanese to accurately state.
Everyone, please translate correctly.

1 前提となる事実。
以下の事実については,証拠上明らかであり,被告人・弁護人もこれを争っていない。
(1)レフコ社と各正犯者の雇用実態
レフコ社は被告人が経営するIT会社であるが,各正犯者は,
レフコ社で一度も働いたことはなく,いずれも飲食店で働いていた。

(2)面接の不実施
被告人は各正犯者の雇用契約書等を作成する前に面接しなかった。
以下省略。

What I am in dispute is that the reason for the "prosecution" is not a crime.
The criminal reason of the indictment points out Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

The indictment states the same for the four Chinese A, B, C, and D, respectively.
1) Chinese A is working at Restaurant X and reports the "facts"
that violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The "fact" that Nagano created "false documents"
(contract documents with false content) in the "LEFCO company".
3) The fact that "Kin Gungaku", which is regarded as "Complicity",
has passed a "fake document" to Chinese A.
4) "Fact" that Chinese A "attached" false documents ",
went to Tokyo Immigration, and updated" status of residence ".

If it is "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D are violation of Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
However, there are no "facts" that Chinese A, B, C, and D received "disposition"
as a violation of the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) by the Minister of Justice.

Even if it is a "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D do not violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of "status
of residence" received from the Minister of Justice.
The “causal relationship” in which the Chinese A, B, C, D violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act is the “employer”
who hired a non-qualified foreigner prescribed
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Immigration issues are international issues.
Japan accepts foreigners in the name of "technical intern".
They escape from the training site for reasons such as illegal low wages.
"Technical intern" can work only at "the training destination".
Japan's judicial administration punishes foreigners who work illegally
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"Technical intern" is forced to work like "slave".

I also report to "OHCHR".
Ambassadors of African countries say.
"OHCHR" is for Africa. !
Japan is an economical big sponsor of "OHCHR".
"OHCHR" does not say to Japan.

Next week, I will write about foreign victims who violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

My information ***************************************************

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

Email

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-05-31: Chers Messieurs, Au Royaume-Uni, "Nature" dit que "reste" de "Megumi Yokota" est un "faux" Il critique le gouvernement japonais si cela ne peut pas être dit scientifiquement. La Corée du Nord est "présomption d'innocence". Le Japon a commencé à déplacer les Nations Unies et le président Donald Trump avec la "force" de l'argent. La Chine et le Japon sont "fous".

Emmanuel Macron au président français

2019-05-31: Chers Messieurs, Au Royaume-Uni, "Nature" dit que "reste" de "Megumi Yokota" est un "faux"
Il critique le gouvernement japonais si cela ne peut pas être dit scientifiquement.
La Corée du Nord est "présomption d'innocence".
Le Japon a commencé à déplacer les Nations Unies et le président Donald Trump avec la "force" de l'argent.
La Chine et le Japon sont "fous".

Partie 1 Il s'agit d'une "lettre de jugement" de "aide / cas" de "l'affaire de violation du droit de l'immigration" de 2010.
En outre, la "décision judiciaire" est écrite en japonais pour indiquer avec précision.
Tout le monde, s'il vous plaît traduire correctement.

.......................................

1 前提となる事実。
以下の事実については,証拠上明らかであり,被告人・弁護人もこれを争っていない。
(1)レフコ社と各正犯者の雇用実態
レフコ社は被告人が経営するIT会社であるが,
各正犯者は,レフコ社で一度も働いたことはなく,いずれも飲食店で働いていた。

(2)面接の不実施
被告人は各正犯者の雇用契約書等を作成する前に面接しなかった。
以下省略。

...................................

1 Prérequis.
Les faits suivants sont évidents dans la preuve, et l'accusé et les avocats de la défense n'ont pas contesté ce fait.
(1) Conditions d'emploi de Lefko et de chaque délinquant régulier
Lefko est une société informatique dirigée par l'accusé,
Chaque criminel ordinaire n'avait jamais travaillé à Lefko et tous deux travaillaient au restaurant.

(2) ne pas mener des entretiens
L’accusé n’a pas passé d’interview avant la rédaction du contrat d’emploi de chaque délinquant.
Ce qui suit est omis.

......................................

Ce que je conteste, c'est que le motif de la "poursuite" n'est pas un crime.
La raison pénale de l'acte d'accusation rappelle l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.

L'acte d'accusation dit la même chose pour les quatre Chinois A, B, C et D, respectivement.
1) Le Chinois A travaille au restaurant X et rapporte les "faits" qui violaient l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
2) à la société LEFCO,
"Fait" que Nagano a créé de "faux documents" (documents contractuels ayant un faux contenu).
3) Le fait que "Kin Gungaku", qui est considéré comme "complicité", ait transmis un "faux document" au Chinois A.
4) le chinois A "attache de" faux documents ",
"Fait" qui est allé à l'immigration de Tokyo et mis à jour "statut de résidence".

S'il s'agit d'un "fait", les Chinois A, B, C et D enfreignent la loi sur l'immigration 22-4- (4).
Cependant, les Chinois A, B, C, D appartiennent au ministre de la Justice,
Il n'y a pas de «fait» qui ait été «éliminé» comme une violation de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4- (4).

Les Chinois A, B, C, D ont été reçus du ministre de la Justice même s’ils étaient des "faits"
S'il fonctionne dans le cadre du "statut de résidence", il n'enfreint pas l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Les Chinois A, B, C et D ont enfreint l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
La "causalité" est "l'employeur" qui a embauché un étranger non qualifié en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Les problèmes d'immigration sont des problèmes internationaux.
Le Japon accepte les étrangers au nom de "stagiaire technique".
Ils s’échappent du site de formation pour des raisons telles que des bas salaires illégaux.
Le "stagiaire technique" ne peut travailler que sur "la destination de la formation".
L'administration judiciaire japonaise punit les étrangers qui travaillent illégalement pour violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
"Technicien interne" est obligé de travailler comme "esclave".

Je relève également du "HCDH".
Les ambassadeurs des pays africains disent.
"OHCHR" est pour l'Afrique. !
Le Japon est un grand sponsor économique du "HCDH".
"HCDH" ne dit pas au Japon.

La semaine prochaine, je parlerai des victimes étrangères qui violent l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence".
Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration,
veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».

Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-05-31: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, "Nature" in Großbritannien sagt, dass "Überreste" von "Megumi Yokota" eine "Fälschung" sind. Es kritisiert die japanische Regierung, wenn es wissenschaftlich nicht gesagt werden kann. Nordkorea ist "Unschuldsvermutung". Japan begann die Vereinten Nationen und Präsident Donald Trump mit der "Kraft" des Geldes zu bewegen. China und Japan sind "verrückt".

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten

2019-05-31: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, "Nature" in Großbritannien sagt, dass "Überreste" von "Megumi Yokota" eine "Fälschung" sind.
Es kritisiert die japanische Regierung, wenn es wissenschaftlich nicht gesagt werden kann.
Nordkorea ist "Unschuldsvermutung".
Japan begann die Vereinten Nationen und Präsident Donald Trump mit der "Kraft" des Geldes zu bewegen.
China und Japan sind "verrückt".

Teil 1. Es ist ein "Urteilsschreiben" von "Beihilfe / Fall" des "Einwanderungsrechtsverletzungsverfahrens" von 2010.
Auch die "richterliche Entscheidung" ist in japanischer Sprache verfasst, um genau anzugeben.
Jeder, bitte übersetzen Sie richtig.

...............................

1 前提となる事実。
以下の事実については,証拠上明らかであり,被告人・弁護人もこれを争っていない。
(1)レフコ社と各正犯者の雇用実態
レフコ社は被告人が経営するIT会社であるが,
各正犯者は,レフコ社で一度も働いたことはなく,いずれも飲食店で働いていた。

(2)面接の不実施
被告人は各正犯者の雇用契約書等を作成する前に面接しなかった。
以下省略。

...................................

1 Vorausgesetzte Fakten.
Die folgenden Tatsachen sind aus den Beweisen ersichtlich,
und die Angeklagten und Verteidiger haben diese Tatsache nicht bestritten.
(1) Beschäftigungsbedingungen von Lefko und jedem regulären Täter
Lefko ist ein IT-Unternehmen, das von der beschuldigten,
Jeder normale Verbrecher hatte noch nie bei Lefko gearbeitet,
und beide arbeiteten im Restaurant.

(2) Keine Interviews durchführen
Der Angeklagte befragte nicht jeden Täter, bevor er den Arbeitsvertrag vorbereitete.
Folgendes wird weggelassen.

......................................

Umstritten ist, dass der Grund für die "Verfolgung" kein Verbrechen ist.
Der strafrechtliche Grund der Anklage ist Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Die Anklageschrift besagt dasselbe für die vier Chinesen A, B, C und D.
1) Chinese A arbeitet im Restaurant X und meldet die "Tatsachen", die gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstoßen haben.
2) Bei der LEFCO Company
"Fakt", dass Nagano "falsche Dokumente" erstellt hat (Vertragsdokumente mit falschem Inhalt).
3) Die Tatsache, dass "Kin Gungaku", das als "Komplizenschaft" gilt, ein "gefälschtes Dokument" an Chinese A weitergegeben hat.
4) Chinesisch A "fügt" falsche Dokumente "hinzu,
"Fakt", der an Tokyo Immigration ging und den "Aufenthaltsstatus" aktualisierte.

Wenn es "Tatsache" ist, verstoßen die Chinesen A, B, C, D gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz 22-4- (4).
Allerdings sind die Chinesen A, B, C, D vom Justizminister,
Es gibt keine "Tatsache", die als Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz 22-4- (4) "beseitigt" wurde.

Die Chinesen A, B, C, D wurden vom Justizminister empfangen, auch wenn es sich um "Tatsachen" handelte.
Wenn es im Rahmen des "Aufenthaltsstatus" funktioniert, verstößt es nicht gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Die Chinesen A, B, C und D verstießen gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
"Kausalität" ist der "Arbeitgeber", der einen nicht qualifizierten Ausländer gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes eingestellt hat.

Einwanderungsfragen sind internationale Fragen.
Japan akzeptiert Ausländer im Namen des "technischen Praktikanten".
Sie entkommen aus Gründen wie illegalen Niedriglöhnen aus dem Übungsgelände.
"Technischer Praktikant" kann nur am "Ausbildungsort" arbeiten.
Die japanische Justizverwaltung bestraft Ausländer, die illegal arbeiten, wegen Verstoßes gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Technischer Praktikant" muss wie "Sklave" arbeiten.

Ich melde mich auch bei "OHCHR".
Botschafter afrikanischer Länder sagen.
"OHCHR" ist für Afrika. !
Japan ist ein wirtschaftlicher Großsponsor von "OHCHR".
"OHCHR" sagt nicht zu Japan.

Nächste Woche werde ich über ausländische Opfer schreiben, die gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstoßen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes".
Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall von Verstößen gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden,
unterstützen Sie bitte den "Aufruf" an den "IStGH".

Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-05-31:　 It is a "judgment letter" of "aid / case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010. Also, the "judicial decision" is written in Japanese to accurately state. Everyone, please translate correctly.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister

2019-05-31:Dear Sirs, "Nature" in the UK accuses the Japanese government
that it can not be scientifically said that "remains" of "Megumi Yokota" is a "fake".
North Korea is "presumption of innocence".
Japan began to move the United Nations and President Donald Trump with the "force" of money.
China and Japan are "crazy".

Part 1. It is a "judgment letter" of "aid / case"
of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Also, the "judicial decision" is written in Japanese to accurately state.
Everyone, please translate correctly.

1 前提となる事実。
以下の事実については,証拠上明らかであり,被告人・弁護人もこれを争っていない。
(1)レフコ社と各正犯者の雇用実態
レフコ社は被告人が経営するIT会社であるが,各正犯者は,
レフコ社で一度も働いたことはなく,いずれも飲食店で働いていた。

(2)面接の不実施
被告人は各正犯者の雇用契約書等を作成する前に面接しなかった。
以下省略。

What I am in dispute is that the reason for the "prosecution" is not a crime.
The criminal reason of the indictment points out Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

The indictment states the same for the four Chinese A, B, C, and D, respectively.
1) Chinese A is working at Restaurant X and reports the "facts"
that violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The "fact" that Nagano created "false documents"
(contract documents with false content) in the "LEFCO company".
3) The fact that "Kin Gungaku", which is regarded as "Complicity",
has passed a "fake document" to Chinese A.
4) "Fact" that Chinese A "attached" false documents ",
went to Tokyo Immigration, and updated" status of residence ".

If it is "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D are violation of Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
However, there are no "facts" that Chinese A, B, C, and D received "disposition"
as a violation of the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) by the Minister of Justice.

Even if it is a "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D do not violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of "status
of residence" received from the Minister of Justice.
The “causal relationship” in which the Chinese A, B, C, D violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act is the “employer”
who hired a non-qualified foreigner prescribed
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Immigration issues are international issues.
Japan accepts foreigners in the name of "technical intern".
They escape from the training site for reasons such as illegal low wages.
"Technical intern" can work only at "the training destination".
Japan's judicial administration punishes foreigners who work illegally
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"Technical intern" is forced to work like "slave".

I also report to "OHCHR".
Ambassadors of African countries say.
"OHCHR" is for Africa. !
Japan is an economical big sponsor of "OHCHR".
"OHCHR" does not say to Japan.

Next week, I will write about foreign victims who violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."

It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media　 2019-05-31:Dear Sirs, "Nature" in the UK accuses the Japanese government that it can not be scientifically said that "remains" of "Megumi Yokota" is a "fake". North Korea is "presumption of innocence". Japan began to move the United Nations and President Donald Trump with the "force" of money. China and Japan are "crazy".

To everyone in the world's media　

2019-05-31:Dear Sirs, "Nature" in the UK accuses the Japanese government
that it can not be scientifically said that "remains" of "Megumi Yokota" is a "fake".
North Korea is "presumption of innocence".
Japan began to move the United Nations and President Donald Trump with the "force" of money.
China and Japan are "crazy".

Part 1. It is a "judgment letter" of "aid / case"
of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Also, the "judicial decision" is written in Japanese to accurately state.
Everyone, please translate correctly.

1 前提となる事実。
以下の事実については,証拠上明らかであり,被告人・弁護人もこれを争っていない。
(1)レフコ社と各正犯者の雇用実態
レフコ社は被告人が経営するIT会社であるが,各正犯者は,
レフコ社で一度も働いたことはなく,いずれも飲食店で働いていた。

(2)面接の不実施
被告人は各正犯者の雇用契約書等を作成する前に面接しなかった。
以下省略。

What I am in dispute is that the reason for the "prosecution" is not a crime.
The criminal reason of the indictment points out Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

The indictment states the same for the four Chinese A, B, C, and D, respectively.
1) Chinese A is working at Restaurant X and reports the "facts"
that violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The "fact" that Nagano created "false documents"
(contract documents with false content) in the "LEFCO company".
3) The fact that "Kin Gungaku", which is regarded as "Complicity",
has passed a "fake document" to Chinese A.
4) "Fact" that Chinese A "attached" false documents ",
went to Tokyo Immigration, and updated" status of residence ".

If it is "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D are violation of Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
However, there are no "facts" that Chinese A, B, C, and D received "disposition"
as a violation of the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) by the Minister of Justice.

Even if it is a "fact," Chinese A, B, C, D do not violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of "status
of residence" received from the Minister of Justice.
The “causal relationship” in which the Chinese A, B, C, D violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act is the “employer”
who hired a non-qualified foreigner prescribed
by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Immigration issues are international issues.
Japan accepts foreigners in the name of "technical intern".
They escape from the training site for reasons such as illegal low wages.
"Technical intern" can work only at "the training destination".
Japan's judicial administration punishes foreigners who work illegally
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"Technical intern" is forced to work like "slave".

I also report to "OHCHR".
Ambassadors of African countries say.
"OHCHR" is for Africa. !
Japan is an economical big sponsor of "OHCHR".
"OHCHR" does not say to Japan.

Next week, I will write about foreign victims who violate Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.

My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

Email

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested? It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants. So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .

2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested?
It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants.
So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

Part 1. It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
This "reason for crime" is "prescribed" punishment in Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who get "status of residence"
in false documents will be "deported" with "status of residence" being cancelled.
As I mentioned the day before, prosecutors
and judges have stated that it is a crime for me to "issue" false documents
(content false employment contracts etc.) to the Chinese.
In order to describe correctly, the Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act is described in Japanese and English.
Please translate Japanese correctly.

第二十二条の四　法務大臣は、
別表第一又は別表第二の上欄の在留資格をもつて本邦に在留する外国人
（第六十一条の二第一項の難民の認定を受けている者を除く。）について、
次の各号に掲げるいずれかの事実が判明したときは、
法務省令で定める手続により、当該外国人が現に有する在留資格を取り消すことができる。

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance.

四　前三号に掲げるもののほか、
不実の記載のある文書（不実の記載のある文書又は図画の提出又は提示により
交付を受けた第七条の二第一項の規定による証明書及び不実の記載のある文書
又は図画の提出又は提示により旅券に受けた査証を含む。）
又は図画の提出又は提示により、上陸許可の証印等を受けたこと。

(iv)　In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the alien has received,
by submitting or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including the certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
and a visa obtained for the passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry) or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing.
Please understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
The prosecutor and the judge gave me false documents to the Chinese.
So the Chinese got "status of residence".
So the Chinese did "illegal labor" of Article 70 of the immigration.
This is said to be an "act" that "supports" a violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
This logic is this crazy.
Even if it is a fact,
If the Chinese work within the scope of "status of residence",
the Chinese will not be "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “causal relationship” they became illegal labor is
It is in the "employer" who hired them.
The Immigration Act stipulates that Article 73-2 strictly punishes employers.
Please understand and support this legal system and the logic of the law.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.

My information *********************************************** ****

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

Email

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested? It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants. So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

To President Trump

At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.

2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested?
It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants.
So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

Part 1. It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
This "reason for crime" is "prescribed" punishment in Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who get "status of residence"
in false documents will be "deported" with "status of residence" being cancelled.
As I mentioned the day before, prosecutors
and judges have stated that it is a crime for me to "issue" false documents
(content false employment contracts etc.) to the Chinese.
In order to describe correctly, the Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act is described in Japanese and English.
Please translate Japanese correctly.

第二十二条の四　法務大臣は、
別表第一又は別表第二の上欄の在留資格をもつて本邦に在留する外国人
（第六十一条の二第一項の難民の認定を受けている者を除く。）について、
次の各号に掲げるいずれかの事実が判明したときは、
法務省令で定める手続により、当該外国人が現に有する在留資格を取り消すことができる。

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance.

四　前三号に掲げるもののほか、
不実の記載のある文書（不実の記載のある文書又は図画の提出又は提示により
交付を受けた第七条の二第一項の規定による証明書及び不実の記載のある文書
又は図画の提出又は提示により旅券に受けた査証を含む。）
又は図画の提出又は提示により、上陸許可の証印等を受けたこと。

(iv)　In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the alien has received,
by submitting or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including the certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
and a visa obtained for the passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry) or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing.
Please understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
The prosecutor and the judge gave me false documents to the Chinese.
So the Chinese got "status of residence".
So the Chinese did "illegal labor" of Article 70 of the immigration.
This is said to be an "act" that "supports" a violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
This logic is this crazy.
Even if it is a fact,
If the Chinese work within the scope of "status of residence",
the Chinese will not be "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “causal relationship” they became illegal labor is
It is in the "employer" who hired them.
The Immigration Act stipulates that Article 73-2 strictly punishes employers.
Please understand and support this legal system and the logic of the law.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

My information ***************************************************

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

Email

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-05-30: Chers Messieurs, pourquoi le président Donald Trump n’est-il pas arrêté? Ce n'est pas un "cas de la Russie" mais le terrain de golf Trump a embauché des immigrants illégaux. Alors, le président "protégera-t-il" le "gouvernement judiciaire japonais" fautif?

Emmanuel Macron au président français

2019-05-30: Chers Messieurs, pourquoi le président Donald Trump n’est-il pas arrêté?
Ce n'est pas un "cas de la Russie" mais le terrain de golf Trump a embauché des immigrants illégaux.
Alors, le président "protégera-t-il" le "gouvernement judiciaire japonais" fautif?

Partie 1 Il s'agit d'un "document de jugement" de "l'affaire. Assistance" de "l'affaire de violation du droit de l'immigration" de 2010.
Cette "raison du crime" est une peine "prescrite" dans la Loi sur l'immigration 22-4- (4).
Étrangers qui obtiennent un «statut de résidence» sur de faux documents
Le "statut de résidence" sera annulé et "l'expulsion à l'étranger".
Nous avons énuméré la veille, mais les procureurs et les juges
C'est un crime que j'ai "délivré" de faux documents (contenu, faux contrat de travail, etc.) aux Chinois.
Afin de décrire correctement, l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration est décrit en japonais et en anglais.
S'il vous plaît traduire le japonais correctement.

............................

第二十二条の四　法務大臣は、
別表第一又は別表第二の上欄の在留資格をもつて本邦に在留する外国人
（第六十一条の二第一項の難民の認定を受けている者を除く。）について、
次の各号に掲げるいずれかの事実が判明したときは、法務省令で定める手続により、
当該外国人が現に有する在留資格を取り消すことができる。

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)), the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status
of residence in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry
of Justice ordinance.

四　前三号に掲げるもののほか、不実の記載のある文書
（不実の記載のある文書又は図画の提出又は提示により
交付を受けた第七条の二第一項の規定による証明書及び不実の記載のある文書
又は図画の提出又は提示により旅券に受けた査証を含む。）
又は図画の提出又は提示により、上陸許可の証印等を受けたこと。

(iv)　In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the alien has received, by submitting or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including the certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2,
paragraph (1), obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing
that contains a false entry and a visa obtained for the passport
by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry)
or a drawing that contains a false entry, a seal of verification for landing.

......................................

Article 22-4 Le ministre de la justice
Ressortissants étrangers résidant au Japon et statut de résidence dans la colonne du haut de l'annexe 1 ou 2
À propos (sauf pour ceux qui ont été reconnus comme réfugiés en vertu de l'article 61-2 (1).)
Lorsque l’un des faits énumérés ci-après apparaît clairement, la procédure prescrite par l’ordonnance du ministère de la Justice,
Il est possible d'annuler le statut de résidence dont dispose réellement l'étranger.

Article 22-4 (1) Lorsque l'un des faits suivants est constaté
à l'égard d'un étranger résidant au Japon sous un statut de résidence énuméré
dans la colonne de gauche du tableau I annexé ou du tableau II annexé
(sauf ceux reconnus comme réfugiés au sens de l'article 61-2,
paragraphe (1)), le ministre de la Justice peut révoquer le statut de l'étranger
de résidence conformément aux procédures prévues par le ministère
de l'ordonnance de la justice.

(Iv) Documents avec des déclarations fausses autres que celles énumérées dans les trois éléments précédents
(Par la soumission ou la présentation d'un document ou
Documents visés à l'article 7-2, paragraphe 1, ayant reçu une subvention et documents contenant de fausses déclarations
Ou comprend un visa reçu sur un passeport lors de la soumission ou de la présentation des dessins. )
Ou avoir reçu le sceau de permission d'atterrissage par présentation ou présentation du dessin.

iv) Outre les cas énumérés dans les trois points précédents,
l'étranger a reçu, en soumettant ou en présentant un document contenant une fausse entrée
(y compris le certificat conformément aux dispositions de l’article 7-2,
l’alinéa 1) obtenu en souscrivant ou en présentant un document ou un dessin
qui contient une fausse entrée et un visa obtenu pour le passeport
en soumettant ou en présentant un document ou un dessin contenant une fausse entrée)
ou un dessin contenant une fausse entrée, un sceau de vérification pour l'atterrissage.

............................................

S'il vous plaît comprendre l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.
Le procureur et le juge m'ont donné de faux documents aux Chinois.
Les Chinois ont donc obtenu le "statut de résidence".
Les Chinois ont donc fait du "travail illégal" en vertu de l'article 70 de l'immigration.
Cela constituerait un "acte" qui "soutiendrait" une violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Cette logique est cette folle.
Même si c'est un fait,
Si une personne chinoise travaille dans le cadre du "statut de résidence",
Les Chinois ne deviennent pas du "travail illégal" au sens de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La «relation de cause à effet» où ils sont devenus du travail illégal
C'est chez "l'employeur" qui les a embauchés.
La loi sur l'immigration stipule que l'article 73-2 punit sévèrement les employeurs.
S'il vous plaît comprendre et soutenir ce système juridique et la logique du droit.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Au fur et à mesure que nos "restaurations d'honneur et réparations" ont lieu,
Merci pour votre soutien.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme.
Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence".
Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a "puni" que les étrangers,
Je ne "punis" pas "l'employeur".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration (acquisition du statut de résidence par le dépôt de faux documents)
Conduit l'acte prescrit.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».

Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 30.05.2019: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, warum wird Präsident Donald Trump nicht verhaftet? Es ist kein "Russland-Fall", aber der Trump-Golfplatz hat illegale Einwanderer eingestellt. Wird der Präsident die beleidigende "Justizverwaltung Japans" "schützen"?

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten

30.05.2019: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
warum wird Präsident Donald Trump nicht verhaftet?
Es ist kein "Russland-Fall", aber der Trump-Golfplatz hat illegale Einwanderer eingestellt.
Wird der Präsident die beleidigende "Justizverwaltung Japans" "schützen"?

Teil 1. Es ist ein "Urteilsdokument" der "Unterstützung". Fall "des Einwanderungsrechtsverletzungsverfahrens" von 2010.
Dieser "Grund für das Verbrechen" ist eine "vorgeschriebene" Bestrafung im Einwanderungsgesetz 22-4- (4).
Ausländer, die in gefälschten Dokumenten den „Aufenthaltsstatus“ erhalten
"Aufenthaltsstatus" wird annulliert und "ins Ausland abgeschoben".
Wir haben am Vortag aufgelistet, aber Staatsanwälte und Richter
Es ist ein Verbrechen, dass ich den Chinesen falsche Dokumente
(inhaltlich falscher Arbeitsvertrag etc.) "ausgestellt" habe.
Zur korrekten Beschreibung wird Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes auf Japanisch und Englisch beschrieben.
Bitte übersetzen Sie Japanisch korrekt.

............................

第二十二条の四　法務大臣は、
別表第一又は別表第二の上欄の在留資格をもつて本邦に在留する外国人
（第六十一条の二第一項の難民の認定を受けている者を除く。）について、
次の各号に掲げるいずれかの事実が判明したときは、法務省令で定める手続により、
当該外国人が現に有する在留資格を取り消すことができる。

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)), the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status
of residence in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry
of Justice ordinance.

四　前三号に掲げるもののほか、不実の記載のある文書
（不実の記載のある文書又は図画の提出又は提示により
交付を受けた第七条の二第一項の規定による証明書及び不実の記載のある文書
又は図画の提出又は提示により旅券に受けた査証を含む。）
又は図画の提出又は提示により、上陸許可の証印等を受けたこと。

(iv)　In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the alien has received, by submitting or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including the certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2,
paragraph (1), obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing
that contains a false entry and a visa obtained for the passport
by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry)
or a drawing that contains a false entry, a seal of verification for landing.

......................................

Artikel 22-4 Der Justizminister
Ausländer mit Wohnsitz in Japan mit Wohnsitzstatus in der oberen Spalte von Anhang 1 oder 2
Über (mit Ausnahme derer, die gemäß Artikel 61-2 Absatz 1 als Flüchtlinge anerkannt wurden.)
Wenn einer der in den folgenden Punkten aufgeführten Sachverhalte klar wird, wird das durch die Verordnung des Justizministeriums vorgeschriebene Verfahren
Es ist möglich, den Aufenthaltsstatus des Ausländers zu annullieren.

Artikel 22-4 (1) Wenn einer der folgenden Sachverhalte festgestellt wird
in Bezug auf einen Ausländer mit Wohnsitz in Japan, dessen Aufenthaltsstatus aufgeführt ist
in der linken Spalte der beigefügten Tabelle I oder der beigefügten Tabelle II
(mit Ausnahme derjenigen, die als Flüchtlinge gemäß Artikel 61-2 anerkannt sind,
Absatz 1 kann der Justizminister den Status des Ausländers widerrufen
Wohnsitz gemäß den vom Ministerium vorgesehenen Verfahren
der Rechtsverordnung.

(Iv) Dokumente mit anderen falschen Angaben als den in den vorhergehenden drei Punkten aufgeführten
(Durch Einreichung oder Vorlage eines Dokuments oder
Dokumente gemäß Artikel 7-2 Absatz 1, die eine Finanzhilfe erhalten haben, und Dokumente mit falschen Angaben
Oder schließt ein Visum ein, das auf einem Pass nach Vorlage oder Vorlage von Zeichnungen erhalten wird. )
Oder das Siegel der Landeerlaubnis durch Vorlage oder Vorlage der Zeichnung erhalten haben.

(iv) Zusätzlich zu den in den vorhergehenden drei Punkten aufgeführten Fällen
der Ausländer hat durch Einreichen oder Vorlegen eines Dokuments, das eine falsche Eingabe enthält, erhalten
(einschließlich der Bescheinigung gemäß Artikel 7-2,
Absatz (1), erhalten durch Abonnieren oder Vorlegen eines Dokuments oder einer Zeichnung
Das enthält eine falsche Einreise und ein Visum für den Reisepass
durch Einreichen oder Präsentieren eines Dokuments oder einer Zeichnung, die eine falsche Eingabe enthält)
oder eine Zeichnung, die eine falsche Eingabe enthält, ein Prüfsiegel für die Landung.

............................................

Bitte haben Sie Verständnis für Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Der Staatsanwalt und der Richter gaben den Chinesen falsche Dokumente.
So bekamen die Chinesen "Aufenthaltsstatus".
Also haben die Chinesen "illegale Arbeit" nach Artikel 70 der Einwanderung verrichtet.
Dies soll eine "Tat" sein, die einen Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "unterstützt".
Diese Logik ist so verrückt.
Auch wenn es eine Tatsache ist,
Wenn eine chinesische Person im Bereich des "Aufenthaltsstatus" arbeitet,
Chinesen werden keine "illegale Arbeit" nach Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Der "Kausalzusammenhang", in dem sie zu illegaler Arbeit wurden, ist
Es ist im "Arbeitgeber", der sie angestellt hat.
Das Einwanderungsgesetz sieht vor, dass Arbeitgeber in Artikel 73-2 streng bestraft werden.
Bitte verstehen und unterstützen Sie dieses Rechtssystem und die Logik des Gesetzes.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Da unsere "Ehre Wiederherstellung und Wiedergutmachung" stattfinden,
Vielen Dank für Ihre Unterstützung.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln.
Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes".
Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer,
Ich "bestrafe" nicht den "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer unterliegen dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4 (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente)
Hat die vorgeschriebene Tat durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall von Verstößen gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte den "Aufruf" an den "IStGH".

Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested? It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants. So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister

2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested?
It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants.
So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

Part 1. It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
This "reason for crime" is "prescribed" punishment in Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who get "status of residence"
in false documents will be "deported" with "status of residence" being cancelled.
As I mentioned the day before, prosecutors
and judges have stated that it is a crime for me to "issue" false documents
(content false employment contracts etc.) to the Chinese.
In order to describe correctly, the Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act is described in Japanese and English.
Please translate Japanese correctly.

第二十二条の四　法務大臣は、
別表第一又は別表第二の上欄の在留資格をもつて本邦に在留する外国人
（第六十一条の二第一項の難民の認定を受けている者を除く。）について、
次の各号に掲げるいずれかの事実が判明したときは、
法務省令で定める手続により、当該外国人が現に有する在留資格を取り消すことができる。

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance.

四　前三号に掲げるもののほか、
不実の記載のある文書（不実の記載のある文書又は図画の提出又は提示により
交付を受けた第七条の二第一項の規定による証明書及び不実の記載のある文書
又は図画の提出又は提示により旅券に受けた査証を含む。）
又は図画の提出又は提示により、上陸許可の証印等を受けたこと。

(iv)　In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the alien has received,
by submitting or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including the certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
and a visa obtained for the passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry) or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing.
Please understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
The prosecutor and the judge gave me false documents to the Chinese.
So the Chinese got "status of residence".
So the Chinese did "illegal labor" of Article 70 of the immigration.
This is said to be an "act" that "supports" a violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
This logic is this crazy.
Even if it is a fact,
If the Chinese work within the scope of "status of residence",
the Chinese will not be "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “causal relationship” they became illegal labor is
It is in the "employer" who hired them.
The Immigration Act stipulates that Article 73-2 strictly punishes employers.
Please understand and support this legal system and the logic of the law.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."

It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp