To President Trump! March 10, 2026 President Trump intends to impose a 10% #tariff on all goods worldwide under Section 122 of the #TradeAct, and further raise it to 15%. My proposed #balanced countervailing duties will be more effective the higher the #tariff rate, and should provide a good opportunity to #eliminate the trade deficit. Do you understand? The #new tariffs will take effect on the 24th. Some agricultural products were exempt from #tariffs due to a serious labor shortage, but this issue will be resolved by establishing a #special zone on the Mexican border. Today, I will explain #balanced countervailing duties.

To President Trump!

March 10, 2026

President Trump intends to impose a 10% tariff on all goods worldwide under Sec-tion 122 of the Trade Act, with the goal of further raising it to 15%. My proposed balanced countervailing duties will be more effective the higher the tariff rate, providing a good opportunity to eliminate the trade deficit. Do you understand?

The new tariffs will take effect on the 24th. Some agricultural products were ex-empt from tariffs due to a serious labor shortage, but this will be resolved by estab-lishing a special zone on the Mexican border. Today, I will explain balanced coun-tervailing duties.

The higher the tariff rate, the greater the tariff reduction effect of balanced coun-tervailing duties. This is a preferential policy that promotes trade balance for U.S. importers that promote the export of U.S. products and for foreign exporters that import U.S. products.

The Trump administration's #tariff policy is designed to address the huge US trade deficit. The trade deficit should be addressed through #export promotion policies, not through #tariffs to restrict imports. Companies that cooperate in reducing the US trade deficit can eliminate #tariffs through #balanced countervailing duties.

The Trump administration's tariff policy discourages imports through #tariffs, en-couraging manufacturing in the US and creating jobs for workers. I believe that im-posing high #tariffs, combined with #balanced countervailing duties, will promote the export of US products and eliminate the trade deficit.

#balanced countervailing duties exempt the #balanced portion from #tariffs if #im-ports and exports are balanced. Overseas exporting companies can eliminate #tar-iffs by importing the same amount of US products as they export.

With #balanced countervailing duties, US importing companies can eliminate #tar-iffs by exporting the same amount of US products as they import. This will elimi-nate rising prices.

American consumers will stop buying from retailers who add #tariffs to their prices. This will lower the prices of imported products in the United States and lower the overall inflation rate.

If President Trump implements #balanced countervailing duties, he will no longer be criticized for raising prices due to #tariffs. The trade deficit will be the responsi-bility of American companies, not just foreign companies.

The International Trade Administration (#ITA) at the U.S. Department of Com-merce supports U.S. exports. The Export Trading Companies Act (#ETC Act) aims to protect and promote exports by small and medium-sized businesses.

The higher the Trump administration's #tariffs, the greater the effect of #balanced countervailing duties. American companies that strive to export and foreign compa-nies that strive to import U.S. products will be #tariff-exempt. Global trade will ex-pand.

The Trump administration should use #balanced countervailing duties to eliminate the U.S. trade deficit. What #balanced countervailing duties cannot solve is #un-competitive products.

The problem of "#uncompetitiveproducts" can be solved by establishing a "#spe-cialzone" on the "#Mexico border," accepting "#illegalimmigrants" there, and em-ploying them at "#lowwages" lower than those in China.

The Trump administration should eliminate the trade deficit through U.S. efforts. This can be achieved through "#TrumpTariffs" and "#balancedcountervailingdu-ties." Go America, Go Trump!

Part 1 References

President Trump Announces He Will Raise Alternative "#Tariffs" on Global Markets from 10% to 15% (Posted, Timing Undetermined)

https://www.sankei.com/article/20260222-4VR3VNFI3ZKYJJCQDZKT2T2F2Q/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano