To President Trump! February 10, 2026 #PresidentTrump's remarks about #NATO have drawn criticism not only from the UK but from many other countries. I believe President Trump "believes" that #NATO member countries like the UK are "appendages" of the #US. I think there is a big gap between the two views. I believe #MAGA supporters are also dissatisfied with #PresidentTrump's quick apology. However, since the end of the war, America is no longer the only superpower. America should regain its status as an "industrial superpower."

 To President Trump!

February 10, 2026

#PresidentTrump's remarks about #NATO have drawn criticism not only from the UK but from many other countries. I believe President Trump believes that #NATO member countries like the UK are "appendages of the #US." I think there is a big gap between their views.

I believe #MAGA supporters are also unhappy with #PresidentTrump's quick apolo-gy. However, after the war, America is no longer the only superpower. America should regain its status as an "industrial superpower."

#PresidentTrump probably believes that #NATO member countries are "appendag-es of the #US" because they are not "contributing troops" to the US on an equal footing. I believe the US should "withdraw from #NATO."

Europe (especially the #EU) recovered rapidly after the war thanks to US support such as the #MarshallPlan, but in the early stages it relied heavily on trade with the US.

The United States has long been Europe's major trading partner, and Europe (espe-cially the #EU) has traditionally relied on the US for both economic and defense purposes. However, this is no longer the case.

The #EU's overall dependence on the US has declined significantly due to regional integration (deepening the #EU market) and expanded trade with China and emerg-ing countries. This is where the gap between the #US and #EU lies.

In the #EU, trade between member states now accounts for the majority of total trade (approximately 60-70%), and the #EU's dependence on the US is declining. The US is now second only to China in terms of trade volume.

While the US still has the economic power to be the #largest consumer, I believe we can establish a #special zone on the #Mexico border and return it to the #world's factory, even if only 10% of Americans are #secondary industry workers.

To achieve this, we should accept the #illegal immigrants flocking to the #special zone (#industrial zone) as legal #temporary immigrants and employ them as #low-wage workers.

If the wages of #temporaryimmigrants are lower than those of China or Mexico, American products can be produced at a lower price than China. It's easy enough for a #monkey to understand.

Trump is using #TrumpTariffs to encourage exporting country companies to pro-duce and sell in the US, but there are no #industrialzones in the US where #low-wage workers live, even those paid lower than China's.

#PresidentTrump claims that illegal immigrants are dangerous because they com-mit crimes. That's why I propose limiting the residence of #temporaryimmigrants to #specialzones. This would ensure 100% safety.

If #specialzones are established, companies from all over the world will compete to build factories on the #Mexicanborder where they can employ #low-wage workers. It's easy enough for a #monkey to understand.

Once construction of #specialzones begins, exports of construction materials and equipment to the US from Europe and other countries will also increase. This will motivate European countries to follow America's lead.

#PresidentTrump should think strategically, not manipulate Europe for short-term gain. GO AMERICA! GO TRUMP!

Part 1 References

Trump praises British military, shows conciliatory attitude; Europe reacts negatively to NATO remarks

https://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3619338

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano