To President Trump! November 26, 2025 The Trump administration suffered a major defeat in the U.S. local elections. Growing dissatisfaction with the rising cost of living is manifesting itself as criticism of the Trump administration. My (Nagano) proposal for a "balanced countervailing duty" should be implemented immediately. The U.S. Republican Party suffered a complete defeat in local elections, including the New York City mayoral election held on the 4th. Nagano's proposal for a "balanced countervailing duty" should be enacted.

 To President Trump!

November 26, 2025

The Trump administration suffered a major defeat in the US local elections. Growing dissatisfaction with the rising cost of living is surfacing as criticism of the Trump administration. Nagano's proposal for a "balanced countervailing du-ty" should be implemented immediately.

The US Republican Party suffered a complete defeat in local elections, including the New York City mayoral election held on the 4th. Nagano's proposal for a "balanced countervailing duty" should be established.

The Republican Party's complete defeat in local elections has created a growing atmosphere of unrest within the administration and party ahead of next year's midterm elections. The Trump tariffs are the cause of this. Nagano's proposal for a "balanced countervailing duty" should be established.

Dissatisfaction with rising prices is surfacing. That is why I continue to call for the establishment of a "balanced countervailing duty" that would balance ex-ports and imports and effectively reduce tariffs to zero.

In local elections, Radical Left Democrat Mamdani won the New York City mayoral election by campaigning on reducing housing, food, and childcare costs. Nagano's "balanced countervailing duties" proposal should be established.

Democratic candidates who advocated cost-of-living measures also won the gubernatorial elections in southern Virginia and eastern New Jersey. Republi-cans should immediately implement the creation of "balanced countervailing du-ties."

The Democrats also won landslide victories in the lieutenant governor's and at-torney general's elections, which took place simultaneously with these three elections. This was not due to the strength of the Democratic Party, but rather to people who were "dissatisfied" with Trump's policies voting for the "Demo-cratic candidate."

Many experts point out that the underlying cause of these victories is persistent concerns about inflation, which is putting pressure on household budgets. Na-gano's "balanced countervailing duties" proposal should be established.

I'm not saying that the Trump tariffs are bad. I'm arguing that we should com-bine the Trump tariffs with "balanced countervailing duties" to effectively reduce tariffs to zero and curb inflation.

Walmart should encourage companies in exporting countries like China to im-port American products. Tariffs should be imposed on the difference between Walmart's import and export amounts. If the amounts are equal, the "Trump tariffs" would be zero.

Nissan signs a sales contract with GM. Nissan uses specialized ships to "export" Nissan cars to the U.S., and on the return journey, it loads GM vehicles like Ca-dillacs onto the ship and "imports" them.

Under "balanced countervailing duties," the more GM cars Nissan imports, the more Nissan cars it can export tariff-free. This is a "mutual export promotion policy between Japan and the U.S.."

If the U.S. applies "balanced countervailing duties" and effectively reduces im-port tariffs to zero, inflation will be contained. However, exporting U.S. prod-ucts increases income taxes for companies and workers.

Trump restricts imports with the "Trump tariffs" to eliminate the "trade deficit," but the important thing is to promote exports. "Balanced countervailing duties" are an export promotion policy.

I have said this many times. If you still don't understand the meaning of "bal-anced countervailing duties," please contact me by email or message. I'm wait-ing to save America.

Part 1: References

US Local Elections: Trump Administration Reeling from Complete Defeat; Rising Prices Surface Frustration

https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2025110800334&g=int

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp