Dear President Trump! October 23, 2025 Tensions are rising between federal authorities and protesters outside an immigration center in Illinois. This is truly unfortunate, given that my proposal to establish a "special zone" on the Mexican border would help solve the illegal immigration problem. President Trump's "deployment of the National Guard" to support "federal authorities' immigration crackdown" is reminiscent of the Tiananmen Square incident in China. It's very un-American.

 To President Trump!

October 23, 2025

Tensions are rising between federal authorities and protesters outside an immi-gration center in Illinois. This is truly unfortunate, considering my proposal to establish a "special zone" on the Mexican border would help resolve the illegal immigration issue.

President Trump's "deployment of the National Guard" to support "federal au-thorities' immigration crackdown" is reminiscent of the Tiananmen Square inci-dent in China. It is un-American.

I continue to propose accepting illegal immigrants into a "special zone" on the Mexican border with "provisional immigrant" status and employing them as "low-wage workers."

This "provisional immigrant" status differs from a work visa; residency is limited to the "special zone" and is isolated from the general American public.

Provisional immigrants will be required to complete "compulsory education and English proficiency" while working in the "special zone." If they meet certain re-quirements, they will be granted a work visa allowing them to work "within the United States."

"Temporary immigrants" are "low-wage workers" who earn wages lower than those in China, but they receive free food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education. As a result, they live a more prosperous life than low-wage workers in the United States.

For this reason, I believe that "illegal immigrants" already in the United States and working in unstable employment will voluntarily relocate to "special zones." This would solve the illegal immigration problem.

"Special zones" are not for "illegal immigrants" residing in the United States. They are built to supply "low-wage workers" to companies that operate in "spe-cial zones."

I believe that if "special zones" are built, "illegal immigrants" will voluntarily re-locate to "special zones" rather than "immigration centers." This is a great pro-posal.

For this reason, the Trump administration should build "special zones" on the Mexican border, not "immigration centers." "Special zones" are "working zones" for illegal immigrants.

President Trump is urging companies to build factories and produce in the Unit-ed States, rather than exporting to the United States. He should understand why this is not possible.

Companies would rather build factories and produce in the United States than pay tariffs and export to the United States, but the United States does not have any "factory zones" where "low-wage workers" can live.

The United States is not just short of low-wage workers, it is short of workers overall. Furthermore, there is a shortage of "suitable locations for building fac-tories." This means that companies cannot build factories in the United States.

If Trump is serious about encouraging companies to build factories in the Unit-ed States, he should create "special zones" on the Mexican border.

If "special zones" were "created" on the Mexican border, many companies would compete to set up factories there. Trump should "utilize illegal immigra-tion" to strengthen the manufacturing industry.

Part 1: References

President Trump orders deployment of National Guard troops to Illinois, ignor-ing the governor's objections

https://www.bloomberg.co.jp/news/articles/2025-10-04/T3MNPCGOYMTD00?srnd=cojp-v2

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/