To President Trump! October 16, 2025 As of October 2, 2025, tariff negotiations between the United States and China remain unstable, with ongoing negotiations and retaliatory measures mixed together. China is using rare metal exports to pressure the United States. In April 2025, export restrictions were imposed on seven rare earth elements, which are used to make neodymium magnets, essential for electric vehicles (EVs) and wind power generation, and the scope of these restrictions is expanding. The United States should withdraw from "rechargeable EVs."

 To President Trump!

October 16, 2025

As of October 2, 2025, tariff negotiations between the United States and China remain unstable, with ongoing negotiations and retaliatory measures mixed to-gether. China is using rare metal exports to pressure the United States.

In April 2025, export restrictions were imposed on seven rare earth elements, which are used to make neodymium magnets, essential for electric vehicles (EVs) and wind power generation, and the scope of these restrictions is ex-panding. The United States should withdraw from "rechargeable EVs."

Rare metals are also used in weapons such as fighter jets and missiles. If China halts exports, the United States would be in a critical situation of halting pro-duction of high-performance weapons.

In light of this situation, I believe that the United States and other Western countries should ban the manufacture and sale of EVs. Rare metals should be prioritized for use in weapons.

Countries such as France have harshly criticized carbon dioxide emissions, but the CO2 emissions from gunpowder weapons in the Ukraine war are shocking! I would like to call the Paris Agreement a conspiracy theory.

If the Trump administration abolishes electric vehicles and legislates that next-generation vehicles will be hydrogen vehicles, automakers will be able to devel-op them with confidence.

What stands in the way of hydrogen vehicles becoming a reality is the lack of hydrogen refueling facilities and the need to lower hydrogen prices below gaso-line prices. The United States is promoting a project to mass-produce hydrogen from natural gas.

Regarding hydrogen refueling facilities, I have continued to propose that hy-drogen cartridges be "exchanged" at existing gas stations, rather than at hy-drogen stations.

If hydrogen were "filled" into high-pressure gas cartridges at a hydrogen pro-duction plant and then delivered to gas stations by dedicated truck, it would be the same as the current gasoline transportation method.

If ExxonMobil were to fill cartridges with hydrogen at its own hydrogen produc-tion plant and sell them, it would be able to operate its business in parallel with its current gasoline sales.

If ExxonMobil "filled" cartridges in the United States and exported them, it could expand its "hydrogen refueling business" to "ExxonMobil gas stations" around the world, including in developing countries.

If ExxonMobil, GM, Tesla, and Nissan jointly develop hydrogen cartridges, ob-tain patents, and take the lead, American-made "hydrogen and hydrogen vehi-cles" will undoubtedly take the world by storm.

The Trump administration should invest tax money in hydrogen cartridge de-velopment. Competing with Chinese EVs is foolish. The United States should dominate the world with hydrogen vehicles.

Tesla should develop "hydrogen fuel cell EVs" that run on hydrogen, rather than "rechargeable EVs." The hydrogen filling method would be the same as the proposed "hydrogen cartridges."

If the four companies jointly obtain patents and sell "hydrogen cartridges" at "ExxonMobil-affiliated gas stations," the United States would dominate the global "hydrogen vehicle" market. The future of the United States is very bright. I'm looking forward to it.

Part 1: References

Marubeni Participates in Low-Carbon Hydrogen and Ammonia Production Pro-ject in the United States

https://www.marubeni.com/jp/news/2025/release/00021.html

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp