To President Trump! November 4, 2025 According to the British newspaper FT, President Trump "abuses" President Zelensky in order to pressure Ukraine into ceding territory. The president said he is "fed up." I think Trump should "advise" President Putin to end the war with a "nuclear EMP" rather than a "nuclear bomb."
To President Trump!
November 4, 2025
According to the British newspaper FT, President Trump "abuses" President Zelenskyy in order to pressure Ukraine into ceding territory. The president said he is "fed up."
I believe Trump should "advise" President Putin to end the war with a "nuclear EMP" rather than a "nuclear bomb."
The meeting turned into a "shouting match," and President Trump "abuses" Zelenskyy "throughout the meeting."
President Zelensky "whines" to "cooperative EU countries." EU countries threaten President Trump. President Trump "kowtows" to the "EU." This vicious cycle continues.
The "Ukraine War" was started by Biden. Trump should explain to the world how the "Ukraine War" began.
The media continues to report the "Ukraine War" as a war of aggression caused by "Russia's war in Ukraine." As long as this "false reporting" continues, the war will not end.
The story of Biden, who established a "puppet government" in Ukraine in 2014, and Nuland handing out cookies is well known.
Biden relentlessly urged Russia to invade Ukraine. Outraged by the "Maida Rev-olution," Putin annexed the Crimean Peninsula.
After Russia's "annexation of Crimea," Vice President Biden, under President Obama, sent U.S. naval vessels to the Black Sea. Naturally, Russia retaliated.
Russia also sent missile vessels to Cuban waters. When President Obama with-drew U.S. vessels from the Black Sea, Russia also withdrew its missile vessels from Cuba.
Putin is angry with Biden, but has no problem with Trump. Therefore, a meet-ing between Trump and Putin will likely clear up misunderstandings between the two countries.
Zelensky won the presidential election by promising to "retake eastern Ukraine and the Crimean Peninsula" from Russia by force, while his "rival" advocated re-taking them through negotiations.
June 2022: (CNN) Pope Francis said he believes the Ukraine war "was likely provoked or not prevented in some way."
Pope Francis made this statement in a comment published in an Italian newspa-per on the 14th. This is a famous story. Many Christians did not listen to what the Pope had to say. It's ridiculous.
The United States ended the "Pacific War" with a "nuclear bomb." Shouldn't Trump be "talking" with Russia about the use of nuclear weapons? I advocate the use of a high-altitude EMP.
Part 1: References
Biden, who established a US puppet government in Ukraine in 2014, and Nu-land, who "hands out cookies"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/087fd5204f4dd44820b6c490ec8ff92c03be266f
I'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano

Comments
Post a Comment