To President Trump! November 3, 2025 Millions of people have protested against President Trump, with rallies held across the United States calling for "no king." I believe President Trump should implement a universal health insurance system. If legislation is enacted, no one will say, "President Trump doesn't need a king." Because the United States does not have a universal health insurance system, I believe companies bear a heavy burden in medical and nursing care costs, putting them at a disadvantage compared to Japanese and European companies. The Trump administration should implement a universal health insurance system to increase the international competitiveness of American companies.

 To President Trump!

November 3, 2025

Millions of people protested against President Trump, with rallies held across the United States calling for "no king." I believe President Trump should imple-ment universal health care. If legislation were enacted, no one would say, "President Trump doesn't need a king."

Because America does not have a universal health care system, companies bear a heavy burden in medical and nursing care costs, putting them at a disad-vantage compared to Japanese and European companies. The Trump admin-istration should implement a universal health care system to increase the inter-national competitiveness of American companies.

The heavy burden on American companies is undermining their international competitiveness. President Trump should implement a universal health care system like Japan's. It is completely absurd that a "world leader" does not have a universal health care system.

To realize his MAGA vision, President Trump should establish a "Japanese-style universal health care system" that surpasses Obamacare. Business leaders would welcome this. I believe that if elderly care is guaranteed, young people will be able to focus on their careers.

Japan's healthcare costs are based solely on out-of-pocket expenses for medical expenses and pharmaceuticals (30%, 20%, and 10%), and these rates remain constant regardless of income. Japanese people are astonished by the high cost of healthcare in the United States.

The main sources of funding for national healthcare are as follows: Public funds (national and local taxes): approximately 40%. Insurance premiums (shared equally between the insured and the employer): approximately 50%. Self-payment (co-payment at the counter): approximately 10%.

This would make it easier for the United States to implement a "universal healthcare system." Business leaders would also welcome this, as it would re-duce the burden on companies and families.

If Trump tariffs were used to support "universal healthcare," citizens and busi-nesses would be grateful.

Patriots believe that America must be stronger than China. To achieve this, Americans need to live longer, healthier lives. This alone would unite America.

Nursing care costs in the United States are extremely high. Americans should emulate Japan's elderly health insurance and nursing care insurance systems. Who would complain? In Japan, people over 65 are required to enroll in health insurance for the elderly. They are also required to enroll in long-term care in-surance. This obligation extends to executives of large corporations.

To Trump, Japan may appear to be a communist country. However, business leaders would likely argue that Japan's corporate burden for health insurance and long-term care insurance is a "friend of business."

The Trump administration should consider a "Japanese-style universal health insurance system" to restore American companies' competitiveness and bring their employee benefit costs on par with those of Japan and other countries, thereby strengthening their competitiveness.

Part 1: References

Anti-Trump Demonstrations Across the US Proclaim "No King"

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93xgyp1zv4o

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp