To President Trump! November 12, 2025 "Temporary immigrants" (illegal immigrants) earn low wages, but are provided with free living expenses, including food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education. These costs are covered by the cooperative that operates the "Special Zone." Furthermore, the jobs of existing factory workers outside the "Special Zone" are protected through the supply chain. The mission of the "Special Zone" is to achieve coexistence and mutual prosperity with existing companies outside the "Special Zone" in the "Investor Country." This is to protect the industries and jobs of the "Investor Country" and to protect the lives of its citizens from illegal immigration.

 To President Trump!

November 12, 2025

"Temporary immigrants" (illegal immigrants) earn low wages, but are provided with free living expenses, including food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education. These costs are borne by the cooperative operating the "Special Zone." Furthermore, the jobs of existing factory workers outside the "Special Zone" are protected through the supply chain.

The mission of the "Special Zone" is to achieve coexistence and mutual prosper-ity with existing companies outside the "Special Zone" in the "Investor Coun-try." This is to protect the industries and jobs of the "Investor Country" and protect the lives of its citizens from illegal immigrants.

The cooperative is run with investments from the host country and the factory operating companies. The cooperative does not distribute profits, but instead uses those profits to provide free "food, clothing, shelter, etc." to temporary residents (illegal immigrants) working in the factories of member companies.

As a result, companies operating within the "Special Zone" are free to cover "welfare and welfare expenses" and only pay the wages of "temporary immi-grants." It truly is a paradise for companies.

The cooperative's main sources of income are raw material procurement (B2B) and "internet usage fees" from companies selling their products (B2C). Looking at China's Alibaba Group, the profits are immeasurable.

Companies operating within the "Special Zone" procure raw materials through the cooperative's supply chain. Orders are placed through the cooperative's B2B. Looking at Alibaba's example, the profits are immeasurable.

Raw materials are generally sourced from "existing companies outside the Spe-cial Zone." Orders are placed based on the "Special Zone Law (tentative name)." This is a supply chain that prioritizes "investor countries."

Therefore, in the case of the Mexican border, suppliers must, in principle, pro-cure from within the United States, pursuant to the Special Zone Law.

As a result, even if "temporary immigrants" (illegible immigrants) are employed to produce products "within the Special Zone," employment "outside the Special Zone" will not decrease, but rather increase.

The "Special Zone" is surrounded by a "wall," and raw materials can only be brought in from outside the "Special Zone" through designated raw material en-try gates. Violations are monitored.

For example, the Special Zone Law (tentative name) requires prior approval from an expert committee to purchase raw materials from "Country C compa-nies, etc." outside the investing country.

Companies are free to sell products produced within the "Special Zone." Coop-eratives "support" online sales to consumers and businesses around the world through B2C.

Three meals a day for "provisional immigrants (illegal immigrants)" are pre-pared in a "cooking center" and delivered to the factory cafeteria. Many of the kitchen workers are also "provisional immigrants."

Citizens from the "funding country" (the United States) volunteer at the "cook-ing center" to plan menus and provide cooking instruction. America is home to many people with a spirit of service.

The "fun story" surrounding President Trump's "award" of the Nobel Prize in Economics will continue tomorrow. Without war, the Earth would be a "happy world."

Part 1: References

[Latest Edition] What are the Top 3 E-Commerce Websites in China by Transac-tion Volume?

https://ebisumart.com/blog/chinaec-best10/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano