To President Trump! August 1, 2025 I believe America should regain its role as the "world's workshop" through free trade. To achieve this, we must create a "special zone," abandon "white supremacy," and make America great again. Until a "special zone" is realized, America will remain a weak nation. "Weak nations" have the right to protect their "nation and people" through "tariffs." However, this would be humiliating to Mr. Trump.

 To President Trump!

August 1, 2025

The "TACO theory" is spreading among investors. Trump should turn things around with "balanced countervailing duties."

"TACO" stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out," meaning that even if Trump says he will impose high tariffs, he will get scared and end up backing down.

"I" believe that America should regain its role as the "world's factory" through free trade. To do this, we should create a "special zone," abandon "white su-premacy," and make America Great Again.

Until the "special zone" is realized, America will remain a weak country. "Weak countries" have the right to protect their "nation and people" with "tariffs." However, that would be humiliating for Trump.

There are two ways to eliminate America's trade deficit. One is an "import re-straint policy" through "tariffs," and the other is an "export promotion policy." The policy that Trump is overlooking is the "export promotion policy."

Trump must have felt that there is a limit to the "Trump tariffs" trade on a na-tional level. In order to avoid being called a "TACO," Trump should promote exports with "balanced countervailing duties."

Trump should make the tax rates unfair for "companies" separately from the government through "balanced countervailing duties" and create a competition to import American products.

President Trump should announce a "policy" to create a competition to "import American products" by offering "balanced countervailing duties" to exporters to the United States.

The United States should formulate a policy to impose "Trump tariffs" on each exporter according to the amount of "exports to the United States minus im-ports to the United States."

Even if an "exporter" exports to the United States, there are exporters who pay tariffs and exporters who do not pay tariffs. This is the aim. We should create unfairness and create competition.

Let's take Japanese automobiles as an example. Nissan imports and sells GM cars. Nissan will pay tariffs on the amount of "export value of Nissan cars" mi-nus "import value of GM cars".

The more GM cars Nissan sells in Japan, the more Nissan cars it can sell in the United States at zero tariffs. Toyota will say, "This is unfair." Then Toyota should import and sell "Ford cars".

MAGA people will understand my logic. If so, MAGA people should demand that President Trump adopt my proposal.

President Trump should announce "balanced countervailing duties" as soon as possible and "set" foreign companies to compete to import American products. MAGA people, let's support President Trump!

Part 1 References

Shocking tariff notice: How to defeat President Trump? [Column from Asia]

https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250711/k10014858861000.html

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp