To the world media

I appeal for this every day. 1. Create a "special zone" in the world. Instead of developed countries "resetting" their economic stagnation with war, they can make "each other" happy by accepting "refugees and illegal immigrants" as "temporary immigrants" in a "special zone" isolated from the general public, and employing them as "low-wage workers". 2. Establish a "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA). A "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA)" will be established between the three countries of "the

To President Trump! , May 8, 2025 Trump tariffs should be made unavoidable for all countries, including Japan. The Trump administration should establish a "system" called "balanced countervailing duties (tentative name)" for each exporting company. This is a system that allows for zero tariffs through corporate efforts.

To President Trump!

Weekday edition, May 8, 2025

Trump tariffs should be made unavoidable for all countries, including Japan. The Trump administration should establish a "system" called "balanced countervailing duties (tentative name)" for each exporting company. This is a system that allows for zero tariffs through corporate efforts.

In addition to the system of imposing "reciprocal duties" on a country-by-country basis, a wise Trump administration would impose "balanced countervailing duties" on each company in the exporting country and exempt the "countervailing portion of exports and imports" from the "reciprocal duties."

Generally, countervailing duties (CVD) are a system that imposes additional duties on subsidized imports. The "balanced countervailing duties system" I refer to is dif-ferent from this.

In other words, companies exporting to the United States will be subject to "recip-rocal duties" on the "export-import difference." The Trump administration should take "preferential" measures according to the "degree of contribution of each com-pany."

For example, if a Japanese car is exported to the US on a car carrier, and then US cars are loaded onto a ferry on the return journey and imported to Japan, a "bal-anced countervailing duty" will be applied.

Companies exporting to the US can reduce their reciprocal tariffs to zero by import-ing from the US. This should be the centerpiece of Trump's "tariff policy."

The "balanced countervailing duty" system is applied at the exporting country com-pany level, and by making the exporting country company bear the burden of elimi-nating the "trade deficit," it makes it possible to avoid "reciprocal tariffs" through corporate efforts.

There are "two ways" for exporting companies to reduce tariffs to "zero." The first is to produce in the US. The second is to "import" the "export amount" from the US and "pay" only the "export/export difference" as "reciprocal tariffs."

For example, Nissan can "export" completed cars on a car carrier, and "offset" the tariffs by loading the cars exported from the US to Japan on the "return cargo."

If Nissan actively sells "Cadillacs" in Japan, export tariffs could be "zero." First, Nis-san and GM should enter into a sales partnership and begin the experiment.

I believe that this "balanced countervailing duty" can be applied to "many fields." Even if an exporting company "exports miscellaneous goods" and "imports beef," the "balanced countervailing duty" applies.

The biggest attraction is that exporting companies can export to the United States tariff-free by importing American products without building a factory in the United States.

The "aim" of the Trump administration is to encourage exporting companies to im-port from the United States and to achieve "import-export balance" for each com-pany.

The EU would welcome this method. If you want to export "German-made Mer-cedes" to the United States at "zero tariff," you can import "Cadillacs" and sell them at "Mercedes dealerships."

By applying the "balanced countervailing duty," Germany can export "Mercedes-Benz" to the United States, import "beef" from the United States, and sell it at "Mercedes-Benz dealerships."

President Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" are wonderful. President Trump's goal is to reduce the "US trade deficit." To achieve this, exporting countries need to establish a system that can be implemented on a company-by-company basis.

Part 1: References

Anti-Trump demonstrations in over 1,300 locations around the world: anger and confusion over reciprocal tariffs

https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_international/articles/000416239.html

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

石破茂内閣総理大臣 2025年5月8日賢明なトランプ政権であれば、国ごとに「相互関税」を課す制度に加え、輸出国において各企業に「均衡相殺関税」を課し、「輸出入の相殺部分」を「相互関税」から免除するでしょう。

石破茂内閣総理大臣

2025年5月8日平日版

トランプ関税は、日本を含むすべての国にとって不可避なものにすべきです。トランプ政権は、輸出企業ごとに「均衡相殺関税（仮称）」と呼ばれる「制度」を構築すべきです。これは、企業努力によって関税ゼロを可能にする制度です。

賢明なトランプ政権であれば、国ごとに「相互関税」を課す制度に加え、輸出国において各企業に「均衡相殺関税」を課し、「輸出入の相殺部分」を「相互関税」から免除するでしょう。

一般的に、相殺関税（CVD）とは、補助金を受けた輸入品に追加関税を課す制度です。私が言及する「均衡相殺関税制度」はこれとは異なります。

つまり、米国に輸出する企業は、「輸出入差額」に対して「相互関税」を課されることになる。トランプ政権は、「各企業の貢献度」に応じて「優遇」措置を講じるべきである。

例えば、日本車を自動車専用船で米国に輸出し、復路で米国車をフェリーに積み込んで日本に輸入する場合、「均衡相殺関税」が適用される。

米国に輸出する企業は、米国から輸入することで相互関税をゼロにすることができる。これがトランプ氏の「関税政策」の目玉となるべきである。

「均衡相殺関税」制度は輸出国企業レベルで適用され、「貿易赤字」の解消を輸出国企業に負担させることで、企業努力によって「相互関税」を回避することを可能にする。

輸出国企業が関税を「ゼロ」にするには「二つの方法」がある。一つ目は、米国で生産することだ。 2つ目は、「輸出分」を米国から「輸入」し、「輸出入の差額」のみを「相互関税」として「支払う」というものです。

例えば、日産は完成車を自動車船で「輸出」し、米国から日本に輸出した自動車を「帰りの貨物」に積載することで「関税を相殺」することができる。

日産が日本で「キャデラック」を積極的に販売すれば、輸出関税は「ゼロ」になる可能性がある。まず、日産とGMが販売提携を結び、実験を始めるべきです。

この「均衡相殺関税」は「多くの分野」に適用できると私は考えています。輸出企業が「雑貨を輸出」し「牛肉を輸入」する場合でも、「均衡相殺関税」が適用されます。

最大の魅力は、輸出国企業が米国に工場を建設することなく、米国製品を輸入することで米国に無関税で輸出できることです。

トランプ政権の「狙い」は、輸出国企業に米国からの輸入を促進し、企業ごとに「輸出入の均衡」を図ることです。

EUはこの方法を歓迎するでしょう。「ドイツ製メルセデス」を「ゼロ関税」で米国に輸出したいのであれば、「キャデラック」を輸入し「メルセデス販売店」で販売すればいいのです。

ドイツは「均衡相殺関税」を適用することで、「メルセデス・ベンツ」を米国に輸出し、米国から「牛肉」を輸入し、「メルセデス・ベンツ販売店」で販売することができます。

トランプ大統領の「相互関税」は素晴らしいものです。トランプ大統領の目的は「米国の貿易赤字」の削減です。そのためには、輸出国が「企業ごと」に実施できる制度を構築する必要があります。

パート1：参考資料

「世界1300カ所以上」で反トランプデモ ― 相互関税への怒りと混乱

https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_international/articles/000416239.html

また明日書きます。

第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。

日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

❤全文は下記をクリック！

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：

1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。

2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。

3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。

4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。

5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。

6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。

この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：

「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。

しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。

「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。

難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。

一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。

NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump! , May 7, 2025　I want to see President Trump smile when Cadillac sells more than Mercedes-Benz in Japan. President Obama also lamented the lack of American cars on the streets. Mr. Trump, fight!

To President Trump!

Weekday edition, May 7, 2025

I want to see President Trump smile when Cadillac sells more than Mercedes-Benz in Japan. President Obama also lamented the lack of American cars on the streets. Mr. Trump, fight!

Cadillac is a luxury American manufacturer, like Lexus in Japan. In terms of fashion, it's like Louis Vuitton or Prada. However, it's not popular in Japan.

Americans should be angry. For Japanese people, Cadillac means "upstart" and Mercedes and Mercedes have a "refined image". Who said that?

In America, even "bureaucrats" drive Cadillacs. That's why I'm saying that we should pressure them to use Cadillacs as official cars.

The Trump administration will make the Japanese government enact the "(tenta-tive name) Japan-US Trade Imbalance Correction Act." National and local govern-ments will be required to purchase about 10% American cars for their official car purchases.

This way, the Japanese prime minister, ministers, and high-ranking bureaucrats will be able to drive Cadillacs with pride, under the law. Of course, they will be chauf-feured. So there will be no problem with left-hand drive.

The White House will request large Japanese companies operating in the US to pur-chase American-made luxury cars. This will be included in the (tentative name) Ja-pan-US Trade Imbalance Correction Act.

If this is done, the company car of the heads of large Japanese companies will be Cadillacs. They will happily make the excuse, "I don't mind a Crown, but I'm driving a Cadillac because of pressure from the Trump administration."

If we go on the offensive in this way, Cadillacs will be seen as cars for "people who have made it big" and Mercedes-Benzes as cars for "upstarts, presidents of small and medium-sized companies."

For those who drive a Cadillac, if you consider that you are driving a chauffeured Cadillac, then the fact that it has a left-hand drive and poor fuel economy is not worth thinking about.

There are also entertainers and athletes who have made it big in their careers. For them, the fact that it has a left-hand drive and poor fuel economy is a status sym-bol.

In the US, Cadillac was once the number one car that people wanted to drive when they became rich. "Someday, a Cadillac," "Finally, a Cadillac." It's about making Japanese people feel the same way.

It doesn't seem to be the case now, but it is sometimes used in songs as a symbol of the good old days of America. It's a shiny, flashy image. What about the cars of Trump's cabinet members?

The American model of "power and speed are justice" is still alive and well in Cadil-lac. The image of American cars with large displacement V8 engines and overflow-ing torque that run fast is a thing of the past.

The 2025 model of the CT5-V Blackwing, Cadillac's fastest model, has been an-nounced. It's a monster with over 600 horsepower for a typical 4-door sedan.

I can't wait to see the "Cadillac TV commercial" that Nissan will air. It's not an EV, hybrid, or diesel. Japanese people also like these models after all.

Part 1 References

Cadillac is still alive and well with American models where "power" and "speed" are the ultimate justice.

https://dig-it.media/lightning/article/832695/