To President Trump! July 16, 2025 President Trump should ask President Zelensky for "unconditional surrender." There is no 100% chance that the situation will turn in Ukraine's favor. Kiev will fall and a scene similar to that in Saigon, South Vietnam, will be repeated in Kiev.

 To President Trump!

July 16, 2025 Japanese version

On the 30th, Russian officials in Luhansk Oblast in eastern Ukraine claimed to Russian state media that Russian forces had taken control of the entire oblast. This is the first time that Russia has taken control of the entire oblast.

President Zelensky signed a presidential decree that includes a policy to with-draw from the "Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty." President Zelensky believes that "unconditional surrender" will be made soon.

It is difficult for Ukraine to withdraw because there is a provision that withdraw-al will not come into effect during armed conflict between the contracting par-ties. President Zelensky is believed to have chosen "unconditional surrender."

On the 30th, President Putin attended a conference on the development of four oblasts in Ukraine, Donetsk Oblast and Luhansk Oblast in eastern Ukraine, which Russia unilaterally declared annexation, and Zaporizhia Oblast and Kher-son Oblast in the south.

In his statement, President Putin claimed that "since 2022, about 23,000 facili-ties, including houses, schools and hospitals, have been restored or built." Rus-sia has suffered severe damage.

Meanwhile, the Russian military continues to launch large-scale attacks using missiles and drones across Ukraine. The Ukrainian military has "lost its will to fight." It should "surrender unconditionally" as soon as possible!

President Trump should ask President Zelensky to "surrender unconditionally." There is no 100% chance that the situation will turn in Ukraine's favor.

If things continue as they are, President Putin will march Russian troops into Kiev and occupy half of the Ukrainian territory.

Kiev will fall, and a scene similar to that in Saigon, South Vietnam, will be re-peated in Kiev again.

The rooftops of European embassies will be overflowing with staff who have fled Ukraine. The French military will be busy preparing helicopters.

Will we again see President Zelensky carrying a bag full of dollar bills, some of which will fly away in the wind, as in Afghanistan?

More than half of the Ukrainian people will return to their "pre-war" "jobs" in the "EU". Is there any need to "rebuild" Ukraine? Absolutely not.

I think Ukraine should be left as a historical monument, like Hiroshima and Na-gasaki. I hope that Ukrainian leaders will never again talk about recapturing ter-ritory from Russia through war.

Before the war, EU countries employed Ukrainians as low-wage workers. In other words, Ukrainians could work freely within the EU.

If Ukrainians return to EU jobs, the European economy will improve somewhat. However, EU citizens may have to compete with "Ukrainians" for jobs.

Part 1 References

President Putin emphasizes the return of four Ukrainian provinces, justifying annexation? https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250701/k10014849191000.html

Ukraine withdraws from landmine ban treaty, European countries announce withdrawal one after another

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250701-OYT1T50027/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano