Dear President Trump! July 25, 2025 President Trump has repealed a bill that would have allowed California to ban gasoline-powered cars by 2035. That's great. If California is going to ban gasoline-powered cars, I argue that they should first ban the use of "explosives and weapons."

 To President Trump!

July 25, 2025 Japanese version

President Trump withdrew a bill that would have allowed California to ban gaso-line-powered cars by 2035. That's great.

I argue that if California is going to ban gasoline-powered cars, it should first ban the use of "explosives and weapons."

Gasoline-powered cars have won the "conspiracy theory"! The Alliance for Au-tomotive Innovation (AAI), which includes GM and Toyota, had argued that Cal-ifornia's regulations make it "impossible to achieve sales targets."

The Governor of California was furious and said that "the Senate vote was ille-gal." I think that "illegal immigrants" will "rebel" if the Governor announces that "used gasoline-powered cars" will also be banned.

Governor Newsom said, "The Republican Party under the Trump administration will pollute America with exhaust fumes again." I want to say that "ammunition" emits more CO2 than gasoline-powered cars.

President Trump has banned the provision of weapons and ammunition to Ukraine. This should have a greater effect on reducing carbon dioxide emissions on the planet.

President Trump should prioritize the elimination of "explosive weapons".

The Democratic administration has started the "Ukraine War". The Democrats should explain the huge "carbon dioxide" emissions from the "Ukraine War". The "abnormal weather" in Europe is serious.

The United States should not go to war with China over the "competition" for "rare metals" used in batteries and motors, which China has a monopoly on. The United States should go its own way.

The Trump administration should make "hydrogen engine vehicles", which "re-place" gasoline fuel with hydrogen fuel, the "next generation automobile" of the United States.

Hydrogen is compressed in hydrogen production plants, converted into liquid or high-pressure gas, and filled and supplied in hydrogen cartridges. Hydrogen cartridges can be replaced at existing gas stations.

Hydrogen engine vehicles are different from gasoline engine vehicles only in fuel, so they can utilize the technology of gasoline vehicles and have an advantage over Chinese companies.

Even in developed countries, huge investments are required to install charging stations. It is impossible to sell EVs and install charging stations in developing countries.

The United States should make hydrogen engine cars the next generation of automobiles. Hydrogen cars produced in a special zone on the Mexican border will take the world by storm. It won't be long until that happens.

The United States should take the world by storm with "hydrogen engine cars" that can be refueled at "gas stations around the world". The time will soon come when GM and Ford's hydrogen engine cars will take the world by storm.

Part 1 References

President Trump repeals California's 2035 ban on gasoline cars

https://carview.yahoo.co.jp/news/detail/e825796bf78b3f8bdb5401936023e0fd35fe95d2/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp